WW2
GERMAN TIGER I & TIGER II TANKS and VARIANTS JAGDTIGER STORMTIGER FERDINAND
HEAVILY ILLUSTRATED IMAGES OF
WAR SPECIAL ISSUE SOFTBOUND BOOK in ENGLISH by ANTHONY TUCKER-JONES
---------------------------------
The Tiger I was a German heavy
tank of World War II that began operational duty in 1942 in Africa and in the
Soviet Union, usually in independent heavy tank battalions. It gave the German
Army its first armoured fighting vehicle that mounted the 8.8 cm KwK 36 gun (derived
from the 8.8 cm Flak 36, the famous "eighty-eight" feared by Allied
troops). 1,347 were built between August 1942 and August 1944.[12] After August
1944, production of the Tiger I was phased out in favour of the Tiger II.
While the Tiger I has been
called an outstanding design for its time it has also been called
overengineered, using expensive materials and labour-intensive production
methods. In the early period, the Tiger was prone to certain types of track
failures and breakdowns. It was expensive to maintain, but generally
mechanically reliable.[15] It was difficult to transport and vulnerable to
immobilisation when mud, ice, and snow froze between its overlapping and
interleaved Schachtellaufwerk-pattern road wheels, often jamming them solid.
This was a problem on the Eastern Front in the muddy rasputitsa season and during
periods of extreme cold.
The tank was given its nickname
"Tiger" by Ferdinand Porsche, and the Roman numeral was added after
the Tiger II entered production. The initial designation was Panzerkampfwagen
VI Ausführung H (literally
"armoured combat vehicle VI version H", abbreviated PzKpfw VI Ausf.
H) where 'H' denoted Henschel as the designer/manufacturer. It was classified
with ordnance inventory designation Sd.Kfz. 182. The tank was later
re-designated as PzKpfw VI Ausf. E in March 1943, with ordnance inventory
designation Sd.Kfz. 181.
On 22 June 1941, Germany
launched Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. The Germans
encountered large numbers of Soviet T-34 medium and KV-1 heavy tanks.[19]
According to Henschel designer Erwin Aders, "There was great consternation
when it was discovered that the Soviet tanks were superior to anything
available to the Heer."
Weight increase to 45 tonnes and an increase in gun calibre to
8.8 cm were ordered for it on 26 May
1941.[21] The due date for the new prototypes was set for 20 April 1942, Adolf
Hitler's 53rd birthday. Unlike the Panther tank, the designs did not
incorporate sloped armour.
Porsche and Henschel submitted
prototype designs, each making use of the Krupp-designed turret. They were
demonstrated at Rastenburg in front of Hitler. The Henschel design was
accepted, mainly because the Porsche VK 4501 (P) prototype design used a troubled
petrol-electric transmission system which needed large quantities of copper for
the manufacture of its electrical drivetrain components, a strategic war
material of which Germany had limited supplies with acceptable electrical
properties for such uses.[22] Production of the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf. H
began in August 1942. Expecting an order for his tank, Porsche built 100
chassis. After the contract was awarded to Henschel, they were used for a new
turretless, casemate-style tank destroyer; 91 hulls were converted into the
Panzerjäger Tiger (P) in early 1943.
The Tiger was still at the
prototype stage when it was first hurried into service, and therefore changes
both large and small were made throughout the production run. A redesigned
turret with a lower cupola was the most significant change. The river-fording
submersion capability and an external air-filtration system were dropped to cut
costs.
Design
The Tiger differed from earlier
German tanks principally in its design philosophy. Its predecessors balanced
mobility, armour and firepower and were sometimes outgunned by their opponents.
While heavy, this tank was not
slower than the best of its opponents. Although the general design and layout
were broadly similar to the Panzer IV medium tank, the Tiger weighed more than
twice as much. This was due to its substantially thicker armour, the larger
main gun, greater volume of fuel and ammunition storage, larger engine, and a
more solidly built transmission and suspension.
Armour
The Tiger I's armour was up to
200 mm on the gun mantlet.
The Tiger I had frontal hull
armour 100 mm (3.9 in) thick, frontal turret of 100 mm (3.9 in) and gun mantlet
with a varying thickness of 120 mm (4.7 in) to 200 mm (7.9 in).[23] The Tiger
had 60 mm (2.4 in) thick hull side plates and 80 mm armour on the side
superstructure/sponsons, while turret sides and rear were 80 mm. The top and
bottom armour was 25 mm (1 in) thick; from March 1944, the turret roof was
thickened to 40 mm (1.6 in).[7] Armour plates were mostly flat, with
interlocking construction. This flat construction encouraged angling the Tiger
hull roughly 30-45° when firing in order to increase effective thickness.
Gun
Turmzielfernrohr TZF 9c gun
sight
The 56-calibre long 8.8 cm KwK
36 was chosen for the Tiger. A combination of a flat trajectory from the high
muzzle velocity and precision from the Leitz Turmzielfernrohr TZF 9b sight
(later replaced by the monocular TZF 9c) made it very accurate. In British
wartime firing trials, five successive hits were scored on a 410 by 460 mm (16
by 18 in) target at a range of 1,100 metres (3,600 ft).[20] Compared with the
other contemporary German tank guns, the 8.8 cm KwK 36 had superior penetration
to the 7.5 cm KwK 40 on the Sturmgeschütz III and Panzer IV but inferior to the
7.5 cm KwK 42 on the Panther tank[24] under ranges of 2,500 metres. At greater
ranges, the 8.8 cm KwK 36 was superior in penetration and accuracy. The gun
took around 10.9 seconds to reload.
The ammunition for the Tiger had
electrically fired primers. Four types of ammunition were available but not all
were fully available; the PzGr 40 shell used tungsten, which was in short
supply as the war progressed.
PzGr. 39 (armour-piercing,
capped, ballistic cap)
PzGr. 40 (armour-piercing,
composite rigid)
Hl. Gr. 39 (high explosive
anti-tank)
sch. Sprgr. Patr. L/4.5
(incendiary shrapnel)
The rear of the tank held an
engine compartment flanked by two separate rear compartments each containing a
fuel tank and radiator. The Germans had not developed an adequate diesel
engine, so a petrol (gasoline) powerplant had to be used instead. The original
engine utilized was a 21.35-litre (1303 cu.in.) 12-cylinder Maybach HL210 P45
developing 485 kW (650 hp) at 3,000 rpm and a top speed of 38 km (24 mph.)[26]
It was found to be underpowered for the vehicle from the 251st Tiger onwards.
It was replaced by the upgraded HL 230 P45, a 23.095 litre (1409 cu.in.) engine
developing 521 kW (700 hp) at 3,000 rpm.[27] The main difference between these
engines was that the original Maybach HL 210 used an aluminium engine block
while the Maybach HL 230 used a cast-iron engine block. The cast-iron block
allowed for larger cylinders (and thus, greater displacement) which increased
the power output to 521 kW (700 hp). The engine was in V-form, with two
cylinder banks set at 60 degrees. An inertia starter was mounted on its right
side, driven via chain gears through a port in the rear wall. The engine could
be lifted out through a hatch on the rear hull roof. In comparison to other V12
and various vee-form gasoline engines used for tanks, the eventual HL 230
engine was nearly four litres smaller in displacement than the Allied British
Rolls-Royce Meteor V12 AFV power plant, itself adapted from the RR Merlin but
de-rated to 448 kW (600 hp) power output; and the American Ford-designed
precursor V12 to its Ford GAA V-8 AFV engine of 18 litre displacement, which in
its original V12 form would have had the same 27 litre displacement as the
Meteor.
The 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion
(sPzAbt 501) reported in May 1943:
Regarding the overheating
engines, the HL 210 engine caused no troubles during the recent time. All
occurring breakdowns resulted from the low quality of driver training. In
several cases engine failures have to be put down to the missing remote engine thermometer.
Five engines have reached more than 3,000 km without essential failures. A good
driver is essential for the successful deployment of the Tiger, he must have a
good technical training and has to keep his nerve in critical situations
The engine drove the front
sprockets through a drivetrain connecting to a transmission in the front
portion of the lower hull; the front sprockets had to be mounted relatively low
as a result. The Krupp-designed 11-tonne turret had a hydraulic motor whose
pump was powered by mechanical drive from the engine. A full rotation took
about a minute.
Another new feature was the
Maybach-Olvar hydraulically controlled semi-automatic pre-selector gearbox. The
extreme weight of the tank also required a new steering system. Germany's Argus
Motoren, where Hermann Klaue had invented a ring brake[30] in 1940, supplied
them for the Arado Ar 96[31] and also supplied the 55 cm disc.[32] Klaue was
acknowledged in the patent application that he had improved, it can even be
traced back to British designs dating to 1904. It is unclear whether Klaue's
patent ring brake was utilised in the Tiger brake design.
The clutch-and-brake system,
typical for lighter vehicles, was retained only for emergencies. Normally,
steering depended on a double differential, Henschel's development of the
British Merritt-Brown system[33] first encountered in the Churchill tank. The
vehicle had an eight-speed gearbox, and the steering offered two fixed radii of
turns on each gear, thus the Tiger had sixteen different radii of turn. In
first gear, at a speed of a few km/h, the minimal turning radius was 3.44 m (11
ft 3 in). In neutral gear, the tracks could be turned in opposite directions,
so the Tiger I pivoted in place.[34] There was a steering wheel instead of
either a tiller or, as most tanks had at that time, twin braking levers
making the Tiger I's steering system easy to use, and ahead of its time.
Powered turret traverse was
provided by the variable speed Boehringer-Sturm L4 hydraulic motor, which was
driven from the main engine by a secondary drive shaft. On early production
versions of the Tiger maximum turret traverse was limited to 6º/second, whilst
on later versions a selectable high speed traverse gear was added. Thus, the
turret could be rotated 360 degrees at up to 6º/second in low gear independent
of engine rpm (same as on early production versions), or up to 19º/second with
the high-speed setting and engine at 2000 rpm, and at over 36º/second at the
maximum allowable engine speed of 3000 rpm. The direction and speed of traverse
was controlled by the gunner through foot pedals, the speed of traverse
corresponding to the level of depression the gunner applied to the foot pedal.
This system allowed for very precise control of powered traverse, a light touch
on the pedal resulting in a minimum traverse speed of 0.1 deg/sec (360 degrees
in 60 min), unlike in most other tanks of the time (e.g., US M4 Sherman or
Soviet T-34) this allowed for fine laying of the gun without the gunner needing
to use his traverse handwheel.
Suspension
The suspension used sixteen
torsion bars, with eight suspension arms per side. To save space, the swing
arms were leading on one side and trailing on the other side; this is called an
H suspension setup. There were three road wheels (one of them double, closest
to the track's centre) on each arm, in a so-called Schachtellaufwerk
overlapping and interleaved arrangement, similar to that pioneered on German
half-tracked military vehicles of the pre-World War II era, with the Tiger I
being the first all-tracked German AFV built in quantity to use such a road
wheel arrangement. The wheels had a diameter of 800 mm (31 in) in the
Schachtellaufwerk arrangement for the Tiger I's suspension, providing a high uniform
distribution of the load onto the track, at the cost of increased maintenance.
Removing an inner wheel that had
lost its solid rubber tire (a common occurrence) required the removal of up to
nine other wheels first. During the rainy period that brought on the autumn
rasputitsa mud season and onwards into the winter conditions on the Eastern
front, the roadwheels of a Schachtellaufwerk-equipped vehicle could also become
packed with mud or snow that could then freeze.[citation needed] Presumably,
German engineers, based on the experience of the half-tracks, felt that the
improvement in off-road performance, track and wheel life, mobility with wheels
missing or damaged, plus additional protection from enemy fire was worth the
maintenance difficulties of a complex system vulnerable to mud and ice. This
approach was carried on, in various forms, to the Panther and the
non-interleaved wheel design for the Tiger II. Eventually, a new 80 cm diameter
'steel' wheel design with an internally sprung steel-rim tire was substituted.
As these new wheels could carry more weight, the outermost wheel on each
suspension arm was removed. The same wheels would also be used on the Tiger II.
Tiger at the Henschel plant is
loaded onto a special rail car. The outer road wheels have been removed and
narrow tracks put in place to decrease vehicle width, allowing it to fit within
the loading gauge of the German rail network.
To support the considerable
weight of the Tiger, the tracks were 725 mm (2 ft 4.5 in) wide. To meet
rail-freight size restrictions, narrower 520 mm (20 in) wide 'transport' tracks
(Verladeketten) could be installed.[38][33][39] For Tigers equipped with rubber-tired
wheels, this also required the outermost roadwheel on each axle (16 total) to
be removed.[40][37] The track replacement and wheel removal took 30 minutes for
each side of the tank.[41] However, in service, Tigers were frequently
transported by rail with their combat tracks fitted, as long as the train crew
knew there were no narrow tunnels or other obstructions on the route that would
prevent an oversized load from passing, despite this practice being strictly
forbidden.
Fording system
The Tiger tank's combat weight
of 56 tons was often too heavy for small bridges which had 35 ton weight
limits, so it was designed to ford bodies of water up to 15 ft (4.6 m) deep.[6]
This required unusual mechanisms for ventilation and cooling when underwater.
At least 30 minutes of set-up time was required, with the turret and gun being
locked in the forward position, and a large snorkel tube raised at the rear. An
inflatable doughnut-shaped ring sealed the turret ring. The two rear
compartments (each containing a fuel tank, radiator and fans) were
floodable.[citation needed] However, this ability was found to be of limited
practical value for its high cost and was removed from production lines in
August 1943.[6][43] As a result, only the first 495 units were fitted with this
deep fording system;[43] all later models were capable of fording water only
two metres deep.
Crew compartment
The internal layout was typical
of German tanks. Forward was an open crew compartment, with the driver and
radio-operator seated at the front on either side of the gearbox. Behind them
the turret floor was surrounded by panels forming a continuous level surface.
This helped the loader to retrieve the ammunition, which was mostly stowed
above the tracks. Three men were seated in the turret; the loader to the right
of the gun facing to the rear, the gunner to the left of the gun, and the
commander behind him. There was also a folding seat on the right for the
loader. The turret had a full circular floor and 157 cm headroom. Early
versions of the Tiger I's turret included two pistol ports; however, one of
these was replaced with a loader escape hatch and the other was removed from
later designs.
Post-war testing by the Allies
found the tank to be uncomfortable and spartan. For example, the gunner
suffered from clumsy controls and a cramped area. This was in contrast to
German crews who found them to be spacious and comfortable.
Cost
A substantial problem with the
Tiger was that its production required considerable resources in terms of
manpower and material, which led to it being expensive: the Tiger I cost over
twice as much as a Panzer IV and four times as much as a StuG III assault
gun.[47] Partly because of their high cost, only 1,347 Tiger I and 492 Tiger II
tanks were produced.[48] The closest counterpart to the Tiger from the United
States was the M26 Pershing (around 200 deployed to the European Theater of
Operations (ETO) during the war[49][page needed]) and the IS-2 from the USSR
(about 3,800 built during the conflict).
From a technical point of view,
it was better than its contemporaries.[50] Despite the low number produced,
shortages in qualified crew and the considerable fuel consumption in the face
of ever shrinking resources, Tigers (including Tiger IIs) destroyed at least
10,300 enemy tanks and 11,380 anti-tank guns and artillery pieces for the loss
of 1,725 Tigers[clarification needed] (including large numbers of operational
and strategic losses, i.e. abandoned, broken down, etc.).
Production history
Production of the Tiger I began
in August 1942 at the factory of Henschel und Sohn in Kassel,[52] initially at
a rate of 25 per month and peaking in April 1944 at 104 per month. An official
document of the time stated that the first Tiger I was completed on 4 August.
1,355 had been built by August 1944, when production ceased. Deployed Tiger I's
peaked at 671 on 1 July 1944. It took about twice as long to build a Tiger I as
another German tank of the period. When the improved Tiger II began production
in January 1944, the Tiger I was soon phased out.
In 1943, Japan bought several
specimens of German tank designs for study. A single Tiger I was apparently
purchased, along with a Panther and two Panzer IIIs, but only the Panzer IIIs
were actually delivered.[54] The undelivered Tiger was loaned to the German
Wehrmacht by the Japanese government.
Many modifications were
introduced during the production run to improve automotive performance,
firepower and protection. Simplification of the design was implemented, along
with cuts due to raw material shortages. In 1942 alone, at least six revisions
were made, starting with the removal of the Vorpanzer (frontal armour shield)
from the pre-production models in April. In May, mudguards bolted onto the side
of the pre-production run were added, while removable mudguards saw full
incorporation in September. Smoke discharge canisters, three on each side of
the turret, were added in August 1942. In later years, similar changes and
updates were added, such as the addition of Zimmerit (a non-magnetic anti-mine
coating), in late 1943.[55][56][57] Due to slow production rates at the
factories, incorporation of the new modifications could take several months.
The humorous and somewhat racy
crew manual, the Tigerfibel, was the first of its kind for the German Army and
its success resulted in more unorthodox manuals that attempted to emulate its
style.
Variants
Among other variants of the
Tiger, a heavily armoured casemate self-propelled rocket projector, today
commonly known as the Sturmtiger, was built, which mounted a 38 cm/15in rocket
launcher.[58] A tank recovery version of the Porsche Tiger I (Bergetiger), and
one Porsche Tiger I, was issued to the 654th Heavy Tank Destroyer Battalion,
which was equipped with the Ferdinand/Elefant. In Italy, a demolition carrier
version of the Tiger I without a main gun was built by maintenance crews in an
effort to find a way to clear minefields. It is often misidentified as a
BergeTiger recovery vehicle. As many as three may have been built. It carried a
demolition charge on a small crane on the turret in place of the main gun. It
was to move up to a minefield and drop the charge, back away, and then set the
charge off to clear the minefield. There is no verification of any being used
in combat.
Another variant was the
Fahrschulpanzer VI Tiger tanks (driving school Tiger tanks). These tanks were
Tigers with modified engines to run on either compressed Towngas gas (Stadtgas
System) or wood gas (Holzgas System). This was due to shortages in fuel supply.
They used a mixture of turreted and turretless hulls. They were used to train
Tiger tank crews, and were not used in combat.
Eager to make use of the
powerful new weapon, Hitler ordered the vehicle be pressed into service months
earlier than had been planned. A platoon of four Tigers went into action on 23
September 1942 near Leningrad. Operating in swampy, forested terrain, their
movement was largely confined to roads and tracks, making defence against them
far easier. Many of these early models were plagued by problems with the
transmission, which had difficulty handling the great weight of the vehicle if
pushed too hard. It took time for drivers to learn how to avoid overtaxing the
engine and transmission, and many broke down. The most significant event from
this engagement was that one of the Tigers became stuck in swampy ground and had
to be abandoned. Captured largely intact, it enabled the Soviets to study the
design and prepare countermeasures.
The 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion
was deployed to the Don Front in the autumn of 1942, but arrived too late to
participate in Operation Winter Storm, the attempt to relieve Stalingrad. It
was subsequently engaged in heavy defensive fighting in the Rostov-on-Don and
adjacent sectors in January and February 1943.
In the North African Campaign,
the Tiger I first saw action during the Tunisian Campaign on 1 December 1942
east of Tebourba, when three Tigers attacked an olive grove 5 km west of
Djedeida. The thick olive grove made visibility very limited and enemy tanks
were engaged at close range. The Tigers were hit by a number of M3 Lee tanks
firing at a range of 80 to 100 metres. Two of the Lees were knocked out in this
action, while the Tiger tanks provided effective protection from enemy fire,
which greatly increased the crews' trust in the quality of the armour. The
first loss to an Allied gun was on 20 January 1943 near Robaa, when a battery
of the British 72nd Anti-Tank Regiment knocked out a Tiger with their 6-pounder
(57 mm) anti-tank guns. Seven Tigers were immobilised by mines during the
failed attack on Béja during Operation Ochsenkopf at the end of February.
Later actions
In July 1943, two heavy tank
battalions (503rd and 505th) took part in Operation Citadel, including the
Battle of Kursk, with one battalion each on the northern (505th) and southern
(503rd) flanks of the Kursk salient the operation was designed to encircle.
However, the operation failed and the Germans were again put on the defensive.
The resulting withdrawal led to the loss of many broken-down Tigers which had
to be abandoned, with battalions unable to perform required maintenance or
repairs.
On 11 April 1945, a Tiger I
destroyed three M4 Sherman tanks and an armoured car advancing on a road. On 12
April, a Tiger I (F02) destroyed two Comet tanks, one half-track and one scout
car. This Tiger I was destroyed by a Comet tank of A Squadron of the 3rd Royal
Tank Regiment on the next day without infantry support.
The tank's weight significantly
limited its use of bridges. For this reason, the Tiger was built with water
tight hatches and a snorkel device that allowed it to ford water obstacles four
metres deep. The tank's weight also made driving through buildings risky, as
the presence of a cellar could result in a sudden drop. Due to reliability
problems with the Maybach HL 210 TRM P45, which was delivered within the first
production batch of 250 Tigers, performance for its maximum power output at
high gear ratio could not be fulfilled.[81] Though the Maybach engines had a
maximum of 3,000 rpm, crews were told in the Tigerfibel not to exceed 2,600
rpm. The engine limitation was alleviated only by the adoption of the Maybach
HL 230.[81] The turret could also be traversed manually, but this option was
rarely used, except when the engine was turned off or sometimes for very small
adjustments.
Early Tigers had a top speed of
about 45 km/h (28 mph) over optimal terrain. This was not recommended for
normal operation, and was discouraged in training. An engine governor was
subsequently installed, capping the engine at 2,600 rpm and the Tiger's maximum
speed to about 38 km/h (24 mph). Tiger crews report that typical march speed
off-road was 10 km/h (6 mph).[83] However, medium tanks of the time, such as
the Sherman or T-34, had on average a top speed of about 45 km/h (28 mph).
Thus, despite the Tiger being nearly twice as heavy, its speed was
comparatively respectable.[82] With the tank's very wide tracks, a design
feature borrowed from the Soviet T-34, the Tiger had a lower ground pressure
than many smaller tanks, such as the M4 Sherman.
The first production series
Tiger Fgst Nr 250001 with Motor Nr 46052 was only run-in for 25 km by Henschel
before being sent to Kummersdorf for testing. During a test drive on 28 May
1942, with only 52 km on the odometer, a blockage occurred in the steering
gear. This Tiger quickly went through the original and two replacement engines
(Motor Nr 46051 from July lst to 3rd, Motor Nr 46065 from 6 to 8 July) and was
fitted with a fourth motor, Nr 46066, after 13 July. By 3 August 1942, this
Tiger had covered a total of 1046 km; by 31 March 1943 a total of 5623 km; and
by 31 July 1943 a total of 7736 km.These figures clearly demonstrate that once
the Tiger had overcome its teething troubles, it could withstand a lot of
purposefully administered abuse during test programmes.
With the exception of known
childhood diseases, the Pz.Kpfw. VI has proven itself to be good. Already, it
can be said that its reliability is superior to the Pz.Kpfw.III and IV. When
routine care and maintenance are accomplished (that means one day for maintenance
for three days in action), even the way it is now, the Tiger can achieve
exceptional success.
Tiger I tanks needed a high
degree of support. It required two or sometimes three of the standard German
Sd.Kfz. 9 Famo heavy recovery half-track tractors to tow it. Tiger crews often
resorted to using another Tiger to tow the damaged vehicle, but this was not
recommended as it often caused overheating and engine breakdown. The
low-mounted sprocket limited the obstacle clearance height. The tracks also had
a tendency to override the rear sprocket, resulting in immobilisation. If a
track overrode and jammed, two Tigers were normally needed to tow the tank. The
jammed track was also a big problem itself, since due to high tension, it was
often impossible to split the track by removing the track pins. The track
sometimes had to be blown apart with a small explosive charge.
The average reliability of the
Tiger tank in the second half of 1943 was similar to that of the Panther, 36%,
compared to the 48% of the Panzer IV and the 65% of the StuG III.[88] From May
1944 to March 1945, the reliability of the Tiger tank was comparable to the
Panzer IV. With an average of 70%, the Tiger's operational availability on the
Western Front, was better than 62% of Panthers. On the Eastern Front, 65% of
Tigers were operationally available, compared to the 71% of Panzer IVs and 65%
of Panthers.
The British had observed the
gradual increase in German AFV armour and firepower since 1940 and had
anticipated the need for more powerful anti-tank guns. Work on the 76.2 mm
calibre Ordnance QF 17 pounder had begun in late 1940 and in 1942 100 early-production
guns were rushed to North Africa to help counter the new Tiger threat. The gun
carriage had not yet been developed, and the guns were mounted on the carriages
of 25-pounder gun-howitzers and were known by the code name
"Pheasant".
Efforts were hastened to get
cruiser tanks armed with 17-pounder guns into operation. The Cruiser Mk VIII
Challenger (A30) was already at the prototype stage in 1942,[92] but this tank
had relatively weaker armor with a front hull thickness of 64 mm. In the end,
it was produced and deployed in limited numbers (around 200 were ordered in
1943), though crews liked it for its high speed. The extemporised Sherman
Firefly, armed with the 17-pounder, proved to be an excellent anti-tank weapon,
but the gun lacked general purpose capability until later in the war. Fireflies
were successfully used against Tigers; in one engagement, a single Firefly
destroyed three Tigers in 12 minutes with five rounds.[93] Sherman Fireflies
were deployed one per troop of four 75mm armed standard Shermans. The Germans
learned to target Fireflies, so the gun barrel of the Firefly was painted to
disguise its length, resembling the M3 75mm gun. This was partially effective.
[94] Over 2,000 Fireflies were built during the war. Five different
17-pounder-armed British designs saw combat during the war: the Challenger, the
A34 Comet (using the related QF 77mm HV), the Sherman Firefly, the 17pdr SP
Achilles (upgunned M10 GMC), and the 17pdr SP Archer self-propelled gun, while
one more, the A41 Centurion, was about to enter service as the European war
ended. In 1944 the British introduced an APDS round for the 17-pounder, which
increased penetration performance considerably.
Initially, the Soviets responded
to the Tiger I by restarting production of the 57 mm ZiS-2 anti-tank gun
(production was stopped in 1941 in favour of cheaper and more versatile
alternatives e.g. the ZiS-3 as the gun's performance was excessive for early
German armour). The ZiS-2 had better armour penetration than the 76 mm F-34
tank gun used by most Red Army tanks, or the ZiS-3 76 mm divisional cannon, but
was still inadequate against Tigers. A small number of T-34s were again fitted
with a tank version of the ZiS-2, the ZiS-4, but it could not fire an adequate
high-explosive round, making it an unsuitable tank gun.
Firing trials of the new 85 mm
D-5T also had proved disappointing. Several captured German Tiger I tanks were
shipped to Chelyabinsk, where they were subjected to 85 mm fire from various
angles. The 85 mm gun could not reliably penetrate the Tiger I's armour except
at ranges within the lethal envelope of the Tiger I's own 88 mm gun.[95] It was
still initially used on the SU-85 self-propelled gun (based on a T-34 chassis)
from August 1943. The production of KV heavy tanks armed with the 85 mm D-5T in
an IS-85 turret was also started. There was a short production run of 148 KV-85
tanks, which were sent to the front beginning in September 1943 with production
ending by December 1943.[96] By early 1944, the T-34/85 appeared; this
up-gunned T-34 matched the SU-85's firepower, but with the advantage of
mounting the gun in a turret. It also matched the firepower of the heavier
IS-85 tank in a more cost effective package, resulting in a repetition of the
events which heralded the decline of KV-1 production. The IS was subsequently
rearmed with the 122 mm D-25T, which with BR471 AP rounds was capable of
punching through the Tiger's armour from 1,200 m,[97] and with the improved
BR471B APHEBC rounds at over 2,000 m.[98][j] The redundant SU-85 was replaced
by the SU-100, mounting a 100 mm D-10 tank gun, that could penetrate 149 mm of
vertical armour plate at 1,000 m.
In May 1943, the Red Army
deployed the SU-152, which was replaced in 1944 by the ISU-152. Both these
self-propelled guns mounted the large 152 mm howitzer-gun. The SU-152 was
intended to be a close-support gun for use against German fortifications rather
than armour; however, it shared with the later fielded ISU-152 the nickname
Zveroboy ("beast killer") for its rare ability to knock out German
heavy tanks.[citation needed][original research?] The 152 mm armour-piercing
shells weighed over 45 kilograms (99 lb) and could penetrate a Tiger's frontal
armour from about 1,000 metres (1,100 yd). Its high-explosive rounds would
destroy anything that was attached to the outside of the tank, and had a knack
for immobilizing any tank it hit.[citation needed] The sheer force of the shell
meant that at certain points it could knock off the turrets of the Tiger
series. However, the size and weight of the ammunition meant both vehicles had
a low rate of fire.
The US Army hesitated to place
76 mm M1 guns in action even when they were already available, as combat
through early 1944 indicated that the 75 mm M3 was more than adequate for
handling the German tank threat.[101] This conclusion was partly based on the
correct estimate that Tigers would be encountered in relatively small numbers,
and on the assumption that anti-tank gun-fire (as in Tunisia and Sicily) rather
than tanks could knock them out.[102] But as early as 1942, the US was already
planning and testing the rearming of the M4 Sherman with the 76mm gun,
expecting to encounter heavier German armor later in the war.
A substantial problem with the
Tiger was that its production required considerable resources in terms of
manpower and material, which led to it being expensive: the Tiger I cost over
twice as much as a Panzer IV and four times as much as a StuG III assault gun.
Partly because of their high cost, only 1,347 Tiger I and 492 Tiger II tanks
were produced. The closest counterpart to the Tiger from the United States was
the M26 Pershing (around 200 deployed to the European Theater of Operations
(ETO) during the war and the IS-2 from the USSR (about 3,800 built during the
conflict).
From a technical point of view,
it was better than its contemporaries.[50] Despite the low number produced,
shortages in qualified crew and the considerable fuel consumption in the face
of ever shrinking resources, Tigers (including Tiger IIs) destroyed at least
10,300 enemy tanks and 11,380 anti-tank guns and artillery pieces for the loss
of 1,725 Tigers[clarification needed] (including large numbers of operational
and strategic losses, i.e. abandoned, broken down, etc.).
---------------------------------
The Tiger II was a German heavy
tank of the Second World War. The final official German designation was
Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf. B,[a] often shortened to Tiger B.[9] The ordnance
inventory designation was Sd.Kfz. 182.[9] (Sd.Kfz. 267 and 268 for command
vehicles). It was also known informally as the Königstiger[9] (German for
Bengal tiger and also, literally, "King Tiger"). Contemporaneous
Allied soldiers usually called it the King Tiger or Royal Tiger.
The Tiger II was the successor
to the Tiger I, combining the latter's thick armour with the armour sloping
used on the Panther medium tank. The tank weighed almost 70 tonnes, and was
protected by 100 to 185 mm (3.9 to 7.3 in) of armour to the front.[12] It was
armed with the long barrelled (71 calibres) 8.8 cm KwK 43 anti-tank cannon.[b]
The chassis was also the basis for the Jagdtiger turretless Jagdpanzer
anti-tank vehicle.
The Tiger II was issued to heavy
tank battalions of the Army and the Waffen-SS. It was first used in combat by
503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion during the Allied invasion of Normandy on 11 July
1944;[14] on the Eastern Front, the first unit to be outfitted with the Tiger
II was the 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion, which by 1 September 1944 listed 25
Tiger IIs operational.
Henschel won the design
contract, and all Tiger IIs were produced by the firm.[20] Two turret designs
were used in production vehicles. The initial design is often misleadingly
called the "Porsche" turret due to the misbelief that it was designed
by Porsche for their Tiger II prototype; in fact it was the initial Krupp
design for both prototypes.[19] This turret had a rounded front and steeply
sloped sides, with a difficult-to-manufacture curved bulge on the turret's left
side to accommodate the commander's cupola. Fifty early turrets were mounted to
Henschel hulls and used in action. In December 1943 the more common
"production" turret, sometimes erroneously called the
"Henschel" turret, was simplified with a significantly thicker flat
face (which eliminated the shot trap caused by the curved face of the earlier
turret), and less-steeply sloped sides, which avoided the need for a bulge for
the commander's cupola, and added additional room for ammunition storage.
The angular front of the
"production turret" designed by Krupp (erroneously called
"Henschel turret")[19] taken during Operation Panzerfaust in
Budapest, 15 October 1944. The rough Zimmerit coating is evident, used to
prevent magnetic mines from adhering to the tank's armour.
The turrets were designed to
mount the 8.8 cm KwK 43 L/71 gun. Combined with the Turmzielfernrohr 9d (German
"turret telescopic sight") monocular sight by Leitz, which all but a
few early Tiger IIs used, it was a very accurate and deadly weapon. During
practice, the estimated probability of a first-round hit on a 2 m (6 ft 7 in)
high, 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in) wide target was 100 percent at 1,000 m (1,100 yd),
9597 percent at 1,500 m (1,600 yd) and 8587 percent at 2,000 m (2,200 yd),
depending on ammunition type.[citation needed] Recorded combat performance was
lower, but still over 80 percent at 1,000 m, in the 60s at 1,500 m and the 40s
at 2,000 m. Penetration of armoured plate inclined at 30 degrees was 202 and
132 mm (8.0 and 5.2 in) at 100 m (110 yd) and 2,000 m (2,200 yd) respectively
for the Panzergranate 39/43 projectile (PzGr armour-piercing shell), and 238
and 153 mm (9.4 and 6.0 in) for the PzGr. 40/43 projectile between the same
ranges.[citation needed] The Sprenggranate 43 (SpGr) high-explosive round was
available for soft targets, or the Hohlgranate or Hohlgeschoss 39 (HlGr HEAT
or High-explosive anti-tank warhead) round, which had 90 mm (3.5 in)
penetration at any range, could be used as a dual-purpose munition against soft
or armoured targets.
Powered turret traverse was
provided by the variable speed Boehringer-Sturm L4S hydraulic motor, which was
driven from the main engine by a secondary drive shaft. A high and a low speed
setting was available to the gunner via a lever on his right. The turret could
be rotated 360 degrees at 6º/second in low gear independent of engine rpm, at
19º/second the same as with the Tiger I with the high speed setting and
engine at 2000 rpm, and over 36º/second at the maximum allowable engine speed
of 3,000 rpm. The direction and speed of traverse was controlled by the gunner
through foot pedals, whilst a high torque low speed (useful when on slopes) or
low torque high speed final gearing could be selected via a control lever near
his left arm. This system allowed for very precise control of powered traverse,
a light touch on the pedal resulting in a minimum traverse speed of 0.1 deg/sec
(360 degrees in 60 min), unlike in most other tanks of the time (e.g. US M4
Sherman or Soviet T-34 medium tanks) this allowed for fine laying of the gun
without the gunner needing to use his traverse handwheel.[23] If power was
lost, such as when the tank ran out of fuel, the turret could be slowly
traversed by hand, assisted by the loader who had an additional wheel, which
could manually rotate the turret at a rate of one-half a degree per each
revolution of the hand crank; a 20° turret rotation required 40 full cranks of
the handwheel, and to turn the turret a full 360° the gunner would be required
to crank the handwheel 720 full revolutions.
Like all German tanks, the Tiger
II had a petrol engine; in this case the same 700 PS (690 hp, 515 kW) V-12
Maybach HL 230 P30 which powered the much lighter Panther and Tiger I tanks.
The Tiger II was under-powered, like many other heavy tanks of World War
II[citation needed], and consumed a lot of fuel, which was in short supply for
the Germans. The transmission was the Maybach OLVAR OG 40 12 16 Model B, giving
eight forward gears and four reverse, which drove the steering gear. This was
the Henschel L 801, a double radius design which proved susceptible to failure.
Transverse torsion bar suspension supported the hull on nine axles per side.
Overlapped 800 mm (31 in) diameter road wheels with rubber cushions and steel
tyres rode inside the tracks.[24] Late production Tiger Is received the same
wheels, which were one of the few interchangeable parts between the two tanks.
Like the Tiger I, each tank was
issued with two sets of tracks: a normal "battle track" and a
narrower "transport" version used during rail movement. The transport
tracks reduced the overall width of the load and could be used to drive the
tank short distances on firm ground. The crew were expected to change to normal
battle tracks as soon as the tank was unloaded. Ground pressure was 0.76 kg/cm2
(10.8 psi).
The first combat use of the
Tiger II was by the 1st Company of the 503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion
(s.H.Pz.Abt. 503) during the Battle of Normandy, opposing the Canadian
offensive Operation Atlantic between Troarn and Demouville on 18 July 1944. Two
were lost in combat, while the company commander's tank became irrecoverably
trapped after falling into a bomb crater created during Operation Goodwood.
On the Eastern Front, it was
first used on 12 August 1944 by the 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion (s.H.Pz.Abt.
501) resisting the LvovSandomierz Offensive. It attacked the Soviet bridgehead
over the Vistula River near Baranów Sandomierski. On the road to Oględów, three
Tiger IIs were destroyed in an ambush by a few T-34-85s.[48] Because these
German tanks suffered ammunition explosions, which caused many crew fatalities,
main gun rounds were no longer allowed to be stowed within the turret, reducing
capacity to 68.[49] Up to fourteen Tiger IIs of the 501st were destroyed or
captured in the area between 11 and 14 August to ambushes and flank attacks by
both Soviet T-34-85 and IS-2 tanks, and ISU-122 assault guns in inconvenient
sandy terrain. The capture of three operational Tiger IIs allowed the Soviets
to conduct tests at Kubinka and to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses.
A large tank with sloped frontal
armour and a flat faced turret, by a column of marching soldiers wearing
overcoats and helmets, in a wide city street. A large building to the rear
shows the scars of battle.
A Tiger II of s.H.Pz.Abt. 503
and Hungarian troops in a battle-scarred street in Buda's Castle district,
October 1944
On 15 October 1944, Tiger IIs of
503rd Heavy Panzer Battalion played a crucial role during Operation
Panzerfaust, supporting Otto Skorzeny's troops in taking the Hungarian capital
of Budapest, which ensured that the country remained with the Axis until the
end of the war. The 503rd then took part in the Battle of Debrecen. The 503rd
remained in the Hungarian theater of operations for 166 days, during which time
it accounted for at least 121 Soviet tanks, 244 anti-tank guns and artillery
pieces, five aircraft and a train. This was set against the loss of 25 Tiger
IIs; ten were knocked out by Soviet troops and burned out, two were sent back
to Vienna for a factory overhaul, while thirteen were blown up by their crews
for various reasons, usually to prevent them from falling into enemy hands.
The Tiger II was also used in
significant numbers, distributed into four heavy panzer battalions, during the
Ardennes Offensive (also known as the 'Battle of the Bulge') of December
1944.[51] At least 150 Tiger IIs were present, nearly a third of total production;
most were lost over the course of the offensive.
Some Tiger IIs were also present
during the Soviet VistulaOder[53] and East Prussian Offensives in January
1945,[54] as well as the German Lake Balaton Offensive in Hungary in March
1945,[55] the Battle of the Seelow Heights in April 1945, and the Battle of
Berlin at the end of the war.
The
103rd SS Heavy Panzer Battalion (s.SS Pz.Abt. 503) claimed approximately 500
kills in the period from January to April 1945 on the Eastern Front for the
loss of 45 Tiger IIs (most of which were abandoned and destroyed by their own
crews after mechanical breakdowns or for lack of fuel).