WINGS IN
ORBIT: SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING LEGACIES OF THE SPACE SHUTTLE NASA
SOFTBOUND BOOK in ENGLISH by NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (WAYNE HALE, HELEN LANE, GAIL CHAPLINE,
KAMLESH LULLA)
ISBN 148028596X, ISBN-13
9781480285965
A MAGNIFICENT FLYING MACHINE
THE HISTORICAL LEGACY (MAJOR
MILESTONES, THE ACCIDENTS CHALLENGER & COLUMBIA, NATIONAL SECURITY
MISSIONS)
THE SPACE SHUTTLE AND ITS
OPERATIONS (THE SPACE SHUTTLE, PROCESSING THE SHUTTLE FOR FLIGHT, FLIGHT
OPERATIONS, EXTRAVEHICULAR ACTIVITY EVA OPERATIONS AND ADVANCEMENTS, HOW THE
SHUTTLE BUILT THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION ISS)
ENGINEERING INNOVATIONS (PROPULSION,
THERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEM, MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING, AERODYNAMICS &
FLIGHT DYNAMICS, AVIONICS, NAVIGATION, INSTRUMENTATION, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, STRUCTURAL
DESIGN, ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FOR LIFE CYCLE OF COMPLEX
SYSTEMS)
MAJOR SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES
(THE SPACE SHUTTLE AND THE GREAT OBSERVATORIES HUBBLE, ATMOSPHERIC
OBSERVATIONS AND EARTH IMAGING, MAPPING THE EARTH: RADARS & TOPOGRAPHY,
ASTRONAUT HEALTH & PERFORMANCE, THE SPACE SHUTTLE EXPANDING THE FRONTIERS
OF BIOLOGY, MICROGRAVITY RESEARCH, SPACE ENVIRONMENTS)
INDUSTRIES AND SPIN-OFFS
SHUTTLE CARRIER AIRCRAFT
ENTERPRISE TEST VEHICLE
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
FROM PROTOTYPE TO FLIGHT
OPERATIONAL HISTORY
APPROACH AND LANDING TESTS
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FLIGHTS
THE OPERATIONAL ERA
CHALLENGER ACCIDENT 1986 / INVESTIGATION
OV-101 ENTERPRISE
OV-102 COLUMBIA
OV-103 CHALLENGER
OV-104 ATLANTIS
OV-105 DISCOVERY
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION:
ORBITER DESCRIPTION, FORWARD FUSELAGE, CREW
MODULE, FLIGHT DECK, MID-DECK, EQUIPMENT BAY, MID-FUSELAGE, WINGS,
AFT-FUSELAGE, BODY FLAP, VERTICAL STABILIZER, MAIN ENGINES, POWER SYSTEMS,
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS, THERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEM, AVIONICS, LANDING GEAR,
BRAKES, EXTERNAL TANK, SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS, RANGE SAFETY SYSTEM, OPERATIONAL
FLIGHT SEATS, RMS CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS, ROTATION HAND CONTROL, PRIVACY
CURTAINS, PAYLOAD BAY TELEVISION CAMERA AND FLOODLIGHTS, WASTE COLLECTION,
RESCUE CONFIGURATION, AIRLOCK, INSTRUMENT EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS, ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTROL AND LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM, S-BAND RADIOS, ORBITTER ANTENNAS, THERMAL
BARRIERS, RCC WING LEADING EDGE, RCC NOSE CAP, INTERNAL STRUCTURE COMPONENTS,
PAYLOAD BAY DOORS, DOOR DEPLOYABLE RADIATOR, ACTIVE PAYLOAD RETENTION SYSTEM,
MECHANICAL ARM, AERODYNAMIC SURFACES, ELEVON CONTRUCTION, BODY FLAP, VERTICAL
TAIL, NOSE LANDING GEAR, MAIN LANDING GEAR, WHEEL BRAKE ASSEMBLY, LANDING GEAR
DOOR CONSTRUCTION, EXTERNAL TANK CUTAWAY DWG, EXT TANK RANGE SAFETY LINEAR
SHAPED CHARGES, REACTION CONTROL SYSTEM, EXTERNAL TANK-ORBITER DISCONNECT
VALVES, ORBITER/ EXT TANK UMBILICAL, SRB CUTAWAY DRAWING, SRB RECOVERY
PROCEDURE, SRB JOINT DETAILS, SRB SEPARATION SYSTEM, AUXILLIARY POWR UNIT,
WATER SPRAY UNIT, APU EXHAUST AND WATER BOILER VENT, ORBITER VENT DOORS,
VENTING SYSTEM)
LAUNCH FACILITIES
KENNEDY SPACE CENTER
SHUTTLE LANDING FACILITY SLF
VEHICLE ASSEMBLY BUILDING VAB
ORBITER PROCESSING FACILITY OPF
ORBITER MODIFICATION AND REFURBISHMENT OMRF
LAUNCH CONTROL CENTER LCC
TRANSPORTABLE EQUIPMENT
LAUNCH PAD 39A& 39B
VANDENBERG AFB LAUNCH SITE VLS
MISSION CONTROL HOUSTON
MAJOR SPACE SHUTTLE CONTRACTS
APPROACH AND LANDING TEST FLIGHTS
SIGNIFICANT ORBITER MILESTONES
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CONFIGURATION DATA
SHUTTLE ABORT REGIONS
STS MISSION DATA
COUNTDOWN MILESTONES
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Information from Internet Encyclopedia
The Space Shuttle is a partially reusable low
Earth orbital spacecraft system that was operated from 1981 to 2011 by the U.S.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as part of the Space
Shuttle program. Its official program name was Space Transportation System
(STS), taken from a 1969 plan for a system of reusable spacecraft of which it
was the only item funded for development.[10] The first of four orbital test
flights occurred in 1981, leading to operational flights beginning in 1982. In
addition to the prototype whose completion was cancelled, five complete Shuttle
systems were built and used on a total of 135 missions from 1981 to 2011,
launched from the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. Operational missions
launched numerous satellites, interplanetary probes, and the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST); conducted science experiments in orbit; and participated in
construction and servicing of the International Space Station. The Shuttle
fleet's total mission time was 1322 days, 19 hours, 21 minutes and 23 seconds.
Shuttle components include the Orbiter Vehicle
(OV) with three clustered Rocketdyne RS-25 main engines, a pair of recoverable
solid rocket boosters (SRBs), and the expendable external tank (ET) containing
liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The Space Shuttle was launched vertically,
like a conventional rocket, with the two SRBs operating in parallel with the
OV's three main engines, which were fueled from the ET. The SRBs were
jettisoned before the vehicle reached orbit, and the ET was jettisoned just
before orbit insertion, which used the orbiter's two Orbital Maneuvering System
(OMS) engines. At the conclusion of the mission, the orbiter fired its OMS to
deorbit and reenter the atmosphere. The orbiter then glided as a spaceplane to
a runway landing, usually to the Shuttle Landing Facility at Kennedy Space
Center, Florida or Rogers Dry Lake in Edwards Air Force Base, California. After
landing at Edwards, the orbiter was flown back to the KSC on the Shuttle
Carrier Aircraft, a specially modified Boeing 747.
The first orbiter, Enterprise, was built in 1976,
used in Approach and Landing Tests and has no orbital capability. Four fully
operational orbiters were initially built: Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, and
Atlantis. Of these, two were lost in mission accidents: Challenger in 1986 and
Columbia in 2003, with a total of fourteen astronauts killed. A fifth
operational (and sixth in total) orbiter, Endeavour, was built in 1991 to
replace Challenger. The Space Shuttle was retired from service upon the
conclusion of Atlantis's final flight on July 21, 2011. The U.S. has since
relied on the Russian Soyuz spacecraft to transport astronauts to the International
Space Station, pending the Commercial Crew Development and Space Launch System
programs with flights to begin in the 2020s.
In September 1966, NASA and the Air Force released
a joint study concluding that a new vehicle was required to satisfy their respective
future demands, and that a partially reusable system would be the most
cost-effective solution.[12]:164 The head of the NASA Office of Manned Space
Flight, George Mueller, announced the plan for a reusable shuttle on August 10,
1968. NASA issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for designs of the Integrated
Launch and Re-entry Vehicle (ILRV), which would later become the Space Shuttle.
Rather than award a contract based upon initial proposals, NASA announced a
phased approach for the Space Shuttle contracting and development; Phase A was
a request for studies completed by competing aerospace companies, Phase B was a
competition between two contractors for a specific contract, Phase C involved
designing the details of the spacecraft components, and Phase D was the
production of the spacecraft.
In December 1968, NASA created the Space Shuttle
Task Group to determine the optimal design for a reusable spacecraft, and
issued study contracts to General Dynamics, Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas, and
North American Rockwell. In July 1969, the Space Shuttle Task Group issued a
report that determined the Shuttle would support a space station, launch,
service, and retrieve satellites, and support short-duration crewed missions.
The report also created three classes of a future reusable shuttle: Class I
would have a reusable orbiter mounted on expendable boosters, Class II would
use stage-and-a-half staging, and Class III would have both a reusable orbiter
and a reusable booster. In September 1969, the Space Task Group, under
leadership of Vice President Spiro Agnew, issued a report calling for the
development of a space shuttle to bring people and cargo to low Earth orbit
(LEO), as well as a space tug for transfers between orbits and the Moon, and a
reusable nuclear stage for deep space travel.
After the release of the Space Shuttle Task Group
report, many aerospace engineers favored the Class III, fully reusable design
because of perceived savings in hardware costs. Max Faget, a NASA engineer who
had worked to design the Mercury capsule, patented a design for a two-stage
fully recoverable system with a straight-winged orbiter mounted on a larger
straight-winged booster.[16][17] The Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory
argued that a straight-wing design would not be able to withstand the high
thermal and aerodynamic stresses during reentry, and would not provide the
required cross-range capability. Additionally, the Air Force required a larger
payload capacity than Faget's design allowed. In January 1971, NASA and Air
Force leadership decided that a reusable delta-wing orbiter mounted on an
expendable propellant tank would be the optimal design for the Space Shuttle.
After establishing the need for a reusable,
heavy-lift spacecraft, NASA and the Air Force began determining the design
requirements of their respective services. The Air Force expected to launch
large satellites into a polar orbit, and that the Space Shuttle have a
4.6-meter (15 ft) by 18-meter (60 ft) foot payload bay, 1,800-kilometer (1,100
mi) cross-range, and the capacity to lift 29,000-kilogram (65,000 lb) to an
easterly low Earth orbit, and 18,000-kilogram (40,000 lb) into polar orbit.
NASA evaluated the F-1 and J-2 engines from the Saturn rockets, and determined
that they were insufficient for the requirements of the Space Shuttle, and in
July 1971, it issued a contract to Rocketdyne to begin development on the RS-25
engine.
NASA reviewed 29 potential designs for the Space
Shuttle. NASA determined that a design with two side boosters should be used,
and the boosters should be reusable to reduce costs. NASA and the Air Force
elected to use solid-propellant boosters because of the lower costs and the
ease of refurbishing them for reuse after they landed in the ocean. In January
1972, President Richard Nixon approved the Shuttle, and NASA decided on its
final design in March. In August 1972, NASA awarded the contract to build the
orbiter to North American Rockwell, the solid-rocket booster contract to Morton
Thiokol, and the external tank contract to Martin Marietta.
On June 4, 1974, Rockwell began construction on
the first shuttle, Orbiter Vehicle (OV)-101, which would later be named
Enterprise. Enterprise was designed as a test vehicle, and did not include
engines or heat shielding. Construction was completed on September 17, 1976,
and Enterprise was moved to Edwards AFB to begin testing.[12]:173[18] Rockwell
also constructed the Main Propulsion Test Article (MPTA)-098, which was later
fit with RS-25 engines and tested at the National Space Technology Laboratory
(NSTL). Rockwell conducted structural tests on Structural Test Article
(STA)-099 to determine the effect of aerodynamic stresses.
The beginning of the development of the RS-25
Space Shuttle Main Engine was delayed for nine months while Pratt & Whitney
challenged the contract that had been issued to Rocketdyne. The first engine
was completed in March 1975, after issues with developing the first
throttlable, reusable engine. During engine testing, the RS-25 experienced
multiple nozzle failures, as well as broken turbine blades. Despite the
problems during testing, NASA ordered the nine RS-25 engines needed for its
three orbiters under construction in May 1978.
NASA experienced significant delays in the
development of the Space Shuttle's thermal protection system. Previous NASA
spacecraft had used ablative heat shields, but those could not be reused. NASA
chose to use ceramic tiles for thermal protection, as the shuttle could then be
constructed of lightweight aluminum, and the tiles could be individually
replaced as needed. Construction began on Columbia on March 27, 1975, and it
was delivered to the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) on March 25, 1979. At the time
of its arrival at the KSC, Columbia still had 6,000 of its 30,000 tiles
remaining to be installed. However, many of the tiles that had been originally
installed had to be replaced, requiring two years of installation before
Columbia could fly.
On January 5, 1979, NASA commissioned a second
orbiter. Later that month, Rockwell began converting STA-099 to OV-099, later
named Challenger. On January 29, 1979, NASA ordered two additional orbiters,
OV-103 and OV-104, which were named Discovery and Atlantis. Construction of
OV-105, later named Endeavour, began in February 1982, but NASA decided to
limit the Space Shuttle fleet to four orbiters in 1983. After the loss of
Challenger, NASA resumed production of Endeavour in September 1987.
After it arrived at Edwards AFB, Enterprise
underwent flight testing with the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, a Boeing 747 that
had been modified to carry the orbiter. In February 1977, Enterprise began the
Approach and Landing Tests and underwent captive flights, where it remained
attached to the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft for the duration of the flight. On
August 12, 1977, Enterprise conducted its first glide test, where it detached
from the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft and landed at Edwards AFB.[12]:173174 After
four additional flights, Enterprise was moved to the Marshall Space Flight
Center on March 13, 1978. Enterprise underwent shake tests in the Mated
Vertical Ground Vibration Test, where it was attached to an external tank and
solid rocket boosters, and underwent vibrations to simulate the stresses of
launch. In April 1979, Enterprise was taken to the Kennedy Space Center, where
it was attached to an external tank and solid rocket boosters, and moved to
LC-39. Once installed at the launch pad, the Space Shuttle was used to verify
the proper positioning of launch complex hardware. Enterprise was taken back to
California in August 1979, and later served in the development of the SLC-6 at
Vandenberg AFB in 1984.
On November 26, 1980, Columbia was mated with its
external tank and solid-rocket boosters, and was moved to LC-39 on December 29,
1980. The first Space Shuttle mission, STS-1, would be the first time NASA
performed a crewed first-flight of a spacecraft. On April 12, 1981, the Space
Shuttle launched for the first time, and was piloted by John Young and Robert
Crippen. During the two-day mission, Young and Crippen tested equipment on
board the shuttle, and found several of the ceramic tiles had fallen off the
top side of the Columbia. NASA coordinated with the Air Force to use satellites
to image the underside of Columbia, and determined there was no damage.
Columbia reentered the atmosphere on April 14, and landed at Edwards AFB.
NASA conducted three additional test flights with
Columbia in 1981 and 1982. On July 4, 1982, STS-4, flown by Ken Mattingly and
Henry Hartsfield, landed at Edwards AFB. President Ronald Reagan and his wife
Nancy met the crew, and delivered a speech. After STS-4, NASA declared the Space
Shuttle operational.
The Space Shuttle was the first operational
orbital spacecraft designed for reuse. Each Space Shuttle orbiter was designed
for a projected lifespan of 100 launches or ten years of operational life,
although this was later extended. At launch, it consisted of the orbiter, which
contained the crew and payload, the external tank (ET), and the two solid
rocket boosters (SRBs).
Responsibility for the Shuttle components was
spread among multiple NASA field centers. The Kennedy Space Center was
responsible for launch, landing and turnaround operations for equatorial orbits
(the only orbit profile actually used in the program), the U.S. Air Force at
the Vandenberg Air Force Base was responsible for launch, landing and
turnaround operations for polar orbits (though this was never used), the
Johnson Space Center served as the central point for all Shuttle operations,
the Marshall Space Flight Center was responsible for the main engines, external
tank, and solid rocket boosters, the John C. Stennis Space Center handled main
engine testing, and the Goddard Space Flight Center managed the global tracking
network.
The orbiter had design elements and capabilities
of both a rocket and an aircraft to allow it to launch vertically and then land
as a glider. Its three-part fuselage provided support for the crew compartment,
cargo bay, flight surfaces, and engines. The rear of the orbiter contained the
Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSME), which provided thrust during launch, as well
as the Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS), which allowed the orbiter to achieve,
alter, and exit its orbit once in space. Its double-delta wings were 18-meter
(60 ft) long, and were swept 81° at the inner leading edge and 45° at the outer
leading edge. Each wing had an inboard and outboard elevon to provide flight
control during reentry, along with a flap located between the wings, below the
engines to control pitch. The orbiter's vertical stabilizer was swept backwards
at 45°, and contained a rudder that could split to act as a speed brake. The
vertical stabilizer also contained a two-part drag parachute system to slow the
orbiter after landing. The orbiter used retractable landing gear with a nose
landing gear and two main landing gear, each containing two tires. The main
landing gear contained two brake assemblies each, and the nose landing gear
contained an electro-hydraulic steering mechanism.
Four operational OVs were originally built.
Following the construction of Columbia (OV-102) and the conversion of
Challenger (OV-099) to a flyable spacecraft, Discovery (OV-103) and Atlantis
(OV-104) were ordered in January 1979. After the Challenger disaster in January
1986, NASA ordered a fifth OV, Endeavour (OV-105) in July 1987. Endeavour was
primarily built from structural spares that were created during the
construction of Discovery and Atlantis.
Crew compartment
The crew compartment comprised three decks, and
was the pressurized, habitable area on all Space Shuttle missions. The cockpit
consisted of two seats for the commander and pilot, as well as an additional
two to four seats for crew members. The mid-deck is located below the cockpit,
and is where the galley and crew bunks were set up, as well as three or four
crew member seats. The mid-deck contained the airlock, which could support two
astronauts on an extravehicular activity (EVA), as well as access to
pressurized research modules. An equipment bay was below the mid-deck, which
stored environmental control and waste management
systems.[14]:6062[23]:365369 To ensure the cabin would be comfortable for the
crew, designers created a full-sized cardboard mock-up of the cabin. Astronauts
would then mimic their daily activities inside of the mock-up. Each time they
knocked up against a corner, technicians would remove the part of the mock-up
that had gotten in the astronauts' way until there were no more collisions and
the cabin was deemed to be comfortable.
On the first four Shuttle missions, astronauts
wore modified U.S. Air Force high-altitude full-pressure suits, which included
a full-pressure helmet during ascent and descent. From the fifth flight, STS-5,
until the loss of Challenger, the crew wore one-piece light blue nomex flight
suits and partial-pressure helmets. After the Challenger disaster, the crew
members wore the Launch Entry Suit (LES), a partial-pressure version of the
high-altitude pressure suits with a helmet. In 1994, the LES was replaced by
the full-pressure Advanced Crew Escape Suit (ACES), which improved the safety
of the astronauts in an emergency situation. Columbia originally had modified
SR-71 zero-zero ejection seats installed for the ALT and first four missions,
but these were disabled after STS-4 and removed after STS-9.
The flight deck was the top level of the crew
compartment, and contained the flight controls for the orbiter. The commander
sat in the front left seat, and the pilot sat in the front right seat, with two
to four additional seats set up for additional crew members. The instrument
panels contained over 2,100 displays and controls, and the commander and pilot
were both equipped with a heads-up display (HUD) and a Rotational Hand
Controller (RHC) to gimbal the engines during powered flight and fly the
orbiter during unpowered flight. Both seats also had rudder controls, to allow
rudder movement in flight and nose-wheel steering on the ground. The orbiter
vehicles were originally installed with the Multifunction CRT Display System
(MCDS) to display and control flight information. The MCDS displayed the flight
information at the commander and pilot seats, as well as at the after seating
location, and also controlled the data on the HUD. In 1998, Atlantis was
upgraded with the Multifunction Electronic Display System (MEDS), which was a
glass cockpit upgrade to the flight instruments that replaced the eight MCDS
display units with 11 multifunction colored digital screens. MEDS was flown for
the first time in May 2000 on STS-98, and the other orbiter vehicles were
upgraded to it. The aft section of the flight decked contained windows looking
into the payload bay, as well as an RHC to control the Remote Manipulator
System during cargo operations. Additionally, the aft flight deck had monitors
for a closed-circuit television to view the cargo bay.
The mid-deck was located underneath the flight
deck. It contained the crew equipment storage, as well as the sleeping and
hygiene stations for the crew. The mid-deck contained seats for three
crewmembers (Columbia's mid-deck could seat four) during launch and landing
procedures. The mid-deck contained a port-side hatch that crew used for entry
and exit while on Earth. Additionally, each orbiter was originally installed
with an internal airlock in the mid-deck. The airlock was replaced with an
external airlock on Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour to improve docking with
Mir and the ISS.
Flight systems
The orbiter was equipped with an avionics system
to provide information and control during atmospheric flight. Its avionics
suite contained three microwave scanning beam landing systems, three
gyroscopes, three TACANs, three accelerometers, two radar altimeters, two
barometric altimeters, three attitude indicators, two Mach indicators, and two
Mode C transponders. During reentry, the crew deployed two air data probes once
they were travelling slower than Mach 5. The orbiter had three inertial
measuring units (IMU) that it used for guidance and navigation during all
phases of flight. The orbiter contains two star trackers to align the IMUs
while in orbit. The star trackers are deployed while in orbit, and can
automatically or manually align on a star. In 1991, NASA began upgrading the
inertial measurement units with an inertial navigation system (INS), which
provided more accurate location information. In 1993, NASA flew a GPS receiver
for the first time aboard STS-51. In 1997, Honeywell began developing an
integrated GPS/INS to replace the IMU, INS, and TACAN systems, which first flew
on STS-118 in August 2007
While in orbit, the crew primarily communicated
using one of four S band radios, which provided both voice and data
communications. Two of the S band radios were phase modulation transceivers,
and could transmit and receive information. The other two S band radios were
frequency modulation transmitters, and were used to transmit data to NASA. As S
band radios can operate only within their line of sight, NASA used the Tracking
and Data Relay Satellite System and the Spacecraft Tracking and Data
Acquisition Network ground stations to communicate with the orbiter throughout
its orbit. Additionally, the orbiter deployed a high-bandwidth Ku band radio
out of the cargo bay. The Ku radio could also utilized as a rendezvous radar.
The orbiter was also equipped with two UHF radios for communications with air
traffic control and astronauts conducting extravehicular activity.
Although the orbiter could not be flown without a
crew, its fly-by-wire control system was entirely reliant on its main computer,
the Data Processing System (DPS). The DPS controlled the flight controls and
thrusters on the orbiter vehicle, as well as the ET and SRBs during launch. The
DPS consisted of five general purpose computers (GPC), two magnetic tape mass
memory units (MMUs), and the associated sensors to monitors the Space Shuttle
components. The original GPC used was the IBM AP-101B, which used a separate
central processing unit (CPU) and inputer/output processor (IOP), and
non-volatile solid-state memory. From 1991 to 1993, the orbiter vehicles were
upgraded to the AP-101S, which improved the memory and processing capabilities,
and reduced the volume and weight of the computers by combining the CPU and IOP
into a single unit. Four of the GPCs were loaded with the Primary Avionics
Software System (PASS), which was Space Shuttle-specific software that provided
control through all phases of flight. During ascent, maneuvring, reentry, and
landing, the four PASS GPCs functioned identically to produce quadruple
redundancy, and would error check their results. In case of a software error
that would cause erroneous reports from the four PASS GPCs, a fifth GPC ran the
Backup Flight System, which used a different program and could control the
Space Shuttle through ascent, orbit, and reentry, but could not support an
entire mission. The five GPCs were separated in three separate bays within the
mid-deck to provide redundancy in the event of a cooling fan failure. After
achieving orbit, the crew would switch some of the GPCs functions from
guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) to systems management (SM) and payload
(PL) to support the operational mission.
Space Shuttle missions typically brought a
portable general support computer (PGSC) that could integrate with the orbiter
vehicle's computers and communication suite, as well as monitor scientific and
payload data. Early missions brought the Grid Compass, one of the first laptop
computers, as the PGSC, but later missions brought Apple and Intel laptops.
Payload bay
The payload bay comprised most of the orbiter
vehicle's fuselage, and provided the cargo-carrying space for the Space
Shuttle's payloads. It was 18-meter (60 ft) long and 4.6-meter (15 ft) wide,
and was the could accommodate cylindrical payloads up to 15 feet (4.6 m) in
diameter. These measurements were chosen specifically to accommodate the KH-9
HEXAGON spy satellite operated by the National Reconnaissance Office.[33] Two
payload bay doors hinged on either side of the bay, and provided a relatively
airtight seal to protect payloads from heating during launch and reentry.
Payloads were secured the in the payload bay to the attachment points on the
longerons. The payload bay doors served an additional function as radiators for
the orbiter vehicle's heat, and were opened upon reaching orbit for heat
rejection.
The orbiter could be used in conjunction with a
variety of add-on components depending on the mission. This included orbital
laboratories (Spacelab, Spacehab), boosters for launching payloads farther into
space (Inertial Upper Stage, Payload Assist Module), and other functions, such
as provided by Extended Duration Orbiter, Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules, or
Canadarm (RMS). An upper stage called Transfer Orbit Stage (Orbital Science
Corp. TOS-21) was also used once with the orbiter.[34] Other types of systems
and racks were part of the modular Spacelab system pallets, igloo, IPS, etc.,
which also supported special missions such as SRTM.[35] To limit the fuel
conseumption while the orbiter vehicle was docked at the ISS, the
Station-to-Shuttle Power Transfer System (SSPTS) was installed on Discovery and
Endeavour. The SSPTS was first used on STS-118, and allowed the orbiter vehicle
to be power by the ISS's power supply.
Remote Manipulator System
The Remote Manipulator System (RMS), also known as
Canadarm, was a mechanical arm attached to the cargo bay. It could be used to
grasp and manipulate payloads, as well as serve as a mobile platform for
astronauts conducting an Extravehicular activity (EVA). The RMS was built by
the Canadian company Spar Aerospace, and was controlled by an astronaut inside
the orbiter's flight deck using their windows and closed-circuit television.
The RMS allowed for six-degrees of freedom, and had six joints located at three
points along the arm. The original RMS could deploy or retrieve payloads up to
65,000 pounds (29,000 kg), which was later improved to 586,000 pounds (270,000 kg)
Spacelab
In 1973, European ministers met in Belgium to
authorize the Spacelab program, which was a European multidisciplinary orbital
space laboratory that flew in the payload bay.[39][35] Spacelab provided a
modular, pressurized laboratory for use in orbit. The Spacelab module contained
two 2.7 m (9 ft) segments that were mounted in the aft end of the payload bay
to maintain the center of gravity during flight. Astronauts entered the
Spacelab module through a 2.7 m (8.72 ft) or 5.8 m (18.88 ft) tunnel that
connected to the airlock. The Spacelab equipment was primarily stored in
pallets, which provided storage for both experiments as well as computer and
power equipment. Spacelab hardware was flown on 28 missions through 1999, and
studied subjects including astronomy, microgravity, radar, and life
sciences.[35] Spacelab hardware also supported missions such as Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) servicing and space station resupply.[35] STS-2 and STS-3
provided testing, and the first full mission was Spacelab-1 (STS-9) launched on
November 28, 1983.[35] Germany funded the Spacelab missions D1 and D2. In
addition to the European Space Agency, Japan also partially funded research
during the SL-J mission.
Three RS-25 engines were mounted on the orbiter's
aft fuselage in a triangular pattern. The engine nozzles could gimbal ±10.5° in
pitch, and ±8.5° in yaw during ascent to change the direction of their thrust
to steer the Shuttle. The orbiter structure was made primarily from aluminum
alloy, although the engine structure was made primarily from titanium alloy.
The RS-25 engines had several improvements to
enhance reliability and power. During the development program, Rocketdyne
determined that the engine was capable of safe reliable operation at 104% of
the originally specified thrust. To keep the engine thrust values consistent
with previous documentation and software, NASA kept the original specified
thrust as 100%, but had the RS-25 operate at higher thrust. RS-25 upgrade
versions were denoted as Block I and Block II. 109% thrust level was achieved
with the Block II engines in 2001. The normal maximum throttle was 104 percent,
with 106% or 109% used for mission aborts.
-------------------------------
This publication authoritatively
documents the many accomplishments of NASA's Space Shuttle Program from its
origins to the present. Beginning with a Foreword by astronauts John Young and
Robert Crippen, this compelling book provides clear, accurate, and authentic
accounts from NASA's best subject matter experts, including aerospace engineers
who worked with the shuttle program, and leading experts from the science and
academic communities. The book captures the passion of those who devoted their
energies to the program's success for more than three decades. It focuses on
their science and engineering accomplishments, the rich history of the program,
and the shuttle as an icon in U.S. history. Its comprehensive overview of the
shuttle and its accomplishments, combined with its lucid prose, makes Wings in
Orbit a unique resource for anyone interested in the history and achievements
of American space exploration." The first great age of space exploration
culminated with the historic lunar landing in July 1969. Following that
achievement, the space policymakers looked back to the history of aviation as a
model for the future of space travel. The Space Shuttle was conceived as a way
to exploit the resources of the new frontier. Using an aviation analogy, the
shuttle would be the Douglas DC-3 of space. That aircraft is generally
considered to be the first commercially successful air transport. The shuttle
was to be the first commercially successful space transport. This impossible
leap was not realized, an unrealistic goal that appears patently obvious in
retrospect, yet it haunts the history of the shuttle to this day. Much of the
criticism of the shuttle originates from this overhyped initial concept. In
fact, the perceived relationship between the history of aviation and the
promise of space travel continues to motivate space policymakers. In some ways,
the analogy that compares space with aviation can be very illustrative. If the
first crewed spacecraft of 1961 are accurately the analog of the Wright
brothers' first aircraft, the Apollo spacecraft of 1968 should properly be
compared with the Wright brothers' 1909 "Model B"-their first
commercial sale. The "B" was the product of 6 years of tinkering,
experimentation, and adjustments, but were only two major iterations of
aircraft design. In much the same way, Apollo was the technological inheritor
of two iterations of spacecraft design in 7 years. The Space Shuttle of
1981-coming 20 years after the first spaceflights-could be compared with the
aircraft of the mid-1920s. In fact, there is a good analogy in the history of
aviation: the Ford Tri-Motor of 1928. But here the aviation analogy breaks
down. In aviation history, advances are made not just because of the passage of
calendar time but because there are hundreds of different aircraft designs with
thousands of incremental technology advances tested in flight between the
"B" and the Tri-Motor. Even so, the aviation equivalent compression
of decades of technological advance does not do justice to the huge
technological leap from expendable rockets and capsules to a reusable, winged,
hypersonic, cargo-carrying spacecraft. This was accomplished with no
intermediate steps. Viewed from that perspective, the Space Shuttle is truly a
wonder. No doubt the shuttle is but one step of many on the road to the stars,
but it was a giant leap indeed. That is what this book is about: not what might
have been or what was impossibly promised, but what was actually achieved and
what was actually delivered. Viewed against this background, the Space Shuttle
was a tremendous engineering achievement-a vehicle that enabled nearly routine
and regular access to space for hundreds of people, and a profoundly vital link
in scientific advancement. The vision of this book is to take a clear-eyed look
at what the shuttle accomplished and the shuttle's legacy to the world. This
book will serve as an excellent reference for building future space vehicles.