[Thomas BURNET(1635-1715)]. 

Telluris Theoria Sacra: orbis nostri originem & mutations … Libri Duo Priores de Diluvio & Paradiso. 

London: typis  R. N[orton]. impensis Gualt. Kettilby, 1681. 2 parts on one volume (as issued), small quarto (8 x 6in; 203 x 153mm). Pp. [i-xvi], 1-138, [139-144]-306, [i-ii advertisement]. Front blank, general title and title to second part. Numerous engraved illustrations, two double-page hemisphere maps. (Some spotting). Early mottled calf, spine gilt (damage to spine [see images], hinges split but cords holding).

First edition of the first two parts of Burnet’s Theory of the Earth: admired by Sir Isaac Newton. 

There are two separate issues dated 1681, though this is not recorded by Wing and no priority has been established. The present work conforms to ESTC R6547 (collating: A4 a4 B-2Q4 2R2), with an initial blank and final advertisement leaf. Some copies previously offered for sale call for an engraved frontispiece, but this is only noted in the collation for ESTC R200980, which has different pagination and is a different setting of the text. These first two parts were reissued in 1689, with the addition of two further parts on the ‘Conflagration’ and ‘Millenium’.

Wing B 5948; Norman 375 ("Burnet felt the need to place the Biblical account of the creation upon an intellectually respectable foundation. Cartesian physics supplied the mechanics of geologic change for Burnet's theory".

 “Burnet's best known work is his Telluris Theoria Sacra, or Sacred Theory of the Earth. The first part was published in 1681 in Latin, and in 1684 in English translation; the second part appeared in 1689 (1690 in English). It was a speculative cosmogony, in which Burnet suggested a hollow earth with most of the water inside until Noah's Flood, at which time mountains and oceans appeared. He calculated the amount of water on Earth's surface, stating there was not enough to account for the Flood. Burnet was to some extent influenced by Descartes who had written on the creation of the earth in Principia philosophiae (1644), and was criticised on those grounds by Roger North. The heterodox views of Isaac La Peyrère included the idea that the Flood was not universal; Burnet's theory was at least in part intended to answer him on that point.

Burnet's system had its novel features, as well as those such as the four classical elements that were very traditional: an initially ovoid Earth, a Paradise before the Flood that was always in the spring season, and rivers flowing from the poles to the Equator. Herbert Croft published criticism of the book in 1685, in particular accusing Burnet of following the Second Epistle of Peter rather than the Book of Genesis. During the 1690s John Beaumont and Johann Caspar Eisenschmidt picked up on Burnet's ideas. They engendered a great deal of controversy at the time, and Burnet defended himself against selected critics, John Keill and Erasmus Warren.

Isaac Newton was an admirer of Burnet's theological approach to geological processes. Newton even wrote to Burnet, suggesting the possibility that when God created the Earth, the days were longer. However, Burnet did not find this explanation scientific enough. Lengthening the days would require an intervention on God's part. Burnet tightly held the belief that God created the world and all its processes perfectly from the start.”