Rabbit
Temporal range: Late Eocene–Holocene, 53–0 Ma
PreꞒ
Ꞓ
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
A
small brown rabbit sat on the dirt in a forest. Its ears are small and
alert and the tip of its nose, part of its chest and one of its feet are
white.
European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Lagomorpha
Family: Leporidae
Included genera
Pentalagus
Bunolagus
Nesolagus
Romerolagus
Brachylagus
Sylvilagus
Oryctolagus
Poelagus
Rabbits,
also known as bunnies or bunny rabbits, are small mammals in the family
Leporidae (which also contains the hares) of the order Lagomorpha
(which also contains the pikas). Oryctolagus cuniculus includes the
European rabbit species and its descendants, the world's 305 breeds[1]
of domestic rabbit. Sylvilagus includes 13 wild rabbit species, among
them the seven types of cottontail. The European rabbit, which has been
introduced on every continent except Antarctica, is familiar throughout
the world as a wild prey animal and as a domesticated form of livestock
and pet. With its widespread effect on ecologies and cultures, the
rabbit is, in many areas of the world, a part of daily life—as food,
clothing, a companion, and a source of artistic inspiration.
Although
once considered rodents, lagomorphs like rabbits have been discovered
to have diverged separately and earlier than their rodent cousins and
have a number of traits rodents lack, like two extra incisors.
Terminology and etymology
A
male rabbit is called a buck; a female is called a doe. An older term
for an adult rabbit used until the 18th century is coney (derived
ultimately from the Latin cuniculus), while rabbit once referred only to
the young animals.[2] Another term for a young rabbit is bunny, though
this term is often applied informally (particularly by children) to
rabbits generally, especially domestic ones. More recently, the term kit
or kitten has been used to refer to a young rabbit.
A group of
rabbits is known as a colony or nest (or, occasionally, a warren, though
this more commonly refers to where the rabbits live).[3] A group of
baby rabbits produced from a single mating is referred to as a litter[4]
and a group of domestic rabbits living together is sometimes called a
herd.[5]
The word rabbit itself derives from the Middle English
rabet, a borrowing from the Walloon robète, which was a diminutive of
the French or Middle Dutch robbe.[6]
Taxonomy
See also: List of leporids
Rabbits
and hares were formerly classified in the order Rodentia (rodent) until
1912, when they were moved into a new order, Lagomorpha (which also
includes pikas). Below are some of the genera and species of the rabbit.
A small, round, dust-coloured rabbit with upright, close-set ears sat on the ground amidst dead branches.
Brachylagus idahoensis
Pygmy rabbit
A model of a relatively large rabbit, with a slightly longer face and
shorter, rounder ears, and fur patterned black and gold.
Nesolagus netscheri
Sumatran Striped Rabbit
(Model)
A small, light-brown rabbit with upright ears sat on some grass.
Oryctolagus cuniculus
European rabbit
(Feral Tasmanian specimen)
A taxidermy of a large rabbit with dark brown fur, small, thin ears and an elongated, rodent-like face.
Pentalagus furnessi
Amami rabbit
(Taxidermy specimen)
A taxidermy of a very small light-brown rabbit mid-gallop. Its features are equally small, appearing similar to a vole.
Romerolagus diazi
Volcano rabbit
(Taxidermy specimen)
A juvenile rabbit sat on a white person's hand; its fur is a light
brown ticked heavily with dark brown. It is not quite large enough to
fill the person's hand completely.
Sylvilagus aquaticus
Swamp rabbit
(Juvenile)
A medium-sized rabbit with light brown fur ticked with grey, its ears
large and upright. It stands on all fours on some sandy ground.
Sylvilagus audubonii
Desert cottontail
A light-brown rabbit sitting in a field, its body unusually large and
squat, its limbs and head small, and its ears especially small
Sylvilagus bachmani
Brush rabbit
A taxidermy of a small rabbit, its fur a warm brown ticked with a
darker brown, its ears small and set back, its face closer to a vole's
than a rabbit's
Sylvilagus brasiliensis
Tapeti
(Taxidermy specimen)
A rabbit sitting upright in a field, turning to face the camera, its
fur a light brown ticked with grey and dark brown, its ears upright
Sylvilagus floridanus
Eastern cottontail
Order Lagomorpha
Family Leporidae (in part)
Genus Brachylagus
Pygmy rabbit, Brachylagus idahoensis
Genus Bunolagus
Bushman rabbit, Bunolagus monticularis
Genus Lepus[a]
Genus Nesolagus
Sumatran striped rabbit, Nesolagus netscheri
Annamite striped rabbit, Nesolagus timminsi
Genus Oryctolagus
European rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus
Genus Pentalagus
Amami rabbit/Ryūkyū rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi
Genus Poelagus
Central African Rabbit, Poelagus marjorita
Genus Romerolagus
Volcano rabbit, Romerolagus diazi
Genus Sylvilagus
Swamp rabbit, Sylvilagus aquaticus
Desert cottontail, Sylvilagus audubonii
Brush rabbit, Sylvilagus bachmani
Forest rabbit, Sylvilagus brasiliensis
Mexican cottontail, Sylvilagus cunicularis
Dice's cottontail, Sylvilagus dicei
Eastern cottontail, Sylvilagus floridanus
Tres Marias rabbit, Sylvilagus graysoni
Omilteme cottontail, Sylvilagus insonus
San Jose brush rabbit, Sylvilagus mansuetus
Mountain cottontail, Sylvilagus nuttallii
Marsh rabbit, Sylvilagus palustris
New England cottontail, Sylvilagus transitionalis
Hare
Johann Daniel Meyer (1748)
Rabbit
Johann Daniel Meyer (1748)
Differences from hares
Main article: Hare
The
term "rabbit" is typically used for all Leporidae species excluding the
genus Lepus. Members of that genus are instead known as hares or
jackrabbits.
Lepus species are typically precocial, born
relatively mature and mobile with hair and good vision, while rabbit
species are altricial, born hairless and blind, and requiring closer
care. Hares live a relatively solitary life in a simple nest above the
ground, while most rabbits live in social groups in burrows or warrens.
Hares are generally larger than rabbits, with ears that are more
elongated, and with hind legs that are larger and longer. Descendants of
the European rabbit are commonly bred as livestock and kept as pets,
whereas no hares have been domesticated - the breed called the Belgian
hare is actually a domestic rabbit which has been selectively bred to
resemble a hare.
Domestication
Main article: Domestic rabbit
Rabbits
have long been domesticated. Beginning in the Middle Ages, the European
rabbit has been widely kept as livestock, starting in ancient Rome.
Selective breeding has generated a wide variety of rabbit breeds, of
which many (since the early 19th century) are also kept as pets. Some
strains of rabbit have been bred specifically as research subjects.
As
livestock, rabbits are bred for their meat and fur. The earliest breeds
were important sources of meat, and so became larger than wild rabbits,
but domestic rabbits in modern times range in size from dwarf to giant.
Rabbit fur, prized for its softness, can be found in a broad range of
coat colors and patterns, as well as lengths. The Angora rabbit breed,
for example, was developed for its long, silky fur, which is often
hand-spun into yarn. Other domestic rabbit breeds have been developed
primarily for the commercial fur trade, including the Rex, which has a
short plush coat.
Biology
Evolution
Development of the rabbit heart
(wax models)
Because
the rabbit's epiglottis is engaged over the soft palate except when
swallowing, the rabbit is an obligate nasal breather. Rabbits have two
sets of incisor teeth, one behind the other. This way they can be
distinguished from rodents, with which they are often confused.[7] Carl
Linnaeus originally grouped rabbits and rodents under the class Glires;
later, they were separated as the scientific consensus is that many of
their similarities were a result of convergent evolution. Recent DNA
analysis and the discovery of a common ancestor has supported the view
that they share a common lineage, so rabbits and rodents are now often
grouped together in the superorder Glires.[8]
Morphology
Skeleton of the rabbit
Since
speed and agility are a rabbit's main defenses against predators
(including the swift fox), rabbits have large hind leg bones and well
developed musculature. Though plantigrade at rest, rabbits are on their
toes while running, assuming a more digitigrade posture. Rabbits use
their strong claws for digging and (along with their teeth) for
defense.[9] Each front foot has four toes plus a dewclaw. Each hind foot
has four toes (but no dewclaw).[10]
Melanistic coloring
Oryctologus cuniculus
European rabbit (wild)
Most
wild rabbits (especially compared to hares) have relatively full,
egg-shaped bodies. The soft coat of the wild rabbit is agouti in
coloration (or, rarely, melanistic), which aids in camouflage. The tail
of the rabbit (with the exception of the cottontail species) is dark on
top and white below. Cottontails have white on the top of their
tails.[11]
As a result of the position of the eyes in its skull,
the rabbit has a field of vision that encompasses nearly 360 degrees,
with just a small blind spot at the bridge of the nose.[12]
Hind limb elements
This
image comes from a specimen in the Pacific Lutheran University natural
history collection. It displays all of the skeletal articulations of
rabbit's hind limbs.
The anatomy of rabbits' hind limbs are
structurally similar to that of other land mammals and contribute to
their specialized form of locomotion. The bones of the hind limbs
consist of long bones (the femur, tibia, fibula, and phalanges) as well
as short bones (the tarsals). These bones are created through
endochondral ossification during development. Like most land mammals,
the round head of the femur articulates with the acetabulum of the os
coxae. The femur articulates with the tibia, but not the fibula, which
is fused to the tibia. The tibia and fibula articulate with the tarsals
of the pes, commonly called the foot. The hind limbs of the rabbit are
longer than the front limbs. This allows them to produce their hopping
form of locomotion. Longer hind limbs are more capable of producing
faster speeds. Hares, which have longer legs than cottontail rabbits,
are able to move considerably faster.[13] Rabbits stay just on their
toes when moving; this is called Digitigrade locomotion. The hind feet
have four long toes that allow for this and are webbed to prevent them
from spreading when hopping.[14] Rabbits do not have paw pads on their
feet like most other animals that use digitigrade locomotion. Instead,
they have coarse compressed hair that offers protection.[15]
Musculature
The rabbits hind limb (lateral view) includes muscles involved in the quadriceps and hamstrings.
Rabbits
have muscled hind legs that allow for maximum force, maneuverability,
and acceleration that is divided into three main parts; foot, thigh, and
leg. The hind limbs of a rabbit are an exaggerated feature. They are
much longer than the forelimbs, providing more force. Rabbits run on
their toes to gain the optimal stride during locomotion. The force put
out by the hind limbs is contributed to both the structural anatomy of
the fusion tibia and fibula, and muscular features.[16] Bone formation
and removal, from a cellular standpoint, is directly correlated to hind
limb muscles. Action pressure from muscles creates force that is then
distributed through the skeletal structures. Rabbits that generate less
force, putting less stress on bones are more prone to osteoporosis due
to bone rarefaction.[17] In rabbits, the more fibers in a muscle, the
more resistant to fatigue. For example, hares have a greater resistance
to fatigue than cottontails. The muscles of rabbit's hind limbs can be
classified into four main categories: hamstrings, quadriceps,
dorsiflexors, or plantar flexors. The quadriceps muscles are in charge
of force production when jumping. Complementing these muscles are the
hamstrings, which aid in short bursts of action. These muscles play off
of one another in the same way as the plantar flexors and dorsiflexors,
contributing to the generation and actions associated with force.[18]
Ears
A Holland Lop resting with one ear up and one ear down. Some rabbits can adjust their ears to hear distant sounds.
Within
the order lagomorphs, the ears are utilized to detect and avoid
predators. In the family Leporidae, the ears are typically longer than
they are wide. For example, in black tailed jack rabbits, their long
ears cover a greater surface area relative to their body size that allow
them to detect predators from far away. Contrasted to cotton tailed
rabbits, their ears are smaller and shorter, requiring predators to be
closer to detect them before they can flee. Evolution has favored
rabbits having shorter ears so the larger surface area does not cause
them to lose heat in more temperate regions. The opposite can be seen in
rabbits that live in hotter climates, mainly because they possess
longer ears that have a larger surface area that help with dispersion of
heat as well as the theory that sound does not travel well in more arid
air, opposed to cooler air. Therefore, longer ears are meant to aid the
organism in detecting predators sooner rather than later in warmer
temperatures.[19][page needed] The rabbit is characterized by its
shorter ears while hares are characterized by their longer
ears.[20][page needed] Rabbits' ears are an important structure to aid
thermoregulation and detect predators due to how the outer, middle, and
inner ear muscles coordinate with one another. The ear muscles also aid
in maintaining balance and movement when fleeing predators.[21]
Anatomy of mammalian ear
Outer ear
The
auricle, also known as the pinna, is a rabbit's outer ear.[22] The
rabbit's pinnae represent a fair part of the body surface area. It is
theorized that the ears aid in dispersion of heat at temperatures above
30 °C with rabbits in warmer climates having longer pinnae due to this.
Another theory is that the ears function as shock absorbers that could
aid and stabilize rabbit's vision when fleeing predators, but this has
typically only been seen in hares.[23][page needed] The rest of the
outer ear has bent canals that lead to the eardrum or tympanic
membrane.[24]
Middle ear
The middle ear is filled with
three bones called ossicles and is separated by the outer eardrum in the
back of the rabbit's skull. The three ossicles are called hammer,
anvil, and stirrup and act to decrease sound before it hits the inner
ear. In general, the ossicles act as a barrier to the inner ear for
sound energy.[24]
Inner ear
Inner ear fluid called
endolymph receives the sound energy. After receiving the energy, later
within the inner ear there are two parts: the cochlea that utilizes
sound waves from the ossicles and the vestibular apparatus that manages
the rabbit's position in regards to movement. Within the cochlea there
is a basilar membrane that contains sensory hair structures utilized to
send nerve signals to the brain so it can recognize different sound
frequencies. Within the vestibular apparatus the rabbit possesses three
semicircular canals to help detect angular motion.[24]
Thermoregulation
Thermoregulation
is the process that an organism utilizes to maintain an optimal body
temperature independent of external conditions.[25] This process is
carried out by the pinnae, which takes up most of the rabbit's body
surface and contain a vascular network and arteriovenous shunts.[26] In a
rabbit, the optimal body temperature is around 38.5–40℃.[27] If their
body temperature exceeds or does not meet this optimal temperature, the
rabbit must return to homeostasis. Homeostasis of body temperature is
maintained by the use of their large, highly vascularized ears that are
able to change the amount of blood flow that passes through the ears.
Rabbits use their large vascularized ears, which aid in thermoregulation, to keep their body temperature at an optimal level.
Constriction
and dilation of blood vessels in the ears are used to control the core
body temperature of a rabbit. If the core temperature exceeds its
optimal temperature greatly, blood flow is constricted to limit the
amount of blood going through the vessels. With this constriction, there
is only a limited amount of blood that is passing through the ears
where ambient heat would be able to heat the blood that is flowing
through the ears and therefore, increasing the body temperature.
Constriction is also used when the ambient temperature is much lower
than that of the rabbit's core body temperature. When the ears are
constricted it again limits blood flow through the ears to conserve the
optimal body temperature of the rabbit. If the ambient temperature is
either 15 degrees above or below the optimal body temperature, the blood
vessels will dilate. With the blood vessels being enlarged, the blood
is able to pass through the large surface area, causing it to either
heat or cool down.
During hot summers, the rabbit has the
capability to stretch its pinnae, which allows for greater surface area
and increase heat dissipation. In cold winters, the rabbit does the
opposite and folds its ears in order to decrease its surface area to the
ambient air, which would decrease their body temperature.
Ventral view of dissected rabbit lungs with key structures labeled.
The
jackrabbit has the largest ears within the Oryctolagus cuniculus group.
Their ears contribute to 17% of their total body surface area. Their
large pinna were evolved to maintain homeostasis while in the extreme
temperatures of the desert.
Respiratory system
The rabbit's
nasal cavity lies dorsal to the oral cavity, and the two compartments
are separated by the hard and soft palate.[28] The nasal cavity itself
is separated into a left and right side by a cartilage barrier, and it
is covered in fine hairs that trap dust before it can enter the
respiratory tract.[28][29][page needed] As the rabbit breathes, air
flows in through the nostrils along the alar folds. From there, the air
moves into the nasal cavity, also known as the nasopharynx, down through
the trachea, through the larynx, and into the lungs.[29][page
needed][30] The larynx functions as the rabbit's voice box, which
enables it to produce a wide variety of sounds.[29][page needed] The
trachea is a long tube embedded with cartilaginous rings that prevent
the tube from collapsing as air moves in and out of the lungs. The
trachea then splits into a left and right bronchus, which meet the lungs
at a structure called the hilum. From there, the bronchi split into
progressively more narrow and numerous branches. The bronchi branch into
bronchioles, into respiratory bronchioles, and ultimately terminate at
the alveolar ducts. The branching that is typically found in rabbit
lungs is a clear example of monopodial branching, in which smaller
branches divide out laterally from a larger central branch.[31]
The
structure of the rabbit's nasal and oral cavities, necessitates
breathing through the nose. This is due to the fact that the epiglottis
is fixed to the backmost portion of the soft palate.[30] Within the oral
cavity, a layer of tissue sits over the opening of the glottis, which
blocks airflow from the oral cavity to the trachea.[28] The epiglottis
functions to prevent the rabbit from aspirating on its food. Further,
the presence of a soft and hard palate allow the rabbit to breathe
through its nose while it feeds.[29][page needed]
Monopodial branching as seen in dissected rabbit lungs.
Rabbits
lungs are divided into four lobes: the cranial, middle, caudal, and
accessory lobes. The right lung is made up of all four lobes, while the
left lung only has two: the cranial and caudal lobes.[31] In order to
provide space for the heart, the left cranial lobe of the lungs is
significantly smaller than that of the right.[28] The diaphragm is a
muscular structure that lies caudal to the lungs and contracts to
facilitate respiration.[28][30]
Digestion
Rabbits are
herbivores that feed by grazing on grass and other leafy plants. In
consequence, their diet contains large amounts of cellulose, which is
hard to digest. Rabbits solve this problem via a form of hindgut
fermentation. They pass two distinct types of feces: hard droppings and
soft black viscous pellets, the latter of which are known as caecotrophs
or "night droppings" [32] and are immediately eaten (a behaviour known
as coprophagy). Rabbits reingest their own droppings (rather than
chewing the cud as do cows and numerous other herbivores) to digest
their food further and extract sufficient nutrients.[33]
Rabbits
graze heavily and rapidly for roughly the first half-hour of a grazing
period (usually in the late afternoon), followed by about half an hour
of more selective feeding.[citation needed] In this time, the rabbit
will also excrete many hard fecal pellets, being waste pellets that will
not be reingested.[citation needed] If the environment is relatively
non-threatening, the rabbit will remain outdoors for many hours, grazing
at intervals.[citation needed] While out of the burrow, the rabbit will
occasionally reingest its soft, partially digested pellets; this is
rarely observed, since the pellets are reingested as they are
produced.[citation needed]
0:54
Video of a wild European rabbit with ears twitching and a jump
Hard
pellets are made up of hay-like fragments of plant cuticle and stalk,
being the final waste product after redigestion of soft pellets. These
are only released outside the burrow and are not reingested. Soft
pellets are usually produced several hours after grazing, after the hard
pellets have all been excreted.[citation needed] They are made up of
micro-organisms and undigested plant cell walls.[citation needed]
Rabbits
are hindgut digesters. This means that most of their digestion takes
place in their large intestine and cecum. In rabbits, the cecum is about
10 times bigger than the stomach and it along with the large intestine
makes up roughly 40% of the rabbit's digestive tract.[34] The unique
musculature of the cecum allows the intestinal tract of the rabbit to
separate fibrous material from more digestible material; the fibrous
material is passed as feces, while the more nutritious material is
encased in a mucous lining as a cecotrope. Cecotropes, sometimes called
"night feces", are high in minerals, vitamins and proteins that are
necessary to the rabbit's health. Rabbits eat these to meet their
nutritional requirements; the mucous coating allows the nutrients to
pass through the acidic stomach for digestion in the intestines. This
process allows rabbits to extract the necessary nutrients from their
food.[35]
The chewed plant material collects in the large cecum, a
secondary chamber between the large and small intestine containing
large quantities of symbiotic bacteria that help with the digestion of
cellulose and also produce certain B vitamins. The pellets are about 56%
bacteria by dry weight, largely accounting for the pellets being 24.4%
protein on average. The soft feces form here and contain up to five
times the vitamins of hard feces. After being excreted, they are eaten
whole by the rabbit and redigested in a special part of the stomach. The
pellets remain intact for up to six hours in the stomach; the bacteria
within continue to digest the plant carbohydrates. This double-digestion
process enables rabbits to use nutrients that they may have missed
during the first passage through the gut, as well as the nutrients
formed by the microbial activity and thus ensures that maximum nutrition
is derived from the food they eat.[11] This process serves the same
purpose in the rabbit as rumination does in cattle and sheep.[36]
Dissected image of the male rabbit reproductive system with key structures labeled.
Because
rabbits cannot vomit,[37] if buildup occurs within the intestines (due
often to a diet with insufficient fibre),[38] intestinal blockage can
occur.[39]
Reproduction
Diagram of the male rabbit reproductive system with main components labeled.
The
adult male reproductive system forms the same as most mammals with the
seminiferous tubular compartment containing the Sertoli cells and an
adluminal compartment that contains the Leydig cells.[40] The Leydig
cells produce testosterone, which maintains libido[40] and creates
secondary sex characteristics such as the genital tubercle and penis.
The Sertoli cells triggers the production of Anti-Müllerian duct
hormone, which absorbs the Müllerian duct. In an adult male rabbit, the
sheath of the penis is cylinder-like and can be extruded as early as two
months of age.[41] The scrotal sacs lay lateral to the penis and
contain epididymal fat pads which protect the testes. Between 10 and 14
weeks, the testes descend and are able to retract into the pelvic cavity
in order to thermoregulate.[41] Furthermore, the secondary sex
characteristics, such as the testes, are complex and secrete many
compounds. These compounds includes fructose, citric acid, minerals, and
a uniquely high amount of catalase.[40]
Diagram of the female rabbit reproductive system with main components labeled.
The
adult female reproductive tract is bipartite, which prevents an embryo
from translocating between uteri.[42] The two uterine horns communicate
to two cervixes and forms one vaginal canal. Along with being bipartite,
the female rabbit does not go through an estrus cycle, which causes
mating induced ovulation.[41]
The average female rabbit becomes
sexually mature at three to eight months of age and can conceive at any
time of the year for the duration of her life. Egg and sperm production
can begin to decline after three years.[40] During mating, the male
rabbit will mount the female rabbit from behind and insert his penis
into the female and make rapid pelvic hip thrusts. The encounter lasts
only 20–40 seconds and after, the male will throw himself backwards off
the female.[43]
The rabbit gestation period is short and ranges
from 28 to 36 days with an average period of 31 days. A longer gestation
period will generally yield a smaller litter while shorter gestation
periods will give birth to a larger litter. The size of a single litter
can range from four to 12 kits allowing a female to deliver up to 60 new
kits a year. After birth, the female can become pregnant again as early
as the next day.[41]
The mortality rates of embryos are high in
rabbits and can be due to infection, trauma, poor nutrition and
environmental stress so a high fertility rate is necessary to counter
this.[41]
Sleep
Further information: Sleep (non-human)
Rabbits
may appear to be crepuscular, but their natural inclination is toward
nocturnal activity.[44] In 2011, the average sleep time of a rabbit in
captivity was calculated at 8.4 hours per day.[45] As with other prey
animals, rabbits often sleep with their eyes open, so that sudden
movements will awaken the rabbit to respond to potential danger.[46]
Diseases and immunity
See also: Category:Rabbit diseases
In
addition to being at risk of disease from common pathogens such as
Bordetella bronchiseptica and Escherichia coli, rabbits can contract the
virulent, species-specific viruses RHD ("rabbit hemorrhagic disease", a
form of calicivirus)[47] or myxomatosis. Among the parasites that
infect rabbits are tapeworms (such as Taenia serialis), external
parasites (including fleas and mites), coccidia species, and Toxoplasma
gondii.[48][49] Domesticated rabbits with a diet lacking in high fiber
sources, such as hay and grass, are susceptible to potentially lethal
gastrointestinal stasis.[50] Rabbits and hares are almost never found to
be infected with rabies and have not been known to transmit rabies to
humans.[51]
Encephalitozoon cuniculi, an obligate intracellular parasite is also capable of infecting many mammals including rabbits.
Rabbit
immunity has significantly diverged from other tetrapods in the manner
it employs immunoglobulin light chains.[52][53] In one case
McCartney-Francis et al., 1984 discover a unique additional disulfide
bond between Cys 80 in Vκ and Cys 171 in Cκ.[52][53] They suggest that
this may serve to stabilise rabbit antibodies.[52][53] Meanwhile IGKC1
shows high amino acid divergence between domesticated types and ferals
derived from them.[53] This can be as high as 40%.[53]
Rabbit
hemorrhagic disease is caused by strains of rabbit hemorrhagic disease
virus (RHDV) including type 2 (RHDV2).[54] RHDV2 was detected for the
first time in Washington state, USA in May 2022 and then in August once
in Washington and twice in Oregon.[55]
Ecology
Rabbit kits one hour after birth
Rabbits
are prey animals and are therefore constantly aware of their
surroundings. For instance, in Mediterranean Europe, rabbits are the
main prey of red foxes, badgers, and Iberian lynxes.[56] If confronted
by a potential threat, a rabbit may freeze and observe then warn others
in the warren with powerful thumps on the ground. Rabbits have a
remarkably wide field of vision, and a good deal of it is devoted to
overhead scanning.[57] The doe (mother) is aware that she gives off
scent which can attract predators, so she will stay away from the nest
to avoid putting the kits (babies) in danger, returning the nest only a
few times a day to feed the kits.[58]
Rabbits survive predation
by burrowing, hopping away in a zig-zag motion, and, if captured,
delivering powerful kicks with their hind legs. Their strong teeth allow
them to eat and to bite in order to escape a struggle.[59] The
longest-lived rabbit on record, a domesticated European rabbit living in
Tasmania, died at age 18.[60] The lifespan of wild rabbits is much
shorter; the average longevity of an eastern cottontail, for instance,
is less than one year.[61]
Habitat and range
Rabbit habitats
include meadows, woods, forests, grasslands, deserts and wetlands.[62]
Rabbits live in groups, and the best known species, the European rabbit,
lives in burrows, or rabbit holes. A group of burrows is called a
warren.[62]
More than half the world's rabbit population resides
in North America.[62] They are also native to southwestern Europe,
Southeast Asia, Sumatra, some islands of Japan, and in parts of Africa
and South America. They are not naturally found in most of Eurasia,
where a number of species of hares are present. Rabbits first entered
South America relatively recently, as part of the Great American
Interchange. Much of the continent has just one species of rabbit, the
tapeti, while most of South America's southern cone is without rabbits.
The European rabbit has been introduced to many places around the world.[11]
Domestic rabbit photographed at Alligator Bay, Beauvoir, France.
Rabbits have been launched into space orbit.[63]
Environmental problems
See also: Rabbits in Australia
Impact of rabbit-proof fence, Cobar, New South Wales, 1905
Rabbits
have been a source of environmental problems when introduced into the
wild by humans. As a result of their appetites, and the rate at which
they breed, feral rabbit depredation can be problematic for agriculture.
Gassing (fumigation of warrens),[64] barriers (fences), shooting,
snaring, and ferreting have been used to control rabbit populations, but
the most effective measures are diseases such as myxomatosis (myxo or
mixi, colloquially) and calicivirus. In Europe, where rabbits are farmed
on a large scale, they are protected against myxomatosis and
calicivirus with a genetically modified virus. The virus was developed
in Spain, and is beneficial to rabbit farmers. If it were to make its
way into wild populations in areas such as Australia, it could create a
population boom, as those diseases are the most serious threats to
rabbit survival. Rabbits in Australia and New Zealand are considered to
be such a pest that land owners are legally obliged to control
them.[65][66]
As food and clothing
Main article: Cuniculture
See also: Category:Rabbit dishes
Saint Jerome in the Desert
[Note rabbit being chased by a domesticated hound]
Taddeo Crivelli (Italian, died about 1479)
Rabbit being prepared in the kitchen
Simulation of daily life, mid-15th century
Hospices de Beaune, France
In
some areas, wild rabbits and hares are hunted for their meat, a lean
source of high quality protein.[67] In the wild, such hunting is
accomplished with the aid of trained falcons, ferrets, or dogs, as well
as with snares or other traps, and rifles. A caught rabbit may be
dispatched with a sharp blow to the back of its head, a practice from
which the term rabbit punch is derived.
Wild leporids comprise a
small portion of global rabbit-meat consumption. Domesticated
descendants of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) that are bred
and kept as livestock (a practice called cuniculture) account for the
estimated 200 million tons of rabbit meat produced annually.[68]
Approximately 1.2 billion rabbits are slaughtered each year for meat
worldwide.[69] In 1994, the countries with the highest consumption per
capita of rabbit meat were Malta with 8.89 kg (19 lb 10 oz), Italy with
5.71 kg (12 lb 9 oz), and Cyprus with 4.37 kg (9 lb 10 oz), falling to
0.03 kg (1 oz) in Japan. The figure for the United States was 0.14 kg (5
oz) per capita. The largest producers of rabbit meat in 1994 were
China, Russia, Italy, France, and Spain.[70] Rabbit meat was once a
common commodity in Sydney, Australia, but declined after the
myxomatosis virus was intentionally introduced to control the exploding
population of feral rabbits in the area.
In the United Kingdom,
fresh rabbit is sold in butcher shops and markets, and some supermarkets
sell frozen rabbit meat. At farmers markets there, including the famous
Borough Market in London, rabbit carcasses are sometimes displayed
hanging, unbutchered (in the traditional style), next to braces of
pheasant or other small game. Rabbit meat is a feature of Moroccan
cuisine, where it is cooked in a tajine with "raisins and grilled
almonds added a few minutes before serving".[71] In China, rabbit meat
is particularly popular in Sichuan cuisine, with its stewed rabbit,
spicy diced rabbit, BBQ-style rabbit, and even spicy rabbit heads, which
have been compared to spicy duck neck.[68] Rabbit meat is comparatively
unpopular elsewhere in the Asia-Pacific.
An extremely rare
infection associated with rabbits-as-food is tularemia (also known as
rabbit fever), which may be contracted from an infected rabbit.[72]
Hunters are at higher risk for tularemia because of the potential for
inhaling the bacteria during the skinning process.
In addition to
their meat, rabbits are used for their wool, fur, and pelts, as well as
their nitrogen-rich manure and their high-protein milk.[73] Production
industries have developed domesticated rabbit breeds (such as the
well-known Angora rabbit) to efficiently fill these needs.
In art, literature, and culture
Main article: Rabbits and hares in art
Rabbits
are often used as a symbol of fertility or rebirth, and have long been
associated with spring and Easter as the Easter Bunny. The species' role
as a prey animal with few defenses evokes vulnerability and innocence,
and in folklore and modern children's stories, rabbits often appear as
sympathetic characters, able to connect easily with youth of all kinds
(for example, the Velveteen Rabbit, or Thumper in Bambi).
With
its reputation as a prolific breeder, the rabbit juxtaposes sexuality
with innocence, as in the Playboy Bunny. The rabbit (as a swift prey
animal) is also known for its speed, agility, and endurance, symbolized
(for example) by the marketing icons the Energizer Bunny and the
Duracell Bunny.
Folklore
Question book-new.svg
This
section relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant
discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this
article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Rabbit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2018)
Main article: List of fictional hares and rabbits
The rabbit often appears in folklore as the trickster archetype, as he uses his cunning to outwit his enemies.
"Rabbit fools Elephant by showing the reflection of the moon".
Illustration (from 1354) of the Panchatantra
"Three rabbits" motif
Coat of arms of Corbenay, France
In Aztec mythology, a pantheon of four hundred rabbit gods known as
Centzon Totochtin, led by Ometochtli or Two Rabbit, represented
fertility, parties, and drunkenness.
In Central Africa, the common hare (Kalulu), is "inevitably described" as a trickster figure.[74]
In Chinese folklore, rabbits accompany Chang'e on the Moon. In the
Chinese New Year, the zodiacal rabbit is one of the twelve celestial
animals in the Chinese zodiac. Note that the Vietnamese zodiac includes a
zodiacal cat in place of the rabbit, possibly because rabbits did not
inhabit Vietnam.[citation needed] The most common explanation is that
the ancient Vietnamese word for "rabbit" (mao) sounds like the Chinese
word for "cat" (卯, mao).[75]
In Japanese tradition, rabbits live
on the Moon where they make mochi, the popular snack of mashed sticky
rice. This comes from interpreting the pattern of dark patches on the
moon as a rabbit standing on tiptoes on the left pounding on an usu, a
Japanese mortar.
In Jewish folklore, rabbits (shfanim שפנים) are
associated with cowardice, a usage still current in contemporary Israeli
spoken Hebrew (similar to the English colloquial use of "chicken" to
denote cowardice).
In Korean mythology, as in Japanese, rabbits live on the moon making rice cakes ("Tteok" in Korean).
In Anishinaabe traditional beliefs, held by the Ojibwe and some other
Native American peoples, Nanabozho, or Great Rabbit, is an important
deity related to the creation of the world.
A Vietnamese
mythological story portrays the rabbit of innocence and youthfulness.
The Gods of the myth are shown to be hunting and killing rabbits to show
off their power.
Buddhism, Christianity, and Judaism have
associations with an ancient circular motif called the three rabbits (or
"three hares"). Its meaning ranges from "peace and tranquility", to
purity or the Holy Trinity, to Kabbalistic levels of the soul or to the
Jewish diaspora. The tripartite symbol also appears in heraldry and even
tattoos.
The rabbit as trickster is a part of American popular
culture, as Br'er Rabbit (from African-American folktales and, later,
Disney animation) and Bugs Bunny (the cartoon character from Warner
Bros.), for example.
Anthropomorphized rabbits have appeared in
film and literature, in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (the White
Rabbit and the March Hare characters), in Watership Down (including the
film and television adaptations), in Rabbit Hill (by Robert Lawson), and
in the Peter Rabbit stories (by Beatrix Potter). In the 1920s, Oswald
the Lucky Rabbit, was a popular cartoon character.
WWII USAF pilot D. R. Emerson
"flys with a rabbit's foot talisman,
a gift from a New York girl friend"
Beatrix Potter's Peter Rabbit.
A
rabbit's foot may be carried as an amulet, believed to bring protection
and good luck. This belief is found in many parts of the world, with
the earliest use being recorded in Europe c. 600 BC.[76]
On the
Isle of Portland in Dorset, UK, the rabbit is said to be unlucky and
even speaking the creature's name can cause upset among older island
residents. This is thought to date back to early times in the local
quarrying industry where (to save space) extracted stones that were not
fit for sale were set aside in what became tall, unstable walls. The
local rabbits' tendency to burrow there would weaken the walls and their
collapse resulted in injuries or even death. Thus, invoking the name of
the culprit became an unlucky act to be avoided. In the local culture
to this day, the rabbit (when he has to be referred to) may instead be
called a “long ears” or “underground mutton”, so as not to risk bringing
a downfall upon oneself.[77] While it was true 50 years ago[when?] that
a pub on the island could be emptied by calling out the word "rabbit",
this has become more fable than fact in modern times.[citation needed]
In
other parts of Britain and in North America, invoking the rabbit's name
may instead bring good luck. "Rabbit rabbit rabbit" is one variant of
an apotropaic or talismanic superstition that involves saying or
repeating the word "rabbit" (or "rabbits" or "white rabbits" or some
combination thereof) out loud upon waking on the first day of each
month, because doing so will ensure good fortune for the duration of
that month.
The "rabbit test" is a term, first used in 1949, for
the Friedman test, an early diagnostic tool for detecting a pregnancy in
humans. It is a common misconception (or perhaps an urban legend) that
the test-rabbit would die if the woman was pregnant. This led to the
phrase "the rabbit died" becoming a euphemism for a positive pregnancy
test.
See also
iconLagomorpha portal
Animal track
Cuniculture
Dwarf rabbit
Hare games
Jackalope
List of animal names
List of rabbit breeds
Lop rabbit
Rabbits in the arts
Rabbit show jumping
References
Notes
This genus is considered a hare, not a rabbit
Citations
"Data
export". DAD-IS (Domestic Animal Diversity Information System). FAO
(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 21 November
2017. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
"coney". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
"The Collective Noun Page". Archived from the original on 1 February 2008. Retrieved 30 January 2008.
McClure,
DVM PhD DACLAM, Diane (2018). "Breeding and Reproduction of Rabbits".
Merck Veterinary Manual. Archived from the original on 6 January 2018.
Retrieved 5 January 2018.
"Common Questions: What Do You Call a Group
of...?". archived copy of Animal Congregations, or What Do You Call a
Group of.....?. U.S. Geological Survey Northern Prairie Wildlife
Research Center. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015. Retrieved
26 February 2018.
"rabbit". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
Brown, Louise (2001). How to Care for Your Rabbit. Kingdom Books. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-85279-167-4.
Katherine Quesenberry & James W. Carpenter, Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery (3rd ed. 2011).
d'Ovidio,
Dario; Pierantoni, Ludovica; Noviello, Emilio; Pirrone, Federica
(September 2016). "Sex differences in human-directed social behavior in
pet rabbits". Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 15: 37–42.
doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2016.08.072.
van Praag, Esther (2005). "Deformed claws in a rabbit, after traumatic fractures" (PDF). MediRabbit.
"rabbit". Encyclopædia Britannica (Standard ed.). Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. 2007.
"What do Rabbits See?". Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 9 August 2013.
Bensley, Benjamin Arthur (1910). Practical anatomy of the rabbit. The University Press. p. 1. "rabbit skeletal anatomy."
"Description
and Physical Characteristics of Rabbits - All Other Pets - Merck
Veterinary Manual". Merck Veterinary Manual. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
D.A.B.V.P., Margaret A. Wissman, D.V.M. "Rabbit Anatomy". exoticpetvet.net. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
Susan.,
Lumpkin (2011). Rabbits : the animal answer guide. Seidensticker, John.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 9781421401263. OCLC
794700391.
Geiser, Max; Trueta, Joseph (May 1958). "Muscle action,
bone rarefaction and bone formation". The Journal of Bone and Joint
Surgery. British Volume. 40-B (2): 282–311.
doi:10.1302/0301-620X.40B2.282. PMID 13539115.
Lieber, Richard L.;
Blevins, Field T. (January 1989). "Skeletal muscle architecture of the
rabbit hindlimb: Functional implications of muscle design". Journal of
Morphology. 199 (1): 93–101. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051990108. PMID 2921772.
S2CID 25344889.
Hall, E. Raymond (2001). The Mammals of North America. The Blackburn Press. ISBN 978-1930665354.
Bensley, Benjamin Arthur (1910). Practical anatomy of the rabbit. The University Press.
Meyer,
D. L. (1971). "Single Unit Responses of Rabbit Ear-Muscles to Postural
and Accelerative Stimulation". Experimental Brain Research. 14 (2):
118–26. doi:10.1007/BF00234795. PMID 5016586. S2CID 6466476.
Capello,
Vittorio (2006). "Lateral Ear Canal Resection and Ablation in Pet
Rabbits" (PDF). The North American Veterinary Conference. 20: 1711–1713.
Vella, David (2012). Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-4160-6621-7.
Parsons,
Paige K. (2018). "Rabbit Ears: A Structural Look: ...injury or disease,
can send your rabbit into a spin". House Rabbit Society.
Romanovsky,
A. A. (March 2014). "Skin temperature: its role in thermoregulation".
Acta Physiologica. 210 (3): 498–507. doi:10.1111/apha.12231. PMC
4159593. PMID 24716231.
Vella, David (2012). Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents: Clinical, Medicine, and Surgery. Elsevier. ISBN 9781416066217.[page needed]
Fayez,
I; Marai, M; Alnaimy, A; Habeeb, M (1994). "Thermoregulation in
rabbits". In Baselga, M; Marai, I.F.M. (eds.). Rabbit production in hot
climates. Zaragoza: CIHEAM. pp. 33–41.
Johnson-Delaney, Cathy A.;
Orosz, Susan E. (2011). "Rabbit Respiratory System: Clinical Anatomy,
Physiology and Disease". Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic
Animal Practice. 14 (2): 257–266. doi:10.1016/j.cvex.2011.03.002. PMID
21601814.
Smith, David G. (2019). A dissection guide & atlas to the rabbit. ISBN 978-1617319372. OCLC 1084742187.
Jekl,
Vladimi (2012). "Approach to Rabbit Respiratory Disease".
WSAVA/FECAVA/BSAVA World Congress. "As obligate nasal breathers, rabbits
with upper airway disease will attempt to breathe through their mouths,
which prevents feeding and drinking and could be quickly fatal."
Autifi,
Mohamed Abdul Haye; El-Banna, Ahmed Kamal; Ebaid, Ashraf El- Sayed
(2015). "Morphological Study of Rabbit Lung, Bronchial Tree, and
Pulmonary Vessels Using Corrosion Cast Technique". Al-Azhar Assiut
Medical Journal. 13 (3): 41–51.
"Rabbits: The Mystery of Poop". bio.miami.edu. Retrieved 3 December 2018.
"Information
for Rabbit Owners — Oak Tree Veterinary Centre". Oaktreevet.co.uk.
Archived from the original on 23 June 2012. Retrieved 30 August 2010.
"Feeding the Pet Rabbit"
Dr. Byron de la Navarre's "Care of Rabbits" Susan A. Brown, DVM's "Overview of Common Rabbit Diseases: Diseases Related to Diet"
The Private Life of the Rabbit, R. M. Lockley, 1964. Chapter 10.
Bernard
E. Rollin (13 March 1995). The Experimental Animal in Biomedical
Research: Care, Husbandry, and Well-Being-An Overview by Species, Volume
2. CRC Press. p. 359. ISBN 9780849349829.
Karr-Lilienthal, Phd
(University of Nebraska - Lincoln), Lisa (4 November 2011). "The
Digestive System of the Rabbit". eXtension (a Part of the Cooperative
Extension Service). Archived from the original on 6 January 2018.
Retrieved 5 January 2018.
"Living with a House Rabbit". Archived from the original on 21 September 2017. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
Foote,
Robert H; Carney, Edward W (2000). "The rabbit as a model for
reproductive and developmental toxicity studies". Reproductive
Toxicology. 14 (6): 477–493. doi:10.1016/s0890-6238(00)00101-5. ISSN
0890-6238. PMID 11099874.
"Rabbit Reproduction Basics". LafeberVet. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
Weisbroth,
Steven H.; Flatt, Ronald E.; Kraus, Alan L. (1974). The Biology of the
Laboratory Rabbit. doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11681-9. ISBN 9780127421506.
"Understanding the Mating Process for Breeding Rabbits". florida4h.org. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
Jilge,
B (1991). "The rabbit: a diurnal or a nocturnal animal?". Journal of
Experimental Animal Science. 34 (5–6): 170–183. PMID 1814463.
"40 Winks?" Jennifer S. Holland, National Geographic Vol. 220, No. 1. July 2011.
Wright,
Samantha (2011). For The Love of Parsley. A Guide To Your Rabbit's Most
Common Behaviours. Lulu. pp. 35–36. ISBN 978-1-4467-9111-0.
Cooke,
Brian Douglas (2014). Australia's War Against Rabbits. CSIRO Publishing.
ISBN 978-0-643-09612-7. Archived from the original on 7 June 2014.
Wood, Maggie. "Parasites of Rabbits". Chicago Exotics, PC. Archived from the original on 2 March 2013. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
Boschert, Ken. "Internal Parasites of Rabbits". Net Vet. Archived from the original on 2 April 2013. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
Krempels,
Dana. "GastroIntestinal Stasis, The Silent Killer". Department of
Biology at the University of Miami. Archived from the original on 19
June 2017. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
"Rabies: Other Wild Animals".
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 15 November 2011. Archived
from the original on 20 December 2010. Retrieved 20 December 2012.
• Weber, Justus; Peng, Haiyong; Rader, Christoph (2017). "From rabbit
antibody repertoires to rabbit monoclonal antibodies". Experimental
& Molecular Medicine. Nature Portfolio. 49 (3): e305.
doi:10.1038/emm.2017.23. ISSN 2092-6413. PMC 5382564. PMID 28336958.
S2CID 4066391.
• Mage, Rose G.; Lanning, Dennis; Knight,
Katherine L. (2006). "B cell and antibody repertoire development in
rabbits: The requirement of gut-associated lymphoid tissues".
Developmental & Comparative Immunology. Elsevier. 30 (1–2): 137–153.
doi:10.1016/j.dci.2005.06.017. ISSN 0145-305X. PMID 16098588.
•
Conrath, K.E.; Wernery, U.; Muyldermans, S.; Nguyen, V.K. (2003).
"Emergence and evolution of functional heavy-chain antibodies in
Camelidae". Developmental & Comparative Immunology. Elsevier. 27
(2): 87–103. doi:10.1016/s0145-305x(02)00071-x. ISSN 0145-305X. PMID
12543123.
• Davis, Mark M. (1985). "Molecular Genetics of the T
Cell-Receptor Beta Chain". Annual Review of Immunology. Annual Reviews. 3
(1): 537–560. doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.03.040185.002541. ISSN 0732-0582.
PMID 3933533.
Pinheiro, Ana; Neves, Fabiana; Lemos de Matos, Ana;
Abrantes, Joana; van der Loo, Wessel; Mage, Rose; Esteves, Pedro José
(23 September 2015). "An overview of the lagomorph immune system and its
genetic diversity". Immunogenetics. Springer. 68 (2): 83–107.
doi:10.1007/s00251-015-0868-8. ISSN 0093-7711. PMID 26399242. S2CID
18131774.
"Rabbit hemorrhagic disease". American Veterinary Medical Association. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
"Deadly
rabbit disease confirmed in Thurston County; vets urge vaccination".
Washington State Department of Agriculture. 25 September 2020. Retrieved
7 August 2022.
Fedriani, J. M.; Palomares, F.; Delibes, M. (1999).
"Niche relations among three sympatric Mediterranean carnivores" (PDF).
Oecologia. 121 (1): 138–148. Bibcode:1999Oecol.121..138F. CiteSeerX
10.1.1.587.7215. doi:10.1007/s004420050915. JSTOR 4222449. PMID
28307883. S2CID 39202154. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March
2016.
Tynes, Valarie V. Behavior of Exotic Pets Archived 6 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine. Wiley Blackwell, 2010, p. 70.
"How To Keep A Wild Baby Rabbit Alive — Rabbit Care Tips". Rabbitcaretips.com. 24 February 2021. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
Davis,
Susan E. and DeMello, Margo Stories Rabbits Tell: A Natural And
Cultural History of A Misunderstood Creature Archived 6 May 2016 at the
Wayback Machine. Lantern Books, 2003, p. 27.
Glenday, Craig (2013). Guinness World Records 2014. pp. 043. ISBN 978-1-908843-15-9.
Cottontail rabbit at Indiana Department of Natural Resources Archived 17 November 2016 at the Wayback Machine
"Rabbit Habitats". Archived from the original on 4 August 2009. Retrieved 7 July 2009.
Beischer,
DE; Fregly, AR (1962). "Animals and man in space. A chronology and
annotated bibliography through the year 1960". US Naval School of
Aviation Medicine. ONR TR ACR-64 (AD0272581). Archived from the original
on 11 August 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
Department of Primary
Industries and Regional Development; Agriculture and Food Division; Pest
and Disease Information Service (PaDIS). "Rabbit control: fumigation".
agric.wa.gov.au. Government of Western Australia. Retrieved 25 September
2021.
"Feral animals in Australia — Invasive species".
Environment.gov.au. 1 February 2010. Archived from the original on 21
July 2010. Retrieved 30 August 2010.
"Rabbits — The role of
government — Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand". Teara.govt.nz. 1 March
2009. Archived from the original on 12 June 2011. Retrieved 30 August
2010.
"Rabbit: From Farm to Table". Archived from the original on 5 July 2008.
Olivia
Geng, French Rabbit Heads: The Newest Delicacy in Chinese Cuisine
Archived 14 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine. The Wall Street Journal
Blog, 13 June 2014
"FAOSTAT". FAO. Retrieved 25 October 2019.
FAO - The Rabbit - Husbandry, health and production. Archived 23 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine
'Traditional Moroccan Cooking, Recipes from Fez', by Madame Guinadeau. (Serif, London, 2003). ISBN 1-897959-43-5.
"Tularemia (Rabbit fever)". Health.utah.gov. 16 June 2003. Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 30 August 2010.
Houdebine,
Louis-Marie; Fan, Jianglin (1 June 2009). Rabbit Biotechnology: Rabbit
Genomics, Transgenesis, Cloning and Models. シュプリンガー・ジャパン株式会社. pp. 68–72.
ISBN 978-90-481-2226-4. Archived from the original on 26 April 2014.
Retrieved 26 February 2018.
Brian Morris, The Power of Animals: An Ethnography, p. 177 (2000).
"Year of the Cat OR Year of the Rabbit?". nwasianweekly.com. 3 February 2011. Retrieved 27 February 2018.
Ellis,
Bill (1 January 2004). Lucifer Ascending: The Occult in Folklore and
Popular Culture. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0813122892.
"Wallace and Gromit spook island". BBC News. 7 October 2005. Retrieved 25 August 2022.
Further reading
Windling, Terri. The Symbolism of Rabbits and Hares[Usurped!]
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rabbits.
Wikiquote has quotations related to Rabbit.
Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article "Rabbit".
American Rabbit Breeders Association organization, which promotes all phases of rabbit keeping
House Rabbit Society an activist organization that promotes keeping rabbits indoors
vte
Extant Lagomorpha species
vte
Meat
vte
Game animals and shooting in North America
Authority control: National libraries Edit this at Wikidata
France (data) Germany Israel United States Czech Republic
Categories:
LeporidaeHerbivorous mammalsExtant Ypresian first appearancesMammal common namesCosmopolitan mammalsParaphyletic groups
Leporidae
is the family of rabbits and hares, containing over 60 species of
extant mammals in all. The Latin word Leporidae means "those that
resemble lepus" (hare). Together with the pikas, the Leporidae
constitute the mammalian order Lagomorpha. Leporidae differ from pikas
in that they have short, furry tails and elongated ears and hind legs.
The
common name "rabbit" usually applies to all genera in the family except
Lepus, while members of Lepus (almost half the species) usually are
called hares. Like most common names, however, the distinction does not
match current taxonomy completely; jackrabbits are members of Lepus, and
members of the genera Pronolagus and Caprolagus sometimes are called
hares.
Various countries across all continents except Antarctica
and Australia have indigenous species of Leporidae. Furthermore,
rabbits, most significantly the European rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus,
also have been introduced to most of Oceania and to many other islands,
where they pose serious ecological and commercial threats.
Contents
1 Characteristics
2 Reproduction
3 Evolution
4 Classification
5 Predation
6 See also
7 References
Characteristics
Leporids
are small to moderately sized mammals, adapted for rapid movement. They
have long hind legs, with four toes on each foot, and shorter fore
legs, with five toes each. The soles of their feet are hairy, to improve
grip while running, and they have strong claws on all of their toes.
Leporids also have distinctive, elongated and mobile ears, and they have
an excellent sense of hearing. Their eyes are large, and their night
vision is good, reflecting their primarily nocturnal or crepuscular mode
of living.[2]
Leporids are all roughly the same shape and fall
within a small range of sizes with short tails, ranging from the 21 cm
(8 in) long Tres Marias cottontail to the 76 cm (30 in) long desert
hare. Female leporids are almost always larger than males, which is
unusual among terrestrial mammals, in which males are usually the larger
sex.[3]
Both rabbits and hares are almost exclusively
herbivorous (although some Lepus species are known to eat
carrion),[4][5] feeding primarily on grasses and herbs, although they
also eat leaves, fruit, and seeds of various kinds. They are
coprophagous, as they pass food through their digestive systems twice,
first expelling it as soft green feces, called cecotropes, which they
then reingest, eventually producing hard, dark fecal pellets. Like
rodents, they have powerful front incisor teeth, but they also have a
smaller second pair of incisors to either side of the main teeth in the
upper jaw, and the structure is different from that of rodent incisors.
Also like rodents, leporids lack any canine teeth, but they do have more
cheek teeth than rodents do. Their jaws also contain a large diastema.
The dental formula of most, though not all, leporids is: 2.0.3.31.0.2.3
They
have adapted to a remarkable range of habitats, from desert to tundra,
forests, mountains, and swampland. Rabbits generally dig permanent
burrows for shelter, the exact form of which varies between species. In
contrast, hares rarely dig shelters of any kind, and their bodies are
more suited to fast running than to burrowing.[2]
The gestation
period in leporids varies from around 28 to 50 days, and is generally
longer in the hares. This is in part because young hares, or leverets,
are born fully developed, with fur and open eyes, while rabbit kits are
naked and blind at birth, having the security of the burrow to protect
them.[2] Leporids can have several litters a year, which can cause their
population to expand dramatically in a short time when resources are
plentiful.
Reproduction
Leporids are typically polygynandrous,
and have highly developed social systems. Their social hierarchies
determine which males mate when the females go into estrus, which
happens throughout the year. Gestation periods are variable, but in
general, higher latitudes correspond to shorter gestation periods.[6]
Moreover, the gestation time and litter size correspond to predation
rates as well. Species nesting below ground tend to have lower predation
rates and have larger litters.[7]
Evolution
Serengetilagus praecapensis skull, Naturkundemuseum, Berlin
The
oldest known leporid species date from the late Eocene, by which time
the family was already present in both North America and Asia. Over the
course of their evolution, this group has become increasingly adapted to
lives of fast running and leaping. For example, Palaeolagus, an extinct
rabbit from the Oligocene of North America, had shorter hind legs than
modern forms (indicating it ran rather than hopped) though it was in
most other respects quite rabbit-like.[8] Two as yet unnamed fossil
finds—dated ~48 Ma (from China) and ~53 Ma (India)—while primitive,
display the characteristic leporid ankle, thus pushing the divergence of
Ochotonidae and Leporidae yet further into the past.[9]
The cladogram is from Matthee et al., 2004, based on nuclear and mitochondrial gene analysis.[10]
Leporidae
Nesolagus (striped rabbits)
Poelagus (Bunyoro rabbit)
Pronolagus (red rock hares)
Romerolagus (volcano rabbit)
Sylvilagus
(cottontails) Wild animals of North America, intimate studies of big
and little creatures of the mammal kingdom (Page 511) (Sylvilagus
palustris).jpg
Brachylagus (pygmy rabbit)
Caprolagus (hispid hare)
Oryctolagus (European rabbit) Lepus cuniculus - 1700-1880 - Print - Iconographia Zoologica -(white background).jpg
Bunolagus (riverine rabbit)
Pentalagus (Amami rabbit)
Lepus (hares) Lepus timidus - 1700-1880 - Print - Iconographia Zoologica -(white background).jpg
Classification
Main article: List of leporids
Family Leporidae:[1] rabbits and hares
Genus Pentalagus
Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi
Genus Bunolagus
Riverine rabbit, Bunolagus monticularis
Genus Nesolagus
Sumatran striped rabbit, Nesolagus netscheri
Annamite striped rabbit, Nesolagus timminsi
Genus Romerolagus
Volcano rabbit, Romerolagus diazi
Genus Brachylagus
Pygmy rabbit, Brachylagus idahoensis
Genus Sylvilagus
Subgenus Tapeti
Swamp rabbit, Sylvilagus aquaticus
Andean tapetí, Sylvilagus andinus
Bogota tapetí, Sylvilagus apollinaris
Ecuadorian tapetí, Sylvilagus daulensis
Common tapetí, Sylvilagus brasiliensis
Fulvous tapetí, Sylvilagus fulvescens
Dice's cottontail, Sylvilagus dicei
Central American tapetí, Sylvilagus gabbi
Northern tapetí, Sylvilagus incitatus
Omilteme cottontail, Sylvilagus insonus
Nicefor's tapetí, Sylvilagus nicefori
Marsh rabbit, Sylvilagus palustris
Suriname tapetí, Sylvilagus parentum
Colombian tapetí, Sylvilagus salentus
Santa Marta tapetí, Sylvilagus sanctaemartae
Western tapetí, Sylvilagus surdaster
Coastal tapetí, Sylvilagus tapetillus
Venezuelan lowland rabbit, Sylvilagus varynaensis
Subgenus Sylvilagus
Desert cottontail, Sylvilagus audubonii
Mexican cottontail, Sylvilagus cunicularis
Eastern cottontail, Sylvilagus floridanus
Tres Marias cottontail, Sylvilagus graysoni
Robust cottontail, Sylvilagus holzneri
Mountain cottontail, Sylvilagus nuttallii
Appalachian cottontail, Sylvilagus obscurus
New England cottontail, Sylvilagus transitionalis
Subgenus Microlagus
Brush rabbit, Sylvilagus bachmani
Genus Oryctolagus
European rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus
Genus Poelagus
Bunyoro rabbit, Poelagus marjorita
Genus Pronolagus
Natal red rock hare, Pronolagus crassicaudatus
Jameson's red rock hare, Pronolagus randensis
Smith's red rock hare, Pronolagus rupestris
Hewitt's red rock hare, Pronolagus saundersiae
Genus Caprolagus
Hispid hare, Caprolagus hispidus
Genus Lepus
Subgenus Macrotolagus
Antelope jackrabbit, Lepus alleni
Subgenus Poecilolagus
Snowshoe hare, Lepus americanus
Subgenus Lepus
Arctic hare, Lepus arcticus
Alaskan hare, Lepus othus
Mountain hare, Lepus timidus
Subgenus Proeulagus
Black jackrabbit, Lepus insularis
Desert hare, Lepus tibetanus
Tolai hare, Lepus tolai
Subgenus Eulagos
Broom hare, Lepus castroviejoi
Yunnan hare, Lepus comus
Korean hare, Lepus coreanus
European hare, Lepus europaeus
Manchurian hare, Lepus mandshuricus
Ethiopian highland hare, Lepus starcki
Subgenus Sabanalagus
Ethiopian hare, Lepus fagani
African savanna hare, Lepus victoriae
Subgenus Indolagus
Hainan hare, Lepus hainanus
Indian hare, Lepus nigricollis
Burmese hare, Lepus peguensis
Subgenus Sinolagus
Chinese hare, Lepus sinensis
Subgenus Tarimolagus
Yarkand hare, Lepus yarkandensis
Incertae sedis
Tamaulipas jackrabbit, Lepus altamirae
Japanese hare, Lepus brachyurus
Black-tailed jackrabbit, Lepus californicus
White-sided jackrabbit, Lepus callotis
Cape hare, Lepus capensis
Corsican hare, Lepus corsicanus
Tehuantepec jackrabbit, Lepus flavigularis
Granada hare, Lepus granatensis
Abyssinian hare, Lepus habessinicus
Woolly hare, Lepus oiostolus
Scrub hare, Lepus saxatilis
White-tailed jackrabbit, Lepus townsendii
Genus †Serengetilagus
†Serengetilagus praecapensis
Genus †Aztlanolagus
†Aztlanolagus agilis
Predation
Predators
of rabbits and hares include raccoons, snakes, eagles, canids, cats,
mustelids, owls and hawks. Animals that eat roadkill rabbits include
vultures and buzzards.
See also
iconRabbits and hares portal
Mara (mammal)
Viscacha
References
Hoffman,
R.S.; Smith, A.T. (2005). "Order Lagomorpha". In Wilson, D.E.; Reeder,
D.M (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic
Reference (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 194–211. ISBN
978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494.
Chapman, J.; Schneider, E. (1984).
MacDonald, D. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Mammals. New York: Facts on
File. pp. 714–719. ISBN 978-0-87196-871-5.
Ralls, Katherine (June
1976). "Mammals in Which Females are Larger Than Males". The Quarterly
Review of Biology. 51 (2): 245–276. doi:10.1086/409310. PMID 785524.
S2CID 25927323.
Best, Troy L.; Henry, Travis Hill (1994). "Lepus
arcticus". Mammalian Species. American Society of Mammalogists
(published 2 June 1994) (457): 1–9. doi:10.2307/3504088. JSTOR 3504088.
OCLC 46381503.
"Snowshoe Hare". eNature: FieldGuides. eNature.com.
2007. Archived from the original on 16 January 2009. Retrieved 23 March
2008.
Chapman, Joseph A. (1 September 1984). "Latitude and Gestation
Period in New World Rabbits (Leporidae: Sylvilagus and Romerolagus)".
The American Naturalist. 124 (3): 442–445. doi:10.1086/284286. JSTOR
2461471. S2CID 83584955.
Virgós, Emilio; Cabezas-Díaz, Sara;
Blanco-Aguiar, José Antonio (1 August 2006). "Evolution of life history
traits in Leporidae: a test of nest predation and seasonality
hypotheses". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 88 (4): 603–610.
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00646.x. ISSN 1095-8312.
Savage,
R.J.G.; Long, M.R. (1986). Mammal Evolution: an illustrated guide. New
York: Facts on File. pp. 128–129. ISBN 978-0-8160-1194-0.
Handwerk,
Brian (21 March 2008). "Easter Surprise: World's Oldest Rabbit Bones
Found". National Geographic News. National Geographic Society.
Matthee,
Conrad A.; et al. (2004). "A Molecular Supermatrix of the Rabbits and
Hares (Leporidae) Allows for the Identification of Five Intercontinental
Exchanges During the Miocene". Systematic Biology. 53 (3): 433–477.
doi:10.1080/10635150490445715. PMID 15503672.
A
sovereign case is used for carrying either full or half gold sovereign
coins and often worn on a gentleman's Albert/watch chain and kept in a
waistcoat pocket. The coins would be stacked tightly together by a
spring action mechanism; a case usually holds about 4 or 5 sovereigns.
Some can have a number of compartments holding halves as well as full
sovereigns. They can also be seen combined with vesta and stamp cases.
The cases were at the height of fashion during the late Victorian and
Edwardian period and can be highly decorated or completely plain.
Sovereign (British coin)
Sovereign
United Kingdom
Value £1
Mass 7.98805 g
Diameter 22.0 mm
Thickness 1.52 mm
Edge Milled (some not intended for circulation have plain edge)
Composition .917 gold, .083 copper or other metals
Gold 0.2354 troy oz
Years of minting 1817–present
Mint
marks Various. Found on reverse on exergue between design and date
for Saint George and the Dragon sovereigns, and under the wreath for
shield back sovereigns, or below bust on obverse on earlier Australian
issues.
Obverse
1959 sovereign Elizabeth II obverse.jpg
Design Reigning British monarch (Elizabeth II portrait by Mary Gillick pictured)
Reverse
1959 Elizabeth II sovereign reverse.jpg
Design Saint George and the Dragon
Designer Benedetto Pistrucci
Design date 1817
The
sovereign is a British gold coin with a nominal value of one pound
sterling (£1) and contains 0.2354 troy oz of pure gold. Struck since
1817, it was originally a circulating coin that was accepted in Britain
and elsewhere in the world; it is now a bullion coin and is sometimes
mounted in jewellery. In addition, circulation strikes and proof
examples are often collected for their numismatic value. In most recent
years, it has borne the design of Saint George and the Dragon on the
reverse; the initials (B P) of the designer, Benedetto Pistrucci, are
visible to the right of the date.
The coin was named after the
English gold sovereign, which was last minted about 1603, and originated
as part of the Great Recoinage of 1816. Many in Parliament believed a
one-pound coin should be issued rather than the 21-shilling guinea that
was struck until that time. The Master of the Mint, William Wellesley
Pole had Pistrucci design the new coin; his depiction was also used for
other gold coins. Originally, the coin was unpopular because the public
preferred the convenience of banknotes but paper currency of value £1
was soon limited by law. With that competition gone, the sovereign
became a popular circulating coin, and was used in international trade
and overseas, being trusted as a coin containing a known quantity of
gold.
The British government promoted the use of the sovereign as
an aid to international trade, and the Royal Mint took steps to see
lightweight gold coins were withdrawn from circulation. From the 1850s
until 1932, the sovereign was also struck at colonial mints, initially
in Australia and later in Canada, South Africa and India—they have again
been struck in India for the local market since 2013, in addition to
the production in Britain by the Royal Mint. The sovereigns issued in
Australia initially carried a unique local design but by 1887, all new
sovereigns bore Pistrucci's George and Dragon design. Strikings there
were so large that by 1900, about forty per cent of the sovereigns in
Britain had been minted in Australia.
With the start of the First
World War in 1914, the sovereign vanished from circulation in Britain;
it was replaced by paper money and did not return after the war, though
issues at colonial mints continued until 1932. The coin was still used
in the Middle East and demand rose in the 1950s, to which the Royal Mint
eventually responded by striking new sovereigns in 1957. Since then, it
has been struck both as a bullion coin and beginning in 1979 for
collectors. Although the sovereign is no longer in circulation, it is
still legal tender in the United Kingdom.
Background and authorisation
Gold coin showing a woman seated on a throne
Sovereign of Queen Mary I, c. 1553
There
had been an English coin known as the sovereign, first authorised by
Henry VII in 1489. It had a diameter of 42 millimetres (1.7 in), and
weighed 15.55 grams (0.500 oz t), twice the weight of the existing gold
coin, the ryal. The new coin was struck in response to a large influx of
gold into Europe from West Africa in the 1480s, and Henry at first
called it the double ryal, but soon changed the name to sovereign.[1]
Too great in value to have any practical use in circulation, the
original sovereign likely served as a presentation piece to be given to
dignitaries.[2]
The English sovereign, the country's first coin
to be valued at one pound,[3] was struck by the monarchs of the 16th
century, the size and fineness often being altered. James I, when he
came to the English throne in 1603, issued a sovereign in the year of
his accession,[4] but the following year, soon after he proclaimed
himself King of Great Britain, France[a] and Ireland, he issued a
proclamation for a new twenty-shilling piece. About ten per cent lighter
than the final sovereigns, the new coin was called the unite,
symbolising that James had merged the Scottish and English crowns.[5]
In
the 1660s, following the Restoration of Charles II and the
mechanisation of the Royal Mint that quickly followed, a new
twenty-shilling gold coin was issued. It had no special name at first
but the public soon nicknamed it the guinea and this became the accepted
term.[6] Coins were at the time valued by their precious metal content,
and the price of gold relative to silver rose soon after the guinea's
issuance. Thus, it came to trade at 21 shillings or even sixpence more.
Popular in commerce, the coin's value was set by the government at 21
shillings in silver in 1717, and was subject to revision downwards,
though in practice this did not occur.[7] The term sovereign, referring
to a coin, fell from use—it does not appear in Samuel Johnson's
dictionary, compiled in the 1750s.[8]
Old piece of paper money
A £1 note issued in 1814 by the Gloucester Old Bank
The
British economy was disrupted by the Napoleonic Wars, and gold was
hoarded. Among the measures taken to allow trade to continue was the
issue of one-pound banknotes. The public came to like them as more
convenient than the odd-value guinea. After the war, Parliament, by the
Coinage Act 1816, placed Britain officially on the gold standard, with
the pound to be defined as a given quantity of gold. Almost every
speaker supported having a coin valued at twenty shillings, rather than
continuing to use the guinea.[9] Nevertheless, the Coinage Act did not
specify which coins the Mint should strike.[10] A committee of the Privy
Council recommended gold coins of ten shillings, twenty shillings, two
pounds and five pounds be issued, and this was accepted by George,
Prince Regent on 3 August 1816.[11] The twenty-shilling piece was named a
sovereign, with the resurrection of the old name possibly promoted by
antiquarians with numismatic interests.[8]
Creation
A sovereign with the bust of George III on the obverse and Saint George slaying the dragon on the reverse
1817 sovereign of George III
William
Wellesley Pole, elder brother of the Duke of Wellington, was appointed
Master of the Mint (at that time a junior government position) in 1812,
with a mandate to reform the Royal Mint. Pole had favoured retaining the
guinea, due to the number extant and the amount of labour required to
replace them with sovereigns.[12] Formal instruction to the Mint came
with an indenture dated February 1817, directing the Royal Mint to
strike gold sovereigns.[13] As one troy pound (12 troy ounces) of
22-karat gold used to be minted into 441⁄2 guineas worth 44.5*£11⁄20 =
£4629⁄40, each troy pound of 22K gold was henceforth minted into 46.725
sovereigns, with each coin weighing 7.98805 g (0.256822 ozt, 123.274
grains) and containing 7.32238 g (0.235420 ozt) fine gold.[b]
The
Italian sculptor Benedetto Pistrucci came to London early in 1816. His
talent opened the doors of the capital's elite,[15] among them Lady
Spencer, who showed Pistrucci a model in wax of Saint George and the
Dragon by Nathaniel Marchant and commissioned him to reproduce it in the
Greek style as part of her husband's regalia as a Knight of the Garter.
Pistrucci had already been thinking of such a work, and he produced the
cameo.[16] The model for the saint was an Italian waiter at Brunet's
Hotel in Leicester Square, where he had stayed after coming to
London.[17]
In 1816, Pole hired Pistrucci to create models for
the new coinage.[18] After completing Lady Spencer's commission, by most
accounts, Pistrucci suggested to Pole that an appropriate subject for
the sovereign would be Saint George.[19][20] He created a head, in
jasper, of King George III, to be used as model for the sovereign and
the smaller silver coins. He had prepared a model in wax of Saint George
and the Dragon for use on the crown; this was adapted for the
sovereign. The Royal Mint's engravers were not able to successfully
reproduce Pistrucci's imagery in steel, and the sculptor undertook the
engraving of the dies himself.[21]
Pistrucci's George and Dragon design
The Saint George and Dragon design sketched on paper
Pistrucci's original sketch for the sovereign
Pistrucci's
design for the reverse of the sovereign features Saint George on
horseback. His left hand clutches the rein of the horse's bridle, and he
does not wear armour, other than on his lower legs and feet, with his
toes bare. Further protection is provided by the helmet, with, on early
issues, a streamer or plume of hair floating behind. Also flowing behind
the knight is his chlamys, or cloak; it is fastened in front by a
fibula. George's right shoulder bears a balteus for suspending the
gladius, the sword that he grasps in his right hand.[22] He is otherwise
naked[23]—the art critic John Ruskin later considered it odd that the
saint should be unclothed going into such a violent encounter.[24] The
saint's horse appears to be half attacking, half shrinking from the
dragon, which lies wounded by George's spear and in the throes of
death.[23]
A gold coin with a man's head on one side and a crowned heraldic shield on the other
The sovereign replaced the guinea.
The
original 1817 design had the saintly knight still carrying part of his
broken spear. This was changed to a sword when the garter that
originally surrounded the design was eliminated in 1821, and George is
intended to have broken his spear earlier in the encounter with the
dragon.[25] Also removed in 1821 was the plume of hair, or streamer,
behind George's helmet; it was restored in 1887,[26] modified in 1893
and 1902,[22] and eliminated in 2009.[27]
The George and Dragon
design is in the Neoclassical style. When Pistrucci created the coin,
Neoclassicism was all the rage in London, and he may have been inspired
by the Elgin Marbles, which were exhibited from 1807, and which he
probably saw soon after his arrival in London. Pistrucci's sovereign was
unusual for a British coin of the 19th century in not having a heraldic
design, but this was consistent with Pole's desire to make the
sovereign look as different from the guinea as possible.[28]
Circulation years (1817–1914)
Early years (1817–1837)
"Whereas We have thought fit to order that certain Pieces of Gold Money
should be coined, which should be called 'Sovereigns or Twenty Shilling
Pieces', each of which should be of the Value of Twenty Shillings, and
that each Piece should be of the Weight of Five Pennyweights Three
Grains 2,740⁄10,000 Troy Weight of Standard Gold ... And We have further
thought fit to order that every such Piece of Gold Money, so ordered to
be coined as aforesaid, shall have for the Obverse Impression the Head
of His Majesty, with the Inscription 'Georgius III. D.G: Britanniar.
Rex. F. D.' and the Date of the Year; and for the Reverse the Image of
St. George armed sitting on Horseback encountering the Dragon with a
Spear, the said Device being placed within the ennobled Garter, bearing
the Motto 'Honi soit qui mal y pense', with a newly invented Graining on
the Edge of the Piece."
—Proclamation of George, Prince Regent
1 July 1817[29]
When
the sovereign entered circulation in late 1817, it was not initially
popular, as the public preferred the convenience of the banknotes the
sovereign had been intended to replace. Lack of demand meant that
mintages dropped from 2,347,230 in 1818 to 3,574 the following year.[30]
Another reason why few sovereigns were struck in 1819 was a proposal,
eventually rejected, by economist David Ricardo to eliminate gold as a
coinage metal, though making it available on demand from the Bank of
England. Once this plan was abandoned in 1820, the Bank encouraged the
circulation of gold sovereigns, but acceptance among the British public
was slow. As difficulties over the exchange of wartime banknotes were
overcome, the sovereign became more popular, and with low-value
banknotes becoming scarcer, in 1826 Parliament prohibited the issuance
of notes with a value of less than five pounds in England and Wales.[31]
The
early sovereigns were heavily exported; in 1819, Robert Peel estimated
that of the some £5,000,000 in gold struck in France since the previous
year, three-quarters of the gold used had come from the new British
coinage, melted down.[31] Many more sovereigns were exported to France
in the 1820s as the metal alloyed with the gold included silver, which
could be profitably recovered, with the gold often returned to Britain
and struck again into sovereigns. Beginning in 1829, the Mint was able
to eliminate the silver, but the drain on sovereigns from before then
continued.[32]
George III died in January 1820, succeeded by
George, Prince Regent, as George IV. Mint officials decided to continue
to use the late king's head on coinage for the remainder of the
year.[33] For King George IV's coinage, Pistrucci modified the George
and Dragon reverse, eliminating the surrounding Garter ribbon and motto,
with a reeded border substituted. Pistrucci also modified the figure of
the saint, placing a sword in his hand in place of the broken lance
seen previously, eliminating the streamer from his helmet, and refining
the look of the cloak.[34]
The obverse design for George IV's
sovereigns featured a "Laureate head" of George IV, based on the bust
Pistrucci had prepared for the Coronation medal. The new version was
authorised by an Order in Council of 5 May 1821. These were struck every
year between 1821 and 1825, but the king was unhappy with the depiction
of him and requested a new one be prepared, based on a more flattering
bust by Francis Chantrey. Pistrucci refused to copy the work of another
artist and was barred from further work on the coinage. Second Engraver
(later Chief Engraver) William Wyon was assigned to translate Chantrey's
bust into a coin design, and the new sovereign came into use during
1825. It did not bear the George and Dragon design, as the new Master of
the Mint, Thomas Wallace, disliked several of the current coinage
designs, and had Jean Baptiste Merlen of the Royal Mint prepare new
reverse designs.[35] The new reverse for the sovereign featured the
Ensigns Armorial, or royal arms of the United Kingdom, crowned, with the
lions of England seen in two of the quarters, balanced by those of
Scotland and the harp of Ireland. Set on the shield are the arms of
Hanover,[c] again crowned, depicting the armorial bearings of Brunswick,
Lüneburg and Celle. The George and Dragon design would not again appear
on the sovereign until 1871.[36]
William IV's accession in 1830
upon the death of his brother George IV led to new designs for the
sovereign, with the new king's depiction engraved by William Wyon based
on a bust by Chantrey. Two slightly different busts were used, with what
is usually called the "first bust" used for most 1831 circulating
pieces (the first year of production) and some from 1832, with the
"second bust" used for the prototype pattern coins that year, as well as
for proof coins of 1831, some from 1832 and taking over entirely by
1833. The reverse shows another depiction by Merlen of the Ensigns
Armorial, with the date accompanied by the Latin word Anno, or "in the
year". These were struck every year until the year of the king's death,
1837.[37]
Victorian era
Gold coin with Queen Victoria on the obverse and the royal shield within a wreath on the other
1842 "Shield reverse" sovereign
The
accession of Queen Victoria in 1837 ended the personal union between
Britain and Hanover, as under the latter's Salic Law, a woman could not
take the Hanoverian throne. Thus, both sides of the sovereign had to be
changed.[38] Wyon designed his "Young head" portrait of the Queen, which
he engraved, for the obverse, and Merlen engraved the reverse,
depicting the royal arms inside a wreath, and likely played some part in
designing it. The new coin was approved on 26 February 1838, and with
the exception of 1840 and 1867, the "shield back" sovereign was struck
at the Royal Mint in London every year from 1838 to 1874.[39] Sovereigns
struck in London with the shield design between 1863 and 1874 bear
small numbers under the shield, representing which coinage die was used.
Records of why the numbers were used are not known to survive, with one
widely printed theory that they were used to track die wear.[40] George
Frederick Ansell states in his 1870 book The Royal Mint, Its Workings,
Conduct, And Operations Fully And Practically Explained that "the
reverse die has been made to carry, in addition to its recognised
device, a small number, with a view to determine at which coining press,
and on what particular day, the numbered die was used, that bad work
might be traced to an individual."[41]
By 1850, some £94 million
in sovereigns and half sovereigns had been struck and circulated widely,
well beyond Britain's shores, a dispersion aided by the British
government, who saw the sovereign's use as an auxiliary to their
imperialist ambitions. Gold is a soft metal, and the hazards of
circulation tended to make sovereigns lightweight over time. In 1838,
when the legacy of James Smithson was converted into gold in preparation
for transmission to the United States, American authorities requested
recently-struck sovereigns, likely to maximise the quantity of gold when
the sovereigns were melted after arrival in the United States.[42]
The
weight of a newly-struck sovereign was intended to be 123.274 grains
(7.98805 g). It ceased to be legal currency for £1 if found to weigh
less than 1221⁄2 grains[43][d] (i.e. a deficiency of 11⁄2 pence in gold
per sovereign). By the early 1840s, the Bank of England estimated that
twenty per cent of the gold coins that came into its hands were
lightweight. In part to boost the sovereign's reputation in trade, the
Bank undertook a programme of recoinage, melting lightweight gold coins
and using the gold for new, full-weight ones.[42] Between 1842 and 1845,
the Bank withdrew and had recoined some £14 million in lightweight
gold, about one-third the amount of that metal in circulation. This not
only kept the sovereign to standard, it probably removed most of the
remaining guineas still in commerce.[47] The unlucky holder of a
lightweight gold coin could only turn it in as bullion, would lose at
least 11⁄2 pence because of the lightness and often had to pay an equal
amount to cover the Bank of England's costs.[48] There was also
increased quality control within the Royal Mint; by 1866, every gold and
silver coin was weighed individually.[49] The result of these efforts
was that the sovereign became, in Sir John Clapham's later phrase, the
"chief coin of the world".[50]
The California Gold Rush and other
discoveries of the 1840s and 1850s boosted the amount of available gold
and also the number of sovereigns struck, with £150 million in
sovereigns and half sovereigns coined between 1850 and 1875. The wear
problem continued: it was estimated that, on average, a sovereign became
lightweight after fifteen years in circulation. The Coinage Act 1870
tightened standards at the Royal Mint, requiring sovereigns to be
individually tested at the annual Trial of the Pyx rather than in
bulk.[51] These standards resulted in a high rejection rate for newly
coined sovereigns, though less than for the half sovereign, which
sometimes exceeded 50 per cent.[52] When the Royal Mint was rebuilt in
1882, a decisive factor in shutting down production for renovation
rather than moving to a new mint elsewhere was the Bank of England's
report that there was an abnormally large stock of sovereigns and that
no harm would result if they could not be coined in London for a
year.[53] Advances in technology allowed sovereigns to be individually
weighed by automated machines at the Bank of England by the 1890s, and
efforts to keep the coin at full weight were aided by an 1889 Act of
Parliament which allowed redemption of lightweight gold coin at full
face value, with the loss from wear to fall upon the government.[51] The
Coinage Act 1889 also authorised the Bank of England to redeem worn
gold coins from before Victoria's reign, but on 22 November 1890 all
gold coins from before her reign were called in by Royal Proclamation
and demonetised effective 28 February 1891.[54] Owing to an ongoing
programme to melt and recoin lightweight pieces, estimates of sovereigns
in trade weighing less than the legal minimum had fallen to about four
per cent by 1900.[51]
A metal balance with slots
Counterfeit detector. A fake will pass one test (weight or fit) and fail the other.
The
sovereign was seen in fiction: in Dickens' Oliver Twist, Mrs Bumble is
paid £25 in sovereigns her information. Joseph Conrad, in his novels set
in Latin America, refers several times to ship's captains keeping
sovereigns as a ready store of value. Although many sovereigns were
melted down for recoining on reaching a foreign land (as were those for
the Smithsonian) it was regarded as a circulating coin in dozens of
British colonies and even in nations such as Brazil and Portugal;[55]
the latter accepted it at a value of 4,500 reis.[56]
In 1871, the
Deputy Master of the Mint, Charles Fremantle, restored the Pistrucci
George and Dragon design to the sovereign, as part of a drive to
beautify the coinage.[57] The return of Saint George was approved by the
Queen, and authorised by an Order in Council dated 14 January 1871. The
two designs were struck side by side in London from 1871 to 1874, and
at the Australian branch mints until 1887, after which the Pistrucci
design alone was used.[58] The saint returned to the rarely-struck two-
and five-pound pieces in 1887, and was placed on the half sovereign in
1893.[59] Wyon's "Young head" of Queen Victoria for the sovereign's
obverse was struck from 1838 until 1887, when it was replaced by the
"Jubilee head" by Joseph Boehm.[60] That obverse was criticised and was
replaced in 1893 by the "Old head" by Thomas Brock.[61] Victoria's death
in 1901 led to a new obverse for her son and successor, Edward VII by
George William de Saulles, which began production in 1902; Edward's
death in 1910 necessitated a new obverse for his son, George V by
Bertram Mackennal. Pistrucci's George and Dragon design continued on the
reverse.[62]
Branch mint coinage
Gold coin with a crown on one side and the denomination of one pound on the other
The 1852 Adelaide Pound (on average) contains 8.75 grams of gold (0.9170 fine) and weighs 0.2580 of an ounce.[63]
The
1851 discovery of gold in Australia quickly led to calls from the local
populace for the establishment of a branch of the Royal Mint in the
colonies there. Authorities in Adelaide did not wait for London to act,
but set up an assay office, striking what became known as the "Adelaide
Pound". In 1853, an Order in Council approved the establishment of the
Sydney Mint; the Melbourne Mint would follow in 1872, and the Perth Mint
in 1899.[64] The act which regulated currency in New South Wales came
into force on 18 July 1855 and stipulated that the gold coins were to be
called sovereigns and half sovereigns. They were also to be the same
weight, fineness and value as other sovereigns.[65]
Sovereign, 1855,
from original gold coin, Sydney Mint, State Library of New South Wales,
[http://archival.sl.nsw.gov.au/Details/archive/110493273 SAFE/DN/C 1
Early
issues for Sydney, until 1870, depicted a bust of Victoria similar to
those struck in Britain, but with a wreath of banksia, native to
Australia, in her hair. The reverse was distinctive as well, with the
name of the mint, the word AUSTRALIA and the denomination ONE SOVEREIGN
on the reverse.[64] These coins were not initially legal tender outside
Australia, as there were concerns about the design and about the light
colour of the gold used (due to a higher percentage of silver in the
alloy) but from 1866 Australian sovereigns were legal tender alongside
those struck in London. Beginning in 1870, the designs were those used
in London, though with a mint mark "S" or "M" (or, later, "P") denoting
their origin. The mints at Melbourne and Sydney were allowed to continue
striking the shield design even though it had been abandoned at the
London facility, and did so until 1887 due to local popularity. The
large issues of the colonial mints meant that by 1900, about forty per
cent of the sovereigns circulating in Britain were from
Australia.[64][66] Dies for the Australian coinage were made at
London.[67]
Gold coin in a red card
2017-I sovereign in card of issue
Following
the Klondike Gold Rush, the Canadian Government asked for the
establishment of a Royal Mint branch in Canada. It was not until 1908
that what is now the Royal Canadian Mint, in Ottawa, opened, and it
struck sovereigns with the mint mark "C" from 1908 to 1919, except 1912
and 1915, each year in small numbers.[68] Branch mints at Bombay (1918;
mint mark "I") and Pretoria (1923–1932; mint mark "SA") also struck
sovereigns. Melbourne and Perth stopped striking sovereigns after 1931,
with Sydney having closed in 1926.[69] The 1932 sovereigns struck at
Pretoria were the last to be issued intended as currency at their face
value.[70]
To address the high demand for gold coins in the
Indian market, which does not allow gold coins to be imported,[71] the
minting of gold sovereigns in India with mint mark I has resumed since
2013. Indian/Swiss joint venture company MMTC-PAMP mints under licence
in its facility close to Delhi with full quality control from the Royal
Mint.[72] The coins are legal tender in the United Kingdom.[73]
Trade coin (1914–1979)
Poster depicting the gold sovereign with text urging support for the British cause in the First World War
First World War propaganda poster featuring the sovereign coin
In
the late 19th century, several Chancellors of the Exchequer had
questioned the wisdom of having much of Britain's stock of gold used in
coinage. Lord Randolph Churchill proposed relying less on gold coinage
and moving to high-value silver coins, and the short-lived double florin
or four-shilling piece is a legacy of his views. Churchill's successor,
George Goschen, urged issuing banknotes to replace the gold coins,
saying he preferred £20 million in gold in the Bank of England to thirty
million sovereigns in the hands of the public. Fears that widespread
forgery of banknotes would shake confidence in the pound ended his
proposal.[74]
In March 1914, John Maynard Keynes noted that the
large quantities of gold arriving from South Africa were making the
sovereign even more important. "The combination of the demand for
sovereigns in India and Egypt with London's situation as the
distributing centre of the South African gold is rapidly establishing
the sovereign as the predominant gold coin of the world. Possibly it may
be destined to hold in the future the same kind of international
position as was held for several centuries, in the days of a silver
standard, by the Mexican dollar."[75]
As Britain moved towards
war in the July Crisis of 1914, many sought to convert Bank of England
notes into gold, and the bank's reserves of the metal fell from £27
million on 29 July to £11 million on 1 August. Following the declaration
of war against Germany on 4 August, the government circulated one-pound
and ten-shilling banknotes in place of the sovereign and half
sovereign.[76] Restrictions were placed on sending gold abroad, and the
melting-down of coin made an offence.[77] Not all were enthusiastic
about the change from gold to paper: J.J. Cullimore Allen, in his 1965
book on sovereigns, recalled meeting his first payroll after the change
to banknotes, with the workers dubious about the banknotes and initially
asking to be paid in gold. Allen converted five sovereigns from his own
pocket into notes, and the workers made no further objection.[78]
Conversion into gold was not forbidden, but the Chancellor, David Lloyd
George, made it clear that such actions would be unpatriotic and would
harm the war effort. Few insisted on payment in gold in the face of such
appeals, and by mid-1915, the sovereign was rarely seen in London
commerce. The coin was depicted on propaganda posters, which urged
support for the war.[76]
Although sovereigns continued to be
struck at London until the end of 1917, they were mostly held as part of
the nation's gold reserves, or were paid out for war debts to the
United States.[79] They were still used as currency in some foreign
countries, especially in the Middle East.[80] Sovereigns continued to be
struck at the Australian mints, where different economic circumstances
prevailed. After the war, the sovereign did not return to commerce in
Britain, with the pieces usually worth more as gold than as currency. In
1925, the Chancellor, Winston Churchill, secured the passage of the
Gold Standard Act 1925, restoring Britain to that standard, but with
gold to be kept in reserve rather than as a means of circulation. The
effort failed—Churchill regarded it as the worst mistake of his life—but
some lightweight sovereigns were melted and restruck dated 1925, and
were released only later. Many of the Australian pieces struck in the
postwar period were to back currency, while the South African sovereigns
were mostly for export and to pay workers at the gold mines.[81][82]
By
the time Edward VIII came to the throne in 1936, there was no question
of issuing sovereigns for circulation, but pieces were prepared as part
of the traditional proof set of coins issued in the coronation year.
With a bust of King Edward by Humphrey Paget and the date 1937, these
sovereigns were not authorised by royal proclamation prior to Edward
VIII's abdication in December 1936, and are considered pattern
coins.[83] Extremely rare, one sold in 2020 for £1,000,000, setting what
was then a record (since broken) for a British coin.[84][85] Sovereigns
in proof condition dated 1937 were struck for Edward's brother and
successor, George VI, also designed by Paget, the only sovereigns to
bear George's effigy. The 1925-dated George V sovereign was restruck in
1949, 1951 and 1952, lowering the value of the original, of which only a
few had hitherto been known.[86] These were struck to meet the need for
sovereigns, and to maintain the skills of the Royal Mint in striking
them.[87]
The sovereign remained popular as a trade coin in the
Middle East and elsewhere following the Second World War. The small
strikings of 1925-dated sovereigns in the postwar period were not enough
to meet the demand, which was met in part by counterfeiters in Europe
and the Middle East, who often put full value of gold in the pieces. A
counterfeiting prosecution was brought, to which the defence was made
that the sovereign was no longer a current coin. The judge directed an
acquittal although the sovereign remained legal tender under the Coinage
Act 1870.[88]
Sovereigns were struck in 1953, the coronation
year of Elizabeth II, bearing the portrait of her by Mary Gillick,
though the gold pieces were placed only in the major museums.[89] A 1953
sovereign sold at auction in 2014 for £384,000.[73] In 1957, the
Treasury decided to defend the status of the sovereign, both by
continuing prosecutions and by issuing new pieces with the current
date.[89] Elizabeth II sovereigns bearing Gillick's portrait were struck
as bullion pieces between 1957 and 1959, and from 1962 to 1968.[90] The
counterfeiting problem was minimised by the striking of about
45,000,000 sovereigns by 1968, and efforts by Treasury solicitors which
resulted in the sovereign's acceptance as legal tender by the highest
courts of several European nations.[91] In 1966, the Wilson government
placed restrictions on the holding of gold coins to prevent hoarding
against inflation, with collectors required to obtain a licence from the
Bank of England. This proved ineffective, as it drove gold dealing
underground, and was abandoned in 1970.[92]
The sovereign's role
in popular culture continued: in the 1957 novel From Russia, with Love, Q
issues James Bond with a briefcase, the handle of which contains 50
sovereigns. When held at gunpoint on the Orient Express by Red Grant,
Bond uses the gold to distract Grant, leading to the villain's
undoing.[93] The sovereign survived both decimalisation and the Royal
Mint's move from London to Llantrisant, Wales. The last of the Gillick
sovereigns had been struck in 1968; when production resumed in 1974, it
was with a portrait by Arnold Machin.[94] The last coin minted at Tower
Hill, in 1975, was a sovereign.[95]
Bullion and collectors coin (1979 to present)
From
1979, the sovereign was issued as a coin for the bullion market, but
was also struck by the Royal Mint in proof condition for collectors, and
this issuance of proof coins has continued annually. In 1985, the
Machin portrait of the Queen was replaced by one by Raphael Maklouf.[96]
Striking of bullion sovereigns had been suspended after 1982, and so
the Maklouf portrait, struck every year but 1989 until the end of 1997,
is seen on the sovereign only in proof condition.[97] In 1989, a
commemorative sovereign, the first, was issued for the 500th anniversary
of Henry VII's sovereign. The coin, designed by Bernard Sindall, evokes
the designs of that earlier piece, showing the Queen enthroned and
facing front, as Henry appeared on the old English sovereign. The
reverse of the 1489 piece depicts a double Tudor rose fronted by the
royal arms; a similar design with updated arms graces the reverse of the
1989 sovereign.[98]
Reverse of the 2020 sovereign
Ian
Rank-Broadley designed the fourth bust of the Queen to be used on the
sovereign, and this went into use in 1998 and was used until 2015.
Bullion sovereigns began to be issued again in 2000, and this has
continued.[99] A special reverse design was used in 2002 for the Golden
Jubilee, with an adaptation of the royal arms on a shield by Timothy
Noad recalling the 19th-century "shield back" sovereigns.[100] The years
2005 and 2012 (the latter, the Queen's Diamond Jubilee) saw
interpretations of the George and Dragon design, the first by Noad, the
later by Paul Day. In 2009, the reverse was re-engraved using tools from
the reign of George III in the hope of better capturing Pistrucci's
design.[101] A new portrait of the Queen by Jody Clark was introduced
during 2015, and some sovereigns were issued with the new bust. The most
recent special designs, in 2016 and 2017, were only for collectors. The
2016 collector's piece, for the Queen's 90th birthday, has a
one-year-only portrait of her on the obverse designed by James Butler.
The 2017 collector's piece returned to Pistrucci's original design of
1817 for the modern sovereign's 200th birthday, with the Garter belt and
motto. A piedfort was also minted, and the bullion sovereign struck at
Llantrisant, though retaining the customary design, was given a privy
mark with the number 200.[102][103] For 2022, a reverse design by Noad
in honour of the Queen's Platinum Jubilee, depicting his interpretation
of the Royal Coat of Arms was used.[104]
In 2017, a collection of
633 gold sovereigns and 280 half sovereigns was discovered to have been
hoarded inside an upright piano which had been donated to a community
college in Shropshire, England.[105] The coins, which date from 1847 to
1915, were found by a technician who had been asked to tune the piano,
'stitched into seven cloth packets and a leather drawstring purse' under
the piano's keyboard. Despite inquiries being made as to who could have
stored the coins, no owner or claimants were found.
Collecting, other use and tax treatment
A gold coin
Sydney Mint sovereign, 1857
Many
of the variant designs of the sovereign since 1989 have been intended
to appeal to coin collectors, as have the other gold coins based on the
sovereign, from the quarter sovereign to the five-sovereign piece. To
expedite matters, the Royal Mint is authorised to sell gold sovereigns
directly to the public, rather than having its output channelled through
the Bank of England as was once the case.[106] As a legal tender coin,
the sovereign is exempt from capital gains tax for UK residents.[107]
As
well as being used as a circulating coin, the sovereign has entered
fashion: some men in the 19th century placed one on their pocket watch
chains (seen as a sign of integrity),[108] and others carried them in a
small purse linked to the chain.[109] These customs vanished with the
popularisation of the wrist watch. Women also have worn sovereigns, as
bangles or ear rings.[108] In the 21st century, the wearing of a
sovereign ring has been seen as a sign of chav culture.[110]
The
staff carried by the Gentleman or Lady Usher of the Black Rod (known as
Black Rod) as a symbol of office, and used to strike the door of the
House of Commons of the United Kingdom during the State Opening of
Parliament, has a sovereign inset into one of its ends.[111]
Coin
auction houses deal in rare sovereigns of earlier date, as do
specialist dealers.[112] As well as the 1937 Edward VIII and 1953
Elizabeth II sovereigns, rare dates in the series include the 1819,[113]
and the 1863 piece with the number "827" on the obverse in place of
William Wyon's initials. The 827 likely is an ingot number, used for
some sort of experiment, though research has not conclusively
established this.[114] Few 1879 sovereigns were struck at London, and
those that remain are often well-worn.[58] Only 24,768 of the Adelaide
Pound were struck; surviving specimens are rare and highly prized.[115]
The sovereign itself has been the subject of commemoration; in 2005, the
Perth Mint issued a gold coin with face value A$25, reproducing the
reverse design of the pre-1871 Sydney Mint sovereigns.[116]
See also
iconMoney portal Numismatics portal flagUnited Kingdom portal
Crown gold
Gold Britannia coin
Krugerrand
Notes
A historic claim only. See Hubbard.
The
indenture, dated 6 February 1817, directed that there be 9341⁄2
sovereigns struck from twenty troy pounds of standard gold - or 46.725
sovereigns to a troy pound.[14]
The British monarch also ruled Hanover between 1714 and 1837. See Seaby, pp. 134, 153.
Changed in 1821 from a minimum weight of 122.75 grains as experience
had shown that to be two small a tolerance, and reaffirmed at the 1821
figure in 1838[44][45] and in 1843.[46]
References
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 61.
"Tudor sovereign". The Royal Mint Museum. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
Clancy, p. 15.
Marsh 2017, pp. 3–4.
Clancy, p. 41.
Clancy, p. 45.
Clancy, p. 47.
Clancy, p. 57.
Clancy, pp. 52–55.
Seaby, pp. 116–117.
Marsh 2017, p. 7.
Clancy, p. 55.
Clancy, p. 56.
"Parliamentary Papers". Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 1866. p. 27.
ODNB.
Marsh 1996, p. 15.
Farey September 2014, p. 52.
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 91.
Clancy, p. 58.
Rodgers, pp. 43–44.
Marsh 2017, p. 8.
Allen, p. 13.
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 92.
Clancy, p. 63.
Marsh 2017, pp. 10–16.
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 109.
Marsh 2017, p. 101.
Clancy, pp. 62–63.
Ruding,
Rogers (1819). Supplement to the Annals of the Coinage of Britain.
London: John Nichols and Son. pp. 47–48. OCLC 778858975. Archived from
the original on 19 February 2018.
Rodgers, p. 44.
Clancy, pp. 64–67.
Craig, p. 304.
Marsh 2017, p. 13.
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 98.
Clancy, pp. 66–67.
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 99.
Marsh 2017, pp. 21–27.
Clancy, p. 69.
Marsh 2017, pp. 27–38.
Marsh 2017, pp. 31, 29.
Ansell 1870, p. 66.
Clancy, pp. 70–71.
Seyd,
Ernest (1868). Bullion and Foreign Exchanges Theoretically and
Practically Considered: Followed by a Defence of the Double Valuation,
with Special Reference to the Proposed System of Universal Coinage. E.
Wilson. p. 291. OCLC 574480898.
Ruding, Rogers (1819). Supplement to
the Annals of the Coinage of Britain. London: John Nichols and Son. p.
48. OCLC 778858975. Archived from the original on 19 February 2018.
Ruding,
Rogers (1840). Supplement to the Annals of the Coinage of Britain. Vol.
2 (Third ed.). London: John Hearne. pp. 128, 132. OCLC 771752141.
"By the Queen, a Proclamation". London Gazette. 10 October 1843. p. 3284.
Dyer & Gaspar, p. 484.
Craig, p. 310.
Craig, p. 322.
Dyer & Gaspar, p. 511.
Clancy, pp. 76–77.
Dyer & Gaspar, pp. 520–521.
Dyer & Gaspar, p. 525.
Hayter, p. 433.
Clancy, pp. 73, 78–79, 85.
Browne, W. A. (1899). "The Merchants' Handbook of Money, Weights and Measures, with Their British Equivalents".
Clancy, p. 73.
Marsh 2017, p. 47.
Clancy, p. 65.
Marsh 2017, pp. 47, 57.
Marsh 2017, p. 64.
Marsh 2017, pp. 69, 77.
Cuhaj,
George S., ed. (2009). Standard Catalog of World Coins 1801–1900 (6
ed.). Iola, Wisconsin: Krause Publications. p. 82. ISBN
978-0-89689-940-7.
Celtel & Gullbekk, pp. 131–132.
Pamphlets
issued by the New South Wales Commissioners for the World's Columbian
Exposition, Chicago (1 ed.). New South Wales. Commission for the World's
Columbian Exposition. 1893. p. 137.
Marsh 2017, pp. 28–29, 64.
Dyer & Gaspar, pp. 530–531.
Marsh 2017, pp. 69–72, 81.
Marsh 2017, pp. 78–87.
Rodgers, p. 46.
"Chindambaram
rules out lifting ban on import of gold coins". The Hindu. 22 October
2013. Archived from the original on 1 March 2014.
"MMTC PAMP
Sovereign web page". MMTC PAMP. 7 September 2014. Archived from the
original on 26 December 2014. Retrieved 21 February 2018.
Rodgers, p. 47.
Clancy, p. 78.
Keynes, p. 155.
Clancy, pp. 89–91.
Josset, pp. 143–144.
Allen, p. 7.
Marsh 2017, p. 77.
Josset, p. 141.
Clancy, pp. 92–93.
Allen, p. 10.
Marsh 2017, pp. 88–89.
"'Never
meant to exist': Edward VIII coin bought for record £1m". The Guardian.
PA Media. 17 January 2020. Retrieved 17 January 2020.
"1937 British
gold sovereign realizes $2.28M record in Heritage March 2021 sale".
CoinNews.net. 29 March 2021. Retrieved 30 March 2021.
Marsh 2017, pp. 90–91.
Clancy, p. 95.
Allen, pp. 15–16.
Clancy, pp. 95–97.
Marsh 2017, p. 97.
Dyer & Gaspar, p. 598.
Seaby, p. 173.
Clancy, pp. 94–95.
Marsh 2017, pp. 94, 97–98.
Clancy, p. 99.
Celtel & Gullbekk, pp. 116–117.
Marsh 2017, pp. 98–99.
Celtel & Gullbekk, pp. 118–119.
Marsh 2017, pp. 100–101.
Clancy, p. 102.
Marsh 2017, pp. 104–105.
Marsh 2017, pp. 95–96, 106.
Clancy, pp. 102–103.
Alexander,
Michael (15 November 2021). "United Kingdom: New 2022 gold sovereigns
released — the first coins in the Platinum Jubilee Collection". Coin
Update. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
Davies, Caroline (20 April 2017).
"Mystery gold sovereign hoard found in piano declared to be treasure".
The Guardian. Retrieved 2 February 2019.
Clancy, pp. 99–103.
"Gold and capital gains tax". Royal Mint. 15 November 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2018.
Allen, p. 14.
"Sovereign cases: Sampson Mordan & Co Ltd". Antiques in Oxford. Retrieved 5 October 2020.
Rumsey,
Nichola; Harcourt, Diana, eds. (2014). Oxford Handbook of the
Psychology of Appearance. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Oxford University Press.
p. 12. ISBN 978-0-19-872322-6.
"Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod". Armchair Travel Complany. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
Marsh 2017, pp. 186–192.
Marsh 2017, p. 10.
Marsh 2017, p. 31.
Allen, pp. 56–57.
Celtel & Gullbekk, p. 133.
Bibliography
Allen, James John Cullimore (1965). Sovereigns of the British Empire.
London, United Kingdom: Spink & Son, Ltd. OCLC 493287074.
Ansell, G. F. (1870). The Royal Mint: its working, conduct, and
operations, fully and practically explained. London: Effingham Wilson.
Celtel, André; Gullbekk, Svein H. (2006). The Sovereign and its Golden
Antecedents. Oslo, Norway: Monetarius. ISBN 978-82-996755-6-7.
Clancy, Kevin (2017) [2015]. A History of the Sovereign: Chief Coin of
the World (second ed.). Llantrisant, Wales: Royal Mint Museum. ISBN
978-1-869917-00-5.
Craig, John (2010) [1953]. The Mint (paperback
ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN
978-0-521-17077-2.
Dyer, G.P.; Gaspar, G.P. (1992), "Reform, the
New Technology and Tower Hill", in Challis, C.E. (ed.), A New History of
the Royal Mint, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press,
pp. 398–606, ISBN 978-0-521-24026-0
Farey, Roderick (September 2014). "Benedetto Pistrucci (1782–1855), Part 1". Coin News: 51–53.
Hayter, Henry Heylyn (1891). Victorian Year-Book for 1890–91 (18th ed.). Melbourne: Sands & McDougall Ltd.
Hubbard, Arnold (14 July 2003). "How George III lost France: Or, Why
Concessions Never Make Sense". Electric Review: A High Tory Online
Journal of Politics, Art and Literature. Archived from the original on 5
December 2008.
Josset, Christopher Robert (1962). Money in Britain. London: Frederick Warne and Co Ltd. OCLC 923302099.
Keynes, John Maynard (March 1914). "Currency in 1912". The Economic
Journal. Royal Economic Society. 24 (93): 152–157. doi:10.2307/2221837.
JSTOR 2221837.
Marsh, Michael A. (1996). Benedetto Pistrucci:
Principal Engraver and Chief Medallist of the Royal Mint, 1783–1855.
Hardwick, Cambridgeshire: Michael A. Marsh (Publications). ISBN
978-0-9506929-2-0.
Marsh, Michael A. (2017) [1980]. The Gold
Sovereign (revised ed.). Exeter, Devon: Token Publishing Ltd. ISBN
978-1-908828-36-1.
Pollard, Graham (2004). "Pistrucci,
Benedetto". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford
University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/22314. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
Rodgers, Kerry (June 2017). "Britain's Gold Sovereign". Coin News: 43–47.
Seaby, Peter (1985). The Story of British Coinage. London: B. A. Seaby Ltd. ISBN 978-0-900652-74-5.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sovereign (British coin).
The Sovereign | The Royal Mint
Gold Sovereign History | The Royal Mint
Benedetto Pistrucci – Historical Royal Mint Artists | The Royal Mint Museum
Gold Sovereigns | CoinParade
Sovereign (Pre-Decimal), Coin Type from United Kingdom
vte
Sterling coinage
Decimal
1/2p 1p 2p 5p 10p 20p 50p £1 £2
Pre-decimal
Quarter farthing (1/16d) Third farthing (1/12d) Half farthing (1/8d)
Farthing (1/4d) Halfpenny (1/2d) Penny (1d) Three halfpence (1+1/2d)
Twopence (2d) Threepence (3d) Fourpence (4d) Sixpence (6d) Shilling
(1/–) Fifteen pence (1/3d) Florin (2/–) Half crown (2/6d) Double florin
(4/–) Crown (5/–) Quarter guinea (5/3d) Third guinea (7/–) Half
sovereign (10/–) Half guinea (10/6d) Sovereign (£1) Guinea (£1/1/–)
Double sovereign (£2) Two guineas (£2/2/–) Five pounds (£5) Five guineas
(£5/5/–)
Non-circulating
Commemorative
25p £5 £10 £20 £25 £50 £100 £200 £500 £1000 Maundy money
Bullion
Britannia Quarter sovereign Half sovereign Sovereign Double sovereign
Quintuple sovereign Lunar The Queen's Beasts Landmarks of Britain
See also
Sterling Sterling banknotes List of British banknotes and coins List of
British currencies Jubilee coinage Old Head coinage Scottish coinage
Coins of Ireland List of people on coins of the United Kingdom
Authority control: National libraries Edit this at Wikidata
Israel United States
Categories:
British gold coinsCoins of AustraliaOne-base-unit coinsBullion coinsSaint George and the Dragon
Owls
are birds from the order Strigiformes (/ˈstrɪdʒəfɔːrmiːz/), which
includes over 200 species of mostly solitary and nocturnal birds of prey
typified by an upright stance, a large, broad head, binocular vision,
binaural hearing, sharp talons, and feathers adapted for silent flight.
Exceptions include the diurnal northern hawk-owl and the gregarious
burrowing owl.
Owls hunt mostly small mammals, insects, and other
birds, although a few species specialize in hunting fish. They are
found in all regions of the Earth except the polar ice caps and some
remote islands.
Owls are divided into two families: the true (or typical) owl family, Strigidae, and the barn-owl family, Tytonidae.
A group of owls is called a "parliament".[1]
Anatomy
Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia)
Cross-eyed owl
Owls
possess large, forward-facing eyes and ear-holes, a hawk-like beak, a
flat face, and usually a conspicuous circle of feathers, a facial disc,
around each eye. The feathers making up this disc can be adjusted to
sharply focus sounds from varying distances onto the owls'
asymmetrically placed ear cavities. Most birds of prey have eyes on the
sides of their heads, but the stereoscopic nature of the owl's
forward-facing eyes permits the greater sense of depth perception
necessary for low-light hunting. Although owls have binocular vision,
their large eyes are fixed in their sockets—as are those of most other
birds—so they must turn their entire heads to change views. As owls are
farsighted, they are unable to clearly see anything within a few
centimeters of their eyes. Caught prey can be felt by owls with the use
of filoplumes—hairlike feathers on the beak and feet that act as
"feelers". Their far vision, particularly in low light, is exceptionally
good.
Owls can rotate their heads and necks as much as 270°.
Owls have 14 neck vertebrae compared to seven in humans, which makes
their necks more flexible. They also have adaptations to their
circulatory systems, permitting rotation without cutting off blood to
the brain: the foramina in their vertebrae through which the vertebral
arteries pass are about 10 times the diameter of the artery, instead of
about the same size as the artery as in humans; the vertebral arteries
enter the cervical vertebrae higher than in other birds, giving the
vessels some slack, and the carotid arteries unite in a very large
anastomosis or junction, the largest of any bird's, preventing blood
supply from being cut off while they rotate their necks. Other
anastomoses between the carotid and vertebral arteries support this
effect.[2][3]
The smallest owl—weighing as little as 31 g (1+3⁄32
oz) and measuring some 13.5 cm (5+1⁄4 in)—is the elf owl (Micrathene
whitneyi).[4] Around the same diminutive length, although slightly
heavier, are the lesser known long-whiskered owlet (Xenoglaux loweryi)
and Tamaulipas pygmy owl (Glaucidium sanchezi).[4] The largest owls are
two similarly sized eagle owls; the Eurasian eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) and
Blakiston's fish owl (Bubo blakistoni). The largest females of these
species are 71 cm (28 in) long, have a 190 cm (75 in) wing span, and
weigh 4.2 kg (9+1⁄4 lb).[4][5][6][7][8]
Different species of owls
produce different sounds; this distribution of calls aids owls in
finding mates or announcing their presence to potential competitors, and
also aids ornithologists and birders in locating these birds and
distinguishing species. As noted above, their facial discs help owls to
funnel the sound of prey to their ears. In many species, these discs are
placed asymmetrically, for better directional location.
Owl
plumage is generally cryptic, although several species have facial and
head markings, including face masks, ear tufts, and brightly colored
irises. These markings are generally more common in species inhabiting
open habitats, and are thought to be used in signaling with other owls
in low-light conditions.[9]
Sexual dimorphism
Sexual
dimorphism is a physical difference between males and females of a
species. Females owls are typically larger than the males.[10] The
degree of size dimorphism varies across multiple populations and
species, and is measured through various traits, such as wing span and
body mass.[10] Overall, female owls tend to be slightly larger than
males, for reasons not fully agreed.
One theory suggests that
selection has led males to be smaller because it allows them to be
efficient foragers. The ability to obtain more food is advantageous
during breeding season. In some species, female owls stay at their nest
with their eggs while it is the responsibility of the male to bring back
food to the nest.[11] If food is scarce, the male first feeds himself
before feeding the female.[12] Small birds, which are agile, are an
important source of food for owls. Male burrowing owls have been
observed to have longer wing chords than females, despite being smaller
than females.[12] Furthermore, owls have been observed to be roughly the
same size as their prey.[12] This has also been observed in other
predatory birds,[11] which suggests that owls with smaller bodies and
long wing chords have been selected for because of the increased agility
and speed that allows them to catch their prey.[citation needed]
Another
popular theory suggests that females have not been selected to be
smaller like male owls because of their sexual roles. In many species,
female owls may not leave the nest. Therefore, females may have a larger
mass to allow them to go for a longer period of time without starving.
For example, one hypothesized sexual role is that larger females are
more capable of dismembering prey and feeding it to their young, hence
female owls are larger than their male counterparts.[10]
A
different theory suggests that the size difference between male and
females is due to sexual selection: since large females can choose their
mate and may violently reject a male's sexual advances, smaller male
owls that have the ability to escape unreceptive females are more likely
to have been selected.[12]
If the character is stable, there can
be different optimums for both sexes. Selection operates on both sexes
at the same time; therefore it is necessary to explain not only why one
of the sexes is relatively bigger, but also why the other sex is
smaller.[13] If owls are still evolving toward smaller bodies and longer
wing chords, according to V. Geodakyan's Evolutionary Theory of Sex,
males should be more advanced on these characters. Males are viewed as
an evolutionary vanguard of a population, and sexual dimorphism on the
character, as an evolutionary “distance” between the sexes.
“Phylogenetic rule of sexual dimorphism” states that if there exists a
sexual dimorphism on any character, then the evolution of this trait
goes from the female form toward the male one.[14]
Hunting adaptations
All
owls are carnivorous birds of prey and live on diets of insects, small
rodents and lagomorphs. Some owls are also specifically adapted to hunt
fish. They are very adept in hunting in their respective environments.
Since owls can be found in nearly all parts of the world and across a
multitude of ecosystems, their hunting skills and characteristics vary
slightly from species to species, though most characteristics are shared
among all species.[citation needed]
Flight and feathers
Most
owls share an innate ability to fly almost silently and also more slowly
in comparison to other birds of prey. Most owls live a mainly nocturnal
lifestyle and being able to fly without making any noise gives them a
strong advantage over prey alert to the slightest sound in the night. A
silent, slow flight is not as necessary for diurnal and crepuscular owls
given that prey can usually see an owl approaching. Owls’ feathers are
generally larger than the average birds’ feathers, have fewer radiates,
longer pennulum, and achieve smooth edges with different rachis
structures.[15] Serrated edges along the owl's remiges bring the
flapping of the wing down to a nearly silent mechanism. The serrations
are more likely reducing aerodynamic disturbances, rather than simply
reducing noise.[16] The surface of the flight feathers is covered with a
velvety structure that absorbs the sound of the wing moving. These
unique structures reduce noise frequencies above 2 kHz,[17] making the
sound level emitted drop below the typical hearing spectrum of the owl's
usual prey[17][18] and also within the owl's own best hearing
range.[19][20] This optimizes the owl's ability to silently fly to
capture prey without the prey hearing the owl first as it flies, and to
hear any noise the prey makes. It also allows the owl to monitor the
sound output from its flight pattern.
A great horned owl with wet feathers, waiting out a rainstorm
The
feather adaption that allows silent flight means that barn owl feathers
are not waterproof. To retain the softness and silent flight, the barn
owl cannot use the preen oil or powder dust that other species use for
waterproofing. In wet weather, they cannot hunt and this may be
disastrous during the breeding season. Barn owls are frequently found
drowned in livestock drinking troughs, since they land to drink and
bathe, but are unable to climb out. Owls can struggle to keep warm,
because of their lack of waterproofing, so large numbers of downy
feathers help them to retain body heat.[21]
Vision
Eyesight is
a particular characteristic of the owl that aids in nocturnal prey
capture. Owls are part of a small group of birds that live nocturnally,
but do not use echolocation to guide them in flight in low-light
situations. Owls are known for their disproportionally large eyes in
comparison to their skulls. An apparent consequence of the evolution of
an absolutely large eye in a relatively small skull is that the eye of
the owl has become tubular in shape. This shape is found in other
so-called nocturnal eyes, such as the eyes of strepsirrhine primates and
bathypelagic fishes.[22] Since the eyes are fixed into these sclerotic
tubes, they are unable to move the eyes in any direction.[23] Instead of
moving their eyes, owls swivel their heads to view their surroundings.
Owls' heads are capable of swiveling through an angle of roughly 270°,
easily enabling them to see behind them without relocating the
torso.[23] This ability keeps bodily movement at a minimum, thus reduces
the amount of sound the owl makes as it waits for its prey. Owls are
regarded as having the most frontally placed eyes among all avian
groups, which gives them some of the largest binocular fields of vision.
Owls are farsighted and cannot focus on objects within a few
centimeters of their eyes.[22][24] These mechanisms are only able to
function due to the large-sized retinal image.[25] Thus, the primary
nocturnal function in the vision of the owl is due to its large
posterior nodal distance; retinal image brightness is only maximized to
the owl within secondary neural functions.[25] These attributes of the
owl cause its nocturnal eyesight to be far superior to that of its
average prey.[25]
Hearing
A great horned owl perched on the top of a Joshua tree at evening (twilight) in the Mojave Desert, U.S.
Owls
exhibit specialized hearing functions and ear shapes that also aid in
hunting. They are noted for asymmetrical ear placements on the skull in
some genera. Owls can have either internal or external ears, both of
which are asymmetrical. Asymmetry has not been reported to extend to the
middle or internal ear of the owl. Asymmetrical ear placement on the
skull allows the owl to pinpoint the location of its prey. This is
especially true for strictly nocturnal species such as the barn owls
Tyto or Tengmalm's owl.[23] With ears set at different places on its
skull, an owl is able to determine the direction from which the sound is
coming by the minute difference in time that it takes for the sound
waves to penetrate the left and right ears.The Hearing of the Barn Owl
The owl turns its head until the sound reaches both ears at the same
time, at which point it is directly facing the source of the sound. This
time difference between ears is about 30 microseconds. Behind the ear
openings are modified, dense feathers, densely packed to form a facial
ruff, which creates an anterior-facing, concave wall that cups the sound
into the ear structure.[26] This facial ruff is poorly defined in some
species, and prominent, nearly encircling the face, in other species.
The facial disk also acts to direct sound into the ears, and a
downward-facing, sharply triangular beak minimizes sound reflection away
from the face. The shape of the facial disk is adjustable at will to
focus sounds more effectively.[23]
The prominences above a great
horned owl's head are commonly mistaken as its ears. This is not the
case; they are merely feather tufts. The ears are on the sides of the
head in the usual location (in two different locations as described
above).
Talons
While the auditory and visual capabilities of
the owl allow it to locate and pursue its prey, the talons and beak of
the owl do the final work. The owl kills its prey using these talons to
crush the skull and knead the body.[23] The crushing power of an owl's
talons varies according to prey size and type, and by the size of the
owl. The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), a small, partly
insectivorous owl, has a release force of only 5 N. The larger barn owl
(Tyto alba) needs a force of 30 N to release its prey, and one of the
largest owls, the great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) needs a force over
130 N to release prey in its talons.[27] An owl's talons, like those of
most birds of prey, can seem massive in comparison to the body size
outside of flight. The Tasmanian masked owl has some of the
proportionally longest talons of any bird of prey; they appear enormous
in comparison to the body when fully extended to grasp prey.[28] An
owl's claws are sharp and curved. The family Tytonidae has inner and
central toes of about equal length, while the family Strigidae has an
inner toe that is distinctly shorter than the central one.[27] These
different morphologies allow efficiency in capturing prey specific to
the different environments they inhabit.
Beak
The beak of the
owl is short, curved, and downward-facing, and typically hooked at the
tip for gripping and tearing its prey. Once prey is captured, the
scissor motion of the top and lower bill is used to tear the tissue and
kill. The sharp lower edge of the upper bill works in coordination with
the sharp upper edge of the lower bill to deliver this motion. The
downward-facing beak allows the owl's field of vision to be clear, as
well as directing sound into the ears without deflecting sound waves
away from the face.[29]
Camouflage
The snowy owl has effective snow camouflage
The
coloration of the owl's plumage plays a key role in its ability to sit
still and blend into the environment, making it nearly invisible to
prey. Owls tend to mimic the coloration and sometimes the texture
patterns of their surroundings, the barn owl being an exception. The
snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus) appears nearly bleach-white in color with a
few flecks of black, mimicking their snowy surroundings perfectly, while
the speckled brown plumage of the tawny owl (Strix aluco) allows it to
lie in wait among the deciduous woodland it prefers for its habitat.
Likewise, the mottled wood-owl (Strix ocellata) displays shades of
brown, tan and black, making the owl nearly invisible in the surrounding
trees, especially from behind. Usually, the only tell-tale sign of a
perched owl is its vocalizations or its vividly colored eyes.
Behavior
Comparison of an owl (left) and hawk (right) remex.
The serrations on the leading edge of an owl's flight feathers reduce noise
Owl
eyes each have nictitating membranes that can move independently of
each other, as seen on this spotted eagle-owl in Johannesburg, South
Africa.
Most owls are nocturnal, actively hunting their prey in
darkness. Several types of owls are crepuscular—active during the
twilight hours of dawn and dusk; one example is the pygmy owl
(Glaucidium). A few owls are active during the day, also; examples are
the burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia) and the short-eared owl (Asio
flammeus).
Much of the owls' hunting strategy depends on stealth
and surprise. Owls have at least two adaptations that aid them in
achieving stealth. First, the dull coloration of their feathers can
render them almost invisible under certain conditions. Secondly,
serrated edges on the leading edge of owls' remiges muffle an owl's wing
beats, allowing an owl's flight to be practically silent. Some
fish-eating owls, for which silence has no evolutionary advantage, lack
this adaptation.
An owl's sharp beak and powerful talons allow it
to kill its prey before swallowing it whole (if it is not too big).
Scientists studying the diets of owls are helped by their habit of
regurgitating the indigestible parts of their prey (such as bones,
scales, and fur) in the form of pellets. These "owl pellets" are
plentiful and easy to interpret, and are often sold by companies to
schools for dissection by students as a lesson in biology and
ecology.[30]
Breeding and reproduction
Owl eggs typically have
a white color and an almost spherical shape, and range in number from a
few to a dozen, depending on species and the particular season; for
most, three or four is the more common number. In at least one species,
female owls do not mate with the same male for a lifetime. Female
burrowing owls commonly travel and find other mates, while the male
stays in his territory and mates with other females.[31]
Evolution and systematics
A great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) sleeping during daytime in a hollow tree
Recent
phylogenetic studies place owls within the clade Telluraves, most
closely related to the Accipitrimorphae and the Coraciimorphae,[32][33]
although the exact placement within Telluraves is disputed.[34][35]
See below cladogram:
Telluraves
Accipitrimorphae
Cathartiformes (New World vultures)Vintage Vulture Drawing white background.jpg
Accipitriformes (hawks and relatives)Golden Eagle Illustration white background.jpg
Strigiformes (owls)Cuvier-12-Hibou à huppe courte.jpg
Coraciimorphae
Coliiformes (mouse birds)
Cavitaves
Leptosomiformes (cuckoo roller)
Trogoniformes (trogons and quetzals)Harpactes fasciatus 1838 white background.jpg
Picocoraciae
Bucerotiformes (hornbills and relatives)
Picodynastornithes
Coraciiformes (kingfishers and relatives)Cuvier-46-Martin-pêcheur d'Europe.jpg
Piciformes (woodpeckers and relatives)
Australaves
Cariamiformes (seriemas)Cariama cristata 1838 white background.jpg
Eufalconimorphae
Falconiformes (falcons)NewZealandFalconBuller white background.jpg
Psittacopasserae
Psittaciformes (parrots)Pyrrhura lucianii - Castelnau 2.jpg
Passeriformes (passerines)Cuvier-33-Moineau domestique.jpg
Cladogram of Telluraves relationships based on Braun & Kimball (2021)[36]
Some
220 to 225 extant species of owls are known, subdivided into two
families: 1. true owls or typical owls family (Strigidae) and 2.
barn-owls family (Tytonidae). Some entirely extinct families have also
been erected based on fossil remains; these differ much from modern owls
in being less specialized or specialized in a very different way (such
as the terrestrial Sophiornithidae). The Paleocene genera Berruornis and
Ogygoptynx show that owls were already present as a distinct lineage
some 60–57 million years ago (Mya), hence, possibly also some 5 million
years earlier, at the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs. This makes
them one of the oldest known groups of non-Galloanserae landbirds. The
supposed "Cretaceous owls" Bradycneme and Heptasteornis are apparently
non-avialan maniraptors.[37]
During the Paleogene, the
Strigiformes radiated into ecological niches now mostly filled by other
groups of birds.[clarification needed] The owls as known today, though,
evolved their characteristic morphology and adaptations during that
time, too. By the early Neogene, the other lineages had been displaced
by other bird orders, leaving only barn-owls and typical owls. The
latter at that time were usually a fairly generic type of (probably
earless) owls similar to today's North American spotted owl or the
European tawny owl; the diversity in size and ecology found in typical
owls today developed only subsequently.
Around the
Paleogene-Neogene boundary (some 25 Mya), barn-owls were the dominant
group of owls in southern Europe and adjacent Asia at least; the
distribution of fossil and present-day owl lineages indicates that their
decline is contemporary with the evolution of the different major
lineages of true owls, which for the most part seems to have taken place
in Eurasia. In the Americas, rather, an expansion of immigrant lineages
of ancestral typical owls occurred.
The supposed fossil herons
"Ardea" perplexa (Middle Miocene of Sansan, France) and "Ardea" lignitum
(Late Pliocene of Germany) were more probably owls; the latter was
apparently close to the modern genus Bubo. Judging from this, the Late
Miocene remains from France described as "Ardea" aureliensis should also
be restudied.[38] The Messelasturidae, some of which were initially
believed to be basal Strigiformes, are now generally accepted to be
diurnal birds of prey showing some convergent evolution toward owls. The
taxa often united under Strigogyps[39] were formerly placed in part
with the owls, specifically the Sophiornithidae; they appear to be
Ameghinornithidae instead.[40][41][42]
The ancient fossil owl Palaeoglaux artophoron
For
fossil species and paleosubspecies of extant taxa, see the genus and
species articles. For a full list of extant and recently extinct owls,
see the article List of owl species.
Unresolved and basal forms (all fossil)
Berruornis (Late Paleocene of France) basal? Sophornithidae?
Strigiformes gen. et sp. indet. (Late Paleocene of Zhylga, Kazakhstan)[43]
Primoptynx (Early Eocene of Wyoming, U.S.)[44]
Palaeoglaux (Middle – Late Eocene of West-Central Europe) own family Palaeoglaucidae or Strigidae?
Palaeobyas (Late Eocene/Early Oligocene of Quercy, France) Tytonidae? Sophiornithidae?[citation needed]
Palaeotyto (Late Eocene/Early Oligocene of Quercy, France) Tytonidae? Sophiornithidae?[citation needed]
Strigiformes gen. et spp. indet. (Early Oligocene of Wyoming, U.S.)[38]
Ogygoptyngidae
Ogygoptynx (Middle/Late Paleocene of Colorado, U.S.)
Protostrigidae
Eostrix (Early Eocene of United States, Europe, and Mongolia). E. gulottai is the smallest known fossil (or living) owl.[45]
Minerva (Middle – Late Eocene of western U.S.) formerly Protostrix,
includes "Aquila" ferox, "Aquila" lydekkeri, and "Bubo" leptosteus
Oligostrix (mid-Oligocene of Saxony, Germany)
Sophiornithidae
Sophiornis
Tytonidae
Genus Tyto – the barn owls, grass owls and masked owls, stand up to 500
mm (20 in) tall; some 15 extant species and possibly one recently
extinct
Genus Phodilus – the bay owls, two to three extant species and possibly one recently extinct
Fossil genera
Nocturnavis (Late Eocene/Early Oligocene) includes "Bubo" incertus
Selenornis (Late Eocene/Early Oligocene) – includes "Asio" henrici
Necrobyas (Late Eocene/Early Oligocene – Late Miocene) includes "Bubo" arvernensis and Paratyto
Prosybris (Early Oligocene? – Early Miocene)
Placement unresolved
Tytonidae gen. et sp. indet. "TMT 164" (Middle Miocene) – Prosybris?
Strigidae
A long-eared owl (Asio otus) in an erect pose
The laughing owl (Ninox albifacies), last seen in 1914
Genus Aegolius – the saw-whet owls, four species
Genus Asio – the eared owls, eight species
Genus Athene – two to four species (depending on whether the genera Speotyto and Heteroglaux are included or not)
Genus Bubo – the horned owls, eagle-owls and fish-owls; paraphyletic
with the genera Nyctea, Ketupa, and Scotopelia, some 25 species
Genus Glaucidium – the pygmy owls, about 30–35 species
Genus Gymnasio – the Puerto Rican owl
Genus Gymnoglaux – the bare-legged owl or Cuban screech-owl
Genus Lophostrix – the crested owl
Genus Jubula – the maned owl
Genus Megascops – the screech owls, some 20 species
Genus Micrathene – the elf owl
Genus Ninox – the Australasian hawk-owls or boobooks, some 20 species
Genus Otus – the scops owls; probably paraphyletic, about 45 species
Genus Pseudoscops – the Jamaican owl
Genus Psiloscops – the flammulated owl
Genus Ptilopsis – the white-faced owls, two species
Genus Pulsatrix – the spectacled owls, three species
Genus Strix – the earless owls, about 15 species, including four previously assigned to Ciccaba
Genus Surnia – the northern hawk-owl
Genus Taenioptynx - the collared owlet
Genus Uroglaux – the Papuan hawk-owl
Genus Xenoglaux – the long-whiskered owlet
Extinct genera
Genus Grallistrix – the stilt-owls, four species; prehistoric
Genus Ornimegalonyx – the Caribbean giant owls, one to two species; prehistoric
Fossil genera
Mioglaux (Late Oligocene? – Early Miocene of West-Central Europe) – includes "Bubo" poirreiri
Intutula (Early/Middle – ?Late Miocene of Central Europe) – includes "Strix/Ninox" brevis
Alasio (Middle Miocene of Vieux-Collonges, France) – includes "Strix" collongensis
Oraristrix – the Brea owl (Late Pleistocene)
Placement unresolved
"Otus/Strix" wintershofensis: fossil (Early/Middle Miocene of
Wintershof West, Germany) – may be close to extant genus Ninox[38]
"Strix" edwardsi – fossil (Middle/Late? Miocene)
"Asio" pygmaeus – fossil (Early Pliocene of Odessa, Ukraine)
Strigidae gen. et sp. indet. UMMP V31030 (Late Pliocene) – Strix/Bubo?
the Ibizan owl, Strigidae gen. et sp. indet. – prehistoric[46]
Symbolism and mythology
African cultures
Among
the Kikuyu of Kenya, it was believed that owls were harbingers of
death. If one saw an owl or heard its hoot, someone was going to die. In
general, owls are viewed as harbingers of bad luck, ill health, or
death. The belief is widespread even today.[47]
Asia
In
Mongolia, the owl is regarded as a benign omen. In one story, Genghis
Khan was hiding from enemies in a small coppice when an owl roosted in
the tree above him, which caused his pursuers to think no man could be
hidden there.[48]
In modern Japan, owls are regarded as lucky and are carried in the form of a talisman or charm.[49]
Hootum
Pyanchar Naksha by Kaliprasanna Singha (1841–1870), first published in
1861, is a book of social commentaries influential in Bengali
literature. The name literally means "Sketches by a Watching Owl".
Sumerian and ancient Semitic cultures
In
Sumerian, Akkadian, and Babylonian culture, the owl was associated with
Lilith.[50] This association also occurs in the Bible (in some
translations) in Isaiah 34:14.[51]
Ancient European and modern Western culture
The
modern West generally associates owls with wisdom and vigilance. This
link goes back at least as far as Ancient Greece, where Athens, noted
for art and scholarship, and Athena, Athens' patron goddess and the
goddess of wisdom, had the owl as a symbol.[52] Marija Gimbutas traces
veneration of the owl as a goddess, among other birds, to the culture of
Old Europe, long pre-dating Indo-European cultures.[53]
T. F.
Thiselton-Dyer, in his 1883 Folk-lore of Shakespeare, says that "from
the earliest period it has been considered a bird of ill-omen," and
Pliny tells us how, on one occasion, even Rome itself underwent a
lustration, because one of them strayed into the Capitol. He represents
it also as a funereal bird, a monster of the night, the very abomination
of human kind. Virgil describes its death-howl from the top of the
temple by night, a circumstance introduced as a precursor of Dido's
death. Ovid, too, constantly speaks of this bird's presence as an evil
omen; and indeed the same notions respecting it may be found among the
writings of most of the ancient poets."[54] A list of "omens drear" in
John Keats' Hyperion includes the "gloom-bird's hated screech."[55]
Pliny the Elder reports that owl's eggs were commonly used as a hangover
cure.[56]
One of the etymologies offered for the name of the German folk hero Till Eulenspiegel is that it means "Mirror for Owls".
An owl-shaped protocorinthian aryballos, c. 640 BCE, from Greece
An owl-shaped protocorinthian aryballos, c. 640 BCE, from Greece
A Roman owl mosaic from Italica, Spain
A Roman owl mosaic from Italica, Spain
A Manises plate, c. 1535. A fantastical owl wearing a crown, a
characteristic Manises design during the first half of the 16th century
A Manises plate, c. 1535. A fantastical owl wearing a crown, a
characteristic Manises design during the first half of the 16th century
The Little Owl, 1506, by Albrecht Dürer
The Little Owl, 1506, by Albrecht Dürer
Wooden Owls of Natungram, West Bengal, India. The wooden owl is an
integral part of an ancient and indigenous tradition and art form in
Bengal along with its auspicious association with Goddess of wealth,
Laxmi.
Wooden Owls of Natungram, West Bengal, India. The
wooden owl is an integral part of an ancient and indigenous tradition
and art form in Bengal along with its auspicious association with
Goddess of wealth, Laxmi.
Hinduism
The Hindu goddess Lakshmi with the owl
In
Hinduism, an owl is the vahana (mount) of the goddess Lakshmi,
specially in eastern region of India.[57] Owl is considered a symbol of
wealth, prosperity, wisdom, good luck and Fortune. This is the reason
why Owl is seen with Godden Lakshmi, who is also the goddess the
fortune, wealth and prosperity. The Goddess Lakshmi, is known to have a
White Barn Owl as her vahana.
At the same time, owls are also
associated with evil times in Hinduism. At times, Chamunda (fearsome
form of Chandi) is depicted seated on an owl, her vahana (mount or
vehicle). Hindus believed that owls are messengers of death.[58]
Native American cultures
People
often allude to the reputation of owls as bearers of supernatural
danger when they tell misbehaving children, "the owls will get you",[59]
and in most Native American folklore, owls are a symbol of death.
According
to the Apache and Seminole tribes, hearing owls hooting is considered
the subject of numerous "bogeyman" stories told to warn children to
remain indoors at night or not to cry too much, otherwise the owl may
carry them away.[60][61] In some tribal legends, owls are associated
with spirits of the dead, and the bony circles around an owl's eyes are
said to comprise the fingernails of apparitional humans. Sometimes owls
are said to carry messages from beyond the grave or deliver supernatural
warnings to people who have broken tribal taboos.[62]
The Aztecs
and the Maya, along with other natives of Mesoamerica, considered the
owl a symbol of death and destruction. In fact, the Aztec god of death,
Mictlantecuhtli, was often depicted with owls.[63] There is an old
saying in Mexico that is still in use:[64] Cuando el tecolote canta, el
indio muere ("When the owl cries/sings, the Indian dies"). The Popol
Vuh, a Mayan religious text, describes owls as messengers of Xibalba
(the Mayan "Place of Fright").[65]
The belief that owls are
messengers and harbingers of the dark powers is also found among the
Hočągara (Winnebago) of Wisconsin.[66] When in earlier days the Hočągara
committed the sin of killing enemies while they were within the
sanctuary of the chief's lodge, an owl appeared and spoke to them in the
voice of a human, saying, "From now on, the Hočągara will have no
luck." This marked the beginning of the decline of their tribe.[67] An
owl appeared to Glory of the Morning, the only female chief of the Hočąk
nation, and uttered her name. Soon after, she died.[68][69]
According
to the culture of the Hopi, a Uto-Aztec tribe, taboos surround owls,
which are associated with sorcery and other evils.
The Ojibwe
tribes, as well as their Aboriginal Canadian counterparts, used an owl
as a symbol for both evil and death. In addition, they used owls as a
symbol of very high status of spiritual leaders of their
spirituality.[70]
The Pawnee tribes viewed owls as the symbol of protection from any danger within their realms.[70]
The Puebloan peoples associated owls with Skeleton Man, the god of death and the spirit of fertility.[70]
The Yakama tribes use an owl as a totem, to guide where and how forests and natural resources are useful with management.[70]
Rodent control
A purpose-built owl-house or owlery at a farm near Morton on the Hill, England (2006)
Encouraging
natural predators to control rodent population is a natural form of
pest control, along with excluding food sources for rodents. Placing a
nest box for owls on a property can help control rodent populations (one
family of hungry barn owls can consume more than 3,000 rodents in a
nesting season) while maintaining the naturally balanced food chain.[71]
Attacks on humans
Although
humans and owls frequently live together in harmony, there have been
incidents when owls have attacked humans. For example, in January 2013, a
man from Inverness, Scotland suffered heavy bleeding and went into
shock after being attacked by an owl, which was likely a
50-centimetre-tall (20 in) eagle-owl.[72] The photographer Eric Hosking
lost his left eye after attempting to photograph a tawny owl, which
inspired the title of his 1970 autobiography, An Eye for a Bird.
Conservation issues
See also: List of Strigiformes by population
The snowy owl is very endangered in Scandinavia[73] and Finland, where it is found only in northern Lapland.[74]
Almost
all owls are listed in Appendix II of the international CITES treaty
(the Convention on Illegal Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora) with four species listed in Appendix I. Although owls have long
been hunted, a 2008 news story from Malaysia indicates that the
magnitude of owl poaching may be on the rise. In November 2008, TRAFFIC
reported the seizure of 900 plucked and "oven-ready" owls in Peninsular
Malaysia. Said Chris Shepherd, Senior Programme Officer for TRAFFIC's
Southeast Asia office, "This is the first time we know of where
'ready-prepared' owls have been seized in Malaysia, and it may mark the
start of a new trend in wild meat from the region. We will be monitoring
developments closely." TRAFFIC commended the Department of Wildlife and
National Parks in Malaysia for the raid that exposed the huge haul of
owls. Included in the seizure were dead and plucked barn owls, spotted
wood owls, crested serpent eagles, barred eagles, and brown wood owls,
as well as 7,000 live lizards.[75]
References
Lipton, James (1991). An Exaltation of Larks. Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-30044-0.
"International
Science & Engineering Visualization Challenge: Posters &
Graphics". Science. 339 (6119): 514–515. 1 February 2013.
doi:10.1126/science.339.6119.514.
"Owl mystery unraveled: Scientists
explain how bird can rotate its head without cutting off blood supply to
brain". Johns Hopkins Medicine. 31 January 2013. Retrieved 3 March
2013.
Konig, Claus; Welck, Friedhelm and Jan-Hendrik Becking (1999)
Owls: A Guide to the Owls of the World, Yale University Press, ISBN
978-0-300-07920-3.
Eurasian Eagle Owl. Oiseaux-birds.com. Retrieved 2013-03-02.
Eurasian Eagle Owl – Bubo bubo – Information, Pictures, Sounds. Owlpages.com (13 August 2012). Retrieved 2013-03-02.
Take A Peek At Boo, The Eagle Owl – The Quillcards Blog. Quillcards.com (23 September 2009). Retrieved 2013-03-02.
Blakiston's Fish Owl Project. Fishowls.com (26 February 2013). Retrieved 2013-03-02.
Galeotti,
Paolo; Diego Rubolini (November 2007). "Head ornaments in owls: what
are their functions?". Journal of Avian Biology. 38 (6): 731–736.
doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2007.04143.x.
Lundberg, Arne (May 1986).
"Adaptive advantages of reversed sexual size dimorphism in European
owls". Ornis Scandinavica. 17 (2): 133–140. doi:10.2307/3676862. JSTOR
3676862.
Krüger, Oliver (September 2005). "The evolution of reversed
sexual size dimorphism in hawks, falcons and owls: a comparative study"
(PDF). Evolutionary Ecology. 19 (5): 467–486.
doi:10.1007/s10682-005-0293-9. S2CID 22181702.
Mueller, H.C. (1986).
"The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in owls: an empirical
analysis of possible selective factors" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 19
(5): 467. doi:10.1007/s10682-005-0293-9. S2CID 22181702.
Székely T,
Freckleton R. P., Reynolds J. D. (2004) Sexual selection explains
Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds. PNAS, 101, N. 33, p.
12224-12227.
Geodakyan V. A. (1985) Sexual dimorphism. In: Evolution
and morphogenesis. (Mlikovsky J., Novak V. J. A., eds.), Academia,
Praha, p. 467–477.
Bachmann T.; Klän S.; Baughmgartner W.; Klaas M.;
Schröder W. & Wagner H. (2007). "Morphometric characterisation of
wing feathers of the barn owl Tyto alba pratincola and the pigeon
Columba livia". Frontiers in Zoology. 4: 23. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-23.
PMC 2211483. PMID 18031576.
Stevenson, John (18 November 2020).
"Small finlets on owl feathers point the way to less aircraft noise".
Phys.org. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
Neuhaus W.; Bretting H. &
Schweizer B. (1973). "Morphologische und funktionelle Untersuchungen
über den, lautlosen" Flug der Eulen (strix aluco) im Vergleich zum Flug
der Enten (Anas platyrhynchos)". Biologisches Zentralblatt. 92: 495–512.
Willott J.F. (2001) Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research CRC Press ISBN 1420038737.
Dyson,
M. L.; Klump, G. M.; Gauger, B. (April 1998). "Absolute hearing
thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European barn owl: a
comparison with other owls". Journal of Comparative Physiology. 182 (5):
695–702. doi:10.1007/s003590050214. S2CID 24641904.
Webster, Douglas
B.; Fay, Richard R. (6 December 2012). "Hearing in Birds". The
Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. Springer Science & Business Media.
p. 547. ISBN 978-1-4612-2784-7.
Ian Hayward (27 July 2007). "Ask an expert: Are barn owl feathers waterproof?". RSPB. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
Walls G.L. (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation, Cranbook Institute of Science.
König,
Claus, Friedhelm Weick & Jan-Hendrik Becking (1999). Owls: A guide
to the owls of the world. Yale Univ Press, 1999. ISBN 0300079206
Hughes
A. (1979). "A schematic eye for the rat". Vision Res. 19 (5): 569–588.
doi:10.1016/0042-6989(79)90143-3. PMID 483586. S2CID 10317667.
Martin
G.R. (1982). "An owl's eye: schematic optics and visual performance in
Strix aluco L". J Comp Physiol. 145 (3): 341–349.
doi:10.1007/BF00619338. S2CID 35039625.
Norberg, R.A. (31 August
1977). "Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry
in owls and implications on owl taxonomy". Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 280 (973):
375–408. Bibcode:1977RSPTB.280..375N. doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0116.
Marti,
C. D. (1974). "Feeding Ecology of Four Sympatric Owls" (PDF). The
Condor. 76 (1): 45–61. doi:10.2307/1365983. JSTOR 1365983.
Einoder,
Luke D. & Alastair M. M. Richardson (2007). "Aspects of the Hindlimb
Morphology of Some Australian Birds of Prey: A Comparative and
Quantitative Study". The Auk. 124 (3): 773–788.
doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[773:AOTHMO]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 86011581.
Shamim1410 (22 April 2020). "Owl Bird Traits, Adaptations and Surprising Facts". Bird Baron. Retrieved 4 February 2022.
Owl Pellets in the Classroom: Safety Guidelines. carolina.com
Martin,
Dennis J. (1973). "Selected Aspects of Burrowing Owl Ecology and
Behavior". The Condor. 75 (4): 446–456. doi:10.2307/1366565. JSTOR
1366565. S2CID 55069283.
Jarvis, Erich D.; Mirarab, Siavash; Aberer,
Andre J.; Li, Bo; Houde, Peter; Li, Cai; Ho, Simon Y. W.; Faircloth,
Brant C.; Nabholz, Benoit; Howard, Jason T.; Suh, Alexander; Weber,
Claudia C.; da Fonseca, Rute R.; Li, Jianwen; Zhang, Fang; Li, Hui;
Zhou, Long; Narula, Nitish; Liu, Liang; Ganapathy, Ganesh; Boussau,
Bastien; Bayzid, Md. Shamsuzzoha; Zavidovych, Volodymyr; Subramanian,
Sankar; Gabaldón, Toni; Capella-Gutiérrez, Salvador; Huerta-Cepas,
Jaime; Rekepalli, Bhanu; Munch, Kasper; et al. (12 December 2014).
"Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of
modern birds". Science. 346 (6215): 1320–1331.
Bibcode:2014Sci...346.1320J. doi:10.1126/science.1253451. PMC 4405904.
PMID 25504713.
H Kuhl, C Frankl-Vilches, A Bakker, G Mayr, G
Nikolaus, S T Boerno, S Klages, B Timmermann, M Gahr (2020) An unbiased
molecular approach using 3’UTRs resolves the avian family-level tree of
life. Molecular Biology and Evolution.
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa191
Prum, R.O. et al. (2015) A
comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation
DNA sequencing. Nature 526, 569–573.
Houde, Peter; Braun, Edward L.;
Narula, Nitish; Minjares, Uriel; Mirarab, Siavash (2019). "Phylogenetic
Signal of Indels and the Neoavian Radiation". Diversity. 11 (7): 108.
doi:10.3390/d11070108. ISSN 1424-2818.
Braun, E.L. & Kimball,
R.T. (2021) Data types and the phylogeny of Neoaves. Birds, 2(1), 1-22;
https://doi.org/10.3390/birds2010001
Mortimer, Michael (2004): The
Theropod Database: Phylogeny of taxa Archived 16 May 2013 at the Wayback
Machine. Retrieved 2013-03-02.
Olson, Storrs L. (1985): The fossil
record of birds. In: Farner, D.S.; King, J.R. & Parkes, Kenneth C.
(eds.): Avian Biology 8: 79–238 (131, 267). Academic Press, New York.
Mayr,
Gerald (2005). ""Old World phorusrhacids" (Aves, Phorusrhacidae): a new
look at Strigogyps ("Aenigmavis") sapea (Peters 1987)". PaleoBios. 25
(1): 11–16.
Alvarenga, Herculano M. F. & Höfling, Elizabeth
(2003). "Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes)".
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. 43 (4): 55–91.
doi:10.1590/S0031-10492003000400001.
Larco Herrera, Rafael and Berrin, Kathleen (1997) The Spirit of Ancient Peru Thames and Hudson, New York, ISBN 0500018022.
Peters,
Dieter Stefan (January 2007). "The fossil family Ameghinornithidae
(Mourer-Chauviré 1981): a short synopsis" (PDF). Journal of Ornithology.
148 (1): 25–28. doi:10.1007/s10336-006-0095-z. S2CID 27322057.
Mourer-Chauviré,
Cécile (September 1994). "A large owl from the Paleocene of France".
Palaeontology. 37 (2): 339–348. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
Mayr,
Gerald; Gingerich, Philip; Smith, Thierry (July 2020). "Skeleton of a
new owl from the early Eocene of North America (Aves, Strigiformes) with
an accipitrid-like foot morphology". Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology. 40 (2): e1769116. doi:10.1080/02724634.2020.1769116. S2CID
222210173.
Gerald Mayr. "The world's smallest owl, the earliest
unambiguous charadriiform bird, and other avian remains from the early
Eocene Nanjemoy Formation of Virginia (USA)" (PDF). Phatfossils.com.
Retrieved 24 March 2022.
Sánchez Marco, Antonio (2004). "Avian
zoogeographical patterns during the Quaternary in the Mediterranean
region and paleoclimatic interpretation" (PDF). Ardeola. 51 (1): 91–132.
"Owls in Lore and Culture – The Owl Pages". Owlpages.com.
Sparks & Soper (1979). Owls: their natural and unnatural history. p. 163. ISBN 0715349953.
"The Significance and Meaning of Owls in Japanese Culture". Owlcation.
Sex
and gender in the ancient Near East: proceedings of the 47th Rencontre
Assyriologique Internationale, Helsinki, July 2–6, 2001, Part 2 p. 481.
Isaiah 34:14
Deacy,
Susan, and Villing, Alexandra (2001). Athena in the Classical World.
Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands, ISBN 9004121420.
Gimbutas, Marija (2001) The living goddesses, University of California Press, p. 158. ISBN 0520927095.
Thiselton-Dyer, T. F. (1883) Folk-lore of Shakespeare, sacred-texts.com
Keats, John. (1884) 49. Hyperion, in The Poetical Works of John Keats. Bartleby.com.
Dubow, Charles (1 January 2004). "Hangover Cures". Forbes. Archived from the original on 17 January 2003.
Chopra,
Capt. Praveen (2017). Vishnu's Mount: Birds In Indian Mythology And
Folklore. Notion Press. p. 109. ISBN 978-1-948352-69-7.
"Owl in Hinduism". Tamil and Vedas. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
Lenders,
E. W. (1914). "The Myth of the 'Wah-ru-hap-ah-rah,' or the Sacred
Warclub Bundle". Zeitschrift für Ethnologie. 46: 404–420 (409).
"Stikini, an owl monster of Seminole folklore". Native-languages.org. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
"Big Owl (Owl-Man), a malevolent Apache monster". Native-languages.org. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
"Native
American Indian Owl Legends, Meaning and Symbolism from the Myths of
Many Tribes". Native-languages.org. 25 July 2008. Retrieved 25 October
2015.
"Mictlantecuhtli". World History Encyclopedia.
"Cuando el tecolote canta, el indio muere". La Cronica. 27 July 2008. Archived from the original on 3 September 2010.
"The Popol Vuh". meta-religion.com. Retrieved 23 July 2008.
"Owls". Hočąk Encyclopedia.
Radin, Paul (1990 [1923]) The Winnebago Tribe, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 7–9 ISBN 0803257104.
Smith, David Lee (1997) Folklore of the Winnebago Tribe, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, p. 160
"Glory of the Morning", Hočąk Encyclopedia.
"Owls in Lore and Culture". The Owl Pages. 31 October 2012. p. 3. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
"The Hungry Owl Project". Hungryowl.org. Archived from the original on 13 August 2003. Retrieved 9 April 2010.
"Man needed hospital treatment after owl attack". Daily Telegraph (London). 25 January 2013.
Juvonen,
Arto; Muukkonen, Tomi; Peltomäki, Jari; Varesvuo, Markku (2009). Linnut
vauhdissa (in Finnish). Tammi. pp. 178, 187. ISBN 978-951-31-4604-7.
Harrison,
Colin; Greensmith, Alan (1995). Koko maailman linnut (in Finnish).
Translated by Laine, Lasse J.; Nikander, Pekka. Helsinki Media. p. 198.
ISBN 951-875-637-6.
"Wildlife Trade News – Huge haul of dead owls and live lizards in Peninsular Malaysia". TRAFFIC. 12 November 2008.
Further reading
Calaprice, Alice & Heinrich, Bernd (1990): Owl in the House: A
Naturalist's Diary. Joy Street Books, Boston. ISBN 0-316-35456-2.
Duncan, James (2013). The Complete Book of North American Owls. Thunder Bay Press, San Diego. ISBN 9781607107262.
Duncan, James (2003). Owls of the World. Key Porter Books, Toronto. ISBN 1552632148.
Heinrich, Bernd (1987): One Man's Owl. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691084701. OCLC 15486687.
Johnsgard, Paul A. (2002): North American Owls: Biology and Natural
History, 2nd ed. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. ISBN
1-56098-939-4.
Maslow, Jonathan Evan (1983): The Owl Papers, 1st Vintage Books ed. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 0-394-75813-7.
Sibley, Charles Gald & Monroe, Burt L. Jr. (1990): Distribution and
taxonomy of the birds of the world: A Study in Molecular Evolution.
Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. ISBN 0-300-04969-2
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Strigiformes.
Wikispecies has information related to Strigiformes.
Look up owl in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
The Owl Pages
Owl Brain Atlas
Smithsonian Snowy Owl Info
World Owl Trust
Athenian Owl coins
Eurasia:
World of Owls – Northern Ireland's only owl, bird of prey and exotic animal centre
Current Blakiston's Fish Owl Research in Russia
North America:
List of Owl Species Breeding In North American and Owl Photos
Oceania:
iprimus info. re Australian owls and frogmouths
Bird
Temporal range:
Late Cretaceous – present, 72–0 Ma[1][2]
PreꞒ
Ꞓ
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
Possible Early Cretaceous or early Late Cretaceous origin based on molecular clock[3][4][5]
Bird Diversity 2013.png
About this image
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Sauropsida
Clade: Avemetatarsalia
Clade: Ornithurae
Class: Aves
Linnaeus, 1758[6]
Extant clades
Palaeognathae (ratites and tinamou)
Neognathae
Pangalloanserae (fowl)
Neoaves
Synonyms
Neornithes Gadow, 1883
Birds
are a group of warm-blooded vertebrates constituting the class Aves
(/ˈeɪviːz/), characterised by feathers, toothless beaked jaws, the
laying of hard-shelled eggs, a high metabolic rate, a four-chambered
heart, and a strong yet lightweight skeleton. Birds live worldwide and
range in size from the 5.5 cm (2.2 in) bee hummingbird to the 2.8 m (9
ft 2 in) ostrich. There are about ten thousand living species, more than
half of which are passerine, or "perching" birds. Birds have wings
whose development varies according to species; the only known groups
without wings are the extinct moa and elephant birds. Wings, which
evolved from forelimbs, gave birds the ability to fly, although further
evolution has led to the loss of flight in some birds, including
ratites, penguins, and diverse endemic island species. The digestive and
respiratory systems of birds are also uniquely adapted for flight. Some
bird species of aquatic environments, particularly seabirds and some
waterbirds, have further evolved for swimming.
Birds are
feathered theropod dinosaurs and constitute the only known living
dinosaurs. Likewise, birds are considered reptiles in the modern
cladistic sense of the term, and their closest living relatives are the
crocodilians. Birds are descendants of the primitive avialans (whose
members include Archaeopteryx) which first appeared about 160 million
years ago (mya) in China. According to DNA evidence, modern birds
(Neornithes) evolved in the Middle to Late Cretaceous, and diversified
dramatically around the time of the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction
event 66 mya, which killed off the pterosaurs and all non-avian
dinosaurs.[5]
Many social species pass on knowledge across
generations, which is considered a form of culture. Birds are social,
communicating with visual signals, calls, and songs, and participating
in such behaviours as cooperative breeding and hunting, flocking, and
mobbing of predators. The vast majority of bird species are socially
(but not necessarily sexually) monogamous, usually for one breeding
season at a time, sometimes for years, and rarely for life. Other
species have breeding systems that are polygynous (one male with many
females) or, rarely, polyandrous (one female with many males). Birds
produce offspring by laying eggs which are fertilised through sexual
reproduction. They are usually laid in a nest and incubated by the
parents. Most birds have an extended period of parental care after
hatching.
Many species of birds are economically important as
food for human consumption and raw material in manufacturing, with
domesticated and undomesticated birds being important sources of eggs,
meat, and feathers. Songbirds, parrots, and other species are popular as
pets. Guano (bird excrement) is harvested for use as a fertiliser.
Birds figure throughout human culture. About 120 to 130 species have
become extinct due to human activity since the 17th century, and
hundreds more before then. Human activity threatens about 1,200 bird
species with extinction, though efforts are underway to protect them.
Recreational birdwatching is an important part of the ecotourism
industry.
Evolution and classification
Main article: Evolution of birds
Slab of stone with fossil bones and feather impressions
Archaeopteryx lithographica is often considered the oldest known true bird.
The
first classification of birds was developed by Francis Willughby and
John Ray in their 1676 volume Ornithologiae.[7] Carl Linnaeus modified
that work in 1758 to devise the taxonomic classification system
currently in use.[8] Birds are categorised as the biological class Aves
in Linnaean taxonomy. Phylogenetic taxonomy places Aves in the clade
Theropoda.[9]
Definition
Aves and a sister group, the order
Crocodilia, contain the only living representatives of the reptile clade
Archosauria. During the late 1990s, Aves was most commonly defined
phylogenetically as all descendants of the most recent common ancestor
of modern birds and Archaeopteryx lithographica.[10] However, an earlier
definition proposed by Jacques Gauthier gained wide currency in the
21st century, and is used by many scientists including adherents to the
PhyloCode. Gauthier defined Aves to include only the crown group of the
set of modern birds. This was done by excluding most groups known only
from fossils, and assigning them, instead, to the broader group
Avialae,[11] in part to avoid the uncertainties about the placement of
Archaeopteryx in relation to animals traditionally thought of as
theropod dinosaurs.[citation needed]
Gauthier and de Queiroz[12]
identified four different definitions for the same biological name
"Aves", which is a problem. The authors proposed to reserve the term
Aves only for the crown group consisting of the last common ancestor of
all living birds and all of its descendants, which corresponds to
meaning number 4 below. He assigned other names to the other
groups.[citation needed]
Crocodiles
Birds
Turtles
Lizards (including snakes)
The birds' phylogenetic relationships to major living reptile groups
Aves can mean all archosaurs closer to birds than to crocodiles (alternately Avemetatarsalia)
Aves can mean those advanced archosaurs with feathers (alternately Avifilopluma)
Aves can mean those feathered dinosaurs that fly (alternately Avialae)
Aves can mean the last common ancestor of all the currently living
birds and all of its descendants (a "crown group", in this sense
synonymous with Neornithes)
Under the fourth definition
Archaeopteryx, traditionally considered one of the earliest members of
Aves, is removed from this group, becoming a non-avian dinosaur instead.
These proposals have been adopted by many researchers in the field of
palaeontology and bird evolution, though the exact definitions applied
have been inconsistent. Avialae, initially proposed to replace the
traditional fossil content of Aves, is often used synonymously with the
vernacular term "bird" by these researchers.[13]
Maniraptoromorpha
†Coelurus
†Ornitholestes
Maniraptoriformes
†Ornithomimosauria
Maniraptora
†Alvarezsauridae
Pennaraptora
†Oviraptorosauria
Paraves
Cladogram showing the results of a phylogenetic study by Cau, 2018.[14]
Most
researchers define Avialae as branch-based clade, though definitions
vary. Many authors have used a definition similar to "all theropods
closer to birds than to Deinonychus",[15][16] with Troodon being
sometimes added as a second external specifier in case it is closer to
birds than to Deinonychus.[17] Avialae is also occasionally defined as
an apomorphy-based clade (that is, one based on physical
characteristics). Jacques Gauthier, who named Avialae in 1986,
re-defined it in 2001 as all dinosaurs that possessed feathered wings
used in flapping flight, and the birds that descended from them.[12][18]
Despite
being currently one of the most widely used, the crown-group definition
of Aves has been criticised by some researchers. Lee and Spencer (1997)
argued that, contrary to what Gauthier defended, this definition would
not increase the stability of the clade and the exact content of Aves
will always be uncertain because any defined clade (either crown or not)
will have few synapomorphies distinguishing it from its closest
relatives. Their alternative definition is synonymous to
Avifilopluma.[19]
Dinosaurs and the origin of birds
Main article: Origin of birds
Paraves
†Scansoriopterygidae
†Eosinopteryx
Eumaniraptora
†Jinfengopteryx
†Aurornis
†Dromaeosauridae
†Troodontidae
Avialae
Cladogram following the results of a phylogenetic study by Cau et al., 2015[20]
Anchiornis huxleyi is an important source of information on the early evolution of birds in the Late Jurassic period.[21]
Based
on fossil and biological evidence, most scientists accept that birds
are a specialised subgroup of theropod dinosaurs[22] and, more
specifically, members of Maniraptora, a group of theropods which
includes dromaeosaurids and oviraptorosaurs, among others.[23] As
scientists have discovered more theropods closely related to birds, the
previously clear distinction between non-birds and birds has become
blurred. Recent discoveries in the Liaoning Province of northeast China,
which demonstrate many small theropod feathered dinosaurs, contribute
to this ambiguity.[24][25][26]
Simplified phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between modern birds and dinosaurs [27]
The
consensus view in contemporary palaeontology is that the flying
theropods, or avialans, are the closest relatives of the
deinonychosaurs, which include dromaeosaurids and troodontids.[28]
Together, these form a group called Paraves. Some basal members of
Deinonychosauria, such as Microraptor, have features which may have
enabled them to glide or fly. The most basal deinonychosaurs were very
small. This evidence raises the possibility that the ancestor of all
paravians may have been arboreal, have been able to glide, or
both.[29][30] Unlike Archaeopteryx and the non-avialan feathered
dinosaurs, who primarily ate meat, recent studies suggest that the first
avialans were omnivores.[31]
The Late Jurassic Archaeopteryx is
well known as one of the first transitional fossils to be found, and it
provided support for the theory of evolution in the late 19th century.
Archaeopteryx was the first fossil to display both clearly traditional
reptilian characteristics—teeth, clawed fingers, and a long, lizard-like
tail—as well as wings with flight feathers similar to those of modern
birds. It is not considered a direct ancestor of birds, though it is
possibly closely related to the true ancestor.[32]
Early evolution
See also: List of fossil bird genera
White slab of rock left with cracks and impression of bird feathers and bone, including long paired tail feathers
Confuciusornis
sanctus, a Cretaceous bird from China that lived 125 million years ago,
is the oldest known bird to have a beak.[33]
Over 40% of key
traits found in modern birds evolved during the 60 million year
transition from the earliest bird-line archosaurs to the first
maniraptoromorphs, i.e. the first dinosaurs closer to living birds than
to Tyrannosaurus rex. The loss of osteoderms otherwise common in
archosaurs and acquisition of primitive feathers might have occurred
early during this phase.[14][34] After the appearance of
Maniraptoromorpha, the next 40 million years marked a continuous
reduction of body size and the accumulation of neotenic (juvenile-like)
characteristics. Hypercarnivory became increasingly less common while
braincases enlarged and forelimbs became longer.[14] The integument
evolved into complex, pennaceous feathers.[34]
The oldest known
paravian (and probably the earliest avialan) fossils come from the
Tiaojishan Formation of China, which has been dated to the late Jurassic
period (Oxfordian stage), about 160 million years ago. The avialan
species from this time period include Anchiornis huxleyi, Xiaotingia
zhengi, and Aurornis xui.[13]
The well-known probable early
avialan, Archaeopteryx, dates from slightly later Jurassic rocks (about
155 million years old) from Germany. Many of these early avialans shared
unusual anatomical features that may be ancestral to modern birds, but
were later lost during bird evolution. These features include enlarged
claws on the second toe which may have been held clear of the ground in
life, and long feathers or "hind wings" covering the hind limbs and
feet, which may have been used in aerial manoeuvreing.[35]
Avialans
diversified into a wide variety of forms during the Cretaceous period.
Many groups retained primitive characteristics, such as clawed wings and
teeth, though the latter were lost independently in a number of avialan
groups, including modern birds (Aves).[36] Increasingly stiff tails
(especially the outermost half) can be seen in the evolution of
maniraptoromorphs, and this process culminated in the appearance of the
pygostyle, an ossification of fused tail vertebrae.[14] In the late
Cretaceous, about 100 million years ago, the ancestors of all modern
birds evolved a more open pelvis, allowing them to lay larger eggs
compared to body size.[37] Around 95 million years ago, they evolved a
better sense of smell.[38]
A third stage of bird evolution
starting with Ornithothoraces (the "bird-chested" avialans) can be
associated with the refining of aerodynamics and flight capabilities,
and the loss or co-ossification of several skeletal features.
Particularly significant are the development of an enlarged, keeled
sternum and the alula, and the loss of grasping hands. [14]
Avialae
†Anchiornis
†Archaeopteryx
†Xiaotingia
†Rahonavis
†Jeholornis
†Jixiangornis
Euavialae
†Balaur
Avebrevicauda
†Zhongjianornis
†Sapeornis
Pygostylia
†Confuciusornithiformes
†Protopteryx
†Pengornis
Ornithothoraces
Cladogram following the results of a phylogenetic study by Cau et al., 2015[20]
Early diversity of bird ancestors
See also: Protobirds and Avialae
Ornithothoraces
†Enantiornithes
Euornithes
†Archaeorhynchus
Ornithuromorpha
†Patagopteryx
†Vorona
†Schizooura
†Hongshanornithidae
†Jianchangornis
†Songlingornithidae
†Gansus
†Apsaravis
Ornithurae
†Hesperornithes
†Ichthyornis
†Vegavis
Aves
Mesozoic bird phylogeny simplified after Wang et al., 2015's phylogenetic analysis[39]
Ichthyornis, which lived 93 million years ago, was the first known prehistoric bird relative preserved with teeth.
The
first large, diverse lineage of short-tailed avialans to evolve were
the Enantiornithes, or "opposite birds", so named because the
construction of their shoulder bones was in reverse to that of modern
birds. Enantiornithes occupied a wide array of ecological niches, from
sand-probing shorebirds and fish-eaters to tree-dwelling forms and
seed-eaters. While they were the dominant group of avialans during the
Cretaceous period, enantiornithes became extinct along with many other
dinosaur groups at the end of the Mesozoic era.[36]
Many species
of the second major avialan lineage to diversify, the Euornithes
(meaning "true birds", because they include the ancestors of modern
birds), were semi-aquatic and specialised in eating fish and other small
aquatic organisms. Unlike the Enantiornithes, which dominated
land-based and arboreal habitats, most early euornithes lacked perching
adaptations and seem to have included shorebird-like species, waders,
and swimming and diving species.[citation needed]
The latter
included the superficially gull-like Ichthyornis[40] and the
Hesperornithiformes, which became so well adapted to hunting fish in
marine environments that they lost the ability to fly and became
primarily aquatic.[36] The early euornithes also saw the development of
many traits associated with modern birds, like strongly keeled
breastbones, toothless, beaked portions of their jaws (though most
non-avian euornithes retained teeth in other parts of the jaws).[41]
Euornithes also included the first avialans to develop true pygostyle
and a fully mobile fan of tail feathers,[42] which may have replaced the
"hind wing" as the primary mode of aerial maneuverability and braking
in flight.[35]
A study on mosaic evolution in the avian skull
found that the last common ancestor of all Neornithes might have had a
beak similar to that of the modern hook-billed vanga and a skull similar
to that of the Eurasian golden oriole. As both species are small aerial
and canopy foraging omnivores, a similar ecological niche was inferred
for this hypothetical ancestor.[43]
Diversification of modern birds
See also: Sibley–Ahlquist taxonomy of birds and dinosaur classification
Aves
Palaeognathae
Struthioniformes
Tinamiformes
Neognathae
Other birds (Neoaves)
Galloanserae
Anseriformes
Galliformes
Basal divergences of modern birds
based on Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy
All
modern birds lie within the crown group Aves (alternately Neornithes),
which has two subdivisions: the Palaeognathae, which includes the
flightless ratites (such as the ostriches) and the weak-flying tinamous,
and the extremely diverse Neognathae, containing all other birds.[44]
These two subdivisions have variously been given the rank of
superorder,[45] cohort,[9] or infraclass.[46] Depending on the taxonomic
viewpoint, the number of known living bird species varies anywhere from
9,800[47] to 10,758.[48]
The discovery of Vegavis from the
Maastrichtian, the last stage of the Late Cretaceous proved that the
diversification of modern birds started before the Cenozoic era.[49] The
affinities of an earlier fossil, the possible galliform Austinornis
lentus, dated to about 85 million years ago,[50] are still too
controversial to provide a fossil evidence of modern bird
diversification. In 2020, Asteriornis from the Maastrichtian was
described, it appears to be a close relative of Galloanserae, the
earliest diverging lineage within Neognathae.[1]
Most studies
agree on a Cretaceous age for the most recent common ancestor of modern
birds but estimates range from the Early Cretaceous[3][51] to the latest
Late Cretaceous.[52][4] Similarly, there is no agreement on whether
most of the early diversification of modern birds occurred before or
after the Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction event.[53] This disagreement
is in part caused by a divergence in the evidence; most molecular dating
studies suggests a Cretaceous evolutionary radiation, while fossil
evidence points to a Cenozoic radiation (the so-called 'rocks' versus
'clocks' controversy). Previous attempts to reconcile molecular and
fossil evidence have proved controversial,[53][54] but more recent
estimates, using a more comprehensive sample of fossils and a new way of
calibrating molecular clocks, showed that while according to some
studies, modern birds originated early in the Late Cretaceous in Western
Gondwana, a pulse of diversification in all major groups occurred
around the Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction event. Modern birds expanded
from West Gondwana to the Laurasia through two routes. One route was an
Antarctic interchange in the Paleogene. This can be confirmed with the
presence of multiple avian groups in Australia and New Zealand. The
other route was probably through North America, via land bridges, during
the Paleocene. This allowed the expansion and diversification of
Neornithes into the Holarctic and Paleotropics.[55] On the other hand,
the occurrence of Asteriornis in the Northern Hemisphere challenges
biogeographical hypotheses of a Gondwanan origin of crown birds.[1]
Classification of bird orders
See also: List of birds
Cladogram of modern bird relationships based on Braun & Kimball (2021)[56]
Aves
Palaeognathae
Struthioniformes (ostriches) Struthio camelus - Etosha 2014 (1) white background.jpg
Rheiformes (rheas) Rhea white background.jpg
Apterygiformes (kiwis) Little spotted kiwi, Apteryx owenii, Auckland War Memorial Museum white background.jpg
Tinamiformes (tinamous) NothuraDarwiniiSmit white background.jpg
Casuariiformes (emu and cassowaries) Emu RWD2 white background.jpg
Neognathae
Galloanserae
Galliformes (chickens and relatives) Red Junglefowl by George Edward Lodge white background.png
Anseriformes (ducks and relatives) Cuvier-97-Canard colvert.jpg
Neoaves
Mirandornithes
Phoenicopteriformes (flamingos)Cuvier-87-Flamant rouge.jpg
Podicipediformes (grebes)Podiceps cristatus Naumann white background.jpg
Columbimorphae
Columbiformes
(pigeons and doves) Meyers grosses Konversations-Lexikon - ein
Nachschlagewerk des allgemeinen Wissens (1908) (Antwerpener
Breiftaube).jpg
Mesitornithiformes (mesites)Monias benschi 1912 white background.jpg
Pterocliformes (sandgrouse)Pterocles quadricinctus white background.jpg
Passerea
Otidiformes (bustards)Cayley Ardeotis australis flipped.jpg
Cuculiformes (cuckoos)British birds in their haunts (Cuculus canorus).jpg
Musophagiformes (turacos)Planches enluminées d'histoire naturelle (1765) (Tauraco persa).jpg
Gruiformes (rails and cranes)Cuvier-72-Grue cendrée.jpg
Charadriiformes (waders and relatives)D'Orbigny-Mouette rieuse et Bec-en-ciseaux white background.jpg
Opisthocomiformes (hoatzin)Cuvier-59-Hoazin huppé.jpg
Strisores
Caprimulgiformes (nightjars) Chordeiles acutipennis texensisAQBIP06CA.jpg
Vanescaves
Nyctibiiformes (potoos) NyctibiusBracteatusSmit.jpg
Steatornithiformes (oilbird) Steatornis caripensis MHNT ZON STEA 1.jpg
Podargiformes (frogmouths) Batrachostomus septimus 01.jpg
Daedalornithes
Aegotheliformes (owlet-nightjars) Aegotheles savesi.jpg
Apodiformes (swifts, treeswifts and hummingbirds) White-eared Hummingbird (Basilinna leucotis) white background.jpg
Phaethoquornithes
Eurypygimorphae
Phaethontiformes (tropicbirds)Cuvier-95-Phaeton à bec rouge.jpg
Eurypygiformes (sunbittern and kagu)Cuvier-72-Caurale soleil.jpg
Aequornithes
Gaviiformes[57] (loons) Loon (PSF).png
Austrodyptornithes
Procellariiformes (albatrosses and petrels) Thalassarche chlororhynchos 1838.jpg
Sphenisciformes (penguins) Chinstrap Penguin white background.jpg
Ciconiiformes (storks) Weißstorch (Ciconia ciconia) white background.jpg
Suliformes (boobies, cormorants, etc.) Cormorant in Strunjan, white background.png
Pelecaniformes (pelicans, herons & ibises) Spot-billed pelican takeoff white background.jpg
(Ardeae)
Telluraves
Accipitrimorphae
Cathartiformes (New World vultures)Vintage Vulture Drawing white background.jpg
Accipitriformes (hawks and relatives)Golden Eagle Illustration white background.jpg
Strigiformes (owls)Cuvier-12-Hibou à huppe courte.jpg
Coraciimorphae
Coliiformes (mousebirds) ColiusCastanonotusKeulemans.jpg
Cavitaves
Leptosomiformes
(cuckoo roller) Leptosomus discolor - 1825-1834 - Print - Iconographia
Zoologica - Special Collections University of Amsterdam - UBA01
IZ16700267.tif
Trogoniformes (trogons and quetzals)Harpactes fasciatus 1838 white background.jpg
Picocoraciae
Bucerotiformes
(hornbills and relatives) A monograph of the Bucerotidæ, or family of
the hornbills (Plate II) (white background).jpg
Picodynastornithes
Coraciiformes (kingfishers and relatives)Cuvier-46-Martin-pêcheur d'Europe.jpg
Piciformes (woodpeckers and relatives) Dendrocopos major -Durham, England -female-8 white background.jpg
Australaves
Cariamiformes (seriemas)Cariama cristata 1838 white background.jpg
Eufalconimorphae
Falconiformes (falcons)NewZealandFalconBuller white background.jpg
Psittacopasserae
Psittaciformes (parrots)Pyrrhura lucianii - Castelnau 2.jpg
Passeriformes (passerines)Cuvier-33-Moineau domestique.jpg
The
classification of birds is a contentious issue. Sibley and Ahlquist's
Phylogeny and Classification of Birds (1990) is a landmark work on the
classification of birds,[58] although it is frequently debated and
constantly revised. Most evidence seems to suggest the assignment of
orders is accurate,[59] but scientists disagree about the relationships
between the orders themselves; evidence from modern bird anatomy,
fossils and DNA have all been brought to bear on the problem, but no
strong consensus has emerged. More recently, new fossil and molecular
evidence is providing an increasingly clear picture of the evolution of
modern bird orders.[52][60]
Genomics
See also: list of sequenced animal genomes
As
of 2010, the genome had been sequenced for only two birds, the chicken
and the zebra finch. As of 2022 the genomes of 542 species of birds had
been completed. At least one genome has been sequenced from every
order.[61][62] These include at least one species in about 90% of extant
avian families (218 out of 236 families recognised by the Howard and
Moore Checklist).[63]
Being able to sequence and compare whole
genomes gives researchers many types of information, about genes, the
DNA that regulates the genes, and their evolutionary history. This has
led to reconsideration of some of the classifications that were based
solely on the identification of protein-coding genes. Waterbirds such as
pelicans and flamingos, for example, may have in common specific
adaptations suited to their environment that were developed
independently.[61][62]
Distribution
See also: Lists of birds by region and List of birds by population
small bird withpale belly and breast and patterned wing and head stands on concrete
The range of the house sparrow has expanded dramatically due to human activities.[64]
Birds
live and breed in most terrestrial habitats and on all seven
continents, reaching their southern extreme in the snow petrel's
breeding colonies up to 440 kilometres (270 mi) inland in
Antarctica.[65] The highest bird diversity occurs in tropical regions.
It was earlier thought that this high diversity was the result of higher
speciation rates in the tropics; however recent studies found higher
speciation rates in the high latitudes that were offset by greater
extinction rates than in the tropics.[66] Many species migrate annually
over great distances and across oceans; several families of birds have
adapted to life both on the world's oceans and in them, and some seabird
species come ashore only to breed,[67] while some penguins have been
recorded diving up to 300 metres (980 ft) deep.[68]
Many bird
species have established breeding populations in areas to which they
have been introduced by humans. Some of these introductions have been
deliberate; the ring-necked pheasant, for example, has been introduced
around the world as a game bird.[69] Others have been accidental, such
as the establishment of wild monk parakeets in several North American
cities after their escape from captivity.[70] Some species, including
cattle egret,[71] yellow-headed caracara[72] and galah,[73] have spread
naturally far beyond their original ranges as agricultural expansion
created alternative habitats although modern practices of intensive
agriculture have negatively impacted farmland bird populations.[74]
Anatomy and physiology
Main articles: Bird anatomy and Bird vision
See also: Egg tooth
External
anatomy of a bird (example: yellow-wattled lapwing): 1 Beak, 2 Head, 3
Iris, 4 Pupil, 5 Mantle, 6 Lesser coverts, 7 Scapulars, 8 Median
coverts, 9 Tertials, 10 Rump, 11 Primaries, 12 Vent, 13 Thigh, 14
Tibio-tarsal articulation, 15 Tarsus, 16 Foot, 17 Tibia, 18 Belly, 19
Flanks, 20 Breast, 21 Throat, 22 Wattle, 23 Eyestripe
Compared with other vertebrates, birds have a body plan that shows many unusual adaptations, mostly to facilitate flight.
Skeletal system
Main article: Bird_anatomy § Skeletal_system
The
skeleton consists of very lightweight bones. They have large air-filled
cavities (called pneumatic cavities) which connect with the respiratory
system.[75] The skull bones in adults are fused and do not show cranial
sutures.[76] The orbital cavities that house the eyeballs are large and
separated from each other by a bony septum (partition). The spine has
cervical, thoracic, lumbar and caudal regions with the number of
cervical (neck) vertebrae highly variable and especially flexible, but
movement is reduced in the anterior thoracic vertebrae and absent in the
later vertebrae.[77] The last few are fused with the pelvis to form the
synsacrum.[76] The ribs are flattened and the sternum is keeled for the
attachment of flight muscles except in the flightless bird orders. The
forelimbs are modified into wings.[78] The wings are more or less
developed depending on the species; the only known groups that lost
their wings are the extinct moa and elephant birds.[79]
Excretory system
Like
the reptiles, birds are primarily uricotelic, that is, their kidneys
extract nitrogenous waste from their bloodstream and excrete it as uric
acid, instead of urea or ammonia, through the ureters into the
intestine. Birds do not have a urinary bladder or external urethral
opening and (with exception of the ostrich) uric acid is excreted along
with faeces as a semisolid waste.[80][81][82] However, birds such as
hummingbirds can be facultatively ammonotelic, excreting most of the
nitrogenous wastes as ammonia.[83] They also excrete creatine, rather
than creatinine like mammals.[76] This material, as well as the output
of the intestines, emerges from the bird's cloaca.[84][85] The cloaca is
a multi-purpose opening: waste is expelled through it, most birds mate
by joining cloaca, and females lay eggs from it. In addition, many
species of birds regurgitate pellets.[86]
It is a common but not
universal feature of altricial passerine nestlings (born helpless, under
constant parental care) that instead of excreting directly into the
nest, they produce a fecal sac. This is a mucus-covered pouch that
allows parents to either dispose of the waste outside the nest or to
recycle the waste through their own digestive system.[87]
Reproductive system
Males
within Palaeognathae (with the exception of the kiwis), the
Anseriformes (with the exception of screamers), and in rudimentary forms
in Galliformes (but fully developed in Cracidae) possess a penis, which
is never present in Neoaves.[88][89] The length is thought to be
related to sperm competition.[90] When not copulating, it is hidden
within the proctodeum compartment within the cloaca, just inside the
vent. Female birds have sperm storage tubules[91] that allow sperm to
remain viable long after copulation, a hundred days in some species.[92]
Sperm from multiple males may compete through this mechanism. Most
female birds have a single ovary and a single oviduct, both on the left
side,[93] but there are exceptions: species in at least 16 different
orders of birds have two ovaries. Even these species, however, tend to
have a single oviduct.[93] It has been speculated that this might be an
adaptation to flight, but males have two testes, and it is also observed
that the gonads in both sexes decrease dramatically in size outside the
breeding season.[94][95] Also terrestrial birds generally have a single
ovary, as does the platypus, an egg-laying mammal. A more likely
explanation is that the egg develops a shell while passing through the
oviduct over a period of about a day, so that if two eggs were to
develop at the same time, there would be a risk to survival.[93] While
rare, mostly abortive, parthenogenesis is not unknown in birds and eggs
can be diploid, automictic and results in male offspring.[96]
Birds
are solely gonochoric.[97] Meaning they have two sexes: either female
or male. The sex of birds is determined by the Z and W sex chromosomes,
rather than by the X and Y chromosomes present in mammals. Male birds
have two Z chromosomes (ZZ), and female birds have a W chromosome and a Z
chromosome (WZ).[76]
In nearly all species of birds, an
individual's sex is determined at fertilisation. However, one 2007 study
claimed to demonstrate temperature-dependent sex determination among
the Australian brushturkey, for which higher temperatures during
incubation resulted in a higher female-to-male sex ratio.[98] This,
however, was later proven to not be the case. These birds do not exhibit
temperature-dependent sex determination, but temperature-dependent sex
mortality.[99]
Respiratory and circulatory systems
Birds have
one of the most complex respiratory systems of all animal groups.[76]
Upon inhalation, 75% of the fresh air bypasses the lungs and flows
directly into a posterior air sac which extends from the lungs and
connects with air spaces in the bones and fills them with air. The other
25% of the air goes directly into the lungs. When the bird exhales, the
used air flows out of the lungs and the stored fresh air from the
posterior air sac is simultaneously forced into the lungs. Thus, a
bird's lungs receive a constant supply of fresh air during both
inhalation and exhalation.[100] Sound production is achieved using the
syrinx, a muscular chamber incorporating multiple tympanic membranes
which diverges from the lower end of the trachea;[101] the trachea being
elongated in some species, increasing the volume of vocalisations and
the perception of the bird's size.[102]
In birds, the main
arteries taking blood away from the heart originate from the right
aortic arch (or pharyngeal arch), unlike in the mammals where the left
aortic arch forms this part of the aorta.[76] The postcava receives
blood from the limbs via the renal portal system. Unlike in mammals, the
circulating red blood cells in birds retain their nucleus.[103]
Heart type and features
Didactic model of an avian heart
The
avian circulatory system is driven by a four-chambered, myogenic heart
contained in a fibrous pericardial sac. This pericardial sac is filled
with a serous fluid for lubrication.[104] The heart itself is divided
into a right and left half, each with an atrium and ventricle. The
atrium and ventricles of each side are separated by atrioventricular
valves which prevent back flow from one chamber to the next during
contraction. Being myogenic, the heart's pace is maintained by pacemaker
cells found in the sinoatrial node, located on the right
atrium.[citation needed]
The sinoatrial node uses calcium to
cause a depolarising signal transduction pathway from the atrium through
right and left atrioventricular bundle which communicates contraction
to the ventricles. The avian heart also consists of muscular arches that
are made up of thick bundles of muscular layers. Much like a mammalian
heart, the avian heart is composed of endocardial, myocardial and
epicardial layers.[104] The atrium walls tend to be thinner than the
ventricle walls, due to the intense ventricular contraction used to pump
oxygenated blood throughout the body. Avian hearts are generally larger
than mammalian hearts when compared to body mass. This adaptation
allows more blood to be pumped to meet the high metabolic need
associated with flight.[105]
Organisation
Birds have a very
efficient system for diffusing oxygen into the blood; birds have a ten
times greater surface area to gas exchange volume than mammals. As a
result, birds have more blood in their capillaries per unit of volume of
lung than a mammal.[105] The arteries are composed of thick elastic
muscles to withstand the pressure of the ventricular contractions, and
become more rigid as they move away from the heart. Blood moves through
the arteries, which undergo vasoconstriction, and into arterioles which
act as a transportation system to distribute primarily oxygen as well as
nutrients to all tissues of the body.[106] As the arterioles move away
from the heart and into individual organs and tissues they are further
divided to increase surface area and slow blood flow. Blood travels
through the arterioles and moves into the capillaries where gas exchange
can occur.[citation needed]
Capillaries are organised into
capillary beds in tissues; it is here that blood exchanges oxygen for
carbon dioxide waste. In the capillary beds, blood flow is slowed to
allow maximum diffusion of oxygen into the tissues. Once the blood has
become deoxygenated, it travels through venules then veins and back to
the heart. Veins, unlike arteries, are thin and rigid as they do not
need to withstand extreme pressure. As blood travels through the venules
to the veins a funneling occurs called vasodilation bringing blood back
to the heart.[106] Once the blood reaches the heart, it moves first
into the right atrium, then the right ventricle to be pumped through the
lungs for further gas exchange of carbon dioxide waste for oxygen.
Oxygenated blood then flows from the lungs through the left atrium to
the left ventricle where it is pumped out to the body.[citation needed]
The nictitating membrane as it covers the eye of a masked lapwing
Nervous system
The
nervous system is large relative to the bird's size.[76] The most
developed part of the brain is the one that controls the flight-related
functions, while the cerebellum coordinates movement and the cerebrum
controls behaviour patterns, navigation, mating and nest building. Most
birds have a poor sense of smell[107] with notable exceptions including
kiwis,[108] New World vultures[109] and tubenoses.[110] The avian visual
system is usually highly developed. Water birds have special flexible
lenses, allowing accommodation for vision in air and water.[76] Some
species also have dual fovea. Birds are tetrachromatic, possessing
ultraviolet (UV) sensitive cone cells in the eye as well as green, red
and blue ones.[111] They also have double cones, likely to mediate
achromatic vision.[112]
Many birds show plumage patterns in
ultraviolet that are invisible to the human eye; some birds whose sexes
appear similar to the naked eye are distinguished by the presence of
ultraviolet reflective patches on their feathers. Male blue tits have an
ultraviolet reflective crown patch which is displayed in courtship by
posturing and raising of their nape feathers.[113] Ultraviolet light is
also used in foraging—kestrels have been shown to search for prey by
detecting the UV reflective urine trail marks left on the ground by
rodents.[114] With the exception of pigeons and a few other
species,[115] the eyelids of birds are not used in blinking. Instead the
eye is lubricated by the nictitating membrane, a third eyelid that
moves horizontally.[116] The nictitating membrane also covers the eye
and acts as a contact lens in many aquatic birds.[76] The bird retina
has a fan shaped blood supply system called the pecten.[76]
Eyes
of most birds are large, not very round and capable of only limited
movement in the orbits,[76] typically 10–20°.[117] Birds with eyes on
the sides of their heads have a wide visual field, while birds with eyes
on the front of their heads, such as owls, have binocular vision and
can estimate the depth of field.[117][118] The avian ear lacks external
pinnae but is covered by feathers, although in some birds, such as the
Asio, Bubo and Otus owls, these feathers form tufts which resemble ears.
The inner ear has a cochlea, but it is not spiral as in mammals.[119]
Defence and intraspecific combat
A
few species are able to use chemical defences against predators; some
Procellariiformes can eject an unpleasant stomach oil against an
aggressor,[120] and some species of pitohuis from New Guinea have a
powerful neurotoxin in their skin and feathers.[121]
A lack of
field observations limit our knowledge, but intraspecific conflicts are
known to sometimes result in injury or death.[122] The screamers
(Anhimidae), some jacanas (Jacana, Hydrophasianus), the spur-winged
goose (Plectropterus), the torrent duck (Merganetta) and nine species of
lapwing (Vanellus) use a sharp spur on the wing as a weapon. The
steamer ducks (Tachyeres), geese and swans (Anserinae), the solitaire
(Pezophaps), sheathbills (Chionis), some guans (Crax) and stone curlews
(Burhinus) use a bony knob on the alular metacarpal to punch and hammer
opponents.[122] The jacanas Actophilornis and Irediparra have an
expanded, blade-like radius. The extinct Xenicibis was unique in having
an elongate forelimb and massive hand which likely functioned in combat
or defence as a jointed club or flail. Swans, for instance, may strike
with the bony spurs and bite when defending eggs or young.[122]
Feathers, plumage, and scales
Main articles: Feather, Flight feather, and Down feather
Owl with eyes closed in front of similarly coloured tree trunk partly obscured by green leaves
The disruptively patterned plumage of the African scops owl allows it to blend in with its surroundings.
Feathers
are a feature characteristic of birds (though also present in some
dinosaurs not currently considered to be true birds). They facilitate
flight, provide insulation that aids in thermoregulation, and are used
in display, camouflage, and signalling.[76] There are several types of
feathers, each serving its own set of purposes. Feathers are epidermal
growths attached to the skin and arise only in specific tracts of skin
called pterylae. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts
(pterylosis) is used in taxonomy and systematics. The arrangement and
appearance of feathers on the body, called plumage, may vary within
species by age, social status,[123] and sex.[124]
Plumage is
regularly moulted; the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after
breeding is known as the "non-breeding" plumage, or—in the
Humphrey–Parkes terminology—"basic" plumage; breeding plumages or
variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey–Parkes
system as "alternate" plumages.[125] Moulting is annual in most species,
although some may have two moults a year, and large birds of prey may
moult only once every few years. Moulting patterns vary across species.
In passerines, flight feathers are replaced one at a time with the
innermost primary being the first. When the fifth of sixth primary is
replaced, the outermost tertiaries begin to drop. After the innermost
tertiaries are moulted, the secondaries starting from the innermost
begin to drop and this proceeds to the outer feathers (centrifugal
moult). The greater primary coverts are moulted in synchrony with the
primary that they overlap.[126]
A small number of species, such
as ducks and geese, lose all of their flight feathers at once,
temporarily becoming flightless.[127] As a general rule, the tail
feathers are moulted and replaced starting with the innermost pair.[126]
Centripetal moults of tail feathers are however seen in the
Phasianidae.[128] The centrifugal moult is modified in the tail feathers
of woodpeckers and treecreepers, in that it begins with the second
innermost pair of feathers and finishes with the central pair of
feathers so that the bird maintains a functional climbing
tail.[126][129] The general pattern seen in passerines is that the
primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from
centre outward.[130] Before nesting, the females of most bird species
gain a bare brood patch by losing feathers close to the belly. The skin
there is well supplied with blood vessels and helps the bird in
incubation.[131]
Red parrot with yellow bill and wing feathers in bill
Red lory preening
Feathers
require maintenance and birds preen or groom them daily, spending an
average of around 9% of their daily time on this.[132] The bill is used
to brush away foreign particles and to apply waxy secretions from the
uropygial gland; these secretions protect the feathers' flexibility and
act as an antimicrobial agent, inhibiting the growth of
feather-degrading bacteria.[133] This may be supplemented with the
secretions of formic acid from ants, which birds receive through a
behaviour known as anting, to remove feather parasites.[134]
The
scales of birds are composed of the same keratin as beaks, claws, and
spurs. They are found mainly on the toes and metatarsus, but may be
found further up on the ankle in some birds. Most bird scales do not
overlap significantly, except in the cases of kingfishers and
woodpeckers. The scales of birds are thought to be homologous to those
of reptiles and mammals.[135]
Flight
Main articles: Bird flight and Flightless birds
Black bird with white chest in flight with wings facing down and tail fanned and down pointing
Restless flycatcher in the downstroke of flapping flight
Most
birds can fly, which distinguishes them from almost all other
vertebrate classes. Flight is the primary means of locomotion for most
bird species and is used for searching for food and for escaping from
predators. Birds have various adaptations for flight, including a
lightweight skeleton, two large flight muscles, the pectoralis (which
accounts for 15% of the total mass of the bird) and the
supracoracoideus, as well as a modified forelimb (wing) that serves as
an aerofoil.[76]
Wing shape and size generally determine a bird's
flight style and performance; many birds combine powered, flapping
flight with less energy-intensive soaring flight. About 60 extant bird
species are flightless, as were many extinct birds.[136] Flightlessness
often arises in birds on isolated islands, most likely due to limited
resources and the absence of mammalian land predators.[137]
Flightlessnes is almost exclusively correlated with gigantism due to an
island's inheren condition of isolation.[138] Although flightless,
penguins use similar musculature and movements to "fly" through the
water, as do some flight-capable birds such as auks, shearwaters and
dippers.[139]
Behaviour
Most birds are diurnal, but some
birds, such as many species of owls and nightjars, are nocturnal or
crepuscular (active during twilight hours), and many coastal waders feed
when the tides are appropriate, by day or night.[140]
Diet and feeding
Illustration of the heads of 16 types of birds with different shapes and sizes of beak
Feeding adaptations in beaks
Birds'
diets are varied and often include nectar, fruit, plants, seeds,
carrion, and various small animals, including other birds.[76] The
digestive system of birds is unique, with a crop for storage and a
gizzard that contains swallowed stones for grinding food to compensate
for the lack of teeth.[141] Some species such as pigeons and some
psittacine species do not have a gallbladder.[142] Most birds are highly
adapted for rapid digestion to aid with flight.[143] Some migratory
birds have adapted to use protein stored in many parts of their bodies,
including protein from the intestines, as additional energy during
migration.[144]
Birds that employ many strategies to obtain food
or feed on a variety of food items are called generalists, while others
that concentrate time and effort on specific food items or have a single
strategy to obtain food are considered specialists.[76] Avian foraging
strategies can vary widely by species. Many birds glean for insects,
invertebrates, fruit, or seeds. Some hunt insects by suddenly attacking
from a branch. Those species that seek pest insects are considered
beneficial 'biological control agents' and their presence encouraged in
biological pest control programmes.[145] Combined, insectivorous birds
eat 400–500 million metric tons of arthropods annually.[146]
Nectar
feeders such as hummingbirds, sunbirds, lories, and lorikeets amongst
others have specially adapted brushy tongues and in many cases bills
designed to fit co-adapted flowers.[147] Kiwis and shorebirds with long
bills probe for invertebrates; shorebirds' varied bill lengths and
feeding methods result in the separation of ecological niches.[76][148]
Loons, diving ducks, penguins and auks pursue their prey underwater,
using their wings or feet for propulsion,[67] while aerial predators
such as sulids, kingfishers and terns plunge dive after their prey.
Flamingos, three species of prion, and some ducks are filter
feeders.[149][150] Geese and dabbling ducks are primarily
grazers.[151][152]
Some species, including frigatebirds,
gulls,[153] and skuas,[154] engage in kleptoparasitism, stealing food
items from other birds. Kleptoparasitism is thought to be a supplement
to food obtained by hunting, rather than a significant part of any
species' diet; a study of great frigatebirds stealing from masked
boobies estimated that the frigatebirds stole at most 40% of their food
and on average stole only 5%.[155] Other birds are scavengers; some of
these, like vultures, are specialised carrion eaters, while others, like
gulls, corvids, or other birds of prey, are opportunists.[156]
Water and drinking
Water
is needed by many birds although their mode of excretion and lack of
sweat glands reduces the physiological demands.[157] Some desert birds
can obtain their water needs entirely from moisture in their food. They
may also have other adaptations such as allowing their body temperature
to rise, saving on moisture loss from evaporative cooling or
panting.[158] Seabirds can drink seawater and have salt glands inside
the head that eliminate excess salt out of the nostrils.[159]
Most
birds scoop water in their beaks and raise their head to let water run
down the throat. Some species, especially of arid zones, belonging to
the pigeon, finch, mousebird, button-quail and bustard families are
capable of sucking up water without the need to tilt back their
heads.[160] Some desert birds depend on water sources and sandgrouse are
particularly well known for their daily congregations at waterholes.
Nesting sandgrouse and many plovers carry water to their young by
wetting their belly feathers.[161] Some birds carry water for chicks at
the nest in their crop or regurgitate it along with food. The pigeon
family, flamingos and penguins have adaptations to produce a nutritive
fluid called crop milk that they provide to their chicks.[162]
Feather care
Main article: Preening
Feathers,
being critical to the survival of a bird, require maintenance. Apart
from physical wear and tear, feathers face the onslaught of fungi,
ectoparasitic feather mites and bird lice.[163] The physical condition
of feathers are maintained by preening often with the application of
secretions from the preen gland. Birds also bathe in water or dust
themselves. While some birds dip into shallow water, more aerial species
may make aerial dips into water and arboreal species often make use of
dew or rain that collect on leaves. Birds of arid regions make use of
loose soil to dust-bathe. A behaviour termed as anting in which the bird
encourages ants to run through their plumage is also thought to help
them reduce the ectoparasite load in feathers. Many species will spread
out their wings and expose them to direct sunlight and this too is
thought to help in reducing fungal and ectoparasitic activity that may
lead to feather damage.[164][165]
Migration
Main article: Bird migration
A flock of Canada geese in V formation
Many
bird species migrate to take advantage of global differences of
seasonal temperatures, therefore optimising availability of food sources
and breeding habitat. These migrations vary among the different groups.
Many landbirds, shorebirds, and waterbirds undertake annual
long-distance migrations, usually triggered by the length of daylight as
well as weather conditions. These birds are characterised by a breeding
season spent in the temperate or polar regions and a non-breeding
season in the tropical regions or opposite hemisphere. Before migration,
birds substantially increase body fats and reserves and reduce the size
of some of their organs.[166][167]
Migration is highly demanding
energetically, particularly as birds need to cross deserts and oceans
without refuelling. Landbirds have a flight range of around 2,500 km
(1,600 mi) and shorebirds can fly up to 4,000 km (2,500 mi),[76]
although the bar-tailed godwit is capable of non-stop flights of up to
10,200 km (6,300 mi).[168] Seabirds also undertake long migrations, the
longest annual migration being those of sooty shearwaters, which nest in
New Zealand and Chile and spend the northern summer feeding in the
North Pacific off Japan, Alaska and California, an annual round trip of
64,000 km (39,800 mi).[169] Other seabirds disperse after breeding,
travelling widely but having no set migration route. Albatrosses nesting
in the Southern Ocean often undertake circumpolar trips between
breeding seasons.[170]
A map of the Pacific Ocean with several coloured lines representing bird routes running from New Zealand to Korea
The
routes of satellite-tagged bar-tailed godwits migrating north from New
Zealand. This species has the longest known non-stop migration of any
species, up to 10,200 km (6,300 mi).
Some bird species undertake
shorter migrations, travelling only as far as is required to avoid bad
weather or obtain food. Irruptive species such as the boreal finches are
one such group and can commonly be found at a location in one year and
absent the next. This type of migration is normally associated with food
availability.[171] Species may also travel shorter distances over part
of their range, with individuals from higher latitudes travelling into
the existing range of conspecifics; others undertake partial migrations,
where only a fraction of the population, usually females and
subdominant males, migrates.[172] Partial migration can form a large
percentage of the migration behaviour of birds in some regions; in
Australia, surveys found that 44% of non-passerine birds and 32% of
passerines were partially migratory.[173]
Altitudinal migration
is a form of short-distance migration in which birds spend the breeding
season at higher altitudes and move to lower ones during suboptimal
conditions. It is most often triggered by temperature changes and
usually occurs when the normal territories also become inhospitable due
to lack of food.[174] Some species may also be nomadic, holding no fixed
territory and moving according to weather and food availability.
Parrots as a family are overwhelmingly neither migratory nor sedentary
but considered to either be dispersive, irruptive, nomadic or undertake
small and irregular migrations.[175]
The ability of birds to
return to precise locations across vast distances has been known for
some time; in an experiment conducted in the 1950s, a Manx shearwater
released in Boston in the United States returned to its colony in
Skomer, in Wales within 13 days, a distance of 5,150 km (3,200 mi).[176]
Birds navigate during migration using a variety of methods. For diurnal
migrants, the sun is used to navigate by day, and a stellar compass is
used at night. Birds that use the sun compensate for the changing
position of the sun during the day by the use of an internal clock.[76]
Orientation with the stellar compass depends on the position of the
constellations surrounding Polaris.[177] These are backed up in some
species by their ability to sense the Earth's geomagnetism through
specialised photoreceptors.[178]
Communication
See also: Bird vocalisation
Bird song
0:39
Song of the house wren, a common North American songbird
Mimicry
0:23
A tooth-billed bowerbird mimicking a spangled drongo
Drumming
0:03
A woodpecker drumming on wood
Problems playing these files? See media help.
Large brown patterned ground bird with outstretched wings each with a large spot in the centre
The startling display of the sunbittern mimics a large predator.
Birds
communicate primarily using visual and auditory signals. Signals can be
interspecific (between species) and intraspecific (within species).
Birds
sometimes use plumage to assess and assert social dominance,[179] to
display breeding condition in sexually selected species, or to make
threatening displays, as in the sunbittern's mimicry of a large predator
to ward off hawks and protect young chicks.[180]
Visual
communication among birds may also involve ritualised displays, which
have developed from non-signalling actions such as preening, the
adjustments of feather position, pecking, or other behaviour. These
displays may signal aggression or submission or may contribute to the
formation of pair-bonds.[76] The most elaborate displays occur during
courtship, where "dances" are often formed from complex combinations of
many possible component movements;[181] males' breeding success may
depend on the quality of such displays.[182]
Bird calls and
songs, which are produced in the syrinx, are the major means by which
birds communicate with sound. This communication can be very complex;
some species can operate the two sides of the syrinx independently,
allowing the simultaneous production of two different songs.[101] Calls
are used for a variety of purposes, including mate attraction,[76]
evaluation of potential mates,[183] bond formation, the claiming and
maintenance of territories,[76] the identification of other individuals
(such as when parents look for chicks in colonies or when mates reunite
at the start of breeding season),[184] and the warning of other birds of
potential predators, sometimes with specific information about the
nature of the threat.[185] Some birds also use mechanical sounds for
auditory communication. The Coenocorypha snipes of New Zealand drive air
through their feathers,[186] woodpeckers drum for long-distance
communication,[187] and palm cockatoos use tools to drum.[188]
Flocking and other associations
massive flock of tiny birds seen from distance so that birds appear as specks
Red-billed queleas, the most numerous species of wild bird,[189] form enormous flocks – sometimes tens of thousands strong.
While
some birds are essentially territorial or live in small family groups,
other birds may form large flocks. The principal benefits of flocking
are safety in numbers and increased foraging efficiency.[76] Defence
against predators is particularly important in closed habitats like
forests, where ambush predation is common and multiple eyes can provide a
valuable early warning system. This has led to the development of many
mixed-species feeding flocks, which are usually composed of small
numbers of many species; these flocks provide safety in numbers but
increase potential competition for resources.[190] Costs of flocking
include bullying of socially subordinate birds by more dominant birds
and the reduction of feeding efficiency in certain cases.[191]
Birds
sometimes also form associations with non-avian species. Plunge-diving
seabirds associate with dolphins and tuna, which push shoaling fish
towards the surface.[192] Some species of hornbills have a mutualistic
relationship with dwarf mongooses, in which they forage together and
warn each other of nearby birds of prey and other predators.[193]
Resting and roosting
"Roosting" redirects here. For other uses, see Roost.
Pink flamingo with grey legs and long neck pressed against body and head tucked under wings
Many birds, like this American flamingo, tuck their head into their back when sleeping.
The
high metabolic rates of birds during the active part of the day is
supplemented by rest at other times. Sleeping birds often use a type of
sleep known as vigilant sleep, where periods of rest are interspersed
with quick eye-opening "peeks", allowing them to be sensitive to
disturbances and enable rapid escape from threats.[194] Swifts are
believed to be able to sleep in flight and radar observations suggest
that they orient themselves to face the wind in their roosting
flight.[195] It has been suggested that there may be certain kinds of
sleep which are possible even when in flight.[196]
Some birds
have also demonstrated the capacity to fall into slow-wave sleep one
hemisphere of the brain at a time. The birds tend to exercise this
ability depending upon its position relative to the outside of the
flock. This may allow the eye opposite the sleeping hemisphere to remain
vigilant for predators by viewing the outer margins of the flock. This
adaptation is also known from marine mammals.[197] Communal roosting is
common because it lowers the loss of body heat and decreases the risks
associated with predators.[198] Roosting sites are often chosen with
regard to thermoregulation and safety.[199] Unusual mobile roost sites
include large herbivores on the African savanna that are used by
oxpeckers.[200]
Many sleeping birds bend their heads over their
backs and tuck their bills in their back feathers, although others place
their beaks among their breast feathers. Many birds rest on one leg,
while some may pull up their legs into their feathers, especially in
cold weather. Perching birds have a tendon-locking mechanism that helps
them hold on to the perch when they are asleep. Many ground birds, such
as quails and pheasants, roost in trees. A few parrots of the genus
Loriculus roost hanging upside down.[201] Some hummingbirds go into a
nightly state of torpor accompanied with a reduction of their metabolic
rates.[202] This physiological adaptation shows in nearly a hundred
other species, including owlet-nightjars, nightjars, and woodswallows.
One species, the common poorwill, even enters a state of
hibernation.[203] Birds do not have sweat glands, but can lose water
directly through the skin, and they may cool themselves by moving to
shade, standing in water, panting, increasing their surface area,
fluttering their throat or using special behaviours like urohidrosis to
cool themselves.[204][205]
Breeding
See also: Category:Avian sexuality, Animal sexual behaviour § Birds, Seabird breeding behaviour, and Sexual selection in birds
Social systems
Bird faces up with green face, black breast and pink lower body. Elaborate long feathers on the wings and tail.
Like others of its family, the male Raggiana bird-of-paradise has elaborate breeding plumage used to impress females.[206]
Ninety-five
per cent of bird species are socially monogamous. These species pair
for at least the length of the breeding season or—in some cases—for
several years or until the death of one mate.[207] Monogamy allows for
both paternal care and biparental care, which is especially important
for species in which care from both the female and the male parent is
required in order to successfully rear a brood.[208] Among many socially
monogamous species, extra-pair copulation (infidelity) is common.[209]
Such behaviour typically occurs between dominant males and females
paired with subordinate males, but may also be the result of forced
copulation in ducks and other anatids.[210]
For females, possible
benefits of extra-pair copulation include getting better genes for her
offspring and insuring against the possibility of infertility in her
mate.[211] Males of species that engage in extra-pair copulations will
closely guard their mates to ensure the parentage of the offspring that
they raise.[212]
Other mating systems, including polygyny,
polyandry, polygamy, polygynandry, and promiscuity, also occur.[76]
Polygamous breeding systems arise when females are able to raise broods
without the help of males.[76] Mating systems vary across bird
families[213] but variations within species are thought to be driven by
environmental conditions.[214]
Breeding usually involves some
form of courtship display, typically performed by the male.[215] Most
displays are rather simple and involve some type of song. Some displays,
however, are quite elaborate. Depending on the species, these may
include wing or tail drumming, dancing, aerial flights, or communal
lekking. Females are generally the ones that drive partner
selection,[216] although in the polyandrous phalaropes, this is
reversed: plainer males choose brightly coloured females.[217] Courtship
feeding, billing and allopreening are commonly performed between
partners, generally after the birds have paired and mated.[218]
Homosexual
behaviour has been observed in males or females in numerous species of
birds, including copulation, pair-bonding, and joint parenting of
chicks.[219] Over 130 avian species around the world engage in sexual
interactions between the same sex or homosexual behaviours. "Same-sex
courtship activities may involve elaborate displays, synchronized
dances, gift-giving ceremonies, or behaviors at specific display areas
including bowers, arenas, or leks."[220]
Territories, nesting and incubation
See also: Bird nest
Many
birds actively defend a territory from others of the same species
during the breeding season; maintenance of territories protects the food
source for their chicks. Species that are unable to defend feeding
territories, such as seabirds and swifts, often breed in colonies
instead; this is thought to offer protection from predators. Colonial
breeders defend small nesting sites, and competition between and within
species for nesting sites can be intense.[221]
All birds lay
amniotic eggs with hard shells made mostly of calcium carbonate.[76]
Hole and burrow nesting species tend to lay white or pale eggs, while
open nesters lay camouflaged eggs. There are many exceptions to this
pattern, however; the ground-nesting nightjars have pale eggs, and
camouflage is instead provided by their plumage. Species that are
victims of brood parasites have varying egg colours to improve the
chances of spotting a parasite's egg, which forces female parasites to
match their eggs to those of their hosts.[222]
Yellow weaver (bird) with black head hangs an upside-down nest woven out of grass fronds.
Male golden-backed weavers construct elaborate suspended nests out of grass.
Bird
eggs are usually laid in a nest. Most species create somewhat elaborate
nests, which can be cups, domes, plates, mounds, or burrows.[223] Some
bird nests can be a simple scrape, with minimal or no lining; most
seabird and wader nests are no more than a scrape on the ground. Most
birds build nests in sheltered, hidden areas to avoid predation, but
large or colonial birds—which are more capable of defence—may build more
open nests. During nest construction, some species seek out plant
matter from plants with parasite-reducing toxins to improve chick
survival,[224] and feathers are often used for nest insulation.[223]
Some bird species have no nests; the cliff-nesting common guillemot lays
its eggs on bare rock, and male emperor penguins keep eggs between
their body and feet. The absence of nests is especially prevalent in
open habitat ground-nesting species where any addition of nest material
would make the nest more conspicuous. Many ground nesting birds lay a
clutch of eggs that hatch synchronously, with precocial chicks led away
from the nests (nidifugous) by their parents soon after hatching.[225]
Nest made of straw with five white eggs and one grey speckled egg
Nest of an eastern phoebe that has been parasitised by a brown-headed cowbird
Incubation,
which regulates temperature for chick development, usually begins after
the last egg has been laid.[76] In monogamous species incubation duties
are often shared, whereas in polygamous species one parent is wholly
responsible for incubation. Warmth from parents passes to the eggs
through brood patches, areas of bare skin on the abdomen or breast of
the incubating birds. Incubation can be an energetically demanding
process; adult albatrosses, for instance, lose as much as 83 grams (2.9
oz) of body weight per day of incubation.[226] The warmth for the
incubation of the eggs of megapodes comes from the sun, decaying
vegetation or volcanic sources.[227] Incubation periods range from 10
days (in woodpeckers, cuckoos and passerine birds) to over 80 days (in
albatrosses and kiwis).[76]
The diversity of characteristics of
birds is great, sometimes even in closely related species. Several avian
characteristics are compared in the table below.[228][229]
Species Adult weight
(grams) Incubation
(days) Clutches
(per year) Clutch size
Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) 3 13 2.0 2
House sparrow (Passer domesticus) 25 11 4.5 5
Greater roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) 376 20 1.5 4
Turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) 2,200 39 1.0 2
Laysan albatross (Diomedea immutabilis) 3,150 64 1.0 1
Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) 4,000 40 1.0 1
Golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) 4,800 40 1.0 2
Wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) 6,050 28 1.0 11
Parental care and fledging
Main article: Parental care in birds
At
the time of their hatching, chicks range in development from helpless
to independent, depending on their species. Helpless chicks are termed
altricial, and tend to be born small, blind, immobile and naked; chicks
that are mobile and feathered upon hatching are termed precocial.
Altricial chicks need help thermoregulating and must be brooded for
longer than precocial chicks. The young of many bird species do not
precisely fit into either the precocial or altricial category, having
some aspects of each and thus fall somewhere on an "altricial-precocial
spectrum".[230] Chicks at neither extreme but favouring one or the other
may be termed semi-precocial[231] or semi-altricial.[232]
Hummingbird perched on edge of tiny nest places food into mouth of one of two chicks
A female calliope hummingbird feeding fully grown chicks
Looking down on three helpless blind chicks in a nest within the hollow of a dead tree trunk
Altricial chicks of a white-breasted woodswallow
The
length and nature of parental care varies widely amongst different
orders and species. At one extreme, parental care in megapodes ends at
hatching; the newly hatched chick digs itself out of the nest mound
without parental assistance and can fend for itself immediately.[233] At
the other extreme, many seabirds have extended periods of parental
care, the longest being that of the great frigatebird, whose chicks take
up to six months to fledge and are fed by the parents for up to an
additional 14 months.[234] The chick guard stage describes the period of
breeding during which one of the adult birds is permanently present at
the nest after chicks have hatched. The main purpose of the guard stage
is to aid offspring to thermoregulate and protect them from
predation.[235]
In some species, both parents care for nestlings
and fledglings; in others, such care is the responsibility of only one
sex. In some species, other members of the same species—usually close
relatives of the breeding pair, such as offspring from previous
broods—will help with the raising of the young.[236] Such alloparenting
is particularly common among the Corvida, which includes such birds as
the true crows, Australian magpie and fairy-wrens,[237] but has been
observed in species as different as the rifleman and red kite. Among
most groups of animals, male parental care is rare. In birds, however,
it is quite common—more so than in any other vertebrate class.[76]
Although territory and nest site defence, incubation, and chick feeding
are often shared tasks, there is sometimes a division of labour in which
one mate undertakes all or most of a particular duty.[238]
The
point at which chicks fledge varies dramatically. The chicks of the
Synthliboramphus murrelets, like the ancient murrelet, leave the nest
the night after they hatch, following their parents out to sea, where
they are raised away from terrestrial predators.[239] Some other
species, such as ducks, move their chicks away from the nest at an early
age. In most species, chicks leave the nest just before, or soon after,
they are able to fly. The amount of parental care after fledging
varies; albatross chicks leave the nest on their own and receive no
further help, while other species continue some supplementary feeding
after fledging.[240] Chicks may also follow their parents during their
first migration.[241]
Brood parasites
Main article: Brood parasite
Small brown bird places an insect in the bill of much larger grey bird in nest
Reed warbler raising a common cuckoo, a brood parasite
Brood
parasitism, in which an egg-layer leaves her eggs with another
individual's brood, is more common among birds than any other type of
organism.[242] After a parasitic bird lays her eggs in another bird's
nest, they are often accepted and raised by the host at the expense of
the host's own brood. Brood parasites may be either obligate brood
parasites, which must lay their eggs in the nests of other species
because they are incapable of raising their own young, or non-obligate
brood parasites, which sometimes lay eggs in the nests of conspecifics
to increase their reproductive output even though they could have raised
their own young.[243] One hundred bird species, including honeyguides,
icterids, and ducks, are obligate parasites, though the most famous are
the cuckoos.[242] Some brood parasites are adapted to hatch before their
host's young, which allows them to destroy the host's eggs by pushing
them out of the nest or to kill the host's chicks; this ensures that all
food brought to the nest will be fed to the parasitic chicks.[244]
Sexual selection
The peacock tail in flight, the classic example of a Fisherian runaway
Main article: Sexual selection in birds
Birds
have evolved a variety of mating behaviours, with the peacock tail
being perhaps the most famous example of sexual selection and the
Fisherian runaway. Commonly occurring sexual dimorphisms such as size
and colour differences are energetically costly attributes that signal
competitive breeding situations.[245] Many types of avian sexual
selection have been identified; intersexual selection, also known as
female choice; and intrasexual competition, where individuals of the
more abundant sex compete with each other for the privilege to mate.
Sexually selected traits often evolve to become more pronounced in
competitive breeding situations until the trait begins to limit the
individual's fitness. Conflicts between an individual fitness and
signalling adaptations ensure that sexually selected ornaments such as
plumage colouration and courtship behaviour are "honest" traits. Signals
must be costly to ensure that only good-quality individuals can present
these exaggerated sexual ornaments and behaviours.[246]
Inbreeding depression
Main article: Inbreeding depression
Inbreeding
causes early death (inbreeding depression) in the zebra finch
Taeniopygia guttata.[247] Embryo survival (that is, hatching success of
fertile eggs) was significantly lower for sib-sib mating pairs than for
unrelated pairs.[citation needed]
Darwin's finch Geospiza
scandens experiences inbreeding depression (reduced survival of
offspring) and the magnitude of this effect is influenced by
environmental conditions such as low food availability.[248]
Inbreeding avoidance
Main article: Inbreeding avoidance
Incestuous
matings by the purple-crowned fairy wren Malurus coronatus result in
severe fitness costs due to inbreeding depression (greater than 30%
reduction in hatchability of eggs).[249] Females paired with related
males may undertake extra pair matings (see Promiscuity#Other animals
for 90% frequency in avian species) that can reduce the negative effects
of inbreeding. However, there are ecological and demographic
constraints on extra pair matings. Nevertheless, 43% of broods produced
by incestuously paired females contained extra pair young.[249]
Inbreeding
depression occurs in the great tit (Parus major) when the offspring
produced as a result of a mating between close relatives show reduced
fitness. In natural populations of Parus major, inbreeding is avoided by
dispersal of individuals from their birthplace, which reduces the
chance of mating with a close relative.[250]
Southern pied
babblers Turdoides bicolor appear to avoid inbreeding in two ways. The
first is through dispersal, and the second is by avoiding familiar group
members as mates.[251]
Cooperative breeding in birds typically
occurs when offspring, usually males, delay dispersal from their natal
group in order to remain with the family to help rear younger kin.[252]
Female offspring rarely stay at home, dispersing over distances that
allow them to breed independently, or to join unrelated groups. In
general, inbreeding is avoided because it leads to a reduction in
progeny fitness (inbreeding depression) due largely to the homozygous
expression of deleterious recessive alleles.[253] Cross-fertilisation
between unrelated individuals ordinarily leads to the masking of
deleterious recessive alleles in progeny.[254][255]
Ecology
Gran Canaria blue chaffinch, an example of a bird highly specialised in its habitat, in this case in the Canarian pine forests
Birds
occupy a wide range of ecological positions.[189] While some birds are
generalists, others are highly specialised in their habitat or food
requirements. Even within a single habitat, such as a forest, the niches
occupied by different species of birds vary, with some species feeding
in the forest canopy, others beneath the canopy, and still others on the
forest floor. Forest birds may be insectivores, frugivores, or
nectarivores. Aquatic birds generally feed by fishing, plant eating, and
piracy or kleptoparasitism. Many grassland birds are granivores. Birds
of prey specialise in hunting mammals or other birds, while vultures are
specialised scavengers. Birds are also preyed upon by a range of
mammals including a few avivorous bats.[256] A wide range of endo- and
ectoparasites depend on birds and some parasites that are transmitted
from parent to young have co-evolved and show
host-specificity.[257][258]
Some nectar-feeding birds are
important pollinators, and many frugivores play a key role in seed
dispersal.[259] Plants and pollinating birds often coevolve,[260] and in
some cases a flower's primary pollinator is the only species capable of
reaching its nectar.[261]
Birds are often important to island
ecology. Birds have frequently reached islands that mammals have not; on
those islands, birds may fulfil ecological roles typically played by
larger animals. For example, in New Zealand nine species of moa were
important browsers, as are the kererū and kokako today.[259] Today the
plants of New Zealand retain the defensive adaptations evolved to
protect them from the extinct moa.[262]
Many birds act as
ecosystem engineers through the construction of nests, which provide
important microhabitats and food for hundreds of species of
invertebrates.[263][264] Nesting seabirds may affect the ecology of
islands and surrounding seas, principally through the concentration of
large quantities of guano, which may enrich the local soil[265] and the
surrounding seas.[266]
A wide variety of avian ecology field
methods, including counts, nest monitoring, and capturing and marking,
are used for researching avian ecology.[267]
Relationship with humans
Main article: Birds in culture
Two rows of cages in a dark barn with many white chickens in each cage
Industrial farming of chickens
Since
birds are highly visible and common animals, humans have had a
relationship with them since the dawn of man.[268] Sometimes, these
relationships are mutualistic, like the cooperative honey-gathering
among honeyguides and African peoples such as the Borana.[269] Other
times, they may be commensal, as when species such as the house
sparrow[270] have benefited from human activities. Several bird species
have become commercially significant agricultural pests,[271] and some
pose an aviation hazard.[272] Human activities can also be detrimental,
and have threatened numerous bird species with extinction (hunting,
avian lead poisoning, pesticides, roadkill, wind turbine kills[273] and
predation by pet cats and dogs are common causes of death for
birds).[274]
Birds can act as vectors for spreading diseases such
as psittacosis, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, mycobacteriosis
(avian tuberculosis), avian influenza (bird flu), giardiasis, and
cryptosporidiosis over long distances. Some of these are zoonotic
diseases that can also be transmitted to humans.[275]
Economic importance
See also: Pet § Birds
Illustration of fisherman on raft with pole for punting and numerous black birds on raft
The use of cormorants by Asian fishermen is in steep decline but survives in some areas as a tourist attraction.
Domesticated
birds raised for meat and eggs, called poultry, are the largest source
of animal protein eaten by humans; in 2003, 76 million tons of poultry
and 61 million tons of eggs were produced worldwide.[276] Chickens
account for much of human poultry consumption, though domesticated
turkeys, ducks, and geese are also relatively common.[citation needed]
Many species of birds are also hunted for meat. Bird hunting is
primarily a recreational activity except in extremely undeveloped areas.
The most important birds hunted in North and South America are
waterfowl; other widely hunted birds include pheasants, wild turkeys,
quail, doves, partridge, grouse, snipe, and woodcock.[citation needed]
Muttonbirding is also popular in Australia and New Zealand.[277]
Although some hunting, such as that of muttonbirds, may be sustainable,
hunting has led to the extinction or endangerment of dozens of
species.[278]
Other commercially valuable products from birds
include feathers (especially the down of geese and ducks), which are
used as insulation in clothing and bedding, and seabird faeces (guano),
which is a valuable source of phosphorus and nitrogen. The War of the
Pacific, sometimes called the Guano War, was fought in part over the
control of guano deposits.[279]
Birds have been domesticated by
humans both as pets and for practical purposes. Colourful birds, such as
parrots and mynas, are bred in captivity or kept as pets, a practice
that has led to the illegal trafficking of some endangered species.[280]
Falcons and cormorants have long been used for hunting and fishing,
respectively. Messenger pigeons, used since at least 1 AD, remained
important as recently as World War II. Today, such activities are more
common either as hobbies, for entertainment and tourism,[281]
Amateur
bird enthusiasts (called birdwatchers, twitchers or, more commonly,
birders) number in the millions.[282] Many homeowners erect bird feeders
near their homes to attract various species. Bird feeding has grown
into a multimillion-dollar industry; for example, an estimated 75% of
households in Britain provide food for birds at some point during the
winter.[283]
In religion and mythology
Woodcut of three long-legged and long-necked birds
The 3 of Birds by the Master of the Playing Cards, 15th-century Germany
Birds
play prominent and diverse roles in religion and mythology. In
religion, birds may serve as either messengers or priests and leaders
for a deity, such as in the Cult of Makemake, in which the Tangata manu
of Easter Island served as chiefs[284] or as attendants, as in the case
of Hugin and Munin, the two common ravens who whispered news into the
ears of the Norse god Odin. In several civilisations of ancient Italy,
particularly Etruscan and Roman religion, priests were involved in
augury, or interpreting the words of birds while the "auspex" (from
which the word "auspicious" is derived) watched their activities to
foretell events.[285]
They may also serve as religious symbols,
as when Jonah (Hebrew: יונה, dove) embodied the fright, passivity,
mourning, and beauty traditionally associated with doves.[286] Birds
have themselves been deified, as in the case of the common peacock,
which is perceived as Mother Earth by the people of southern India.[287]
In the ancient world, doves were used as symbols of the Mesopotamian
goddess Inanna (later known as Ishtar),[288][289] the Canaanite mother
goddess Asherah,[288][289][290] and the Greek goddess
Aphrodite.[288][289][291][292][293] In ancient Greece, Athena, the
goddess of wisdom and patron deity of the city of Athens, had a little
owl as her symbol.[294][295][296] In religious images preserved from the
Inca and Tiwanaku empires, birds are depicted in the process of
transgressing boundaries between earthly and underground spiritual
realms.[297] Indigenous peoples of the central Andes maintain legends of
birds passing to and from metaphysical worlds.[297]
In culture and folklore
Painted tiles with design of birds from Qajar dynasty
Birds
have featured in culture and art since prehistoric times, when they
were represented in early cave paintings.[298] Some birds have been
perceived as monsters, including the mythological Roc and the Māori's
legendary Pouākai, a giant bird capable of snatching humans.[299] Birds
were later used as symbols of power, as in the magnificent Peacock
Throne of the Mughal and Persian emperors.[300] With the advent of
scientific interest in birds, many paintings of birds were commissioned
for books.[citation needed]
Among the most famous of these bird
artists was John James Audubon, whose paintings of North American birds
were a great commercial success in Europe and who later lent his name to
the National Audubon Society.[301] Birds are also important figures in
poetry; for example, Homer incorporated nightingales into his Odyssey,
and Catullus used a sparrow as an erotic symbol in his Catullus 2.[302]
The relationship between an albatross and a sailor is the central theme
of Samuel Taylor Coleridge's The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, which led
to the use of the term as a metaphor for a 'burden'.[303] Other English
metaphors derive from birds; vulture funds and vulture investors, for
instance, take their name from the scavenging vulture.[304]
Perceptions
of bird species vary across cultures. Owls are associated with bad
luck, witchcraft, and death in parts of Africa,[305] but are regarded as
wise across much of Europe.[306] Hoopoes were considered sacred in
Ancient Egypt and symbols of virtue in Persia, but were thought of as
thieves across much of Europe and harbingers of war in Scandinavia.[307]
In heraldry, birds, especially eagles, often appear in coats of
arms.[308]
In music
Main article: Birds in music
In music,
birdsong has influenced composers and musicians in several ways: they
can be inspired by birdsong; they can intentionally imitate bird song in
a composition, as Vivaldi, Messiaen, and Beethoven did, along with many
later composers; they can incorporate recordings of birds into their
works, as Ottorino Respighi first did; or like Beatrice Harrison and
David Rothenberg, they can duet with birds.[309][310][311][312]
Conservation
Main article: Bird conservation
See also: Late Quaternary prehistoric birds, List of extinct birds, and Raptor conservation
Large black bird with featherless head and hooked bill
The California condor once numbered only 22 birds, but conservation measures have raised that to over 500 today.
Although
human activities have allowed the expansion of a few species, such as
the barn swallow and European starling, they have caused population
decreases or extinction in many other species. Over a hundred bird
species have gone extinct in historical times,[313] although the most
dramatic human-caused avian extinctions, eradicating an estimated
750–1800 species, occurred during the human colonisation of Melanesian,
Polynesian, and Micronesian islands.[314] Many bird populations are
declining worldwide, with 1,227 species listed as threatened by BirdLife
International and the IUCN in 2009.[315][316]
The most commonly
cited human threat to birds is habitat loss.[317] Other threats include
overhunting, accidental mortality due to collisions with buildings or
vehicles, long-line fishing bycatch,[318] pollution (including oil
spills and pesticide use),[319] competition and predation from nonnative
invasive species,[320] and climate change.
Governments and
conservation groups work to protect birds, either by passing laws that
preserve and restore bird habitat or by establishing captive populations
for reintroductions. Such projects have produced some successes; one
study estimated that conservation efforts saved 16 species of bird that
would otherwise have gone extinct between 1994 and 2004, including the
California condor and Norfolk parakeet.[321]
See also
Animal track
Avian sleep
Bat
Climate change and birds
Glossary of bird terms
Ornithology
Paleocene dinosaurs
References
Field,
Daniel J.; Benito, Juan; Chen, Albert; Jagt, John W. M.; Ksepka, Daniel
T. (March 2020). "Late Cretaceous neornithine from Europe illuminates
the origins of crown birds". Nature. 579 (7799): 397–401.
Bibcode:2020Natur.579..397F. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2096-0. ISSN
0028-0836. PMID 32188952. S2CID 212937591.
De Pietri, Vanesa L.;
Scofield, R. Paul; Zelenkov, Nikita; Boles, Walter E.; Worthy, Trevor H.
(February 2016). "The unexpected survival of an ancient lineage of
anseriform birds into the Neogene of Australia: the youngest record of
Presbyornithidae". Royal Society Open Science. 3 (2): 150635.
Bibcode:2016RSOS....350635D. doi:10.1098/rsos.150635. PMC 4785986. PMID
26998335.
Yonezawa, T, et al. (2017). "Phylogenomics and Morphology
of Extinct Paleognaths Reveal the Origin and Evolution of the Ratites".
Current Biology. 27 (1): 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.029. PMID
27989673.
Kuhl, H; Frankl-Vilches, C; Bakker, A; Mayr, G; Nikolaus,
G; Boerno, S T; Klages, S; Timmermann, B; Gahr, M (2020). "An unbiased
molecular approach using 3'UTRs resolves the avian family-level tree of
life". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 38 (1): 108–127.
doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa191. hdl:21.11116/0000-0007-B72A-C. PMC 7783168.
PMID 32781465.
Crouch, N.M.A. (2022) Interpreting the fossil record
and the origination of birds. bioRxiv, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.19.492716
Brands, Sheila (14 August
2008). "Systema Naturae 2000 / Classification, Class Aves". Project: The
Taxonomicon. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
del Hoyo, Josep; Andy Elliott;
Jordi Sargatal (1992). Handbook of Birds of the World, Volume 1: Ostrich
to Ducks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. ISBN 84-87334-10-5.
Linnaeus,
Carolus (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum
classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis,
synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata (in Latin). Holmiae.
(Laurentii Salvii). p. 824.
Livezey, Bradley C.; Zusi, RL (January
2007). "Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves:
Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion".
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 149 (1): 1–95.
doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x. PMC 2517308. PMID 18784798.
Padian,
Kevin; L.M. Chiappe; Chiappe LM (1997). "Bird Origins". In Philip J.
Currie; Kevin Padian (eds.). Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs. San Diego:
Academic Press. pp. 41–96. ISBN 0-12-226810-5.
Gauthier, Jacques
(1986). "Saurischian Monophyly and the origin of birds". In Kevin Padian
(ed.). The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. Memoirs of the
California Academy of Science 8. San Francisco, CA: Published by
California Academy of Sciences. pp. 1–55. ISBN 0-940228-14-9.
Gauthier,
J., and de Queiroz, K. (2001). "Feathered dinosaurs, flying dinosaurs,
crown dinosaurs, and the name Aves." pp. 7–41 in New perspectives on the
origin and early evolution of birds: proceedings of the International
Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom (J.A. Gauthier and L.F. Gall,
eds.). Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Pascal
Godefroit; Andrea Cau; Hu Dong-Yu; François Escuillié; Wu Wenhao;
Gareth Dyke (2013). "A Jurassic avialan dinosaur from China resolves the
early phylogenetic history of birds". Nature. 498 (7454): 359–362.
Bibcode:2013Natur.498..359G. doi:10.1038/nature12168. PMID 23719374.
S2CID 4364892.
Cau, Andrea (2018). "The assembly of the avian body
plan : a 160-million-year long process" (PDF). Bollettino della Società
Paleontologica Italiana.
Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter;
Osmólska, Halszka (eds.) (2004). The Dinosauria, Second Edition.
University of California Press., 861 pp.
Senter, P (2007). "A new
look at the phylogeny of Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda)". Journal
of Systematic Palaeontology. 5 (4): 429–463.
doi:10.1017/S1477201907002143. S2CID 83726237.
Maryańska, Teresa;
Osmólska, Halszka; Wolsan, Mieczysław (2002). "Avialan status for
Oviraptorosauria". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. S2CID 55462557.
Gauthier,
J. (1986). "Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds." In: K.
Padian, ed. The origin of birds and the evolution of flight. San
Francisco: California, Acad. Sci. pp. 1–55. (Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci.8.)
Lee,
Michael S. Y.; Spencer, Patrick S. (1 January 1997), Sumida, Stuart S.;
Martin, Karen L. M. (eds.), "CHAPTER 3 – CROWN-CLADES, KEY CHARACTERS
AND TAXONOMIC STABILITY: WHEN IS AN AMNIOTE NOT AN AMNIOTE?", Amniote
Origins, Academic Press, pp. 61–84, ISBN 978-0-12-676460-4, retrieved 14
May 2020
Cau, Andrea; Brougham, Tom; Naish, Darren (2015). "The
phylogenetic affinities of the bizarre Late Cretaceous Romanian theropod
Balaur bondoc(Dinosauria, Maniraptora): Dromaeosaurid or flightless
bird?". PeerJ. 3: e1032. doi:10.7717/peerj.1032. PMC 4476167. PMID
26157616.
Li, Q.; Gao, K.-Q.; Vinther, J.; Shawkey, M.D.; Clarke,
J.A.; d'Alba, L.; Meng, Q.; Briggs, D.E.G. & Prum, R.O. (2010).
"Plumage color patterns of an extinct dinosaur" (PDF). Science. 327
(5971): 1369–1372. Bibcode:2010Sci...327.1369L.
doi:10.1126/science.1186290. PMID 20133521. S2CID 206525132.
Prum,
Richard O. Prum (19 December 2008). "Who's Your Daddy?". Science. 322
(5909): 1799–1800. doi:10.1126/science.1168808. PMID 19095929. S2CID
206517571.
Paul, Gregory S. (2002). "Looking for the True Bird
Ancestor". Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in
Dinosaurs and Birds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp.
171–224. ISBN 0-8018-6763-0.
Norell, Mark; Mick Ellison (2005).
Unearthing the Dragon: The Great Feathered Dinosaur Discovery. New York:
Pi Press. ISBN 0-13-186266-9.
Borenstein, Seth (31 July 2014).
"Study traces dinosaur evolution into early birds". Associated Press.
Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 3 August 2014.
Lee,
Michael S.Y.; Cau, Andrea; Naish, Darren; Dyke, Gareth J. (1 August
2014). "Sustained miniaturization and anatomical innovation in the
dinosaurian ancestors of birds". Science. 345 (6196): 562–566.
Bibcode:2014Sci...345..562L. doi:10.1126/science.1252243. PMID 25082702.
S2CID 37866029.
Plotnick, Roy E.; Theodor, Jessica M.; Holtz, Thomas
R. (24 September 2015). "Jurassic Pork: What Could a Jewish Time
Traveler Eat?". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 8 (1): 17.
doi:10.1186/s12052-015-0047-2. ISSN 1936-6434. S2CID 16195453.
Xing
Xu; Hailu You; Kai Du; Fenglu Han (28 July 2011). "An Archaeopteryx-like
theropod from China and the origin of Avialae". Nature. 475 (7357):
465–470. doi:10.1038/nature10288. PMID 21796204. S2CID 205225790.
Turner,
Alan H.; Pol, D.; Clarke, J.A.; Erickson, G.M.; Norell, M.A. (7
September 2007). "A basal dromaeosaurid and size evolution preceding
avian flight" (PDF). Science. 317 (5843): 1378–1381.
Bibcode:2007Sci...317.1378T. doi:10.1126/science.1144066. PMID 17823350.
S2CID 2519726.
Xu, X; Zhou, Z; Wang, X; Kuang, X; Zhang, F; Du, X
(23 January 2003). "Four-winged dinosaurs from China". Nature. 421
(6921): 335–340. Bibcode:2003Natur.421..335X. doi:10.1038/nature01342.
PMID 12540892. S2CID 1160118.
Luiggi, Christina (July 2011). "On the
Origin of Birds". The Scientist. Archived from the original on 16 June
2012. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
Mayr, G.; Pohl, B.; Hartman, S.;
Peters, D.S. (January 2007). "The tenth skeletal specimen of
Archaeopteryx". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 149 (1):
97–116. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00245.x.
Ivanov, M., Hrdlickova, S. & Gregorova, R. (2001) The Complete Encyclopedia of Fossils. Rebo Publishers, Netherlands. p. 312
Benton,
Michael J.; Dhouailly, Danielle; Jiang, Baoyu; McNamara, Maria (1
September 2019). "The Early Origin of Feathers". Trends in Ecology &
Evolution. 34 (9): 856–869. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.018. ISSN
0169-5347. PMID 31164250. S2CID 174811556.
Zheng, X.; Zhou, Z.; Wang,
X.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wei, G.; Wang, S.; Xu, X. (15 March
2013). "Hind Wings in Basal Birds and the Evolution of Leg Feathers".
Science. 339 (6125): 1309–1312. Bibcode:2013Sci...339.1309Z. CiteSeerX
10.1.1.1031.5732. doi:10.1126/science.1228753. PMID 23493711. S2CID
206544531.
Chiappe, Luis M. (2007). Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin
and Early Evolution of Birds. Sydney: University of New South Wales
Press. ISBN 978-0-86840-413-4.
Pickrell, John (22 March 2018). "Early
birds may have been too hefty to sit on their eggs". Nature.
doi:10.1038/d41586-018-03447-3.
Agency France-Presse (April 2011).
"Birds survived dino extinction with keen senses". Cosmos Magazine.
Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
Wang,
M.; Zheng, X.; O'Connor, J.K.; Lloyd, G.T.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang,
X.; Zhou, Z. (2015). "The oldest record of ornithuromorpha from the
early cretaceous of China". Nature Communications. 6 (6987): 6987.
Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.6987W. doi:10.1038/ncomms7987. PMC 5426517. PMID
25942493.
Clarke, Julia A. (2004). "Morphology, Phylogenetic
Taxonomy, and Systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae:
Ornithurae)" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.
286: 1–179. doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2004)286<0001:MPTASO>2.0.CO;2.
hdl:2246/454. S2CID 84035285. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3
March 2009. Retrieved 14 September 2007.
Louchart, A.; Viriot, L.
(2011). "From snout to beak: the loss of teeth in birds". Trends in
Ecology & Evolution. 26 (12): 663–673.
doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.004. PMID 21978465. Archived from the
original on 28 July 2014.
Clarke, J.A.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, F. (March
2006). "Insight into the evolution of avian flight from a new clade of
Early Cretaceous ornithurines from China and the morphology of
Yixianornis grabaui". Journal of Anatomy. 208 (3): 287–308.
doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00534.x. PMC 2100246. PMID 16533313.
Felice,
Ryan N.; Goswami, Anjali (2018). "Developmental origins of mosaic
evolution in the avian cranium". Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (3): 555–60.
doi:10.1073/pnas.1716437115. PMC 5776993. PMID 29279399.
Mitchell,
K.J.; Llamas, B.; Soubrier, J.; Rawlence, N.J.; Worthy, T.H.; Wood, J.;
Lee, M.S.Y.; Cooper, A. (23 May 2014). "Ancient DNA reveals elephant
birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution"
(PDF). Science. 344 (6186): 898–900. Bibcode:2014Sci...344..898M.
doi:10.1126/science.1251981. hdl:2328/35953. PMID 24855267. S2CID
206555952.
Ritchison, Gary. "Bird biogeography". Avian Biology. Eastern Kentucky University. Retrieved 10 April 2008.
Cracraft,
J. (2013). "Avian Higher-level Relationships and Classification:
Nonpasseriforms". In Dickinson, E.C.; Remsen Jr., J.V. (eds.). The
Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1
(4th ed.). Aves Press, Eastbourne, U.K. pp. xxi–xli.
Clements, James
F. (2007). The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World (6th ed.).
Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-4501-9.
"Welcome". IOC World Bird List 9.2. doi:10.14344/ioc.ml.9.2.
Clarke,
Julia A.; Tambussi, Claudia P.; Noriega, Jorge I.; Erickson, Gregory
M.; Ketcham, Richard A. (January 2005). "Definitive fossil evidence for
the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous". Nature. 433 (7023):
305–308. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..305C. doi:10.1038/nature03150. PMID
15662422. S2CID 4354309.
Clarke, J.A. (2004). "Morphology,
phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis
(Avialae: Ornithurae)". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural
History. 286: 1–179.
doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2004)286<0001:mptaso>2.0.co;2. hdl:2246/454.
S2CID 84035285. Archived from the original on 19 June 2015. Retrieved
22 March 2015.
Lee, Michael SY; Cau, Andrea; Naish, Darren; Dyke,
Gareth J. (May 2014). "Morphological Clocks in Paleontology, and a
Mid-Cretaceous Origin of Crown Aves" (PDF). Systematic Biology. Oxford
Journals. 63 (1): 442–449. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt110. PMID 24449041.
Prum,
R.O.; et al. (2015). "A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using
targeted next-generation DNA sequencing". Nature. 526 (7574): 569–573.
Bibcode:2015Natur.526..569P. doi:10.1038/nature15697. PMID 26444237.
S2CID 205246158.
Ericson, Per G.P.; et al. (2006). "Diversification
of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils" (PDF).
Biology Letters. 2 (4): 543–547. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0523. PMC
1834003. PMID 17148284. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March
2009. Retrieved 4 July 2008.
Brown, Joseph W.; Payne, RB; Mindell, DP
(June 2007). "Nuclear DNA does not reconcile 'rocks' and 'clocks' in
Neoaves: a comment on Ericson et al". Biology Letters. 3 (3): 257–259.
doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0611. PMC 2464679. PMID 17389215.
Claramunt,
S.; Cracraft, J. (2015). "A new time tree reveals Earth history's
imprint on the evolution of modern birds". Sci Adv. 1 (11): e1501005.
Bibcode:2015SciA....1E1005C. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501005. PMC 4730849.
PMID 26824065.
Braun, E. L.; Kimball, R. T. (2021). "Data types and the phylogeny of Neoaves". Birds. 2 (1): 1–22. doi:10.3390/birds2010001.
Boyd, John (2007). "NEORNITHES: 46 Orders" (PDF). John Boyd's website. Retrieved 30 December 2017.
Sibley,
Charles; Jon Edward Ahlquist (1990). Phylogeny and classification of
birds. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-04085-7.
Mayr,
Ernst; Short, Lester L. (1970). Species Taxa of North American Birds: A
Contribution to Comparative Systematics. Publications of the Nuttall
Ornithological Club, no. 9. Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club.
OCLC 517185.
Jarvis, E.D.; et al. (2014). "Whole-genome analyses
resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds". Science.
346 (6215): 1320–1331. Bibcode:2014Sci...346.1320J.
doi:10.1126/science.1253451. PMC 4405904. PMID 25504713.
Holmes, Bob
(10 February 2022). "Learning about birds from their genomes". Knowable
Magazine. doi:10.1146/knowable-021022-1. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
Bravo,
Gustavo A.; Schmitt, C. Jonathan; Edwards, Scott V. (3 November 2021).
"What Have We Learned from the First 500 Avian Genomes?". Annual Review
of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 52 (1): 611–639.
doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012121-085928. ISSN 1543-592X. S2CID
239655248. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
Feng, Shaohong; et al. (2020).
"Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative
genomics". Nature. 587 (7833): 252–257. Bibcode:2020Natur.587..252F.
doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2873-9. ISSN 0028-0836. PMC 7759463. PMID
33177665.
Newton, Ian (2003). The Speciation and Biogeography of Birds. Amsterdam: Academic Press. p. 463. ISBN 0-12-517375-X.
Brooke, Michael (2004). Albatrosses And Petrels Across The World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850125-0.
Weir,
Jason T.; Schluter, D (2007). "The Latitudinal Gradient in Recent
Speciation and Extinction Rates of Birds and Mammals". Science. 315
(5818): 1574–1576. Bibcode:2007Sci...315.1574W.
doi:10.1126/science.1135590. PMID 17363673. S2CID 46640620.
Schreiber, Elizabeth Anne; Joanna Burger (2001). Biology of Marine Birds. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-9882-7.
Sato,
Katsufumi; Naito, Y; Kato, A; Niizuma, Y; Watanuki, Y; Charrassin, JB;
Bost, CA; Handrich, Y; Le Maho, Y (1 May 2002). "Buoyancy and maximal
diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume?". Journal
of Experimental Biology. 205 (9): 1189–1197.
doi:10.1242/jeb.205.9.1189. PMID 11948196.
Hill, David; Peter
Robertson (1988). The Pheasant: Ecology, Management, and Conservation.
Oxford: BSP Professional. ISBN 0-632-02011-3.
Spreyer, Mark F.;
Enrique H. Bucher (1998). "Monk Parakeet (Myiopsitta monachus)". The
Birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. doi:10.2173/bna.322.
Retrieved 13 December 2015.
Arendt, Wayne J. (1 January 1988).
"Range Expansion of the Cattle Egret, (Bubulcus ibis) in the Greater
Caribbean Basin". Colonial Waterbirds. 11 (2): 252–262.
doi:10.2307/1521007. JSTOR 1521007.
Bierregaard, R.O. (1994).
"Yellow-headed Caracara". In Josep del Hoyo; Andrew Elliott; Jordi
Sargatal (eds.). Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 2; New World
Vultures to Guineafowl. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. ISBN 84-87334-15-6.
Juniper, Tony; Mike Parr (1998). Parrots: A Guide to the Parrots of the World. London: Christopher Helm. ISBN 0-7136-6933-0.
Weijden,
Wouter van der; Terwan, Paul; Guldemond, Adriaan, eds. (2010). Farmland
Birds across the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 4. ISBN
9788496553637.
Ehrlich, Paul R.; David S. Dobkin; Darryl Wheye
(1988). "Adaptations for Flight". Birds of Stanford. Stanford
University. Retrieved 13 December 2007. Based on The Birder's Handbook
(Paul Ehrlich, David Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye. 1988. Simon and Schuster,
New York.)
Gill, Frank (1995). Ornithology. New York: WH Freeman and Co. ISBN 0-7167-2415-4.
Noll, Paul. "The Avian Skeleton". paulnoll.com. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
"Skeleton of a typical bird". Fernbank Science Center's Ornithology Web. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
"The Surprising Closest Relative of the Huge Elephant Birds". Science & Innovation. 22 May 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
Ehrlich,
Paul R.; David S. Dobkin; Darryl Wheye (1988). "Drinking". Birds of
Stanford. Stanford University. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
Tsahar,
Ella; Martínez Del Rio, C; Izhaki, I; Arad, Z (2005). "Can birds be
ammonotelic? Nitrogen balance and excretion in two frugivores". Journal
of Experimental Biology. 208 (6): 1025–1034. doi:10.1242/jeb.01495. PMID
15767304. S2CID 18540594.
Skadhauge, E; Erlwanger, KH; Ruziwa, SD;
Dantzer, V; Elbrønd, VS; Chamunorwa, JP (2003). "Does the ostrich
(Struthio camelus) coprodeum have the electrophysiological properties
and microstructure of other birds?". Comparative Biochemistry and
Physiology A. 134 (4): 749–755. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00006-0. PMID
12814783.
Preest, Marion R.; Beuchat, Carol A. (April 1997). "Ammonia
excretion by hummingbirds". Nature. 386 (6625): 561–562.
Bibcode:1997Natur.386..561P. doi:10.1038/386561a0. S2CID 4372695.
Mora,
J.; Martuscelli, J; Ortiz Pineda, J; Soberon, G (1965). "The regulation
of urea-biosynthesis enzymes in vertebrates". Biochemical Journal. 96
(1): 28–35. doi:10.1042/bj0960028. PMC 1206904. PMID 14343146.
Packard,
Gary C. (1966). "The Influence of Ambient Temperature and Aridity on
Modes of Reproduction and Excretion of Amniote Vertebrates". The
American Naturalist. 100 (916): 667–682. doi:10.1086/282459. JSTOR
2459303. S2CID 85424175.
Balgooyen, Thomas G. (1 October 1971).
"Pellet Regurgitation by Captive Sparrow Hawks (Falco sparverius)"
(PDF). Condor. 73 (3): 382–385. doi:10.2307/1365774. JSTOR 1365774.
Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 February 2014.
"What Are Fecal Sacs? Bird Diapers, Basically". Audubon. 7 August 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
Yong,
Ed (6 June 2013). "Phenomena: Not Exactly Rocket Science How Chickens
Lost Their Penises (And Ducks Kept Theirs)".
Phenomena.nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 3 October 2013.
"Ornithology,
3rd Edition – Waterfowl: Order Anseriformes". Archived from the
original on 22 June 2015. Retrieved 3 October 2013.
McCracken, KG
(2000). "The 20-cm Spiny Penis of the Argentine Lake Duck (Oxyura
vittata)" (PDF). The Auk. 117 (3): 820–825.
doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0820:TCSPOT]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 5717257.
Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016.
Sasanami, Tomohiro;
Matsuzaki, Mei; Mizushima, Shusei; Hiyama, Gen (2013). "Sperm Storage
in the Female Reproductive Tract in Birds". Journal of Reproduction and
Development. 59 (4): 334–338. doi:10.1262/jrd.2013-038. ISSN 0916-8818.
PMC 3944358. PMID 23965601.
Birkhead, T.R.; Møller, P. (1993).
"Sexual selection and the temporal separation of reproductive events:
sperm storage data from reptiles, birds and mammals". Biological Journal
of the Linnean Society. 50 (4): 295–311.
doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00933.x.
Guioli, Silvana; Nandi,
Sunil; Zhao, Debiao; Burgess-Shannon, Jessica; Lovell-Badge, Robin;
Clinton, Michael (2014). "Gonadal Asymmetry and Sex Determination in
Birds". Sexual Development. 8 (5): 227–242. doi:10.1159/000358406. ISSN
1661-5433. PMID 24577119. S2CID 3035039.
Dawson, Alistair (April
2015). "Annual gonadal cycles in birds: Modeling the effects of
photoperiod on seasonal changes in GnRH-1 secretion". Frontiers in
Neuroendocrinology. 37: 52–64. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.08.004. PMID
25194876. S2CID 13704885.
FARNER, DONALD S.; FOLLETT, BRIAN K.; KING,
JAMESR.; MORTON, MARTIN L. (February 1966). "A Quantitative Examination
of Ovarian Growth in the White-Crowned Sparrow". The Biological
Bulletin. 130 (1): 67–75. doi:10.2307/1539953. JSTOR 1539953. PMID
5948479.
Ramachandran, R; McDaniel, C D (2018). "Parthenogenesis in
birds: a review". Reproduction. 155 (6): R245–R257.
doi:10.1530/REP-17-0728. ISSN 1470-1626. PMID 29559496. S2CID 4017618.
Kobayashi,
Kazuya; Kitano, Takeshi; Iwao, Yasuhiro; Kondo, Mariko (1 June 2018).
Reproductive and Developmental Strategies: The Continuity of Life.
Springer. p. 290. ISBN 978-4-431-56609-0.
Göth, Anne (2007).
"Incubation temperatures and sex ratios in Australian brush-turkey
(Alectura lathami) mounds". Austral Ecology. 32 (4): 278–285.
doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01709.x.
Göth, A; Booth, DT (March
2005). "Temperature-dependent sex ratio in a bird". Biology Letters. 1
(1): 31–33. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0247. PMC 1629050. PMID 17148121.
Maina,
John N. (November 2006). "Development, structure, and function of a
novel respiratory organ, the lung-air sac system of birds: to go where
no other vertebrate has gone". Biological Reviews. 81 (4): 545–579.
doi:10.1017/S1464793106007111. PMID 17038201.
Suthers, Roderick A.;
Sue Anne Zollinger (June 2004). "Producing song: the vocal apparatus".
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1016 (1): 109–129. Bibcode:2004NYASA1016..109S.
doi:10.1196/annals.1298.041. PMID 15313772. S2CID 45809019.
Fitch,
W.T. (1999). "Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds via tracheal
elongation: comparative and theoretical analyses". Journal of Zoology.
248: 31–48. doi:10.1017/S095283699900504X.
Scott, Robert B. (March
1966). "Comparative hematology: The phylogeny of the erythrocyte".
Annals of Hematology. 12 (6): 340–351. doi:10.1007/BF01632827. PMID
5325853. S2CID 29778484.
Whittow, G. (2000). Sturkie's Avian Physiology/ edited by G. Causey Whittow. San Diego : Academic Press, 2000.
Hoagstrom,
C.W. (2002). "Vertebrate Circulation". Magill's Encyclopedia of
Science: Animal Life. Vol 1, pp. 217–219. Pasadena, California, Salem
Press.
Hill, Richard W. (2012) Animal Physiology/ Richard W. Hill,
Gordon A. Wyse, Margaret Anderson. Third Edition pp. 647–678. Sinauer
Associates, Sunderland, MA
Barbara, Taylor (2004). pockets: birds. UK: Dorling Kindersley. p. 16. ISBN 0-7513-5176-8.
Sales,
James (2005). "The endangered kiwi: a review" (PDF). Folia Zoologica.
54 (1–2): 1–20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 September 2007.
Retrieved 15 September 2007.
Ehrlich, Paul R.; David S. Dobkin;
Darryl Wheye (1988). "The Avian Sense of Smell". Birds of Stanford.
Stanford University. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
Lequette, Benoit;
Verheyden; Jouventin (1 August 1989). "Olfaction in Subantarctic
seabirds: Its phylogenetic and ecological significance" (PDF). The
Condor. 91 (3): 732–735. doi:10.2307/1368131. JSTOR 1368131. Archived
from the original (PDF) on 25 December 2013.
Wilkie, Susan E.;
Vissers, PM; Das, D; Degrip, WJ; Bowmaker, JK; Hunt, DM (February 1998).
"The molecular basis for UV vision in birds: spectral characteristics,
cDNA sequence and retinal localization of the UV-sensitive visual
pigment of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)". Biochemical
Journal. 330 (Pt 1): 541–547. doi:10.1042/bj3300541. PMC 1219171. PMID
9461554.
Olsson, Peter; Lind, Olle; Kelber, Almut; Simmons, Leigh
(2018). "Chromatic and achromatic vision: parameter choice and
limitations for reliable model predictions". Behavioral Ecology. 29 (2):
273–282. doi:10.1093/beheco/arx133. ISSN 1045-2249. S2CID 90704358.
Andersson,
S.; J. Ornborg; M. Andersson (1998). "Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and
assortative mating in blue tits". Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
265 (1395): 445–450. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0315. PMC 1688915.
Viitala,
Jussi; Korplmäki, Erkki; Palokangas, Pälvl; Koivula, Minna (1995).
"Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet
light". Nature. 373 (6513): 425–427. Bibcode:1995Natur.373..425V.
doi:10.1038/373425a0. S2CID 4356193.
Pettingill, Olin Sewall, Jr.
(1985). Ornithology in Laboratory and Field. Fifth Edition. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press. p. 11. ISBN 0-12-552455-2.
Williams, David L.;
Flach, E (March 2003). "Symblepharon with aberrant protrusion of the
nictitating membrane in the snowy owl (Nyctea scandiaca)". Veterinary
Ophthalmology. 6 (1): 11–13. doi:10.1046/j.1463-5224.2003.00250.x. PMID
12641836.
Land, M. F. (2014). "Eye movements of vertebrates and their
relation to eye form and function". Journal of Comparative Physiology
A. 201 (2): 195–214. doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0964-5. PMID 25398576. S2CID
15836436.
Martin, Graham R.; Katzir, G (1999). "Visual fields in
Short-toed Eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function
of binocularity in birds". Brain, Behavior and Evolution. 53 (2): 55–66.
doi:10.1159/000006582. PMID 9933782. S2CID 44351032.
Saito, Nozomu
(1978). "Physiology and anatomy of avian ear". The Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America. 64 (S1): S3. Bibcode:1978ASAJ...64....3S.
doi:10.1121/1.2004193.
Warham, John (1 May 1977). "The incidence,
function and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils" (PDF).
Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society. 24 (3): 84–93.
Dumbacher,
J.P.; Beehler, BM; Spande, TF; Garraffo, HM; Daly, JW (October 1992).
"Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: chemical defense in birds?".
Science. 258 (5083): 799–801. Bibcode:1992Sci...258..799D.
doi:10.1126/science.1439786. PMID 1439786.
Longrich, N.R.; Olson,
S.L. (5 January 2011). "The bizarre wing of the Jamaican flightless ibis
Xenicibis xympithecus: a unique vertebrate adaptation". Proceedings of
the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 278 (1716): 2333–2337.
doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2117. PMC 3119002. PMID 21208965.
Belthoff,
James R.; Dufty; Gauthreaux (1 August 1994). "Plumage Variation, Plasma
Steroids and Social Dominance in Male House Finches". The Condor. 96
(3): 614–625. doi:10.2307/1369464. JSTOR 1369464.
Guthrie, R. Dale.
"How We Use and Show Our Social Organs". Body Hot Spots: The Anatomy of
Human Social Organs and Behavior. Archived from the original on 21 June
2007. Retrieved 19 October 2007.
Humphrey, Philip S.; Parkes, K.C. (1
June 1959). "An approach to the study of molts and plumages" (PDF). The
Auk. 76 (1): 1–31. doi:10.2307/4081839. JSTOR 4081839.
Pettingill Jr. OS (1970). Ornithology in Laboratory and Field. Burgess Publishing Co. ISBN 0-12-552455-2.
de
Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFS, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA,
Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001). "SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual
Archived 19 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine".
Gargallo, Gabriel
(1 June 1994). "Flight Feather Moult in the Red-Necked Nightjar
Caprimulgus ruficollis". Journal of Avian Biology. 25 (2): 119–124.
doi:10.2307/3677029. JSTOR 3677029.
Mayr, Ernst (1954). "The tail
molt of small owls" (PDF). The Auk. 71 (2): 172–178.
doi:10.2307/4081571. JSTOR 4081571. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4
October 2014.
Payne, Robert B. "Birds of the World, Biology 532".
Bird Division, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Archived from
the original on 26 February 2012. Retrieved 20 October 2007.
Turner,
J. Scott (1997). "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a
brood patch". Physiological Zoology. 70 (4): 470–480.
doi:10.1086/515854. PMID 9237308. S2CID 26584982.
Walther, Bruno A.
(2005). "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high
maintenance handicaps". Behavioral Ecology. 16 (1): 89–95.
doi:10.1093/beheco/arh135.
Shawkey, Matthew D.; Pillai, Shreekumar
R.; Hill, Geoffrey E. (2003). "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial
oil on feather-degrading bacteria". Journal of Avian Biology. 34 (4):
345–349. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03193.x.
Ehrlich, Paul R.
(1986). "The Adaptive Significance of Anting" (PDF). The Auk. 103 (4):
835. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016.
Lucas, Alfred
M. (1972). Avian Anatomy – integument. East Lansing, Michigan: USDA
Avian Anatomy Project, Michigan State University. pp. 67, 344, 394–601.
Roots, Clive (2006). Flightless Birds. Westport: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-33545-7.
McNab,
Brian K. (October 1994). "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of
Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist. 144 (4): 628–642.
doi:10.1086/285697. JSTOR 2462941. S2CID 86511951.
"Flightlessness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics".
Kovacs,
Christopher E.; Meyers, RA (2000). "Anatomy and histochemistry of
flight muscles in a wing-propelled diving bird, the Atlantic Puffin,
Fratercula arctica". Journal of Morphology. 244 (2): 109–125.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(200005)244:2<109::AID-JMOR2>3.0.CO;2-0.
PMID 10761049. S2CID 14041453.
Robert, Michel; McNeil, Raymond;
Leduc, Alain (January 1989). "Conditions and significance of night
feeding in shorebirds and other water birds in a tropical lagoon" (PDF).
The Auk. 106 (1): 94–101. doi:10.2307/4087761. JSTOR 4087761. Archived
from the original (PDF) on 4 October 2014.
Gionfriddo, James P.; Best
(1 February 1995). "Grit Use by House Sparrows: Effects of Diet and
Grit Size" (PDF). Condor. 97 (1): 57–67. doi:10.2307/1368983. JSTOR
1368983.
Hagey, Lee R.; Vidal, Nicolas; Hofmann, Alan F.; Krasowski,
Matthew D. (2010). "Complex Evolution of Bile Salts in Birds". The Auk.
127 (4): 820–831. doi:10.1525/auk.2010.09155. PMC 2990222. PMID
21113274.
Attenborough, David (1998). The Life of Birds. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01633-X.
Battley,
Phil F.; Piersma, T; Dietz, MW; Tang, S; Dekinga, A; Hulsman, K
(January 2000). "Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions
during trans-oceanic bird flight". Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
267 (1439): 191–195. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.0986. PMC 1690512. PMID
10687826. (Erratum in Proceedings of the Royal Society B
267(1461):2567.)
N Reid (2006). "Birds on New England wool properties
– A woolgrower guide" (PDF). Land, Water & Wool Northern Tablelands
Property Fact Sheet. Australian Government – Land and Water Australia.
Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 March 2011. Retrieved 17 July
2010.
Nyffeler, M.; Şekercioğlu, Ç.H.; Whelan, C.J. (August 2018).
"Insectivorous birds consume an estimated 400–500 million tons of prey
annually". The Science of Nature. 105 (7–8): 47.
Bibcode:2018SciNa.105...47N. doi:10.1007/s00114-018-1571-z. PMC 6061143.
PMID 29987431.
Paton, D.C.; Collins, B.G. (1 April 1989). "Bills and
tongues of nectar-feeding birds: A review of morphology, function, and
performance, with intercontinental comparisons". Australian Journal of
Ecology. 14 (4): 473–506. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1989.tb01457.x.
Baker,
Myron Charles; Baker, Ann Eileen Miller (1 April 1973). "Niche
Relationships Among Six Species of Shorebirds on Their Wintering and
Breeding Ranges". Ecological Monographs. 43 (2): 193–212.
doi:10.2307/1942194. JSTOR 1942194.
Cherel, Yves; Bocher, P; De
Broyer, C; Hobson, KA (2002). "Food and feeding ecology of the sympatric
thin-billed Pachyptila belcheri and Antarctic P. desolata prions at
Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean". Marine Ecology Progress Series.
228: 263–281. Bibcode:2002MEPS..228..263C. doi:10.3354/meps228263.
Jenkin,
Penelope M. (1957). "The Filter-Feeding and Food of Flamingoes
(Phoenicopteri)". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 240
(674): 401–493. Bibcode:1957RSPTB.240..401J.
doi:10.1098/rstb.1957.0004. JSTOR 92549. S2CID 84979098.
Hughes, Baz;
Green, Andy J. (2005). "Feeding Ecology". In Kear, Janet (ed.). Ducks,
Geese and Swans. Oxford University Press. pp. 42–44. ISBN
978-0-19-861008-3.
Li, Zhiheng; Clarke, Julia A. (2016). "The
Craniolingual Morphology of Waterfowl (Aves, Anseriformes) and Its
Relationship with Feeding Mode Revealed Through Contrast-Enhanced X-Ray
Computed Tomography and 2D Morphometrics". Evolutionary Biology. 43:
12–25. doi:10.1007/s11692-015-9345-4. S2CID 17961182.
Takahashi,
Akinori; Kuroki, Maki; Niizuma, Yasuaki; Watanuki, Yutaka (December
1999). "Parental Food Provisioning Is Unrelated to Manipulated Offspring
Food Demand in a Nocturnal Single-Provisioning Alcid, the Rhinoceros
Auklet". Journal of Avian Biology. 30 (4): 486. doi:10.2307/3677021.
JSTOR 3677021.
Bélisle, Marc; Giroux (1 August 1995). "Predation and
kleptoparasitism by migrating Parasitic Jaegers" (PDF). The Condor. 97
(3): 771–781. doi:10.2307/1369185. JSTOR 1369185.
Vickery, J. A. (May
1994). "The Kleptoparasitic Interactions between Great Frigatebirds and
Masked Boobies on Henderson Island, South Pacific". The Condor. 96 (2):
331–340. doi:10.2307/1369318. JSTOR 1369318.
Hiraldo, F.C.; Blanco,
J.C.; Bustamante, J. (1991). "Unspecialized exploitation of small
carcasses by birds". Bird Studies. 38 (3): 200–207.
doi:10.1080/00063659109477089. hdl:10261/47141.
Engel, Sophia Barbara
(2005). Racing the wind: Water economy and energy expenditure in avian
endurance flight. University of Groningen. ISBN 90-367-2378-7. Archived
from the original on 5 April 2020. Retrieved 25 November 2008.
Tieleman,
B.I.; Williams, JB (1999). "The role of hyperthermia in the water
economy of desert birds" (PDF). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 72 (1): 87–100.
doi:10.1086/316640. hdl:11370/6edc6940-c2e8-4c96-832e-0b6982dd59c1. PMID
9882607. S2CID 18920080.
Schmidt-Nielsen, Knut (1 May 1960). "The
Salt-Secreting Gland of Marine Birds". Circulation. 21 (5): 955–967.
doi:10.1161/01.CIR.21.5.955. PMID 14443123. S2CID 2757501.
Hallager, Sara L. (1994). "Drinking methods in two species of bustards". Wilson Bull. 106 (4): 763–764. hdl:10088/4338.
MacLean,
Gordon L. (1 June 1983). "Water Transport by Sandgrouse". BioScience.
33 (6): 365–369. doi:10.2307/1309104. JSTOR 1309104.
Eraud C; Dorie
A; Jacquet A; Faivre B (2008). "The crop milk: a potential new route for
carotenoid-mediated parental effects" (PDF). Journal of Avian Biology.
39 (2): 247–251. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04053.x.
Mario,
Principato; Federica, Lisi; Iolanda, Moretta; Nada, Samra; Francesco,
Puccetti (2005). "The alterations of plumage of parasitic origin".
Italian Journal of Animal Science. 4 (3): 296–299.
doi:10.4081/ijas.2005.296. S2CID 84770232.
Revis, Hannah C.; Waller,
Deborah A. (2004). "Bactericidal and fungicidal activity of ant
chemicals on feather parasites: an evaluation of anting behavior as a
method of self-medication in songbirds". The Auk. 121 (4): 1262–1268.
doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[1262:BAFAOA]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 85677766.
Clayton,
Dale H.; Koop, Jennifer A.H.; Harbison, Christopher W.; Moyer, Brett
R.; Bush, Sarah E. (2010). "How Birds Combat Ectoparasites". The Open
Ornithology Journal. 3: 41–71. doi:10.2174/1874453201003010041.
Battley,
Phil F.; Piersma, T; Dietz, MW; Tang, S; Dekinga, A; Hulsman, K
(January 2000). "Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions
during trans-oceanic bird flight". Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
267 (1439): 191–195. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.0986. PMC 1690512. PMID
10687826. (Erratum in Proceedings of the Royal Society B
267(1461):2567.)
Klaassen, Marc (1 January 1996). "Metabolic
constraints on long-distance migration in birds". Journal of
Experimental Biology. 199 (1): 57–64. doi:10.1242/jeb.199.1.57. PMID
9317335.
"Long-distance Godwit sets new record". BirdLife
International. 4 May 2007. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013.
Retrieved 13 December 2007.
Shaffer, Scott A.; et al. (2006).
"Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific
Ocean in an endless summer". Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (34): 12799–12802.
Bibcode:2006PNAS..10312799S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603715103. PMC 1568927.
PMID 16908846.
Croxall, John P.; Silk, JR; Phillips, RA; Afanasyev,
V; Briggs, DR (2005). "Global Circumnavigations: Tracking year-round
ranges of nonbreeding Albatrosses". Science. 307 (5707): 249–250.
Bibcode:2005Sci...307..249C. doi:10.1126/science.1106042. PMID 15653503.
S2CID 28990783.
Wilson, W. Herbert, Jr. (1999). "Bird feeding and
irruptions of northern finches:are migrations short stopped?" (PDF).
North America Bird Bander. 24 (4): 113–121. Archived from the original
(PDF) on 29 July 2014.
Nilsson, Anna L.K.; Alerstam, Thomas; Nilsson,
Jan-Åke (2006). "Do partial and regular migrants differ in their
responses to weather?". The Auk. 123 (2): 537–547.
doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[537:DPARMD]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 84665086.
Chan,
Ken (2001). "Partial migration in Australian landbirds: a review". Emu.
101 (4): 281–292. doi:10.1071/MU00034. S2CID 82259620.
Rabenold,
Kerry N. (1985). "Variation in Altitudinal Migration, Winter
Segregation, and Site Tenacity in two subspecies of Dark-eyed Juncos in
the southern Appalachians" (PDF). The Auk. 102 (4): 805–819.
Collar,
Nigel J. (1997). "Family Psittacidae (Parrots)". In Josep del Hoyo;
Andrew Elliott; Jordi Sargatal (eds.). Handbook of the Birds of the
World. Vol. 4: Sandgrouse to Cuckoos. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. ISBN
84-87334-22-9.
Matthews, G.V.T. (1 September 1953). "Navigation in
the Manx Shearwater". Journal of Experimental Biology. 30 (2): 370–396.
doi:10.1242/jeb.30.3.370.
Mouritsen, Henrik; L (15 November 2001).
"Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use
stellar cues for a time-independent compass". Journal of Experimental
Biology. 204 (8): 3855–3865. doi:10.1242/jeb.204.22.3855. PMID 11807103.
Deutschlander,
Mark E.; P; B (15 April 1999). "The case for light-dependent magnetic
orientation in animals". Journal of Experimental Biology. 202 (8):
891–908. doi:10.1242/jeb.202.8.891. PMID 10085262.
Möller, Anders
Pape (1988). "Badge size in the house sparrow Passer domesticus".
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 22 (5): 373–378.
doi:10.1007/BF00295107. JSTOR 4600164.
Thomas, Betsy Trent; Strahl (1
August 1990). "Nesting Behavior of Sunbitterns (Eurypyga helias) in
Venezuela" (PDF). The Condor. 92 (3): 576–581. doi:10.2307/1368675.
JSTOR 1368675. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016.
Pickering,
S.P.C. (2001). "Courtship behaviour of the Wandering Albatross Diomedea
exulans at Bird Island, South Georgia" (PDF). Marine Ornithology. 29
(1): 29–37.
Pruett-Jones, S.G.; Pruett-Jones (1 May 1990). "Sexual
Selection Through Female Choice in Lawes' Parotia, A Lek-Mating Bird of
Paradise". Evolution. 44 (3): 486–501. doi:10.2307/2409431. JSTOR
2409431. PMID 28567971.
Genevois, F.; Bretagnolle, V. (1994). "Male
Blue Petrels reveal their body mass when calling". Ethology Ecology and
Evolution. 6 (3): 377–383. doi:10.1080/08927014.1994.9522988. Archived
from the original on 24 December 2007.
Jouventin, Pierre; Aubin, T;
Lengagne, T (June 1999). "Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the
acoustic system of individual recognition". Animal Behaviour. 57 (6):
1175–1183. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1086. PMID 10373249. S2CID 45578269.
Templeton,
Christopher N.; Greene, E; Davis, K (2005). "Allometry of Alarm Calls:
Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size".
Science. 308 (5730): 1934–1937. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1934T.
doi:10.1126/science.1108841. PMID 15976305. S2CID 42276496.
Miskelly, C.M. (July 1987). "The identity of the hakawai". Notornis. 34 (2): 95–116.
Dodenhoff,
Danielle J.; Stark, Robert D.; Johnson, Eric V. (2001). "Do woodpecker
drums encode information for species recognition?". The Condor. 103 (1):
143. doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0143:DWDEIF]2.0.CO;2. ISSN
0010-5422. S2CID 31878910.
Murphy, Stephen; Legge, Sarah; Heinsohn,
Robert (2003). "The breeding biology of palm cockatoos (Probosciger
aterrimus): a case of a slow life history". Journal of Zoology. 261 (4):
327–339. doi:10.1017/S0952836903004175.
Sekercioglu, Cagan Hakki
(2006). "Foreword". In Josep del Hoyo; Andrew Elliott; David Christie
(eds.). Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 11: Old World
Flycatchers to Old World Warblers. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 48. ISBN
84-96553-06-X.
Terborgh, John (2005). "Mixed flocks and polyspecific
associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys".
American Journal of Primatology. 21 (2): 87–100.
doi:10.1002/ajp.1350210203. PMID 31963979. S2CID 83826161.
Hutto,
Richard L. (January 1988). "Foraging Behavior Patterns Suggest a
Possible Cost Associated with Participation in Mixed-Species Bird
Flocks". Oikos. 51 (1): 79–83. doi:10.2307/3565809. JSTOR 3565809.
Au,
David W.K.; Pitman (1 August 1986). "Seabird interactions with Dolphins
and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific" (PDF). The Condor. 88 (3):
304–317. doi:10.2307/1368877. JSTOR 1368877.
Anne, O.; Rasa, E. (June
1983). "Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru desert,
Kenya". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 12 (3): 181–190.
doi:10.1007/BF00290770. S2CID 22367357.
Gauthier-Clerc, Michael;
Tamisier, Alain; Cézilly, Frank (2000). "Sleep-Vigilance Trade-off in
Gadwall during the Winter Period" (PDF). The Condor. 102 (2): 307–313.
doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0307:SVTOIG]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 1369642.
S2CID 15957324. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 December 2004.
Bäckman,
Johan; A (1 April 2002). "Harmonic oscillatory orientation relative to
the wind in nocturnal roosting flights of the swift Apus apus". The
Journal of Experimental Biology. 205 (7): 905–910.
doi:10.1242/jeb.205.7.905. PMID 11916987.
Rattenborg, Niels C.
(2006). "Do birds sleep in flight?". Die Naturwissenschaften. 93 (9):
413–425. Bibcode:2006NW.....93..413R. doi:10.1007/s00114-006-0120-3.
PMID 16688436. S2CID 1736369.
Milius, S. (6 February 1999).
"Half-asleep birds choose which half dozes". Science News Online. 155
(6): 86. doi:10.2307/4011301. JSTOR 4011301.
Beauchamp, Guy (1999).
"The evolution of communal roosting in birds: origin and secondary
losses". Behavioral Ecology. 10 (6): 675–687.
doi:10.1093/beheco/10.6.675.
Buttemer, William A. (1985). "Energy
relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches
(Carduelis tristis)" (PDF). Oecologia. 68 (1): 126–132.
Bibcode:1985Oecol..68..126B. doi:10.1007/BF00379484. hdl:2027.42/47760.
PMID 28310921. S2CID 17355506.
Palmer, Meredith S.; Packer, Craig
(2018). "Giraffe bed and breakfast: Camera traps reveal Tanzanian
yellow‐billed oxpeckers roosting on their large mammalian hosts".
African Journal of Ecology. 56 (4): 882–884. doi:10.1111/aje.12505. ISSN
0141-6707.
Buckley, F.G.; Buckley (1 January 1968). "Upside-down
Resting by Young Green-Rumped Parrotlets (Forpus passerinus)". The
Condor. 70 (1): 89. doi:10.2307/1366517. JSTOR 1366517.
Carpenter, F.
Lynn (1974). "Torpor in an Andean Hummingbird: Its Ecological
Significance". Science. 183 (4124): 545–547.
Bibcode:1974Sci...183..545C. doi:10.1126/science.183.4124.545. PMID
17773043. S2CID 42021321.
McKechnie, Andrew E.; Ashdown, Robert A.M.;
Christian, Murray B.; Brigham, R. Mark (2007). "Torpor in an African
caprimulgid, the freckled nightjar Caprimulgus tristigma". Journal of
Avian Biology. 38 (3): 261–266. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04116.x.
Gill, Frank B.; Prum, Richard O. (2019). Ornithology (4 ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman. pp. 390–396.
Cabello-Vergel,
Julián; Soriano-Redondo, Andrea; Villegas, Auxiliadora; Masero, José
A.; Guzmán, Juan M. Sánchez; Gutiérrez, Jorge S. (2021). "Urohidrosis as
an overlooked cooling mechanism in long-legged birds". Scientific
Reports. 11 (1): 20018. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1120018C.
doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99296-8. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8501033. PMID
34625581.
Frith, C.B (1981). "Displays of Count Raggi's
Bird-of-Paradise Paradisaea raggiana and congeneric species". Emu. 81
(4): 193–201. doi:10.1071/MU9810193.
Freed, Leonard A. (1987). "The
Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?".
The American Naturalist. 130 (4): 507–525. doi:10.1086/284728. S2CID
84735736.
Gowaty, Patricia A. (1983). "Male Parental Care and
Apparent Monogamy among Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis)". The American
Naturalist. 121 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1086/284047. S2CID 84258620.
Westneat,
David F.; Stewart, Ian R.K. (2003). "Extra-pair paternity in birds:
Causes, correlates, and conflict". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution,
and Systematics. 34: 365–396.
doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132439.
Gowaty, Patricia A.;
Buschhaus, Nancy (1998). "Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced
copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social
monogamy". American Zoologist. 38 (1): 207–225.
doi:10.1093/icb/38.1.207.
Sheldon, B (1994). "Male Phenotype,
Fertility, and the Pursuit of Extra-Pair Copulations by Female Birds".
Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 257 (1348): 25–30.
Bibcode:1994RSPSB.257...25S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0089. S2CID 85745432.
Wei,
G; Zuo-Hua, Yin; Fu-Min, Lei (2005). "Copulations and mate guarding of
the Chinese Egret". Waterbirds. 28 (4): 527–530.
doi:10.1675/1524-4695(2005)28[527:CAMGOT]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 86336632.
Owens,
Ian P. F.; Bennett, Peter M. (1997). "Variation in mating system among
birds: ecological basis revealed by hierarchical comparative analysis of
mate desertion". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B:
Biological Sciences. 264 (1385): 1103–1110. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0152.
ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 1688567.
Petrie, Marion; Kempenaers, Bart (1998).
"Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species
and populations". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 13 (2): 52–58.
doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01232-9. PMID 21238200.
Short, Lester L. (1993). Birds of the World and their Behavior. New York: Henry Holt and Co. ISBN 0-8050-1952-9.
Burton, R (1985). Bird Behavior. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. ISBN 0-394-53957-5.
Schamel,
D; Tracy, Diane M.; Lank, David B.; Westneat, David F. (2004). "Mate
guarding, copulation strategies and paternity in the sex-role reversed,
socially polyandrous red-necked phalarope Phalaropus lobatus".
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 57 (2): 110–118.
doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0825-2. S2CID 26038182.
Attenborough, David (1998). The Life of Birds. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01633-X.
Bagemihl,
Bruce. Biological exuberance: Animal homosexuality and natural
diversity. New York: St. Martin's, 1999. pp. 479–655. One hundred
species are described in detail.
MacFarlane, Geoff R.; Blomberg,
Simon P.; Kaplan, Gisela; Rogers, Lesley J. (1 January 2007). "Same-sex
sexual behavior in birds: expression is related to social mating system
and state of development at hatching". Behavioral Ecology. 18 (1):
21–33. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl065. hdl:10.1093/beheco/arl065. ISSN
1045-2249.
Kokko, H; Harris, M; Wanless, S (2004). "Competition for
breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly
colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge". Journal of Animal
Ecology. 73 (2): 367–376. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00813.x.
Booker, L; Booker, M (1991). "Why Are Cuckoos Host Specific?". Oikos. 57 (3): 301–309. doi:10.2307/3565958. JSTOR 3565958.
Hansell M (2000). Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour. University of Cambridge Press ISBN 0-521-46038-7
Lafuma,
L; Lambrechts, M; Raymond, M (2001). "Aromatic plants in bird nests as a
protection against blood-sucking flying insects?". Behavioural
Processes. 56 (2): 113–120. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00191-7. PMID
11672937. S2CID 43254694.
Collias, Nicholas E.; Collias, Elsie C.
(1984). Nest building and bird behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press. pp. 16–17, 26. ISBN 0691083584.
Warham, J. (1990) The Petrels: Their Ecology and Breeding Systems London: Academic Press ISBN 0-12-735420-4
Jones
DN, Dekker, René WRJ, Roselaar, Cees S (1995). The Megapodes. Bird
Families of the World 3. Oxford University Press: Oxford. ISBN
0-19-854651-3
"AnAge: The animal ageing and longevity database". Human Ageing and Genomics Resources. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
"Animal diversity web". University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
Urfi,
A.J. (2011). The Painted Stork: Ecology and Conservation. Springer
Science & Business Media. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-4419-8468-5.
Khanna, D.R. (2005). Biology of Birds. Discovery Publishing House. p. 109. ISBN 978-81-7141-933-3.
Scott, Lynnette (2008). Wildlife Rehabilitation. National Wildlife Rehabilitators Association. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-931439-23-7.
Elliot
A (1994). "Family Megapodiidae (Megapodes)" in Handbook of the Birds of
the World. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl (eds del Hoyo J,
Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-87334-15-6
Metz
VG, Schreiber EA (2002). "Great Frigatebird (Fregata minor)" In The
Birds of North America, No 681, (Poole, A. and Gill, F., eds) The Birds
of North America Inc: Philadelphia
Young, Euan. Skua and Penguin. Predator and Prey. Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 453.
Ekman, J (2006). "Family living amongst birds". Journal of Avian Biology. 37 (4): 289–298. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03666.x.
Cockburn
A (1996). "Why do so many Australian birds cooperate? Social evolution
in the Corvida". In Floyd R, Sheppard A, de Barro P (eds.). Frontiers in
Population Ecology. Melbourne: CSIRO. pp. 21–42.
Cockburn, Andrew
(2006). "Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds".
Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 273 (1592): 1375–1383.
doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3458. PMC 1560291. PMID 16777726.
Gaston AJ
(1994). Ancient Murrelet (Synthliboramphus antiquus). In The Birds of
North America, No. 132 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The
Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American
Ornithologists' Union.
Schaefer, HC; Eshiamwata, GW; Munyekenye, FB;
Böhning-Gaese, K (2004). "Life-history of two African Sylvia warblers:
low annual fecundity and long post-fledging care". Ibis. 146 (3):
427–437. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00276.x.
Alonso, JC; Bautista,
LM; Alonso, JA (2004). "Family-based territoriality vs flocking in
wintering common cranes Grus grus". Journal of Avian Biology. 35 (5):
434–444. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03290.x. hdl:10261/43767.
Davies N (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds and other Cheats. T. & A. D. Poyser: London ISBN 0-85661-135-2
Sorenson,
M (1997). "Effects of intra- and interspecific brood parasitism on a
precocial host, the canvasback, Aythya valisineria". Behavioral Ecology.
8 (2): 153–161. doi:10.1093/beheco/8.2.153.
Spottiswoode, C.N.;
Colebrook-Robjent, J.F.R. (2007). "Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic
Greater Honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations". Behavioral
Ecology. 18 (4): 792–799. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm025.
Edwards, DB
(2012). "Immune investment is explained by sexual selection and
pace-of-life, but not longevity in parrots (Psittaciformes)". PLOS ONE. 7
(12): e53066. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...753066E.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053066. PMC 3531452. PMID 23300862.
Doutrelant,
C; Grégoire, A; Midamegbe, A; Lambrechts, M; Perret, P (January 2012).
"Female plumage coloration is sensitive to the cost of reproduction. An
experiment in blue tits". Journal of Animal Ecology. 81 (1): 87–96.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01889.x. PMID 21819397.
Hemmings NL,
Slate J, Birkhead TR (2012). "Inbreeding causes early death in a
passerine bird". Nat Commun. 3: 863. Bibcode:2012NatCo...3..863H.
doi:10.1038/ncomms1870. PMID 22643890.
Keller LF, Grant PR, Grant BR,
Petren K (2002). "Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of
inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches". Evolution. 56
(6): 1229–1239. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01434.x. PMID 12144022.
S2CID 16206523.
Kingma, SA; Hall, ML; Peters, A (2013). "Breeding
synchronization facilitates extrapair mating for inbreeding avoidance".
Behavioral Ecology. 24 (6): 1390–1397. doi:10.1093/beheco/art078.
Szulkin
M, Sheldon BC (2008). "Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a
wild bird population". Proc. Biol. Sci. 275 (1635): 703–711.
doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0989. PMC 2596843. PMID 18211876.
Nelson-Flower
MJ, Hockey PA, O'Ryan C, Ridley AR (2012). "Inbreeding avoidance
mechanisms: dispersal dynamics in cooperatively breeding southern pied
babblers". J Anim Ecol. 81 (4): 876–883.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01983.x. PMID 22471769.
Riehl C, Stern
CA (2015). "How cooperatively breeding birds identify relatives and
avoid incest: New insights into dispersal and kin recognition".
BioEssays. 37 (12): 1303–1308. doi:10.1002/bies.201500120. PMID
26577076. S2CID 205476732.
Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009). "The
genetics of inbreeding depression". Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (11): 783–796.
doi:10.1038/nrg2664. PMID 19834483. S2CID 771357.
Bernstein H, Hopf
FA, Michod RE (1987). "The molecular basis of the evolution of sex".
Adv. Genet. Advances in Genetics. 24: 323–370.
doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60012-7. ISBN 9780120176243. PMID 3324702.
Michod,
R.E. (1994). "Eros and Evolution: A Natural Philosophy of Sex"
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts. ISBN
978-0201442328
Gong, Lixin; Shi, Biye; Wu, Hui; Feng, Jiang; Jiang,
Tinglei (2021). "Who's for dinner? Bird prey diversity and choice in the
great evening bat, Ia io". Ecology and Evolution. 11 (13): 8400–8409.
doi:10.1002/ece3.7667. ISSN 2045-7758. PMC 8258197. PMID 34257905.
Križanauskienė,
Asta; Hellgren, Olof; Kosarev, Vladislav; Sokolov, Leonid; Bensch,
Staffan; Valkiūnas, Gediminas (2006). "Variation in host specificty
between species of avian hemosporidian parasites: evidence from parasite
morphology and cytochrome b gene sequences". Journal of Parasitology.
92 (6): 1319–1324. doi:10.1645/GE-873R.1. ISSN 0022-3395. PMID 17304814.
S2CID 27746219.
John, J (1995). "Parasites and the avian spleen:
helminths". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 54 (1): 87–106.
doi:10.1016/0024-4066(95)90038-1.
Clout, M; Hay, J (1989). "The
importance of birds as browsers, pollinators and seed dispersers in New
Zealand forests" (PDF). New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 12: 27–33.
Gary
Stiles, F. (1981). "Geographical Aspects of Bird-Flower Coevolution,
with Particular Reference to Central America". Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden. 68 (2): 323–351. doi:10.2307/2398801. JSTOR 2398801.
S2CID 87692272.
Temeles, E; Linhart, Y; Masonjones, M; Masonjones, H
(2002). "The Role of Flower Width in Hummingbird Bill Length–Flower
Length Relationships" (PDF). Biotropica. 34 (1): 68–80.
doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00243.x. S2CID 16315843.
Bond, William
J.; Lee, William G.; Craine, Joseph M. (2004). "Plant structural
defences against browsing birds: a legacy of New Zealand's extinct
moas". Oikos. 104 (3): 500–508. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12720.x.
Berner,
Lewis; Hicks, Ellis A. (June 1959). "Checklist and Bibliography on the
Occurrence of Insects in Birds Nests". The Florida Entomologist. 42 (2):
92. doi:10.2307/3492142. ISSN 0015-4040. JSTOR 3492142.
Boyes,
Douglas H.; Lewis, Owen T. (2019). "Ecology of Lepidoptera associated
with bird nests in mid-Wales, UK". Ecological Entomology. 44 (1): 1–10.
doi:10.1111/een.12669. ISSN 1365-2311. S2CID 91557693.
Wainright, S;
Haney, J; Kerr, C; Golovkin, A; Flint, M (1998). "Utilization of
nitrogen derived from seabird guano by terrestrial and marine plants at
St. Paul, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska". Marine Ecology. 131
(1): 63–71. doi:10.1007/s002270050297. S2CID 83734364.
Bosman, A;
Hockey, A (1986). "Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal
community structure". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 32: 247–257.
Bibcode:1986MEPS...32..247B. doi:10.3354/meps032247.
Sutherland,
William J.; Newton, Ian; Green, Rhys E. (2004). Bird Ecology and
Conservation. A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press. ISBN
0198520859.
Bonney, Rick; Rohrbaugh, Jr., Ronald (2004). Handbook of
Bird Biology (Second ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
ISBN 0-938027-62-X.
Dean, W. R. J.; Siegfried, W. ROY; MacDonald, I.
A. W. (1990). "The Fallacy, Fact, and Fate of Guiding Behavior in the
Greater Honeyguide". Conservation Biology. 4: 99–101.
doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00272.x.
Singer, R.; Yom-Tov, Y.
(1988). "The Breeding Biology of the House Sparrow Passer domesticus in
Israel". Ornis Scandinavica. 19 (2): 139–144. doi:10.2307/3676463. JSTOR
3676463.
Richard Dolbeer (1990). "Ornithology and integrated pest
management: Red-winged blackbirds Agleaius phoeniceus and corn". Ibis.
132 (2): 309–322. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1990.tb01048.x.
Dolbeer, R;
Belant, J; Sillings, J (1993). "Shooting Gulls Reduces Strikes with
Aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport". Wildlife Society
Bulletin. 21: 442–450.
"Will Wind Turbines Ever Be Safe for Birds?",
by Emma Bryce, Audubon, US National Audubon Society, 16 March 2016.
Accessed 19 March 2017.
Zimmer, Carl (19 September 2019). "Birds Are Vanishing From North America". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 September 2019.
Reed,
K.D.; Meece, J.K.; Henkel, J.S.; Shukla, S.K. (2003). "Birds, Migration
and Emerging Zoonoses: West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease, Influenza A and
Enteropathogens". Clinical Medicine & Research. 1 (1): 5–12.
doi:10.3121/cmr.1.1.5. PMC 1069015. PMID 15931279.
Brown, Lester
(2005). "3: Moving Up the Food Chain Efficiently.". Outgrowing the
Earth: The Food Security Challenge in an Age of Falling Water Tables and
Rising Temperatures. earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-185-2.
Hamilton, S.
(2000). "How precise and accurate are data obtained using. an infra-red
scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus?" (PDF).
Marine Ornithology. 28 (1): 1–6.
Keane, Aidan; Brooke, M.de L.;
McGowan, P.J.K. (2005). "Correlates of extinction risk and hunting
pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes)". Biological Conservation. 126 (2):
216–233. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.011.
"The Guano War of 1865–1866". World History at KMLA. Retrieved 18 December 2007.
Cooney,
R.; Jepson, P (2006). "The international wild bird trade: what's wrong
with blanket bans?". Oryx. 40 (1): 18–23. doi:10.1017/S0030605306000056.
Manzi,
M; Coomes, O.T. (2002). "Cormorant fishing in Southwestern China: a
Traditional Fishery under Siege. (Geographical Field Note)".
Geographical Review. 92 (4): 597–603. doi:10.2307/4140937. JSTOR
4140937.
Pullis La Rouche, G. (2006). Birding in the United States: a
demographic and economic analysis. Waterbirds around the world. Eds.
G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith and D.A. Stroud. The Stationery Office,
Edinburgh. pp. 841–846. JNCC.gov.uk Archived 4 March 2011 at the Wayback
Machine, PDF
Chamberlain, D.E.; Vickery, J.A.; Glue, D.E.; Robinson,
R.A.; Conway, G.J.; Woodburn, R.J.W.; Cannon, A.R. (2005). "Annual and
seasonal trends in the use of garden feeders by birds in winter". Ibis.
147 (3): 563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00430.x.
Routledge,
S.; Routledge, K. (1917). "The Bird Cult of Easter Island". Folklore. 28
(4): 337–355. doi:10.1080/0015587X.1917.9719006. S2CID 4216509.
Ingersoll, Ernest (1923). Archive.org, "Birds in legend, fable and folklore". Longmans, Green and co. p. 214
Hauser,
A.J. (1985). "Jonah: In Pursuit of the Dove". Journal of Biblical
Literature. 104 (1): 21–37. doi:10.2307/3260591. JSTOR 3260591.
Thankappan
Nair, P. (1974). "The Peacock Cult in Asia". Asian Folklore Studies. 33
(2): 93–170. doi:10.2307/1177550. JSTOR 1177550.
Botterweck, G.
Johannes; Ringgren, Helmer (1990). Theological Dictionary of the Old
Testament. Vol. VI. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing
Co. pp. 35–36. ISBN 0-8028-2330-0.
Lewis, Sian; Llewellyn-Jones,
Lloyd (2018). The Culture of Animals in Antiquity: A Sourcebook with
Commentaries. New York City, New York and London, England: Routledge. p.
335. ISBN 978-1-315-20160-3.
Dorothy D. Resig, The Enduring
Symbolism of Doves, From Ancient Icon to Biblical Mainstay" Archived 31
January 2013 at the Wayback Machine, BAR Magazine . Bib-arch.org (9
February 2013). Retrieved on 5 March 2013.
Cyrino, Monica S. (2010).
Aphrodite. Gods and Heroes of the Ancient World. New York City, New York
and London, England: Routledge. pp. 120–123. ISBN 978-0-415-77523-6.
Tinkle,
Theresa (1996). Medieval Venuses and Cupids: Sexuality, Hermeneutics,
and English Poetry. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p.
81. ISBN 978-0804725156.
Simon, Erika (1983). Festivals of Attica: An
Archaeological Companion. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
ISBN 0-299-09184-8.
Deacy, Susan; Villing, Alexandra (2001). Athena
in the Classical World. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
ISBN 978-9004121423.
Deacy, Susan (2008). Athena. London and New York City: Routledge. pp. 34–37, 74–75. ISBN 978-0-415-30066-7.
Nilsson,
Martin Persson (1950). The Minoan-Mycenaean Religion and Its Survival
in Greek Religion (second ed.). New York City, New York: Biblo &
Tannen. pp. 491–496. ISBN 0-8196-0273-6.
Smith, S. (2011).
"Generative landscapes: the step mountain motif in Tiwanaku iconography"
(PDF). Ancient America. 12: 1–69. Archived from the original (Automatic
PDF download) on 6 January 2019. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
Meighan,
C.W. (1966). "Prehistoric Rock Paintings in Baja California". American
Antiquity. 31 (3): 372–392. doi:10.2307/2694739. JSTOR 2694739. S2CID
163584284.
Tennyson A, Martinson P (2006). Extinct Birds of New Zealand Te Papa Press, Wellington ISBN 978-0-909010-21-8
Clarke,
CP (1908). "A Pedestal of the Platform of the Peacock Throne". The
Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin. 3 (10): 182–183.
doi:10.2307/3252550. JSTOR 3252550.
Boime, Albert (1999). "John James
Audubon: a birdwatcher's fanciful flights". Art History. 22 (5):
728–755. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.00184.
Chandler, A. (1934). "The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry". The Classical Journal. 30 (2): 78–84. JSTOR 3289944.
Lasky,
E.D. (March 1992). "A Modern Day Albatross: The Valdez and Some of
Life's Other Spills". The English Journal. 81 (3): 44–46.
doi:10.2307/820195. JSTOR 820195.
Carson, A. (1998). "Vulture
Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination". Journal of
Business Ethics. 17 (5): 543–555. doi:10.1023/A:1017974505642. S2CID
156972909.
Enriquez, P.L.; Mikkola, H. (1997). "Comparative study of
general public owl knowledge in Costa Rica, Central America and Malawi,
Africa". pp. 160–166 In: J.R. Duncan, D.H. Johnson, T.H. Nicholls,
(Eds). Biology and conservation of owls of the Northern Hemisphere.
General Technical Report NC-190, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul,
Minnesota. 635 pp.
Lewis DP (2005). Owlpages.com, Owls in Mythology and Culture. Retrieved 15 September 2007.
Dupree,
N. (1974). "An Interpretation of the Role of the Hoopoe in Afghan
Folklore and Magic". Folklore. 85 (3): 173–193.
doi:10.1080/0015587X.1974.9716553. JSTOR 1260073.
Fox-Davies, A.C. (1985). A Complete Guide to Heraldry. Bloomsbury.
Head,
Matthew (1997). "Birdsong and the Origins of Music". Journal of the
Royal Musical Association. 122 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1093/jrma/122.1.1.
Clark,
Suzannah (2001). Music Theory and Natural Order from the Renaissance to
the Early Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. ISBN
0-521-77191-9.
Reich, Ronni (15 October 2010). "NJIT professor finds
nothing cuckoo in serenading our feathered friends". Star Ledger.
Retrieved 19 June 2011.
Taylor, Hollis (21 March 2011). "Composers'
Appropriation of Pied Butcherbird Song: Henry Tate's "undersong of
Australia" Comes of Age". Journal of Music Research Online. 2.
Fuller, Errol (2000). Extinct Birds (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York. ISBN 0-19-850837-9
Steadman, D. (2006). Extinction and Biogeography in Tropical Pacific Birds, University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-77142-7
"BirdLife
International announces more Critically Endangered birds than ever
before". BirdLife International. 14 May 2009. Archived from the original
on 17 June 2013. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
Kinver, Mark (13 May 2009). "Birds at risk reach record high". BBC News Online. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
Norris
K, Pain D (eds, 2002). Conserving Bird Biodiversity: General Principles
and their Application Cambridge University Press. ISBN
978-0-521-78949-3
Brothers, N.P. (1991). "Albatross mortality and
associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern
ocean". Biological Conservation. 55 (3): 255–268.
doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90031-4.
Wurster, D.; Wurster, C.;
Strickland, W. (July 1965). "Bird Mortality Following DDT Spray for
Dutch Elm Disease". Ecology. 46 (4): 488–499. doi:10.2307/1934880. JSTOR
1934880.; Wurster, C.F.; Wurster, D.H.; Strickland, W.N. (1965). "Bird
Mortality after Spraying for Dutch Elm Disease with DDT". Science. 148
(3666): 90–91. Bibcode:1965Sci...148...90W.
doi:10.1126/science.148.3666.90. PMID 14258730. S2CID 26320497.
Blackburn,
T; Cassey, P; Duncan, R; Evans, K; Gaston, K (24 September 2004).
"Avian Extinction and Mammalian Introductions on Oceanic Islands".
Science. 305 (5692): 1955–1958. Bibcode:2004Sci...305.1955B.
doi:10.1126/science.1101617. PMID 15448269. S2CID 31211118.
Butchart, S.; Stattersfield, A.; Collar, N (2006). "How many bird
extinctions have we prevented?". Oryx. 40 (3): 266–79.
doi:10.1017/S0030605306000950.
Further reading
Library resources about
Bird
Online books
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
Roger Lederer und Carol Burr: Latein für Vogelbeobachter: über 3000
ornithologische Begriffe erklärt und erforscht, aus dem Englischen
übersetzt von Susanne Kuhlmannn-Krieg, Verlag DuMont, Köln 2014, ISBN
978-3-8321-9491-8.
del Hoyo, Josep; Elliott, Andrew; Sargatal,
Jordi (eds.): Handbook of the Birds of the World (17-volume
encyclopaedia), Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 1992–2010. (Vol. 1: Ostrich to
Ducks: ISBN 978-84-87334-10-8, etc.).
All the Birds of the World, Lynx Edicions, 2020.
National Geographic Field Guide to Birds of North America, National Geographic, 7th edition, 2017. ISBN 9781426218354
National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Birds: Eastern Region, National Audubon Society, Knopf.
National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Birds: Western Region, National Audubon Society, Knopf.
Svensson, Lars: Birds of Europe, Princeton University Press, second edition, 2010. ISBN 9780691143927
Svensson, Lars: Collins Bird Guide: The Most Complete Guide to the
Birds of Britain and Europe, Collins, 2nd edition, 2010. ISBN
978-0007268146
External links
Listen to this article (4 minutes)
3:48
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 5 January 2008, and does not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help · More spoken articles)
Bird
at Wikipedia's sister projects
Definitions from Wiktionary
Media from Commons
News from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks
Resources from Wikiversity
Taxa from Wikispecies
The Wikibook Dichotomous Key has a page on the topic of: Aves
Birdlife International – Dedicated to bird conservation worldwide; has a
database with about 250,000 records on endangered bird species.
Bird biogeography
Birds and Science from the National Audubon Society
Cornell Lab of Ornithology
"Bird" at the Encyclopedia of Life Edit this at Wikidata
Essays on bird biology
North American Birds for Kids Archived 9 August 2010 at the Wayback Machine
Ornithology
Sora – Searchable online research archive; Archives of the following
ornithological journals The Auk, Condor, Journal of Field Ornithology',
North American Bird Bander, Studies in Avian Biology, Pacific Coast
Avifauna, and the Wilson Bulletin.
The Internet Bird Collection – A free library of videos of the world's birds
The Institute for Bird Populations, California
List of field guides to birds, from the International Field Guides database
RSPB bird identifier Archived 5 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine – Interactive identification of all UK birds
Are Birds Really Dinosaurs? — University of California Museum of Paleontology.
vte
Birds (class: Aves)
Outline
Anatomy
Beak Crop
Milk Dactyly Eggs Feathers Flight Preen gland Plumage Vision
Behaviour
Singing Intelligence Migration Foraging Sexual selection Lek mating
Seabird breeding Incubation Brood parasites Nesting Hybrids
Evolution
Origin of birds
Theropoda dinosaurs Origin of flight Evolution of birds Darwin's finches Seabirds
Fossil birds
Archaeopteryx Omnivoropterygiformes Confuciusornithiformes
Enantiornithes Chaoyangiformes Patagopterygiformes Ambiortiformes
Songlingornithiformes Hongshanornithidae Gansuiformes
Ichthyornithiformes Hesperornithes Lithornithiformes Dinornithiformes
Aepyornithiformes Gastornithiformes
Human interaction
Ringing Ornithology Ornithomancy Bird collections Birdwatching
Big year Bird feeding Conservation Aviculture Waterfowl hunting
Cockfighting Pigeon racing Falconry Pheasantry Imping Egg collecting
Lists
Families and orders Genera Glossary of bird terms List by population
Lists by region Recently extinct birds Late Quaternary prehistoric birds
Notable birds
Individuals Fictional
Neornithes
Palaeognathae
Struthioniformes (ostriches) Rheiformes (rheas) Tinamiformes (tinamous)
Apterygiformes (kiwis) Casuariiformes (emus and cassowaries)
Neognathae
Galloanserae
(fowls)
Anseriformes
(waterfowls)
Anatidae
(ducks)
Anatinae
Aythyini Mergini Oxyurini Anserinae
swans true geese Dendrocygninae Stictonettinae Tadorninae
Anhimidae
Anhima Chauna
Anseranatidae
Anseranas
Galliformes
(landfowls-
gamebirds)
Cracidae
Cracinae Oreophasinae Penelopinae
Megapodidae
Aepypodius Alectura Eulipoa Leipoa Macrocephalon Megapodius Talegalla
Numididae
Acryllium Agelastes Guttera Numida
Odontophoridae
Callipepla Colinus Cyrtonyx Dactylortyx Dendrortyx Odontophorus Oreortyx Philortyx Rhynchortyx
Phasianidae
Meleagridinae (turkeys) Perdicinae Phasianinae (pheasants and relatives) Tetraoninae
Neoaves
Columbea
Columbimorphae
Columbiformes (doves and pigeons) Mesitornithiformes (mesites) Pterocliformes (sandgrouse)
Mirandornithes
Phoenicopteriformes (flamingos) Podicipediformes (grebes)
Passerea
Otidimorphae
Cuculiformes (cuckoos) Musophagiformes (turacos) Otidiformes (bustards)
Strisores
Caprimulgiformes (nightjars and relatives) Steatornithiformes Podargiformes Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds)
Opisthocomiformes
Opisthocomiformes (hoatzin)
Cursorimorphae
Charadriiformes (gulls and relatives) Gruiformes (cranes and relatives)
Phaethontimorphae
Phaethontiformes (tropicbirds) Eurypygiformes (kagu and sunbittern)
Aequornithes
Gaviiformes (loons or divers) Sphenisciformes (penguins)
Procellariiformes (albatrosses and petrels) Ciconiiformes (storks)
Suliformes (cormorants and relatives) Pelecaniformes (pelicans and
relatives)
Australaves
Cariamiformes (seriemas and
relatives) Falconiformes (falcons and relatives) Psittaciformes
(parrots) Passeriformes (perching birds)
Afroaves
Cathartiformes (New World vultures and condors) Accipitriformes (eagles
and hawks) Strigiformes (owls) Coliiformes (mousebirds) Trogoniformes
(trogons and quetzals) Leptosomiformes (cuckoo-roller) Bucerotiformes
(hornbills and hoopoes) Coraciiformes (kingfishers and rollers)
Piciformes (woodpeckers and relatives)
Category Commons Portal WikiProject
vte
Extant chordate classes
Kingdom Animalia (unranked) Bilateria Superphylum Deuterostomia
Cephalochordata
Leptocardii (lancelets)
Olfactores
Tunicata
(Urochordata)
Ascidiacea (sea squirts) Appendicularia (larvaceans) Thaliacea (pyrosomes, salps, doliolids)
Vertebrata
Cyclostomata
Myxini (hagfish) Hyperoartia (lampreys)
Gnathostomata
(jawed vertebrates)
Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fish: sharks, rays, chimaeras)
Euteleostomi
(bony vertebrates)
Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish)
Sarcopterygii
(lobe-finned fish)
Actinistia (coelacanths)¹
Rhipidistia
Dipnoi (lungfish)¹
Tetrapoda
Lissamphibia (modern amphibians: frogs, salamanders, caecilians)
Amniota
Mammalia (mammals)
Sauria
Lepidosauria
Rhynchocephalia (tuatara)² Squamata (scaled reptiles)²
Archelosauria
Testudines (turtles)²
Archosauria
Crocodilia (crocodilians)² Aves (birds)
¹subclasses of Sarcopterygii ²orders of class Reptilia (reptiles) italics denote paraphyletic groups
vte
Maniraptora
Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Clade: Dinosauria Clade: Theropoda Clade: Maniraptoriformes
Avemetatarsalia
see Avemetatarsalia
Theropoda
see Theropoda
Maniraptora
see below↓
Maniraptora
Maniraptora
†Elopteryx? †Fukuivenator? †Kakuru? †Yaverlandia?
†Alvarezsauroidea
Alnashetri Aorun? Bannykus Haplocheirus Shishugounykus Tugulusaurus? Xiyunykus Patagonykinae?
Alvarezsauridae
Achillesaurus Alvarezsaurus Bradycneme Heptasteornis
Patagonykinae
Achillesaurus? Bonapartenykus Patagonykus
Parvicursorinae
Dzharaonyx Khulsanurus Kol? Nemegtonykus Ondogurvel Parvicursor Qiupanykus Trierarchuncus
Ceratonykini
Albinykus Ceratonykus Xixianykus
Mononykini
Albertonykus Linhenykus Mononykus Shuvuuia
†Therizinosauria
Eshanosaurus? Falcarius Fukuivenator? Jianchangosaurus Lingyuanosaurus
Therizinosauroidea
Alxasaurus Beipiaosaurus Enigmosaurus Martharaptor Suzhousaurus
Therizinosauridae
Erliansaurus Erlikosaurus Nanshiungosaurus Neimongosaurus Nothronychus Paralitherizinosaurus Segnosaurus Therizinosaurus
Pennaraptora
see below↓
Patagonykus puertai
Mononykus olecranus
Therizinosaurus cheloniformis
Pennaraptora
†Oviraptorosauria
Incisivosaurus Ningyuansaurus Protarchaeopteryx Scansoriopterygidae?
Caudipteridae
Caudipteryx Similicaudipteryx Xingtianosaurus
Caenagnathoidea
Avimimus Kol?
Caenagnathidae
Anomalipes Beibeilong Chirostenotes Gigantoraptor Leptorhynchos Hagryphus Microvenator Nomingia? Ojoraptorsaurus
Elmisaurinae
Citipes Elmisaurus
Caenagnathinae
Anzu Apatoraptor Caenagnathasia Caenagnathus Epichirostenotes
Oviraptoridae
Luoyanggia Nankangia Nomingia? Tongtianlong Yulong
Oviraptorinae
Citipati Corythoraptor? Huanansaurus? Oviraptor Rinchenia?
Heyuanninae
Banji? Conchoraptor Ganzhousaurus? Gobiraptor Heyuannia Jiangxisaurus Khaan Machairasaurus Nemegtomaia Oksoko Shixinggia?
Paraves
†Imperobator †Palaeopteryx? †Pneumatoraptor †Rahonavis
†Scansoriopterygidae?
Ambopteryx Epidexipteryx Scansoriopteryx Yi
†Anchiornithidae
Anchiornis Aurornis Caihong Eosinopteryx Liaoningvenator? Ostromia Pedopenna Serikornis Xiaotingia Yixianosaurus
Eumaniraptora
see below↓
Apatoraptor pennatus
Ambopteryx longibrachium
Anchiornis huxleyi
Eumaniraptora
†Deinonychosauria?
Anchiornithidae? Archaeopterygidae? Troodontidae? Unenlagiidae?
Dromaeosauridae
Pyroraptor Shanag Variraptor Zhenyuanlong Unenlagiidae?
Microraptoria
Changyuraptor Graciliraptor Hesperonychus Microraptor Sinornithosaurus Tianyuraptor Wulong Zhongjianosaurus
Eudromaeosauria
Bambiraptor Tianyuraptor? Vectiraptor Zhenyuanlong?
Saurornitholestinae?
Atrociraptor Bambiraptor? Saurornitholestes
Dromaeosaurinae
Achillobator Dakotaraptor? Deinonychus? Dromaeosauroides Dromaeosaurus
Itemirus Saurornitholestes? Utahraptor Yurgovuchia Zapsalis
Velociraptorinae
Acheroraptor Adasaurus Boreonykus? Deinonychus? Dineobellator
Kansaignathus Kuru Linheraptor Luanchuanraptor? Nuthetes?
Saurornitholestes? Shri Tsaagan Velociraptor
†Troodontidae
Albertavenator Archaeornithoides? Geminiraptor Hesperornithoides
Jianianhualong Koparion? Liaoningvenator Papiliovenator Paronychodon?
Polyodontosaurus? Sinornithoides Talos Tochisaurus Xixiasaurus
Anchiornithidae?
Jinfengopteryginae
Almas? Jinfengopteryx Liaoningvenator? Philovenator? Tamarro
Sinovenatorinae
Daliansaurus Mei Sinovenator Sinusonasus
Troodontinae
Borogovia Byronosaurus? Gobivenator Latenivenatrix Linhevenator
Pectinodon Philovenator? Saurornithoides Stenonychosaurus Troodon
Urbacodon Zanabazar
†Unenlagiidae
Halszkaraptorinae?
Halszkaraptor Hulsanpes Mahakala
Unenlagiinae
Austroraptor Buitreraptor Dakotaraptor? Neuquenraptor Ornithodesmus?
Pamparaptor Pyroraptor? Rahonavis? Unenlagia Unquillosaurus? Ypupiara
Averaptora?
Overoraptor Rahonavis? †Microraptoria? †Troodontidae? †Unenlagiidae?
Avialae
see below↓
Microraptor gui
Utahraptor ostrommaysorum Zanabazar junior
Austroraptor cabazai
Avialae
Avialae
†Alcmonavis †Balaur †Cretaaviculus? †Fukuipteryx †Rahonavis? †Yandangornis †Anchiornithidae? †Scansoriopterygidae?
†Archaeopterygidae?
Alcmonavis? Archaeopteryx Wellnhoferia Anchiornithidae?
†Jeholornithiformes
Dalianraptor? Jeholornis Jixiangornis? Kompsornis Neimengornis
Euavialae
†Jixiangornis?
Avebrevicauda
†Zhongornis
†Omnivoropterygidae
Omnivoropteryx Sapeornis
Pygostylia
†"Proornis" †Omnivoropterygidae?
†Confuciusornithidae
Changchengornis Confuciusornis Eoconfuciusornis Yangavis
†Jinguofortisidae
Chongmingia Jinguofortis
Ornithothoraces
see below↓
Archaeopteryx lithographica Confuciusornis sp.
Ornithothoraces
†Enantiornithes
Brevirostruavis Dalingheornis Elsornis Eoalulavis Eocathayornis?
Falcatakely Feitianius Fortipesavis Houornis Ilerdopteryx Liaoningornis
Liaoxiornis? Microenantiornis Mirusavis Paraprotopteryx Praeornis?
Protopteryx Yuanjiawaornis Yuornis
Iberomesornithidae
Iberomesornis Noguerornis
Pengornithidae
Chiappeavis Eopengornis Parapengornis Pengornis Yuanchuavis
Longipterygidae
Boluochia Camptodontornis Dapingfangornis Evgenavis? Longipteryx Longirostravis Rapaxavis Shanweiniao Shengjingornis
Euenantiornithes
Abavornis Alethoalaornis Alexornis Avimaia Catenoleimus Cathayornis
Cratoavis Cruralispennia Cuspirostrisornis Dunhuangia Elbretornis
Elektorornis Enantiornis Eoenantiornis Explorornis Flexomornis
Fortunguavis Grabauornis Gracilornis Gurilynia Holbotia Huoshanornis
Incolornis Junornis Kizylkumavis Kuszholia? Largirostrornis Lectavis
Lenesornis Longchengornis Martinavis Monoenantiornis Musivavis Nanantius
Orienantius Otogornis Parvavis Piscivorenantiornis Platanavis?
Pterygornis Qiliania Sazavis Shangyang Sinornis Xiangornis Yungavolucris
Bohaiornithidae
Beiguornis Bohaiornis Gretcheniao Linyiornis Longusunguis Parabohaiornis Shenqiornis Sulcavis Zhouornis
Gobipterygidae
Gobipteryx Jibeinia? Vescornis?
Avisauridae
(sensu Cau & Arduini, 2008)
Bauxitornis? Concornis? Enantiophoenix Halimornis Mystiornis
Avisauridae (sensu Chiappe, 1992)
Avisaurus Gettyia Intiornis Mirarce Neuquenornis Soroavisaurus
Euornithes
see below↓
Longipteryx chaoyangensis Cruralispennia multidonta
Euornithes
Euornithes
†Archaeorhynchus †Chaoyangia †Gargantuavis? †Horezmavis †Jianchangornis †Platanavis †Wyleyia? †Xinghaiornis †Zhongjianornis
Ornithuromorpha
†Bellulornis †Brevidentavis †Changmaornis †Changzuiornis †Dingavis
†Eogranivora †Gansus †Hollanda †Iteravis †Jiuquanornis †Juehuaornis
†Kaririavis †Khinganornis †Meemannavis †Vorona †Yumenornis
†Schizoouridae
Mengciusornis Schizooura
†Patagopterygiformes
Alamitornis Kuszholia? Patagopteryx
†Ambiortiformes
Ambiortus Apsaravis? Palintropus?
†Hongshanornithidae
Archaeornithura Hongshanornis Longicrusavis Parahongshanornis Tianyuornis
†Songlingornithidae
Hollanda? Piscivoravis? Songlingornis Yanornis? Yixianornis?
†Yanornithidae?
Abitusavis Similiyanornis Yanornis
Ornithurae
†Antarcticavis? †Apatornis †Cerebavis †Gallornis †Guildavis †Iaceornis
†Ichthyornis †Kookne †Limenavis †Qinornis †Tingmiatornis
†Hesperornithes
Baptornis Brodavis Chupkaornis Enaliornis Judinornis Pasquiaornis Potamornis
Hesperornithidae
Asiahesperornis Canadaga Fumicollis Hesperornis Parahesperornis
†Vegaviidae
Australornis? Maaqwi Neogaeornis? Polarornis Vegavis
†Cimolopterygidae
Ceramornis Cimolopteryx Lamarqueavis?
Aves / Neornithes
Palaeognathae
see Palaeognathae
Neognathae
Pangalloanserae Panneoaves
Patagopteryx deferrariisi Ichthyornis dispar
See also: Archaeornithes Carinatae Ichthyornithes Odontognathae Odontornithes Sauriurae Category
vte
Human uses of birds
Activities
Aviculture Birdwatching
Big year Bird conservation Fletching In sport
Cockfighting Falconry Pigeon racing Vinkensport In science
Model organism Ornithology In mythology and religion
Augury Sacred ibis Sky burial In hunting
Cormorant fishing Driven grouse shooting Plume hunting Wildfowling
Falconry Book of Frederick II 1240s detail falconers.jpg
Products
Chicken Down Egg Feather Guano Poultry
In the arts
In art
Bird-and-flower painting Feather tights In heraldry
Avalerion Crow/Raven Eagle Gallic rooster Martlet Turul In poetry
The Conference of the Birds Ode to a Nightingale To a Skylark Crow In prose
A History of British Birds The Tale of Jemima Puddle-Duck The Ugly
Duckling Jonathan Livingston Seagull In theatre and ballet
The Birds Swan Lake The Firebird In film
The Birds Kes The Big Year Animated films Chicken films Horror films In music In fashion
Aigrette Feather boa Feather cloak In dance
Cendrawasih Chicken dance
Species
Golden eagle Penguin Pigeon/Dove Raven
of the Tower of London
People
Illustrators
John James Audubon (The Birds of America) Thomas Bewick John Gould Lars
Jonsson John Gerrard Keulemans Edward Lear Richard Lewington Roger Tory
Peterson Henry Constantine Richter Joseph Smit Archibald Thorburn
Joseph Wolf Conservationists
Niels Krabbe Peter Scott Organisations
BirdLife International Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust
Related
Category:Birds and humans Zoomusicology
vte
Lists of dinosaurs by continent
Taxon identifiers
Wikidata: Q5113 Wikispecies: Aves ADW: Aves AFD: Aves BOLD: 51 CoL: V2
EoL: 695 EPPO: 1AVESC Fauna Europaea: 10699 Fauna Europaea (new):
f2fd1555-ab1f-40f7-9cbf-abebff1ffbda Fossilworks: 36616 GBIF: 212
iNaturalist: 3 IRMNG: 1142 ITIS: 174371 NCBI: 8782 NZOR:
dcced4e7-06b1-466e-9d85-5a384501dac2 Plazi:
E1E0B077-76F6-D736-3B27-36617A705C73 uBio: 21646 WoRMS: 1836 ZooBank:
AAFCA22F-1980-4B62-9149-8887F1C1FDC1
Authority control Edit this at Wikidata
National libraries
Spain France (data) Germany Israel United States Latvia Japan Czech Republic
Other
National Archives (US)
Categories:
BirdsAnimal classesDinosaursExtant Late Cretaceous first
appearancesFeathered dinosaursSantonian first appearancesTaxa named by
Carl Linnaeus
List of birds
This article lists living
orders and families of birds. The links below should then lead to family
accounts and hence to individual species.
The passerines
(perching birds) alone account for well over 5,000 species. In total
there are about 10,000 species of birds described worldwide, though one
estimate of the real number places it at almost twice that.[1]
Taxonomy
is very fluid in the age of DNA analysis, so comments are made where
appropriate, and all numbers are approximate. In particular see
Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy for a very different classification.
Phylogeny
Cladogram
of modern bird relationships based on Jarvis, E.D. et al. (2014)[2]
with some clade names after Yuri, T. et al. (2013).[3]
Aves
Palaeognathae
Struthionimorphae
Struthioniformes (ostriches)[4]
Notopalaeognathae
Rheimorphae
Rheiformes (rheas)
Novaeratitae
Casuariiformes (cassowaries & emus)
Apterygiformes (kiwi)
†Aepyornithiformes (elephant birds)
Tinamimorphae
†Dinornithiformes (moas)
†Lithornithiformes (false tinamous)
Tinamiformes (tinamous)
Neognathae
Galloanserae
Gallomorphae
Galliformes (landfowl)
Odontoanserae
†Odontopterygiformes
Anserimorphae
†Vegaviiformes[5]
†Gastornithiformes
Anseriformes (waterfowl)
Neoaves
Columbea
Mirandornithes
Phoenicopteriformes (flamingoes)
Podicipediformes (grebes)
Columbimorphae
Mesitornithiformes (mesites)
Pterocliformes (sandgrouse)
Columbiformes (pigeons)
Passerea
Otidae
Otidimorphae
Cuculiformes (cuckoos)
Otidiformes (bustards)
Musophagiformes (turacos)
Cypselomorphae
Caprimulgiformes (nightjars)
Nyctibiiformes (oilbirds & potoos)
Podargiformes (frogmouths)
Aegotheliformes (owlet-nightjars)
Apodiformes (hummingbirds & swifts)
Gruae
Opisthocomiformes (hoatzin)
Cursorimorphae
Gruiformes (rails and cranes)
Charadriiformes (shorebirds)
Ardeae
Phaethontimorphae
Eurypygiformes (sunbittern, kagu)
Phaethontiformes (tropicbirds)
Aequornithes
Gaviiformes (loons)
Austrodyptornithes
Procellariiformes (albatross and petrels)
Sphenisciformes (penguins)
Ciconiiformes (storks)
Suliformes (boobies, cormorants, etc.)
Pelecaniformes (pelicans, herons & egrets)
Telluraves
Afroaves
Accipitrimorphae
Cathartiformes (condors and New World vultures)
Accipitriformes (hawks, eagles, vultures, etc.)
Strigiformes (owls)
Coraciimorphae
Coliiformes (mousebirds)
Leptosomiformes (cuckoo roller)
Trogoniformes (trogons)
Bucerotiformes (hornbills, hoopoe and wood hoopoes)
Coraciiformes (kingfishers etc.)
Piciformes (woodpeckers etc.)
Picodynastornithes
Picocoraciae
Eucavitaves
Cavitaves
Australaves
Cariamiformes (seriemas)
Eufalconimorphae
Falconiformes (falcons)
Psittacopasserae
Psittaciformes (parrots)
Passeriformes (songbirds and kin)
Paleognathae
The
Paleognathae, or "old jaws", are one of the two superorders recognized
within the taxonomic class Aves and consist of the ratites and tinamous.
The ratites are mostly large and long-legged, flightless birds, lacking
a keeled sternum. Traditionally, all the ratites were place in the
order Struthioniformes. However, recent genetic analysis has found that
the group is not monophyletic, as it is paraphyletic with respect to the
tinamous, so the ostriches are classified as the only members of the
order Struthioniformes and other rattites placed in other orders.[6][7]
Struthioniformes
Greater rhea pair
Eudromia elegans
Casuarius casuarius
Africa; 2 species
Struthionidae: ostrich
Notopalaeognathae
Rheiformes
South America; 2 species
†Opisthodactylidae
Rheidae: rheas
Casuariiformes
Australasia; 4 species
Casuariidae: cassowaries and emu
Apterygiformes
Australasia; 5 species
Apterygidae: kiwis
Aepyornithiformes
Madagascar
†Aepyornithidae: elephant birds
Dinornithiformes
New Zealand
†Megalapteryidae: upland moas
†Dinornithidae: great moas
†Emeidae: lesser moas
Tinamiformes
South America; 45 species
Tinamidae: tinamous
Neognathae
Nearly
all living birds belong to the superorder Neognathae or "new jaws".
With their keeled sternum (breastbone), unlike the ratites, they are
known as carinatae.
Galloanserae
Galliformes
Australian brush turkey
Worldwide; 250 species
†Sylviornithidae
Megapodii
Megapodidae: megapodes
Craci
Cracidae: chachalacas, curassows, and guans
Phasiani
Numidioidea
Numididae: guineafowl
Phasianoidea: pheasants and allies
Odontophoridae: New World quail
Phasianidae: pheasants and relatives
Gastornithiformes
†Gastornithidae
†Dromornithidae: mihirungs
Anseriformes
Worldwide; 150 species
Anhimidae: screamers
Anseranatidae: magpie-goose
Anatidae: ducks, geese, and swans
Mirandornithes
Podicipediformes
Worldwide; 19 species
Podicipedidae: grebes
Phoenicopteriformes
Worldwide; 6 species
†Palaelodidae: swimming flamingos
Phoenicopteridae: flamingos
Columbimorphae
Columbiformes
Worldwide; 300 species
Columbidae: pigeons and doves
Pterocliformes
Africa, Europe, Asia; 16 species
Pteroclidae: sandgrouse
Mesitornithiformes
Madagascar; 3 species
Mesitornithidae: mesites
Cypselomorphae
Caprimulgiformes
Worldwide; 97 species
Caprimulgidae: nightjars
Steatornithiformes
South America; 1 species
Steatornithidae: oilbird
Nyctibiiformes
Americas; 7 species
Nyctibiidae: potoos
Podargiformes
Tawny frogmouth
Asia and Australasia; 16 species
Podargidae: frogmouths
Aegotheliformes
Australasia; 9 species
Aegothelidae: owlet-nightjars
Apodiformes
Worldwide; 478 species
Hemiprocnidae: treeswifts
Apodidae: swifts
Trochilidae: hummingbirds
Otidimorphae
Cuculiformes
Worldwide; 126 species
Cuculidae: cuckoos and relatives
Musophagiformes
Africa; 23 species
Musophagidae: turacos and relatives
Otidiformes
Africa and Eurasia; 27 species
Otididae: bustards
Gruae
Opisthocomiformes
South America; 1 species
Opisthocomidae: hoatzin
Gruiformes
Worldwide; 164 species
Grui: cranes and allies
Gruidae: cranes
Aramidae: limpkin
Psophiidae: trumpeters
Ralli: rails and allies
†Aptornithidae: adzebills
Heliornithidae: finfoots
Sarothruridae: flufftails
Rallidae: rails and relatives
Charadriiformes
Worldwide; 350 species
Charadrii
Chionida: thick-knees and allies
Burhinidae: thick-knees and relatives
Chionididae: sheathbills
Pluvianellidae: Magellanic plover
Charadriida: plover-like waders
Pluvialidae: golden plovers
Ibidorhynchidae: ibisbill
Haematopodidae: oystercatchers
Recurvirostridae: avocets and stilts
Charadriidae: plovers and lapwings
Scolopaci
Jacanida: jacana-like waders
Greater painted-snipe
Rostratulidae: painted snipes
Egyptian plover
Pluvianidae: Egyptian plover
Jacanidae: jacanas
Thinocoridae: seedsnipes
Plains-wanderer
Pedionomidae: plains-wanderer
Scolopacida
Scolopacidae: sandpipers and relatives
Lari
Turnicida
Turnicidae: buttonquail
Larida: gulls and allies
Glareolidae: coursers and pratincoles
Dromadidae: crab-plover
Stercorariidae: skuas and jaegers
Alcidae: auks and puffins
Laridae: gulls, skimmers and terns
Phaethontimorphae
Eurypygiformes
Neotropics and New Caledonia; 2 species
Rhynochetidae: kagu
Sunbittern
Eurypygidae: sunbittern
Phaethontiformes
Oceanic; 3 species
Phaethontidae: tropicbirds
Aequornithes
Gaviiformes
North America, Eurasia; 5 species
Gaviidae: loons
Sphenisciformes
Antarctic and southern waters; 17 species
Spheniscidae: penguins
Procellariiformes
Pan-oceanic; 120 species
Diomedeidae: albatrosses
Oceanitidae: austral storm petrels
Hydrobatidae: northern storm petrels
Procellariidae: petrels and relatives
Ciconiiformes
Worldwide; 19 species
White stork
Ciconiidae: storks
Suliformes
Worldwide; 59 species
Fregatae
Fregatidae: frigatebirds
Sulae
Sulidae: boobies and gannets
Anhingidae: darters
Phalacrocoracidae: cormorants and shags
Pelecaniformes
Hamerkop
Worldwide; 108 species
Threskiornithes
Threskiornithidae: ibises and spoonbills
Pelecani
Scopidae: hamerkop
Balaenicipitidae: shoebill
Pelecanidae: pelicans
Ardeae
Ardeidae: herons and relatives
Afroaves
Accipitriformes
Osprey
Worldwide; 200 species
Cathartae
Cathartidae: New World vultures
Accipitres
Sagittariidae: secretarybird
Pandionidae: osprey
Accipitridae: hawks, eagles, buzzards, harriers, kites and Old World vultures
Strigiformes
Worldwide; 130 species
Tytonidae: barn owls
Strigidae: true owls
Coliiformes
Blue-naped mousebird
Sub-Saharan Africa; 6 species
Coliidae: mousebirds
Leptosomiformes
Madagascar; 1 species
Leptosomidae: cuckoo-roller
Trogoniformes
Sub-Saharan Africa, Americas, Asia; 35 species
Trogonidae: trogons and quetzals
Bucerotiformes
Old World, New Guinea; 64 species
Buceroidea
Bucerotidae: hornbills
Upupoidea
Upupidae: hoopoe
Phoeniculidae: woodhoopoes
Coraciiformes
Worldwide; 144 species
Meropi
Meropidae: bee-eaters
Coracii
Coraciidae: rollers
Brachypteraciidae: ground rollers
Coracii
Todidae: todies
Momotidae: motmots
Alcedinidae: kingfishers
Kingfisher
Piciformes
Worldwide except Australasia; 400 species
Galbuli
Galbulidae: jacamars
Bucconidae: puffbirds
Pici
Lybiidae: African barbets
Megalaimidae: Asian barbets
Ramphastidae: toucans
Semnornithidae: toucan barbets
Capitonidae: American barbets
Picidae: woodpeckers
Indicatoridae: honeyguides
Australaves
Cariamiformes
South America; 2 species
Cariamidae: seriemas
Falconiformes
Worldwide; 60 species
Falconidae: falcons and relatives
Psittaciformes
Pan-tropical, southern temperate zones; 330 species
Strigopoidea
Strigopidae: kakapo, kea and kakas
Cacatuoidea
Cacatuidae: cockatoos and cockatiels
Psittacoidea
Psittacidae: African and American parrots
Psittaculidae: Australasian parrots, Pesquet's parrot, vasa parrots
Passeriformes
Rock wren
Eurylaimus javanicus
Pitta cyanea
Pachyramphus castaneus
Lyrebird
Worldwide; 5,000 species
Acanthisitti
Acanthisittidae: New Zealand wrens
Tyranni: suboscines
Eurylaimides: Old World suboscines
Sapayoidae: sapayoa
Calyptomenidae: Calyptomenid broadbills
Pittidae: pittas
Eurylaimidae: broadbills
Philepittidae: asities
Tyrannides: New World suboscines
Tyrannida: bronchophones
Pipridae: manakins
Cotingidae: cotingas
Oxyruncidae: sharpbills
Onychorhynchidae: royal flycatchers and allies
Tityridae: becards and tityras
Pipritidae: pipriteses
Platyrinchidae: spadebills
Tachurididae: many-colored rush tyrants
Rhynchocyclidae: mionectine flycatchers
Tyrannidae: tyrant flycatchers
Furnariida: tracheophones
Melanopareiidae: crescent-chests
Conopophagidae: gnateaters
Thamnophilidae: antbirds
Grallariidae: antpittas
Rhinocryptidae tapaculos
Formicariidae: ground antbirds
Furnariidae: ovenbirds
Passeri: oscines
Menurides
Atrichornithidae: scrub-birds
Menuridae: lyrebirds
Climacterides
Ptilonorhynchidae: bowerbirds
Climacteridae: Australasian treecreepers
Meliphagides
Maluridae: Australasian wrens
Dasyornithidae: bristlebirds
Pardalotidae: gerygones and allies (Acanthizidae)
Meliphagidae: honeyeaters and relatives
Orthonychides
Pomatostomidae: Australasian babblers
Orthonychidae: logrunners
Corvides
Cinclosomatoidea
Cinclosomatidae: quail-thrushes and jewel-babblers
Campephagoidea
Campephagidae: cuckoo-shrikes
Mohouoidea
Mohouidae: whitehead and allies
Neosittoidea
Neosittidae: sittellas
Orioloidea
Eulacestomidae: wattled ploughbills
Psophodidae: whipbirds and quail-thrushes
Oreoicidae: Australo-Papuan bellbirds
Falcunculidae: crested shriketits
Paramythiidae: painted berrypeckers
Pteruthiidae: shrike-babblers
Vireonidae: vireos and relatives
Pachycephalidae: whistlers and relatives (Colluricinclidae)
Oriolidae: Old World orioles
Malaconotoidea
Machaerirhynchidae: boatbills
Artamidae: woodswallows and butcherbirds
Rhagologidae: mottled berryhunter
Aegithinidae: ioras
Pityriaseidae: bristlehead
Malaconotidae: bushshrikes and relatives
Platysteiridae: wattle-eyes and batises
Vangidae: vangas (Tephrodornithidae; Prionopidae)
Corvoidea
Rhipiduridae: fantails
Lamproliidae: silktail, drongo fantail
Dicruridae: drongos
Ifritidae: blue-capped ifrits
Melampittidae: melampittas
Corcoracidae: Australian mudnesters
Paradisaeidae: birds-of-paradise
Monarchidae: monarch flycatchers
Laniidae: shrikes
Corvidae: jays and crows
Passerides
Melanocharitida
Melanocharitidae: berrypeckers
Cnemophilida
Cnemophilidae: satinbirds
Petroicida
Petroicidae: Australasian robins
Notiomystidae: stitchbird
Callaeidae: wattlebirds
Eupetida
Picathartidae: rockfowl
Chaetopidae: rock-jumpers
Eupetidae: rail-babbler
Sylviida
Paroidea
Stenostiridae: fairy warblers
Hyliotidae: hyliotas
Remizidae: penduline tits
Paridae: chickadees and true tits
Alaudoidea
Nicatoridae: nicators
Panuridae: bearded reedling
Alaudidae: larks
Macrosphenidae: African warblers
Locustelloidea
Cisticolidae: cisticolas and relatives
Acrocephalidae: marsh warblers
Pnoepygidae: pygmy wren-babblers
Locustellidae: grass warblers
Donacobiidae: donacobius
Bernieridae: Malagasy warblers
Hirundinidae: swallows and martins
Pycnonotidae: bulbuls
Aegithaloidea
Phylloscopidae: leaf warblers
Cettiidae: bush warblers (Erythrocercidae; Scotocercidae)
Hyliidae: hylias
Aegithalidae: bushtits
Sylvioidea
Sylviidae: true warblers
Paradoxornithidae: parrotbills, fulvettas
Zosteropidae: white-eyes
Timaliidae: babblers and relatives
Pellorneidae: fulvettas, ground babblers
Leiothrichidae: laughing thrushes
Muscicapida
Reguloidea
Regulidae: kinglets
Bombycilloidea
Elachuridae: spotted wren-babblers
†Mohoidae: Hawaiian honeyeaters
Ptiliogonatidae: silky-flycatchers
Bombycillidae: waxwings
Dulidae: palmchat
Hypocoliidae: hypocolius
Certhioidea
Tichodromidae: wallcreeper
Sittidae: nuthatches
Certhiidae: treecreepers
Troglodytidae: wrens
Polioptilidae: gnatcatchers
Muscicapoidea
Cinclidae: dippers
Turdidae: thrushes and relatives
Muscicapidae: flycatchers and relatives
Buphagidae: oxpeckers
Mimidae: mockingbirds and thrashers
Sturnidae: starlings and mynas (Rhabdornithidae)
Passerida
Promeropidae: sugarbirds
Arcanatoridae: dapplethroat and allies
Dicaeidae: flowerpeckers
Nectariniidae: sunbirds
Irenidae: fairy-bluebirds
Chloropseidae: leafbirds
Peucedramidae: olive warbler
Prunellidae: accentors
Ploceoidea
Urocynchramidae: pink-tailed bunting
Ploceidae: weavers and relatives
Viduidae: whydahs and indigobirds
Estrildidae: weaver finches
Passerid clade
Passeridae: Old World sparrows
Motacillidae: wagtails and pipits
Fringillidae: finches and relatives
Calcariidae: longspurs, snow buntings
Rhodinocichlidae: rosy thrush-tanagers
Emberizidae: Old World buntings
Passerellidae: American sparrows
Phaenicophilidae: palm-tanager and allies
Icteridae: New World blackbirds and New World orioles
Teretistridae: Cuban warblers
Parulidae: wood warblers
Mitrospingidae
Cardinalidae: cardinals, grosbeaks, and New World buntings
Thraupidae: tanagers and relatives (Coerebidae)
See also
Lists of animals
List of chicken breeds
List of birds by common name
List of individual birds
Lists by continent
List of birds of Africa
List of birds of Antarctica
List of birds of Asia
List of birds of Australia
List of birds of Europe
List of birds of North America
List of birds of South America
Lists by smaller geographic unit
Lists of birds by region
Extinct birds
List of recently extinct bird species
List of Late Quaternary prehistoric bird species
List of fossil bird genera
List of fictional birds
References
Barrowclough,
GF; Cracraft, J; Klicka, J; Zink, RM (2016). "How Many Kinds of Birds
Are There and Why Does It Matter?". PLOS ONE. 11 (11): e0166307.
Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1166307B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166307. PMC
5120813. PMID 27880775.
Jarvis, E.D.; et al. (2014). "Whole-genome
analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds".
Science. 346 (6215): 1320–1331. Bibcode:2014Sci...346.1320J.
doi:10.1126/science.1253451. PMC 4405904. PMID 25504713.
Yuri, T.; et
al. (2013). "Parsimony and Model-Based Analyses of Indels in Avian
Nuclear Genes Reveal Congruent and Incongruent Phylogenetic Signals".
Biology. 2 (1): 419–444. doi:10.3390/biology2010419. PMC 4009869. PMID
24832669.
Boyd, John (2007). "NEORNITHES: 46 Orders" (PDF). John Boyd's website. Retrieved 30 December 2017.[unreliable source?]
Worthy,
T.H.; Degrange, F.J.; Handley, W.D.; Lee, M.S.Y. (2017). "The evolution
of giant flightless birds and novel phylogenetic relationships for
extinct fowl (Aves, Galloanseres)". Royal Society Open Science. 11 (10):
170975. Bibcode:2017RSOS....470975W. doi:10.1098/rsos.170975. PMC
5666277. PMID 29134094.
Hackett, S.J.; et al. (2008). "A Phylogenomic
Study of Birds Reveals Their Evolutionary History". Science. 320
(5884): 1763–1768. Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1763H.
doi:10.1126/science.1157704. PMID 18583609. S2CID 6472805.
Yuri, T (2013). "Parsimony and model-based analyses of indels in avian
nuclear genes reveal congruent and incongruent phylogenetic signals".
Biology. 2 (1): 419–44. doi:10.3390/biology2010419. PMC 4009869. PMID
24832669.
Table of Contents
Babs Bunny (Tiny Toon Adventures Cartoons)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Basil Stag Hare (Redwall Book Series)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature & From Movies or Television
Bean Bunny (Tale of The Bunny Picnic)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Benjamin Bunny (The Tales of Benjamin Bunny)
Famous Rabbit From Literature
Bucky o’Hare (Bucky O’Hare Comics)
Famous Rabbit In Comics
Bugs Bunny (Looney Tunes)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Bunnicula (Bunnicula TV Series)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Buster Baxter (Arthur)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Buster Bunny (Tiny Toon Adventures Cartoon)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Br’er Rabbit
Famous Rabbit From Literature
Cadbury Bunny (Cadbury Commercials)
Famous Rabbit In Movies or Television
Captain Carrot (Zoo Crew Comics)
Famous Rabbit In Comics
Crusader Rabbit (Crusader Rabbit)
Famous Rabbit From Movies & Television
Daisy The Rabbit with Longest Tail
Famous Real Life Rabbit
Darius the Largest Rabbit in the World
Famous Real Life Rabbit
Easter Bunny
Famous Rabbit From Literature
Edward Tulane (The Miraculous Journey of Edward Tulane)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature
Energizer Bunny (TV Commercial)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Flopsy the Oldest Rabbit Ever
Famous Real Life Rabbit
Harvey (Harvey)
Famous Rabbit From Movies And Television
Hodge Podge (Bloom County Comics)
Famous Rabbits In Comics
Honey Bunny (Looney Tunes)
Famous Rabbit From Movies And Television
Hoppy The Marvel Bunny (Hoppy the Marvel Bunny)
Famous Rabbit From Comics
Jackalope of the Smithsonian
Famous Rabbits From Real Life
Jazz Jackrabbit (Jazz JackRabbit Video Game)
Famous Rabbit From Video Games
Judy Hops (Zootopia)
Famous Rabbit From Movies or Television
Lola Bunny (Looney Tunes)
Famous Rabbits From Movies or Television
March Hare (Alice in Wonderland)
Famous Rabbit From Literature And Movies
Marlon Bundo (A Day in The Life of Marlon Bundo)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature & From Real Life
Mick The Agouti Rabbit
Famous Rabbit From Real Life
Miffy (Nijntje)
Famous Rabbit From Literature And Movies And Television
Miyamoto Usagi (Usagi Yojimbo)
Famous Rabbit From Comics
Mr. Bunny Rabbit (Captain Kangaroo)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Quicky The Nesquik Bunny
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Oswald the Lucky Rabbit
Famous Rabbit From Comic Books And Television
Peppy Hare (Star Fox Game)
Famous Rabbits In Video Games
Peter Rabbit (The Tale of Peter Rabbit)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature & From Movies or Television
Playboy Bunny
Famous Rabbit From Real Life
Rabbit (Winnie The Pooh)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature & From Movies or Television
Rabbit of Caerbanog (Monty Phyton)
Famous Rabbit From Movies And Television
Ricochet Rabbit (The Magilla Gorilla Show)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Roger Rabbit (Who Framed Roger Rabbit)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Schnuffel
Famous Rabbit From Movies & Television
Skippy Rabbit (Robin Hood)
Famous Rabbit From Movies & Television
Snowball The Rabbit (Secret Life Of Pets)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Taawi The Multi Talented Rabbit
Famous Real Life Rabbit
The White Rabbit (Alice in Wonderland)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature
The Velveteen Rabbit (The Velveteen Rabbit)
A Famous Rabbit From Literature
Thumper (Bambi)
Famous Rabbits In Movies or Television
Thunder Bunny (Thunder Bunny Comics)
Famous Rabbits In Comics
Trix Rabbit (Trix Cereals)
Famous Rabbit From Movies & Television