1976 KODAK IMC INTERNATIONAL MICROGRAPHIC CONGRESS BROCHURE STOCKHOLM SEPTEMBER 28-30 1976  KODAK AB SWEDEN EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY ROCHESTER NEW YORK

NEW IN ENVELOPE   4”  x  5”  CLOSED

THE  BEST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN TO MICROGRAPHICS TODAY WOULD BE FOR ALL PRECONCEPTIONS TO BE SET ASIDE AND THE WHOLE TECHNOLOGY LOOKED AT AFRESH, AS IF IT WERE ONE OF THE EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE REDEFINING THE NATURE OF INFORMATION.

JOHN ROBERTSON

KEYNOTE SPEAKER

IMC ‘76

EDUCATION IS A POSITIVE MEANS OF FOSTERING THE GROWTH AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE MICRO-IMAGE AS A VIABLE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL TOOL.

IMC ’76 SHOULD BE LOOKED UPON AS AN EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE TO BE SHARED WITH OTHERS.

PETER AHLSTEDT

PRESIDENT

IMC ‘76

HONORING

GEORGE EASTMAN 1854-1954

“THE AUTHENTIC UNITED STATES POSTAGE STAMP IN THE KEY CHAIN WAS ISSUED IN 1954.  IT WAS FIRST SOLD IN ROCHESTER, NEW YORK ON JULY 12 OF THAT YEAR TO COMMEMORATE THE 100^TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTH OF GEORGE EASTMAN.  THIS GIFT HAS BEEN SPECIALLY PREPARED FOR HOSE ATTENDING THE INTERNATIONAL MICROGRAPHICS CONGRESS.

STOCKHOLM.

SEPTEMBER, 1976.

IN ENVELOPE

Some Google Research:

NATIONAL MICROFILM SOCIETIES

The International Micrographic Congress (IMC) is a body which draws together the various national microfilm

groups around the world. I am indebted to the Microfilm Association of Great Britain for the complete list of 34

societies from which, I have extracted the following for AGARD member countries:

Canada Norway

Canadian Micrographic Society Norwegian Microfilm Association

P.O. Box 6084, Station 'J' c/o Kodak Norge A/S

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Toibugaten 35

Oslo I, Norway

SWEDEN STOCKHOLM

Content

Raw content

Metadata

Raw source

Print

Share

UNCLASSIFIED PAGE 01 STATE 048673 44 ORIGIN EPA-04 INFO OCT-01 EUR-12 ISO-00 OES-05 /022 R DRAFTED BY EPA/A-106:DGREGORY:OH APPROVED BY OES/ENP/EN:HSPIELMAN EPA/A-106:FGREEN EPA/A-106:JBLANE EUR/NE:PCANNEY (PHONE) --------------------- 055750 R 280219Z FEB 76 FM SECSTATE WASHDC TO AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM UNCLAS STATE 048673 E.O. 11652: N/A TAGS: SENV, SW SUBJECT: EPA INFORMATION SEMINAR

Show Headers

FOR SCIATT 1. EPA REGRETS THAT APRIL SEMINAR NEEDS TO BE RE-SCHEDULED DUE TO TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS FOR REMAINDER OF FISCAL YEAR. 2. PLEASE EXPLORE WITH PALMLUND AND ANDERSSON POSSIBILITY OF SEPTEMBER 23, 24, 27. 3. SEPTEMBER SEMINAR WOULD ALLOW PARTICIPANTS TO STAY FOR INTERNATIONAL MICROGRAPHIC CONGRESS SCHEDULED SEPTEMBER 28-30, STOCKHOLM, ORGANIZED BY LKD, OFFICE AND DATA EQUIP- MENT TRADE ASSOCIATION OF SWEDEN. CONGRESS COULD REPLACE PROPOSED MICROTECHNOLOGY EXHIBIT. 4. REGRET INCONVENIENCE TO SWEDES BUT EPA UNDER CONGRESSIO- NAL TRAVEL CEILING THROUGH JULY 31. INGERSOLL UNCLASSIFIED NNN 

Object of this report

Since 1975, when Unesco published a report on Legal questions of the applica–

—tions of microfilm, a number of changes in the law on admissibility have been made

or initiated in various countries.

The Council of Europe, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

and the International Micrographic Congress (IMC) have also taken an interest in the

problem.

In May 1979, Unesco offered to prepare a new report for

tee of the International Council on Archives. Its aim was as

to collect and analyse information on the admissibility

evidence and their acceptability, including legislation

the subject;

the Executive Commitfollows:

of microforms as

and regulations on

in the light of this new information, to revise and bring up to date the previous

report (Unesco-COM-75/WS/30), referred to above) ;

to draw up a plan taking into account comments and suggestions from directors

of national archives, government archives services, and other organizations

concerned.

The International Microfilm Committee, a working group of the International

Council on Archives specializing in this problem, was asked to prepare the report.

The suggestion was on the agenda of the Microfilm Committee’s annual meeting held

in Oslo from 28 May to 1 June 1979, and the Committee asked Mr Georges Weill (France)

to put forward a work plan.

The plan was submitted in September 1979 and a draft report followed, which

was examined by the Microfilm Committee at its annual meeting held in Dublin from

10 to 13 September 1980.

A further six months was asked for to allow the writer of the report to incorporate

the suggestions and comments of those members of the Committee who were present

at the meeting. It was also decided that the International Organization for

Standardization (ISO) , which held its annual meeting in London from 17 to

21 November 1980, should be kept informed of the questions under consideration.

Thus the writer of the report was able to include the information passed on at the

meeting (20 November 1980) of the ad hoc commission set up by the ISO to correlate

the various points of view on the admissibility of microfilm records as evidence.

The report is based on the 1975 Unesco report, on the books and articles to

which reference is made, and on information obtained from 17 national and international

bodies. For various reasons, some information has not been analysed in

detail. The author believes, however, that the documentation presented in the

report, which brings together the most important recent reforms concerning the law

on admissibility, will enable the reader to form an opinion on the present trends

in legislation and regulations concerning the admissibility of microforms as

evidence.

All of these camera publications and cameras, old film, camera parts and hardware and developing hardware was found in my uncle's attic.

Some was found in a chest of drawers in the dining room.

Shipping cost less than the total of more 1 item.