RG214 RG 214 U RG214U MIL-C-17F M-17/75 50 OHM

Exact markings on Cable as follows;

M-17/75-RG214  MIL-C-17F  RG214U  50 Ohm

End of reel, new and unused.

Length;

6 M

Neither end of cable terminated.

A Military specification cable as detailed above and appearing on the cable sheath itself throughout the entire length.

Perfect as an Antenna feeder cable for CB and Ham radio applications.

[Can be used as a higher specification alternative to RG213]

Screening arrangement;

Double layer of tightly Woven tinned copper (144 inner layer, 144 outer layer).

Centre Core;

7 Strands of Tinned Copper

Impedance;

50 Ohm

Sheath outer diameter;

10.7 mm (RG213 & 214 outer diameters vary slightly (10 mm - 10.7 mm) between manufacturers & types but generally are assumed to be the same regarding the terminations used at the cable ends. All-in-all when making off the cable ends some do seem easier than others). This measurement I've taken myself from each cable on offer and is meant as a guide/indication as to the exact cable measurement. It may help the user to determine the ease of cable termination.

This note I've added to all my RG213 & 214 cable listings just to clarify this point.

Sheath colour;

Black

R.R.P;

£8.50/M (6M @ £8.50/M = £51.00)

Typical price when purchased by reel/bulk.

____________

NOTES ETC:

I generally remove/cut off the inner layer of the woven screening during the termination process (when terminating with PL259 plugs) as this adds excessive bulk.

Please ensure this item is correct by checking part / identification number(s) written above (if present) and/or finally the photographs attached to the listing for compatibility before purchasing.

Supplied will be the exact unit(s) that is/are in the pictures of this listing.

COMBINED POSTAGE:

If more than one item is purchased I will reimburse any excess postal and packaging charge(s) as appropriate.

THE BORING BIT TO READ BELOW

I have described this item as accurately as possible, especially regarding any defects it may have. This combined with the photographs provided within the listing, and in particular any close-up photographs detailing any such defects, give an even more detailed overview of what you will receive.

I package all my items well; it's in the understanding my packaging could be tested to destruction whilst in courier care and therefore enduring some 'extreme transiting.

I assum to the best of my knowledge that all items would reach their destination in just as good a condition as when they were sent.

I guess rare occasions exist where the goods themselves are damaged, and therefore the external packaging to a more severe extent.

In these cases the courier delivering the item would have evidence themselves detailing severity etc, presuming a claim would result.

That said, the previous two paragraphs are to give both genuine buyers 'peace of mind' that 'what they have bought and are expecting is what they'll get' and to detour certain individuals ruining what would otherwise be 'straight forward trading' with one of a whole host of possible scams with goods such as these.

I regret to say that it is this situation that has forced me into not accepting returns.

If however in the rare event the item, the manufacturer's packaging (if present) and the outer postal packaging have been damaged (c/w photographic evidence to back up) then this would result in a claim arising against the courier (instigated from my end) and a resultant refund to the buyer.

Thank you