Publisher Description

This innovative study illuminates the role of polemical literature in the political life of the Roman empire by examining the earliest surviving invectives directed against a living emperor. Written by three bishops (Athanasius of Alexandria, Hilary of Poitiers, Lucifer of Cagliari), these texts attacked Constantius II (337–61) for his vicious and tyrannical behaviour, as well as his heretical religious beliefs. This book explores the strategies employed by these authors to present themselves as fearless champions of liberty and guardians of faith, as they sought to bolster their authority at a time when they were out of step with the prevailing imperial view of Christian orthodoxy. Furthermore, by analysing this unique collection of writings alongside late antique panegyrics and ceremonial, it also rehabilitates anti-imperial polemic as a serious political activity and explores the ways in which it functioned within the complex web of presentations and perceptions that underpinned late Roman power relationships.

Author Biography

Richard Flower is Lecturer in the Department of Classics and Ancient History, University of Exeter.

Table of Contents

Introduction: the use of abuse; 1. Praise and blame in the Roman world; 2. Constructing a Christian tyrant; 3. Writing auto-hagiography; 4. Living up to the past; Epilogue; Appendix 1. Altercatio Heracliani cum Germinio; Appendix 2. Epistula Liberii papae ad Eusebium, Dionysium et Luciferum in exsilio constitutos; Appendix 3. Epistula Luciferi, Pancratii et Hilarii; Appendix 4. Letters of Eusebius of Vercelli; Appendix 5. Hilary of Poitiers, Contra Auxentium.

Review

'Richard Flower's important book is accessible and readable, and wears its impressive store of learning very lightly. Flower is a patient guide through this historically, literarily and theologically tricky field, leavening the material with gentle good humour and sophistication. But do not be deceived by this deftness: this is also a weighty study that will be read widely and appreciatively by all in the field. This book is quite some achievement.' Pegasus
'What Flower offers is an innovative, engaging and richly informed treatment at the sharp end of theology, literature and politics in the controversial fourth century.' Nicholas Baker-Brian, Journal of Ecclesiastical History
'Richard Flower's Emperors and Bishops in Late Roman Invective is a welcome contribution to this field … [It] will be of value to students of late antique history, rhetoric and Christianity.' Catherine Ware, The Journal of Roman Studies

Promotional

An analysis of the earliest surviving invectives against a living Roman emperor and their significance for political and religious history.

Review Quote

"What Flower offers is an innovative, engaging and richly informed treatment at the sharp end of theology, literature and politics in the controversial fourth century." Nicholas Baker-Brian, Journal of Ecclesiastical History

Promotional "Headline"

An analysis of the earliest surviving invectives against a living Roman emperor and their significance for political and religious history.

Description for Bookstore

An innovative study exploring a unique collection of literary character assassinations written against the Roman emperor Constantius II, son of Constantine, by three Christian bishops who accused him of heresy and tyranny. It will be of interest to students of Roman political culture, late antique history and early Christianity.

Description for Library

An innovative study exploring a unique collection of literary character assassinations written against the Roman emperor Constantius II, son of Constantine, by three Christian bishops who accused him of heresy and tyranny. It will be of interest to students of Roman political culture, late antique history and early Christianity.

Details