Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle

Studies the different conceptions of dialectic (art of argumentation, logic) during the Hellenistic and early Imperial periods.

Thomas Bénatouïl (Edited by), Katerina Ierodiakonou (Edited by)

9781108471909, Cambridge University Press

Hardback, published 15 November 2018

400 pages
23.5 x 15.8 x 2.5 cm, 0.73 kg

Ancient dialectic started as an art of refutation and evolved into a science akin to our logic, grammar and linguistics. Scholars of ancient philosophy have traditionally focused on Plato's and Aristotle's dialectic without paying much attention to the diverse conceptions and uses of dialectic presented by philosophers after the classical period. To bridge this gap, this volume aims at a comprehensive understanding of the competing Hellenistic and Imperial definitions of dialectic and their connections with those of the classical period. It starts from the Megaric school of the fourth century BCE and the early Peripatetics, via Epicurus, the Stoics, the Academic sceptics and Cicero, to Sextus Empiricus and Galen in the second century CE. The philosophical foundations and various uses of dialectic are closely analysed and systematically examined together with the numerous objections that were raised against them.

Introduction: dialectics in dialogue Thomas Bénatouïl
1. Megara and dialectic James Allen
2. Dialectic in the early Peripatos Paolo Crivelli
3. Epicurus on dialectic David Sedley
4. Dialectic as a subpart of stoic philosophy Katerina Ierodiakonou
5. Stoic dialectic and its objects Jean-Baptiste Gourinat
6. Dialectic in the Hellenistic Academy Luca Castagnoli
7. Pithana and Probabilia Tobias Reinhardt
8. Terminology and practice of dialectic in Cicero's letters Sophie Aubert-Baillot
9. The sceptic's modes of argumentation Benjamin Morison
10. Galen and middle Platonists on dialectic and knowledge Riccardo Chiaradonna.

Subject Areas: Philosophy: logic [HPL], Western philosophy: Ancient, to c 500 [HPCA], Historical & comparative linguistics [CFF]