Publisher Description

In one of the great contests between State and federal power, the Tasmanian Dam Case pitted the immovable object of Tasmania's commitment to a massive hydro-electric project against the irresistible force of the Commonwealth's determination to protect the environment.\nWho would prevail? Was it more important to create jobs and provide cheap power, or to preserve the natural beauty of the Tasmanian wilderness? On whom did the Australian Constitution confer the power to decide this question?\nBy the narrowest of majorities, the High Court decided in 1983 that the Commonwealth had the final say, and upheld legislation that prohibited the construction of a dam on the Gordon River below the Franklin.\nBecause of the passions aroused by the case, the Court took the unprecedented step of issuing a statement explaining that its job was not to decide whether the proposed dam was a good idea or not, but to determine whether this was a matter of State or federal power. Yet this issue was just as hotly contested. Could any subject be brought within federal power merely by the presence of an international treaty on that subject? Would affirming this proposition destroy the intended balance between State and federal power? Would denying the proposition disable Australia from full participation in international affairs?\nThree decades after the High Court's decision, these and other questions of law and policy remain of vital importance. This book brings together a fascinating collection of commentaries on the impact of the decision, and how the hopes and fears following the decision have played out.\nThis stimulating and timely book contains reflections from then Commonwealth Attorney-General Gareth Evans, then High Court Justice Sir Anthony Mason and leading Indigenous lawyer Professor Mick Dodson. The book also examines some novel questions, such as whether the outcome of the case was inevitable, how similar issues have played out in Canada, and whether better conservation outcomes are more likely to come from the Commonwealth or the States. These and other chapters offer fresh perspectives on one of the most important cases in High Court history.

Author Biography

Michael Coper is Professor of Law at the ANU College of Law, having been Dean of the College from 1998 to 2012. A graduate of the University of Sydney in Arts and Law in 1970, Michael was one of the seven founding fathers of the UNSW Law School in 1971 and taught there until he moved to Canberra in 1988 to take up his appointment as a Member of the Inter-State Commission. After a brief period in legal practice in the early 1990s, he was appointed as Professor of Constitutional Law at the ANU in 1995, following the retirement of the esteemed Professor Leslie Zines. Michael's books include Freedom of Interstate Trade Under the Australian Constitution (1983), Encounters with the Australian Constitution (1987), and, as co-editor, The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (2001). He has appeared as counsel in the High Court in a number of cases, including the landmark Cole v Whitfield (1988), and is both a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Law and a member of the American Law Institute.Dr Heather Roberts is an interdisciplinary researcher, exploring the intersections of constitutional law, judicial biography, feminism and legal history. Her particular interests are in the history and biography of Australian courts, and the role of court ceremony in telling those stories. Heather has published book chapters, articles in leading journals and has spoken widely at Australian and international conferences on these topics. She is Senior Lecturer at the Australian National University College of Law, having previously practiced as a solicitor at a national corporate law firm.Dr James Stellios holds the position of Associate Professor at the Australian National University College of Law. He has written extensively on constitutional law. He is the author of The Federal Judicature: Chapter III of the Constitution (2010) and the co-author of The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia – History, Principle and Interpretation (2015) and Hanks Australian Constitutional Law: Materials and Commentary (2013). He is also a barrister at the NSW Bar.

Table of Contents

CONTENTS
Preface and Acknowledgments
About the Contributors
Table of Cases
Table of Statutes1. Introduction
Michael Coper, Heather Roberts and James Stellios2. The Background Politics of the Tasmanian Dam Case
The Hon Gareth Evans AC QC3. Prelude to the Tasmanian Dam Case – Constitutional Crises, Reserve Powers and the Exercise of Soft Power
Anne Twomey4. The Tasmanian Dam Case
The Hon Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE GBM5. Precarious Federalism: The Tasmanian Dam Case, the Corporations Power and the `Inevitable' Drive Towards Centralism
Alison Hammond6. The Tasmanian Dam Case – An International Lawyer's Perspective
Bill Campbell QC7. The Tasmanian Dam Case and Australia the Good International Citizen
Donald R Rothwell8. Treaty Implementation in Canada – A Comparative Perspective on the Tasmanian Dam Case
Rosalind Dixon, Nesha Balasubramanian and Melissa Vogt9. Human Rights and the Tasmanian Dam Case
George Williams10. Indigenous People as Linked to Place, the Race Power in the Tasmanian Dam Case
Mick Dodson and Siobhan McDonnellTasmanian Dam Case and the `Green Commonwealth' Hypothesis
Andrew MacintoshIndex

Review Text

The passage of a further 30 years since the Tasmanian Dam Case marks another generational transition in Australian constitutional law. The volume of essays under review, with its origins in a symposium held in 2013 by the ANU College of Law to mark the 30th anniversary of the case, takes the opportunity to "look at the case with some distance, consider its impact and its wider implications, locate it in a broader context, and assess how some of its particular themes have played out" (p 3). Although not expressly stated, the volume also brings into conversation the transitioning generations, with contributions from some of the protagonists of the day, from some who would not have been born at the time of the decision, and from others somewhere in between. ... The protagonists include Gareth Evans, who was the Commonwealth Attorney-General, and Sir Anthony Mason, who was one of the majority Justices. ... It is eminently readable from cover to cover, but will also reward intermittent dipping into. It is not (and does not purport to be) a doctrinal resource for practitioners. But it will nonetheless prompt new thoughts about an old case. Some of those new thoughts may even survive the next generation of constitutional law. - Brendan Lim, Australian Law Journal, 2018, 92

Details