Rosebery had little understanding of the mechanics of modern party organization and was irritated by his colleagues' readiness to defer to the party's rank and file. He believed that party politics worked to obscure the popular will and that 'the great difficulty of the age as regards politics is the impossibility of ascertaining the real feeling of the country' (Rosebery to Haldane, 1 April 1896, Hamer, 252). Never losing his ability to sway an audience—even the rancorous Bodmin speech of 1905 was punctuated by 'wild applause'—he became convinced that he understood demos better than Liberal 'faddists'. He was perhaps right, but his awareness of the weakness of his party's programme sometimes blinded him to the limitations of his own. Though lionized as a ‘modern’ politician by the Webbs and others on the strength of his detachment from party dogmas, his outlook was in fact rather dated by the 1900s. His Macaulayan ideals of enlightened aristocratic government, constitutional reform, and free-trade imperialism had bound him to the Gladstonian Liberal Party whatever his reservations about the Gladstonian style of politics, but he had little contact with the thinkers who refashioned Liberalism in the 1890s and 1900s, and was largely unreceptive to their doctrines of social and fiscal reform. He could support the social measures of the LCC as the fruits of local self-government, but proved resolutely hostile to the statist social reforms of the 1905–14 Liberal governments. As a peer—and a very wealthy one—Rosebery was also vulnerable to the revival of the fiscal debate. In 1894 he had been insensitive to the electoral dangers of loading the naval programme onto the existing fiscal system and the electoral advantages of a redistributive budget. After 1903 he was slow to appreciate that fiscal controversy would intensify partisanship, destroying his hope that in his detachment from party he could speak for a silent majority. He himself remained too much of a Gladstonian to stomach either the protectionist remedies of the Unionist tariff reformers or the wealth taxes enacted by the Liberals, but his agnosticism condemned him to political isolation. 'Those who are neither Tariff Reformers nor Socialists nor Home Rulers have no refuge to look to,' he complained in 1907 (Rosebery to Ernest Pretyman, 7 June 1907, Rosebery MS 10202, fol. 171). In the event he found refuge only in his long-promised retirement from politics.
:
City/Town/Village | Tasburgh, Framingham |
Stamp Duty Type | Impressed Blue Paper Revenue |
Type | Document |
Family Surname of | Primrose |
Signed | Yes |
Place or Property | Forncett Grove |
Famous Persons in History | Earl of Rosebury |
Era | 1850 - 1900 |
Country | England |
UK County | Norfolk |
Document type | Manorial Land Document |
Related Interest | Prime Ministers |
Year of Issue | 1877 |